[CentOS] mounting lvm2

CentOS 7 for everything I am probably never using lvm again. I have never not once actually benefited from its capabilities but this is probably the third or fourth time it has gotten in my way. Issue is that I use the tools so rarely that I can't recall what needs to be done to properly

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 and php 5.5

gcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-remi On 8/25/2016 8:08 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/25/2016 07:07 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Looks like you are trying to install packages built for EL6 in EL7 I'm fairly certain Remi has EL7 packages for PHP 7. That should read &

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 and php 5.5

On 08/25/2016 07:07 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Looks like you are trying to install packages built for EL6 in EL7 I'm fairly certain Remi has EL7 packages for PHP 7. That should read "PHP packages for EL7" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 and php 5.5

Looks like you are trying to install packages built for EL6 in EL7 I'm fairly certain Remi has EL7 packages for PHP 7. If he doesn't, I have php 5.6.x for EL7 - but it's a radical update because I build against a new apache and LibreSSL which isn't what a lot of people want.

Re: [CentOS] Linux TCP flaw

On 08/11/2016 11:07 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Peter wrote: On 12/08/16 17:56, Barry Brimer wrote: [root@vps ~]# uname -r 2.6.32-042stab108.7 Not needed. This affects 3.6+ kernels. You don't have one of those. It affects RHEL6 which runs 2.6.32, they backported the

[CentOS] Broken package

CentoOS 7 python-cryptography package is at version 0.8.2 It has a build-requires for python-cryptography-vectors of the same version (but different source tarball apparently) There is no python-cryptography-vectors in CentOS 7 base or updates. There is one in EPEL but it is version 0.8 -=-

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 07:53 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 06:57 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> said: So when building curl, it links curl against the libcurl in the buildroot and not against the libcurl it just compiled? No other packages

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 06:57 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> said: So when building curl, it links curl against the libcurl in the buildroot and not against the libcurl it just compiled? No other packages I know of do that. No, that is not what i

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 06:40 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> said: [alice@pern root]$ ldd builddir/build/BUILDROOT/curl-7.29.0-26.el7_2.awel.libre.0.x86_64/usr/bin/curl |grep crypto libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x7fb

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 06:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> said: [alice@pern ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/curl |grep crypto libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x7f452439) libcrypto.so.10 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 (0x

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 06:17 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: *snip* [alice@pern ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/curl |grep crypto libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x7f452439) libcrypto.so.10 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 (0x7f45234ca000) [alice@pern ~]$ rpm -qf /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 openss

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 06:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> said: Something in the curl build will always link the binary against OpenSSL if the openssl-lib package is present, and will always link the library against OpenSSL if any TLS option is e

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 06:05 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:54 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:45 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:33 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:23 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:11 PM

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 05:54 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:45 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:33 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:23 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:11 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm having a major

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 05:45 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:33 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:23 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:11 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm having a major frustration with curl. When building curl

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 05:33 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:23 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:11 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm having a major frustration with curl. When building curl, if libssl.so.10 is present the curl binary

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 05:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/03/2016 05:11 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm having a major frustration with curl. When building curl, if libssl.so.10 is present the curl binary WILL link against it. *snip* Go ahead and ldd on the CentOS curl binary and library - you will see

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On 08/03/2016 05:11 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm having a major frustration with curl. When building curl, if libssl.so.10 is present the curl binary WILL link against it. *snip* Go ahead and ldd on the CentOS curl binary and library - you will see openssl linked even though the spec file

[CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

I'm having a major frustration with curl. When building curl, if libssl.so.10 is present the curl binary WILL link against it. If curl is configured with an ssl option - the library WILL link against it. If you change the curl configuration options to use a different TLS library (e.g. nss

Re: [CentOS] mate crash

just switched ctrl-alt-F4 and back whilst running 7.2.1511 (updated last night). I'm running gnome though, so it could be a mate problem. On 17/07/16 07:12, Alice Wonder wrote: While playing an audio in totem, the mate desktop crashed. I couldn't switch to a console like I use to be able to do

[CentOS] mate crash

While playing an audio in totem, the mate desktop crashed. I couldn't switch to a console like I use to be able to do with ctrl-alt-F{n} - seems that is gone is from CentOS. I couldn't open a terminal by right clicking on the desktop. I was able to open a folder, navigate to /usr/bin and

Re: [CentOS] AAC in .m4a command line tagging ???

