CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0370
wireshark security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0370.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing
to the mirrors:
x86_64:
wireshark-1.0.15-2.el4.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0370
wireshark security update for CentOS 4 1386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0370.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing
to the mirrors:
i386:
wireshark-1.0.15-2.el4.i386.rpm
Hola,
- yum history con esto ves las últimas acciones con yum.
- yum history info num, donde num es un ID de acción y puedes ver
que ha pasado.
- yum history undo num, deshace la acción.
Estas opciones todavía no están en CentOS 5, pero si en 6...a tener en cuenta.
--
Oscar Osta Pueyo
Gracias por el aporte Oscar. Lo revisé y no tengo habilitado SElinux en
este servidor.
En cuanto reinicie el servidor comentaré en este foro si resultó o no.
Por el momento tendré que esperar al momento más adecuado para hacerlo.
Saludos y gracias a todos por su ayuda.
Miguel A. Velasco
Ing de
Julio Martinez wrote:
Bueno, en el foro en ingles
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=29147viewmode=flatorder=ASCstart=420
hay una discusion bastante agitada desde gente molesta por la falta
de comunicacion de los desarrolladores, pasando gente que los apoya y
gente
Primero saber que es lo que te reconoce el sistema. Prueba con lspci y mira que
te dice de la placa de red.
También ifconfig puede darte alguna pista sobre el tema.
Danos algo más de información para poder ayudarte.
Un saludo.
- Mensaje original -
| Hola lista, le comento que
Sip, algo de eso estuve leyendo, aparte también está el tema de CentOS 4.9
al que le dieron aún mas prioridad y ya vio la luz :-)
Yo vengo usando CentOS desde hace algunos años y me parece una magnifica
distribución, no es que quiera apurar a nadie, solo me dio curiosidad el
porque de la demora;
Hola gente, es mi primer mensaje y sin duda no será el último, porque esta
muy buena la lista.
En el trabajo tengo Centos 5.5 con Centos DS, con la consola y el servidor
de administración y anda muy bien. Ahora bien, necesito en otro trabajo
instalar un pequeño servidor con menos de 50 usuarios y
para qué replicarlo, no te parece? Muy inteligente de tu parte.
El 22/03/2011 04:48 p.m., Alejandro Marin Maturano escribió:
que poca madre el que mando esto
El 20/03/2011 09:27 p.m., Freddy Zavaleta escribió:
http://www.lampugnani.com/i2332.html
Hola buenas tardes:
instale en centos 5.5 ldap+openfire y como cliente estoy usando spark, solo que
no puedo hacer funcionar el plugin de video conferencia, lei que hay que
descargar red5.jar para que funciones lastimosamente no lo encuentro, alguien
instalo y logro hacer funcionar?
Atte Jose
Hola
encontre esto navegando por ahi.
espero te sea de ayuda.
http://pankajdangi.com/2010/01/steps-to-install-red5-on-linux/
Atte.
Mario.
2011/3/22 Jose Manuel Ajhuacho Vargas jose_t...@yahoo.es
Hola buenas tardes:
instale en centos 5.5 ldap+openfire y como cliente estoy usando spark,
Perdón, creo que se entendió, pero quise decir ...porque *phpldapadmin* lo
veo muy técnico...
2011/3/22 Gastón Dall' Oglio gaston.dallog...@gmail.com
Hola gente, es mi primer mensaje y sin duda no será el último, porque esta
muy buena la lista.
En el trabajo tengo Centos 5.5 con Centos DS,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi John,
You would not have to create dummy machine records. The
servicePrincipalName attribute on an AD account is multi-valued and
clients can request and get a ticket for ANY principal in that list.
So you only need one account.
And you do
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
Try this 8-port one from LevelOne:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
Hello community.
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel Xeon
E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and we cant find out the
reason.
The only thing that
Which is about $400, not counting cables, which are expensive.
Well, you said not thousands of dollars... And I bought the cables for
about 20 dollars each.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Budnev
vladimir.bud...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
Hello community.
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel Xeon
E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For some time we
You can pick up a Dell/Avocent 2161DS on eBay for $400-500 USD.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Michael B Allen
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:16 PM
To: CentOS
Subject: [CentOS] Affordable KVM over IP switch
Hello,
Are
Hi all
How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What do you mean by refresh rate of the dns server? Like TTL length of records?
Or..?
Aly
--Original Message--
From: ann kok
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: centos@centos.org
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] dns question
Sent: Mar 22, 2011 9:13 AM
Hi all
How can I
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hi,
There were still several hundreds of duplicate mails awaiting delivery
to this list.
It's an automated enhancement for our weekly re-hashing of why Centos
5.6 is late.
The user reinjecting the mails has been identified and
shot^Wbanned from
the
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
Mike
--
Michael B Allen
You could get a regular KVM, then connect a
Hello everyone:
* DNS does not have a refresh rate. In DNS, the person running the
domain determines what the refresh rate (it's called TTL in DNS) for
their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of once per hour and
my domains (maradns.org, etc.) have a TTL of one day.
* As mentioned
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
Hello community.
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and we cant find out the
reason.
