On 04/01/2012 08:14 AM, Steve-Mustafa Ismail wrote:
Could I please, pretty please, with whipped cream and a cherry on top,
be given the privilege to alter the most exalted and sublime of pages,
the Arabic wiki? :)
how about a reply to my last email ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 |
Sorry Karanbir, I failed to see this email, I wouldn't have sent a
third otherwise.
What would help is if we could get some more people involved, people who
have been seen in the centos ecosystem in the past, and have some level
of trust associated. Is that possible ?
I wouldn't even know
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0438
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0438.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
El 01/04/12, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió:
al configurar el dns y todo estar ok,al utilizar el comando host
dominio.com mas el ip muestra el siguiente mensaje connection time
out trying next origin de igual manera al utilizar los comandos dig
@ip dominio.com
En ese mismo
www.howtoforge.org
César D. Cruz Arrunátegui
- Mensaje original -
De: Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviados: Domingo, 1 de Abril 2012 13:52:00
Asunto: [CentOS-es] configuracion de dns
hola
alguien tiene la configuracion completa para configurar un
El 2 de abril de 2012 01:56, Edg@r Rodolfo edgarr...@gmail.com escribió:
El 01/04/12, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió:
al configurar el dns y todo estar ok,al utilizar el comando host
dominio.com mas el ip muestra el siguiente mensaje connection time
out trying next origin de
El día 2 de abril de 2012 11:27, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió:
hola al ejecutar un chequeo de la zona con el siguinte comando:
named-checkzone dominio.com.zone /var/named/chroot/var/named me
muestra el siguiente error:
dns_master_load: var/named/chroot/var/named:1
Alguien de algún software freeware u opensource que genere esas tarjetas
de un layout e importe los datos de una DB?
Se los agradeceré infinitamente,
Aland Laines Calonge
Tecnico en Informatica
Lima - Perú
___
CentOS-es mailing list
On 04/01/12 10:45 PM, alikhan damirov wrote:
I don't know about statistics, but selinux have log's.
Watch here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
By default SELinux log messages are written to */var/log/audit/audit.log*
I believe the OP was asking about the statistics of how many CentOS
Dear Natraj, Thank you very much for your response, this is really greate
solution and I did not know about it.
Very good stuff indeed. I love it.
Thanks Natraj, for your greate advice.
Prabhpal
On 04/01/2012 09:06 AM, Prabhpal S. Mavi wrote:
Dear Friends Greetings,
i wish to setup SPF look
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 19:52 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 31.03.2012 17:37, schrieb Les Mikesell:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Peter Eckel li...@eckel-edv.de wrote:
So, before you do anything else, set up proper incoming and outgoing IPv6
port filtering rules on your perimeter
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 15:06 +0200, Peter Eckel wrote:
Hi Adam,
And recent computer or distributions is sitting their quietly waiting
for it's IPv6 address to arrive - probably automatically, via auto
discovery. Clients are trivial.
... and that is EXACTLY the biggest problem with IPv6.
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 16:38 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Peter Eckel li...@eckel-edv.de wrote:
1. Each interface on an IPv6 enabled machine has several addresses.
2. Except for the Privacy Extension address(es), auto-configured a
How do applications choose the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
Or you assign the rule to the interface, rather than the address.
Nothing new, that is how firewalls work on DHCP clients today.
that will be pretty difficult on the perimeter router ...
Best regards,
Peter.
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
You can explicitly turn in off on every type of client. Then wait till
you want to do it.
agreed. The problem is that you can, and you actually *must* do it. Doing
nothing leaves v6 on by default on most modern operating systems.
On 03/31/2012 10:31 PM, Min Wang wrote:
hi
Just wondering if there is any statiscs report of selinxu usages in
production environment? I know some still turn it off.
If you have machines purposely serving things to the masses on the
Internet, you should take the time to make SELinux work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
Typically the routing table does a lot of work. Much like 127.0.0.0/8
the mask of a link-local will make it unprefered by 'public' traffic.
There is also a syntax for specifying the outbound interface for
traffic.
Routing tables
On 03/15/2012 02:13 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
Hi,
My Google foo came up empty. Does anyone know where I can find a Grails
1.3.x (S)RPM?
I do not see any rpm past history of once existing 1.0.4 version back in
2008.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Peter Eckel li...@eckel-edv.de wrote:
Routing tables won't do much for you when you have several different IP
addresses (stateless autocnfigured, privacy extension and static) within the
same network on the same physical interface - they'll all use the same
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Just wondering if there is any statiscs report of selinxu usages in
production environment? I know some still turn it off.
If you have machines purposely serving things to the masses on the
Internet, you should take
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Just wondering if there is any statiscs report of selinxu usages in
production environment? I know some still turn it off.
If you have machines purposely serving things to the masses on the
On Monday, April 02, 2012 08:51:46 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Another statistic I'd like to see is how much admin time this costs on
the average to learn and implement.
No more than proper firewalling techniques cost, really.
Has anyone really measured this?
Probably not.
Are there
On 04/02/2012 01:59 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 03/15/2012 02:13 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
Hi,
My Google foo came up empty. Does anyone know where I can find a Grails
1.3.x (S)RPM?
I do not see any rpm past history of once existing 1.0.4 version back in
2008.