On 06/19/2016 03:11 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Hi All, Software patents suck but but unfortunately for speech, MP3 (also still patented until end of next year) also sucks - for html5 audio served to iPhones where Safari doesn't support Ogg Opus and where bandwidth may be limited, AAC is a very

[CentOS] AAC in .m4a command line tagging ???

Hi All, Software patents suck but but unfortunately for speech, MP3 (also still patented until end of next year) also sucks - for html5 audio served to iPhones where Safari doesn't support Ogg Opus and where bandwidth may be limited, AAC is a very attractive option. I have an AAC encoding

Re: [CentOS] How to disable audio in CentOS7?

On 05/15/2016 04:48 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: How can I completely disable audio drivers and services in my CentOS7 system? This system is a server that will never run any audio applications. The problem is, I can't disable the audio device in my BIOS, so the system finds it in the PCI device

Re: [CentOS] ClamAV from EPEL

On 05/14/2016 01:22 PM, Walter H. wrote: Hello, just curious; since March 3rd, 2016 everdays logwatch-mail shows this: Last Status: WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.99 Recommended version: 0.99.1 on May 4th, 2016 I updated clamav by yum

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 05/10/2016 01:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: Hi, I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other operating systems. Right now, I am sure that we do

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

On 05/10/2016 12:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Which assumes that setting selinux to enforcing doesn't break your websites, or the locally-created root directories that have been created before an actual sysadmin came onboard, or That's my biggest problem with SELinux. I suppose at some

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.1.0 stability

On 05/07/2016 11:14 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I usually include it into my rant, I forgot this time. No google chrome for me, thank you very much. Nothing google to a degree possible. I don't like my everything going to google (and NSA and whichever others) databases. I know that 50% of my

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.1.0 stability

On 05/06/2016 11:54 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: Good afternoon, Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking. For example, I can't use it for Twitter because it crashes. It also crashes when I log into gmail. This happens every

[CentOS] [off-topic] Validating e-mail address with php

After running into several web application that rejected any e-mail address on the new gTLDs because the apps were badly written to validate with a hard-coded list of valid TLDs, I wrote a e-mail validation function that I *think* does things properly. Free for anyone to use who wants to.

[CentOS] ImageMagick security alert

https://imagetragick.com/ As CentOS is often used for web servers, I thought this should be posted here. Bug in ImageMagick allows remote exploit. AFAIK no patch exists yet but defense against the exploit is detailed at the link. CVE-2016–3714

Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

On 05/02/2016 12:40 PM, Nux! wrote: I also have this problem. Am still running previous FF version. So ffmpeg appears to be at fault, need to see if it's a version thing or something. I don't go to a lot of media sites but I have two yum repos I semi-maintain mostly for myself -

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

On 05/01/2016 05:50 AM, Ned Slider wrote: On 01/05/16 13:23, Alice Wonder wrote: On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: I think this is my autism coming in to play, I think what is very clear to me I just am not able to adequately communicate because clearly people are not even

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net>: On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote:

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net>: On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote: For e-mail sent to people, yes. But for wh

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote: For e-mail sent to people, yes. But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a us

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

On 04/30/2016 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? ... I don't think a whitelist alphabet is best approach because of people with names that are not spelled with Latin characters

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

On 04/30/2016 12:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Sat, April 30, 2016 1:28 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline

[CentOS] E-mail advice sought

I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline JavaScript in a few places so CSP breaks it) but - Is there any advice on characters to allow in

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

On 04/30/2016 11:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Sat, April 30, 2016 12:56 pm, William Warren wrote: ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else. As I said, I feel I hear MS Widows admins on

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

Not all patches require rebooting the kernel. Most do not. On 04/30/2016 10:56 AM, William Warren wrote: ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else. On 4/30/2016 11:33 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare - bunny trail

On 04/29/2016 04:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: *snip* So what's gone wrong with the Linux Desktop developers? I don't know, but that's why I use MATE. I get acceptable performance on my T410 thinkpad with 4GB of memory and outstanding performance on my home built desktop with 16GB of memory.