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
There were still several hundreds of duplicate mails awaiting delivery
to this list.
It's an automated enhancement for our weekly re-hashing of why Centos
5.6 is late.
Hey, cool! Then you just save the last 100 or so emails about
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
Hello community.
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For some time we have lots of MCE in
Digimer wrote:
On 03/21/2011 08:13 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
How can I determine the device on which the mbr is placed? I tried the
following:
# chroot /mnt/sysimage
# grub-install /dev/hda
Read further down, and read the grub man page (from a good system);
'grub-install' is not
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For
As was previously mentioned, you need to be more clear about what
you're asking. There are multiple related concepts. Look up a
description of the SOA record, in particular the refresh, retry,
expire, and minimum TTL fields. The first three affect how DNS
secondary servers behave. The last
Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
I can attest that the Adderlink iPEPS and iPEPS-DA are excellent units.
They're both in the 500-1000 range. They're
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with
2xIntel Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
I can attest that the Adderlink iPEPS and
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are
Hi :)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Budnev
vladimir.bud...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
But... as i sad we have following slots
CPU1 cpu1-a1 cpu1-a2 cpu1-a3 cpu1-b1 cpu1-b2 cpu1-b3
CPU2 cpu2-a1 cpu2-a2 cpu2-a3 cpu2-b1 cpu2-b2 cpu2-b3
We have modules placed in such way:
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
We are
On 03/22/11 6:13 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi all
How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596001582
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
Michael B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ann kok said the following on 22/03/11 14:13:
How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
$ dig www.google.com
...
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.google.com. 515949 IN CNAME www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.com. 300 IN
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
CHOMP
So with 2 4-core Xeons, I don't understand how you can get 3x and 5x.
Could you post some raw messages, either from /var/log/message or
from /var/log/mcelog?
sure here they are before night party:
MCE 24
CPU 52 BANK 8 TSC
Hi,
Normally daylight date change last sunday march for Turkey but this year
daylight saving time will change for Turkey at 28 March 2011 at 03.00 AM so
how can i change daylight save time setting for this year on CentOS servers
?
I wrote rule file like below and compile it with zic but when I
Semih Gokalp wrote:
Hi,
Normally daylight date change last sunday march for Turkey but this year
daylight saving time will change for Turkey at 28 March 2011 at 03.00 AM
so how can i change daylight save time setting for this year on CentOS
servers
?
snip
Are you sure that's not in the
Yes.
Only Ubuntu distro update tzdata and i updated my ubuntu laptop and copy
Turkey and Istanbul file to CentOS server and then change manually OS
time to 28 Mar 2011 02:59:50 and i waited 10 second.
When the time is 02:59:59 , date was changed to 04.00.It seems work.I will
replace this two
Now that we've got the thing, does anyone know what ppd I can use for it?
I've seen someone recommending:
- the generic postscript ppd;
- the hplips driver.
I also see ppd's for a DesignJet 800ps, and ones for the 5000ps and
5500ps. Has anyone had any experience with any of these?
On 22.3.2011 18:19, Semih Gokalp wrote:
Hi,
Normally daylight date change last sunday march for Turkey but this year
daylight saving time will change for Turkey at 28 March 2011 at 03.00 AM
so how can i change daylight save time setting for this year on CentOS
servers ?
Upstream Vendor is
On 03/20/2011 05:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct
competition with
RH
for RH and
On 03/21/2011 07:08 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Feinberg matt...@choopa.com wrote:
I don't see the problem here. I just tested this and it works fine. The
drupal6 package only requires php 5.2 or greater.
Right. The php53 package is in the upstream
On Mar 22, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/20/2011 05:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
I can attest that the Adderlink iPEPS and
On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing like
RHEL.
So I thought instead of going with such a diff paradigm, that using SL
might be more similar in tool set
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:55 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi John,
You would not have to create dummy machine records. The
servicePrincipalName attribute on an AD account is multi-valued and
clients can request and get a ticket
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/21 m.r...@5-cent.us
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
snip, memory reseating
Now we are just waiting will there be errors again.
I'm sure there will. Reseating the memory may have done
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing like
RHEL.
So I thought instead of going
On 3/22/11 8:07 PM, William Hooper wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:18:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the SL notes
on the srpms that don't build with the listed dependencies as shipped
- and they aren't being picky about the library linkages matching the
RH binaries like
On 03/22/2011 08:18 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/22/11 8:07 PM, William Hooper wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he
On 3/22/11 8:23 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:18:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the SL notes
on the srpms that don't build with the listed dependencies as shipped
- and they aren't being picky about the library
That part isn't a function of the iPEPS, it's a function of your
KVM switch. So yes, I was thinking about models that do it with
a particular key stroke. I've used the D-Link DKVM-8E as a decent
low cost unit, although it has the tendancy to get confused during
a full power outage of your
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
SL did indeed release a 6.0 before CentOS. For all of the other 25
possible releases, SL released before CentOS on 5 of the 25 times.
Right, but as these numbers reveal, since June 2008 Scientific Linux is
closing the gap with CentOS (or rather,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
133 days delay, an all time record (not counting CentOS 2 :-)).
You keep
67 matches
Mail list logo