Thanks Ljubomir. I saw
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 08:51:46 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Another statistic I'd like to see is how much admin time this costs on
the average to learn and implement.
No more than proper firewalling techniques cost, really.
So
Hi Lee,
So what does that mean for a client application (http/ftp,etc.) where
you might have local firewalls permitting things for internal-subnet
source ranges but you also have external targets that only accept
pre-configured static sources?
Are you referring to the situation where you
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 06:29:49 PM John Stanley wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 12:38 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 06:29:12 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
you can still run a vnc install from the netinstall emdia and get the
complete installer going.
With 512MB
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Peter Eckel li...@eckel-edv.de wrote:
So what does that mean for a client application (http/ftp,etc.) where
you might have local firewalls permitting things for internal-subnet
source ranges but you also have external targets that only accept
pre-configured
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2012/3/30 Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com:
What is different about the initial startup of iptables than 'service
iptables restart' (and different from C5)? I want to use iptables
port redirection to send port 80
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:39:17PM +0200, Peter Eckel wrote:
network. Security-wise there is no difference as you'll never get smaller
allocations than /64 per site anyway, so what with respect to filtering
*gigglefit*
One of my providers gave me a single(!) IPv6 address. Another one has
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
On Monday, April 02, 2012 08:51:46 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Another statistic I'd like to see is how much admin time this costs on
the average to learn and implement.
No more than proper firewalling techniques cost, really.
Depends...
Takes me 1mn to open a
Hi Stephen,
*gigglefit*
One of my providers gave me a single(!) IPv6 address.
Actually that's at least something the IETF has thought of ... if it is certain
that one and only one device will be connected. I'm not actually sure what use
case there is for such a connection, but at least it
On 02/04/12 15:10, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 08:51:46 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Another statistic I'd like to see is how much admin time this costs on
the average to learn and implement.
No more than proper firewalling techniques cost, really.
Has anyone really measured this?
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:30:57PM +0200, Peter Eckel wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Another one has subdivided a /64 into multiple /96's (one for each
customer).
Yuck. That doesn't make sense at all.
SLAAC won't work, Privacy Extensions won't work ... you're stuck with static
addresses that
On Monday, April 02, 2012 11:11:29 AM Stephen Harris wrote:
One of my providers gave me a single(!) IPv6 address. Another one has
subdivided a /64 into multiple /96's (one for each customer).
You might want to rethink the /64 concept!
Subscribe to the NANOG list, and let that group know who
On Monday, April 02, 2012 11:27:54 AM John Doe wrote:
...self-compiled...
As Jamie Hyneman would say, well, there's your problem.
Having said that, I run Plone on a few sites, and the only way to run Plone
reliably on CentOS is to use the Plone-distributed unified installer, which
compiles
On Monday, April 02, 2012 10:34:58 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
So at least another grumpy, overworked full-time administrator for a
typical company?
Perhaps. It depends upon how willing the existing admins are to learn
something new, and on how overworked they are.
I'm as overworked as anyone; it
Hi Les (sorry for calling you 'Lee' before),
What is typical or reasonable for source address restrictions? That
is, if there are 2 global organizations, and one wants to increase
the security on access to a service by limiting to the source
addresses that might come from the other, is there
Ned Slider wrote:
On 02/04/12 15:10, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 08:51:46 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Another statistic I'd like to see is how much admin time this costs on
the average to learn and implement.
No more than proper firewalling techniques cost, really.
Has anyone
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:33:10PM -0700, Aaron Blew wrote:
UPDATE
I rolled a new kernel that's identical to the stock CentOS 2.6.32-220.el6
kernel with the exception of the new idmapper being enabled. Unfortunately
there's been no improvement.
Did you get a chance to try the RHEL
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 11:27:54 AM John Doe wrote:
...self-compiled...
As Jamie Hyneman would say, well, there's your problem.
Isn't most of the point of running servers to provide a unique service?
--
Les Mikesell
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 10:43 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 06:29:49 PM John Stanley wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 12:38 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 06:29:12 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
you can still run a vnc install from the netinstall emdia
Hello listamates,
Has anyone tried 6.2? How good is it? Should I specifically download it to
install on a new server I am configuring - or is 6.0 good enough in your
opinion?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello listamates,
Has anyone tried 6.2? How good is it? Should I specifically download it to
install on a new server I am configuring - or is 6.0 good enough in your
opinion?
CentOS 6.2 is just a CentOS 6.0 install
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:59 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Peter Eckel li...@eckel-edv.de wrote:
When there really is a requirement that the external server allows
only a single address to access it and that can't be changed, you
could resort to using a proxy.
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:11 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:39:17PM +0200, Peter Eckel wrote:
network. Security-wise there is no difference as you'll never get smaller
allocations than /64 per site anyway, so what with respect to filterin
*gigglefit
One of my
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:59 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Peter Eckel li...@eckel-edv.de wrote:
When there really is a requirement that the external server allows
only a single
thought you would find this interesting...
I get a LOT of political spam on one of my mails due to hosting a
political site once.
I have been slowly blacklisting the bulk companies and 'the net' of
private people
pushing political spam.
There is one guy who has been sending me stuff for years
48 matches
Mail list logo