[CentOS] DNSSEC deployment stats

Since it was discussed earlier, I thought some might find this link interesting : http://secspider.verisignlabs.com/stats.html It is a spider that crawls DNS servers counting both DNSSEC and TLSA records. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

On 04/27/2016 07:43 PM, Mike Mohr wrote: Don't flame me, but I really recommend using Ubuntu on laptops. If you really want CentOS, you should go with version 7. Many new laptops won't work well with that either though. CentOS 7 works fine on my T410 thinkpad but that's not a new laptop... I

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 08:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Wed, April 27, 2016 10:29 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 01:21 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen <rkam...@kampensonline.com> wrote: Sounds good, but how many dom

[CentOS] DNSSEC / Security stats (forked from php thread)

I don't have a source, I'd have to dig through my browser history, but I looked at some of these stats just last month. Roughly 2% of the top 1000 domains in the United States had deployed DNSSEC - which I *think* is double what it was a year ago. Roughly 7% of ISP recursive DNS servers

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 01:21 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Sounds good, but how many domain MX servers have set up these fingerprint keys - 1%, maybe 2%, so how do you code for that? I guess I'm thinking it uses it if available.

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 01:19 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 01:06 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote: Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. I'm aware of how DANE works. The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix impl

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 01:06 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote: Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. I'm aware of how DANE works. The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix implements it. You can thank the hatred of

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 12:59 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote: That is the only reliable way to avoid MITM with SMTP. Except I can just strip STARTTLS and most MTAs will continue to connect. No you can't. Not with

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 12:41 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 12:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: *snip* Unless you have a very specific requirement for a very bleeding edge feature it's fundamentally a terrible idea to move away from the distribution packages in something as exposed as a webserver

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 12:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: *snip* Unless you have a very specific requirement for a very bleeding edge feature it's fundamentally a terrible idea to move away from the distribution packages in something as exposed as a webserver ... I use to believe that. However I no

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On 04/26/2016 07:21 PM, Digimer wrote: On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/26/2016 03:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: Hey guys, I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise. Never more than 15 web servers for most sites. But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the client.I actually like to install Apache and PHP from

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe About Plugins tells me: Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.577 Status: Aktiviert

[CentOS] RHEL 7.3 wish-list

CentOS tracks RHEL and there is something I think probably can only be done in a point release but I believe should be done. Update to nss and curl. The problem - the version of curl that ships with CentOS does not support ECC cryptography. A newer version would, but requires manual

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5 EOL

On 04/01/2016 03:57 AM, Tris Hoar wrote: Hi List, As an FYI Red Hat have announced the 1 year EOL notice for RHEL 5. Anyone still using CentOS 5 would do well to start planning on upgrading to 6 or 7. Tris I would recommend 7 unless you have an application that just won't run on it. And

Re: [CentOS] www.centos.org/forums/

On 03/25/2016 08:08 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hi List, Does anyone know why the above URL is still using TLS V1.0. I can't connect to it unless I enable TLS V1.0 which I was under the impression that it should not be used anymore. Thanks for any enlightenment. Steve TLS 1.0 is still safe but

Re: [CentOS] C5 MySQL injection attack ("Union Select")

On 03/24/2016 08:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Thu, March 24, 2016 9:48 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Wed, March 23, 2016 10:21 pm, Always Learning wrote: mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.95, for redhat-linux-gnu (x86_64) using readline 5.1 >

Re: [CentOS] C5 MySQL injection attack ("Union Select")

On 03/24/2016 07:33 AM, Always Learning wrote: *snip* Thank you. That server is the last production server on C5. I need to shift it to C6 and Maria 10. I am 'always learning' security is a perpetual task. Thankfully I always read the daily logs and reports (an arduous task). Many thanks.

