CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0508
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0508.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f22bd32a83625815615c7bbe2327731b
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0508
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0508.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
c088d188367c0d1279569091becf2c02
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0510
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0510.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
12edbc60b88d48ae34694ad734a38c8c
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0509
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0509.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
67cd24f496e0ce3d8489c2d9fa6faa1b
I can't get xen live migration to work - CentOS 5.6. I have set up
xend-config.sxp as per RHEL5 virtualization guide, but when I try
it, I get
[root@xenhost1 ]# xm migrate testwww xenhost2 -l
Error: (104, 'Connection reset by peer')
Usage: xm migrate Domain Host
Migrate a domain to another
Lars Hecking writes:
I can't get xen live migration to work - CentOS 5.6. I have set up
xend-config.sxp as per RHEL5 virtualization guide, but when I try
it, I get
[root@xenhost1 ]# xm migrate testwww xenhost2 -l
Error: (104, 'Connection reset by peer')
Usage: xm migrate Domain Host
Hola muy buenas, no sé si me podrán ayudar, ando un poco perdido en
esta tema y me gustaría saber cuales son los pasos a seguir para
solicitar e instalar un
certificado para una empresa, con su nombre etc
para un servidor WEB. Gracias de antemano.
--
ubuntu-es mailing list
Hola, mi nombre es Diego, soy de Costa Rica, soy usuario de Debian desde
hace tiempo, y ahora por cuestiones de trabajo debo mantener algunos
servidores centos. Este es mi primer mensaje a la lista.
He estado investigando como ser notificado de las actualizacion de
seguridad en los
señores saludos a todos , tengo el siguiente problemita en mi centos
5.6 , lo estoy utilizando para un proxy y filtro de contenido con
squid+havp+dansguardian , resulta que el servidor tiene sola una
tarjeta de red por lo cual no puedo hacerlo en modo transparente asi
que todos los clientes tiene
tienes abierto el puerto 443 tanto en el firewall como en el proxy??
Sls
El 12 de mayo de 2011 12:22, troxlinux xserverli...@gmail.com escribió:
señores saludos a todos , tengo el siguiente problemita en mi centos
5.6 , lo estoy utilizando para un proxy y filtro de contenido con
El día 12 de mayo de 2011 11:30, Anthony Mogrovejo
tony001...@gmail.com escribió:
tienes abierto el puerto 443 tanto en el firewall como en el proxy??
si tengo abierto el pto en el firewall , en el proxy no si te refieres
a esta linea?
acl SSL_ports port 443
acl Safe_ports port 80 #
El día 12 de mayo de 2011 13:16, Edg@r Rodolfo edgarr...@gmail.com escribió:
Edguit@r
http://cybernautape.blogspot.com
Yo no me complicaría tanto, te cuento que una vez hice un proxy y lo
hice de la siguiente manera, fué fácil:
usé iptables, para redirigir todas las peticiones del puerto 80
Prueba con esta linea
ACCEPT+loc:ip_proxynet
El 12 de mayo de 2011 14:22, troxlinux xserverli...@gmail.com escribió:
El día 12 de mayo de 2011 13:16, Edg@r Rodolfo edgarr...@gmail.com
escribió:
Edguit@r
http://cybernautape.blogspot.com
Yo no me complicaría tanto,
El 11/05/2011 22:48, Diego Chacon escribió:
Hola Diego, bienvenido! :)
He estado investigando como ser notificado de las actualizacion de
seguridad en los servidores.
A manera de ejemplo, en Debian utilizaba la herramienta cron-apt, la
cual yo podia indicarle que me notificara SOLO las
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would
take no more than 1 month ?
Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake.
Why? seems like a
Mag Gam magawake@... writes:
...
It turned out I had an NMI related issue on the processor. I figured
this out by checking the /var/log/messages but it was a real mystery
for be at first. My question, is there a way to detect or benchmark a
system and all of its processors to make sure I
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradb...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would
take no more than 1
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:05:57AM -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
But at that time there should only be one point release on the table,
instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone
forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all out at the same time?
Amnesia of opportunity,
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 01:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/11/2011 8:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
In my case, I have essentially three choices:
1.) Use SL 6;
2.) Wait on C6;
3.) Buy RHEL6.
All of the three have costs, visible and hidden. 3 obviously has monetary
costs, but both 1 and 2
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 04:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
One upgrade I did from C4 to C5 (with upgradeany) was smoother than the last
LTS upgrade I tried. I liken the C5 - C6 upgrade path as trying to take a
Ubuntu LTS 6.06 to a 10.04; which path I tried, and failed, to get working.
In one
Wiadomość napisana przez Akemi Yagi w dniu 2011-05-12, o godz. 02:29:
2011/5/11 Rainer Traut tr...@gmx.de:
You could also ask on the elrepo mailinglist.
There was a request not too long ago.
http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2011-April/000637.html
So maybe you can install
This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test
and development host and observed this:
Updating : kmod-kvm
4/20
WARNING: Can't read module
/lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm.ko: No
such file or
On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1
would
take no more than 1 month
On 05/10/2011 08:19 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 03:12 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Alain Péan wrote:
The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL
6.1 will be already released. So there will be no
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1
would
take no
On 05/12/2011 08:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test
and development host and observed this:
Updating : kmod-kvm
4/20
WARNING: Can't read module
James B. Byrne wrote:
This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test
and development host and observed this:
Updating : kmod-kvm
4/20
WARNING: Can't read module
/lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm.ko: No
such file or directory
On 05/12/2011 08:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 08:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test
and development host and observed this:
Updating : kmod-kvm
4/20
WARNING: Can't
On 05/09/2011 06:53 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV
Crane todd.dennis...@navy.mil mailto:todd.dennis...@navy.mil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org
On 05/12/2011 09:49 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months,
big snip
It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty
comments about how nothing changes. Nothing could be further from the
truth.
Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very
much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to
I Spoke too early its not fixed.Any one have other options
On 05/09/2011 11:37 PM, Ali Ahsan wrote:
Things i have done to solve this issue is
set swappiness to 0 and i have changed scheduler to anticipatory for
better performance .I don't see kswpad process taking 100% CPU now.
--
S.Ali
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 06:23:52 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
6.04-10.04? Nah, you are supposed to jump to 8.04 and then to 10.04.
I did 6.06 - 8.04 - 10.04, and it broke. Badly.
Upgrades are difficult problems to solve, and at the moment I don't know of
any distribution (that claims
On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 09:12:59 PM Dag Wieers wrote:
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would
take no more than 1 month ?
I can easily think of a few. 4.9 and 6.0 are two of those few.
Again, I'll note that SL is just now releasing the second beta of 5.6 this
Craig White wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
• 2011-01-13: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.6
• 2010-11-10: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
2 months elapsed from release of 6.0 before 5.6 and more than another month
before
On 5/12/2011 8:07 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
So maybe you can install centos 5.4, then install their newer aacraid
driver and then you can update the kernel as well...
As Rainer said, this is best discussed on the ELRepo mailing list, but ...
There is a good chance that kmod-aacraid
Steve Clark wrote on 05/12/2011 10:15 AM:
Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very
much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to suggestions
Keep up the great work - Thanks
+1
++1
Please trim your posts. 60+ included lines and 2k characters for
On 05/12/2011 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
On 05/12/2011 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
On 05/09/2011 06:53 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV
Crane todd.dennis...@navy.mil mailto:todd.dennis...@navy.mil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org
On 5/12/2011 8:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty
comments about how nothing changes.
I think that will change to the extent that the project changes are
visible. Thank you for posting all the links.
--
Les Mikesell
On 05/12/2011 05:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradburymark.bradb...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is NOT the case with 6.0. First off, we can not use any of the
I Spoke too early its not fixed.Any one have other options
On 05/09/2011 11:37 PM, Ali Ahsan wrote:
Things i have done to solve this issue is
set swappiness to 0 and i have changed scheduler to anticipatory for
better performance .I don't see kswpad process taking 100% CPU now.
We had a
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 09:49 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty
comments about how nothing changes. Nothing could be further from the
truth.
Johnny, don't let this type of comment upset you as:
Please note there is a largely
On Thu, May 12, 2011 10:06, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 08:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 08:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test
and development host and observed this:
Updating : kmod-kvm
4/20
Hi all,
Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its
basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS
claims more robust replication, etc...
Granted I am working with the version
On 05/12/11 1:07 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its
basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS
claims more robust
Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
Since we develop mostly Java application we use it for development and
testing: developers don't have to install an OS dependent LDAP
implementation (especially the poor souls working on Windows).
In production we use openldap
On May 11, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 05/12/2011 12:48 AM, Craig White wrote:
Anyone have recommendations for a highly reliable datacenter located in
Holland?
Global Switch is a good one. Lots of carriers too. Contact info here:
Apparently my company will potentially need to put in some servers for Asia and
is hoping to find a highly reliable data center in either Singapore or Hong
Kong if anyone has recommendations.
Thanks
--
Craig White ~~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com
1.800.869.6908
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ...
bug number please
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ...
bug number please
Jeff_S knows. He filed a bunch at upstream bugzilla requesting the
release of missing srpms.
Akemi
I've been getting weird results with the recent filesystem update. It
appears to be hanging at the transaction test stage endlessly. I can close
the ssh connection and the update still goes on. When I use screen I
cannot reattach after logout because the screen still shows as attached
and I
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ...
bug number please
Jeff_S knows. He filed a bunch at upstream bugzilla
On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
CentOS chose another. Personally I happen to
agree with CentOS' choice here.
+1
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 11:34 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 06:23:52 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
6.04-10.04? Nah, you are supposed to jump to 8.04 and then to 10.04.
I did 6.06 - 8.04 - 10.04, and it broke. Badly.
Ahem. With apt-get dist-upgrade or do-release-upgrade?
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
CentOS chose another. Personally I happen to
agree with CentOS' choice here.
+1
I think *both* distros made the right choice. :)
CentOS and SL handle security updates differently.
Hi Craig,
Highly reliable in what sense? network connectivity? bandwidth?
datacentre personnel?
Christopher
On Friday, May 13, 2011 05:31 AM, Craig White wrote:
Apparently my company will potentially need to put in some servers for Asia
and is hoping to find a highly reliable data center
On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its
basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS
claims more
Hi all.
i'm trying to modify some parameters but when system reboots it doesn't
load. For the sysctl if I run sysctl -p then it changes
/etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576
/etc/modprobe.conf
options ip_conntrack hashsize=131072
after reboot results
cat
On 5/12/11, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
Apparently they did admit and it does change:
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=31347forum=53
Late breaking news:
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/67
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/69
This is
Hello,
Thank you everyone for your replies. I would definitely like to stick
with postfix as it's what i'm most comfortable with. The problem is
dovecot. I believe it's extras there's the 1.0.7 dovecot, I'd like to
be running the 2.0.x dovecot prefered or the 1.2.x version if not, the
problem is
66 matches
Mail list logo
