Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 07:09 PM, Mark Weaver wrote: On 03/08/2017 06:42 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > >> > >> > Hello all, > >> > > >> > I've been googling my brains out

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

Did I see an implicit "do as Red Hat says or else" there somewhere? Not appropriate. Linux is not Windows (yet). In the heat of the moment it may easily be forgotton that Linux is all about choice. We choose to run CentOS, and we choose to run it the way we see fit. We appreciate the efforts

[CentOS] another SMTP auth question

My ISP has just informed me that we will soon be required to authenticate when connecting to their smtp server, so I've been looking around on the web for how to do that with sendmail (just using auth when connecting outward-bound, nothing else). I've found a page here:

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 06:42 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: >> >> > Hello all, >> > >> > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for >> > up-to-date information on

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for > up-to-date information on this matter, and have found > information that is

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 06:21 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 08.03.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Weaver: > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: >> I wrote this article years ago: >> >> https://www.madboa.com/geek/sendmail-auth/ > Hi Paul, > > I followed

[CentOS] Re: Firefox for CentOS

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: I am currently building the latest Firefox

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

Am 08.03.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Weaver: On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: I wrote this article years ago: https://www.madboa.com/geek/sendmail-auth/ Hi Paul, I followed your guide to the letter, however I think it seems I missed

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2017:0472 CentOS 7 tzdata BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0472 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0472.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0461 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0461 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2017:0460 CentOS 7 nss Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2017:0460 CentOS 7 nss-util Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2017:0460 CentOS 7 nspr Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2017:0458 CentOS 7 kmod-redhat-mpt3sas Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:0458 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-0458.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2017:0472 CentOS 6 tzdata BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0472 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0472.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2017:0472 CentOS 5 tzdata BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0472 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0472.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some

Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas de correos

De preferencia usa certificados para cifrar los mensajes, ya que la otra parte si los esta usando. Saludos, 2017-03-08 15:27 GMT-06:00 Roberto Bermúdez : > Buenas tardes estimados listeros > > necesito acudir a ustedes a ver si alguien me puede ayudar con una duda que > se

[CentOS-es] Problemas de correos

Buenas tardes estimados listeros necesito acudir a ustedes a ver si alguien me puede ayudar con una duda que se me ocasiona con respecto a mi servidor de correos, primero debo indicar que mi servidor lo tengo en un centos 5.5, con snedmail, y con MailScanner y Spamassassin también pero desde la

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0459 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0459 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0459 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0459 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0454 Important CentOS 5 kvm Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0454 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0454.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 12:34 PM, David Both wrote: Try this article, "Outbound authentication for Sendmail." http://www.databook.bz/?page_id=3097 I wrote this after setting it up on my own CentOS server. Will definitely be having a look at this. The information is much appreciated. On 03/08/2017

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 11:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 03/08/2017 10:41 AM, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for > up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that > is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really

Re: [CentOS-es] Cambiar ruta MySQL

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:14 PM, José Xitumul wrote: > test Dale permisos totales a todo el mundo y mira si así sube, y ahí ves con qué usuario y grupo te crea el archivo en cuestión y restringes a los permisos adecuados, o quizás selinux ... bye ;)

[CentOS-es] Cambiar ruta MySQL

Buen dia compañeros con un favor, estoy configurando mysql en otra partición pero me da el siguiente error la partición se llama /data 170308 11:11:43 mysqld_safe Logging to '/var/log/mysqld.log'. 170308 11:11:43 mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /data/mysql/ 2017-03-08

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

Try this article, "Outbound authentication for Sendmail." http://www.databook.bz/?page_id=3097 I wrote this after setting it up on my own CentOS server. On 03/08/2017 10:41 AM, Mark Weaver wrote: Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On 03/08/2017 10:41 AM, Mark Weaver wrote: Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the

Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the

Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Hi, Johnny, >>> >>> Johnny Hughes wrote: I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed

[CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth

Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP

Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Hi, Johnny, > > > > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed > >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox

Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, Johnny, > > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to >> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 8 March 2017 at 15:00, Giles Coochey wrote: > > > On 08/03/17 14:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> >> >> If you'd like a really simple solution that avoids NetworkManager, I >> suggest using systemd-networkd (both systemd-networkd and >> systemd-resolved packages required).

Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

On 03/08/2017 09:07 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 08.03.2017 um 15:40 schrieb Johnny Hughes : >> >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to >> the mainline tree (Currently

Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed > that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to > the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 > at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). > > EL7: >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

> Am 08.03.2017 um 15:40 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > > I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed > that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to > the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 > at

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 08/03/17 14:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: If you'd like a really simple solution that avoids NetworkManager, I suggest using systemd-networkd (both systemd-networkd and systemd-resolved packages required). I've used it to set up a bridge on my workstattion for use with libvirtd/kvm, and it

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:43:57AM +, Giles Coochey wrote: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle > > I'm not flaming NetworkManager, I'm just stating that for many (perhaps > most), it is over-engineered for a server orientated distribution. I can run > with the script above on 30

[CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). EL7:

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 08/03/17 13:16, Steve Clark wrote: Let us have a vote - how many of us do teaming/bonding/vlans on our servers? Our networking gear does that in our installation. The majority of my servers are virtual, if I need multiple subnets (VLANs) then I have multiple cards. Their throughput does

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 8 March 2017 at 13:16, Steve Clark wrote: > On 03/08/2017 07:39 AM, John Hodrien wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Steve Clark wrote: >> >>> Yes it is really hard! >>> >>> ip address add 192.168.0.1/24 dev enp0s25 >>> ip route add default via 192.168.0.254 dev enp0s25

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

Hello David, It was not to flame something about NetworkManager. There some application that "needs" to wheel the old way. I would never have thought it would be such an enlightenment for such a small, old thing. 1. There is a file that isn't always needed (/etc/sysconfig/network) 2. I wanne

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 03/08/2017 07:39 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Yes it is really hard! >> >> ip address add 192.168.0.1/24 dev enp0s25 >> ip route add default via 192.168.0.254 dev enp0s25 >> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >> echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >>

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Steve Clark wrote: Yes it is really hard! ip address add 192.168.0.1/24 dev enp0s25 ip route add default via 192.168.0.254 dev enp0s25 echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf This is still a deliberately trivial case, as

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 03/08/2017 05:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >>

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 03/08/2017 05:52 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> Not really, Redhat/Centos has a lot to offer, but for me, networking is a >> one-time configuration, and the best way to configure it is using something >> that falls within this principle: >> >>

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

Certain application doesn't like the NetworkManager for example take a look here. https://www.rdoproject.org/install/quickstart/ And on server stage it's better to run without any complicate configuration tools. Tools can make life harder in some cases. Got many other distros run before

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 03/08/2017 05:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > > On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >>> ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >>> route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 >>> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >>> echo

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

Hello James, your right in that position. I will correct it. Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 8 March 2017 at 11:15, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 03/08/2017 01:57 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >> >>> The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless >>> you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: >>> >> The truth is a lot of us

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 03/08/2017 01:57 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. My

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 08/03/17 11:10, James Hogarth wrote: On 8 March 2017 at 10:58, Giles Coochey wrote: On 08/03/17 10:52, John Hodrien wrote: It means you're stuck in your own hand crafted niche. Which is fine, but it's up to you to maintain the niche, or you find yourself using

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 8 March 2017 at 10:58, Giles Coochey wrote: > > > On 08/03/17 10:52, John Hodrien wrote: >> >> >> It means you're stuck in your own hand crafted niche. Which is fine, but >> it's >> up to you to maintain the niche, or you find yourself using obsolete tools >> like ifconfig

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 08/03/17 10:52, John Hodrien wrote: It means you're stuck in your own hand crafted niche. Which is fine, but it's up to you to maintain the niche, or you find yourself using obsolete tools like ifconfig and route. I'd argue there's a gulf between keeping things simple and doing

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: Not really, Redhat/Centos has a lot to offer, but for me, networking is a one-time configuration, and the best way to configure it is using something that falls within this principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle I'm not flaming

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf Oh okay, you really do want

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf Oh okay, you really do want to back away from Redhat entirely. That's

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 08/03/17 10:15, John Hodrien wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. You're opting to have your network managed by a bunch of unloved legacy scripts that you're advised to

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. You're opting to have your network managed by a bunch of unloved legacy scripts that you're advised to avoid using unless necessary, or you've

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. We just need to set an IP address, subnet mask,

Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files

On 8 March 2017 at 06:56, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hello Guys, > > update my post, because of a route from ipv6 on same networkcard, > with only ipv4 enabled > > Sincerely > > Andy > > Please accept this as honest constructive criticism from someone who also likes to blog.