Re: [CentOS] C5 MySQL injection attack ("Union Select")

On 03/24/2016 04:53 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote: Be careful with WordPress - it's database handler doesn't actually use parameterized statements, it emulates them with printf - one (of many) reasons I do not like the product. This is a rather controversial statement. There's nothing wrong

Re: [CentOS] C5 MySQL injection attack ("Union Select")

On 03/23/2016 08:21 PM, Always Learning wrote: mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.95, for redhat-linux-gnu (x86_64) using readline 5.1 I spotted something strange and immediately installed a routine to automatically impose an iptables block when the key used for database access is excessively long.

Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ?

On 03/23/2016 09:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 23:46 -0500, g wrote: until the devs get "r2i", you can use a firefox add-on; User-Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/ or User Agent Quick Switch 0.5.2.1

Re: [CentOS] Centos and automatic update on server

On 03/14/2016 06:36 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/11/2016 12:41 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi list, I know that there are automatic update with yum-cron but never tried. In my experiences I never did automatic backup because if update was broken my installation will be broken and I wait some

Re: [CentOS] Centos and automatic update on server

On 03/11/2016 10:41 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi list, I know that there are automatic update with yum-cron but never tried. In my experiences I never did automatic backup because if update was broken my installation will be broken and I wait some time before apply update. Today seems to be

Re: [CentOS] RES: CVE-2016-1285 & CVE-2016-1286

Looking at the redhat CVE it looks like *by default config* it is not vulnerable except from the localhost. On 03/10/2016 02:37 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: As soon as RHEL does. On 03/10/2016 02:13 PM, Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote: CentOS will provide an update to fix

Re: [CentOS] RES: CVE-2016-1285 & CVE-2016-1286

As soon as RHEL does. On 03/10/2016 02:13 PM, Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote: CentOS will provide an update to fix it? De: centos-boun...@centos.org [centos-boun...@centos.org] em nome de Alice Wonder [al...@domblogger.net] Enviado: quinta-feira, 10 de

Re: [CentOS] CVE-2016-1285 & CVE-2016-1286

On 03/10/2016 07:13 AM, Michael H wrote: On 10/03/16 14:47, Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote: Hello. I think Centos are affected, right? Some update from Centos? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Monthly spins torrents ??

http://buildlogs.centos.org/monthly/7/ A very useful resource. Updates takes less time after install. Just curious if there are torrents for them? I could commit to running a single seed for the x86_64 "everything" ISO. I dd them onto USB sticks for people (personally recommend the 16GB

Re: [CentOS] Keep the politics out, please?

I understand your point. I was just offering a bitcoin spec file for those who wanted it, no politics in that post, and was met with resistance I suppose I shouldn't have responded to. No rants about the fiat banking system in my original post. Bitcoin building on CentOS without needing an

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 03/07/2016 10:14 AM, James Washington wrote: Hey all, Sorry to jump in here but out of curiosity, has the patch actually been back ported to earlier versions of OpenSSL regarding the recent DROWN attack? I've checked the RPM change log and nothing's been mentioned relating to

[CentOS] C-Media CM8828 [CentOS 7]

Basically I will be needing a low profile PCIe sound card with optical out. There isn't a hell of a lot of selection, seems the assumption is if you need sound it is on the motherboard. That one has PCIe and a low profile bracket, but it uses the C-Media CM8828 chipset. My understanding

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 03/02/2016 03:24 AM, Anthony K wrote: On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 21:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/01/2016 09:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: BUt the security plugins do not work for CentOS and they never have, Peter is correct, you need to run yum update or call out the specific packages you

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

On 03/01/2016 09:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: Since I'm likely to use Reds again, it is a bit of a concern. So wondering if I just happen to get an unlucky batch, or is there some incompatibility between the Reds and the Intel C236 chipset, or between Red / C236 / Centos 7 combo or the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 SELinux issue

On 02/24/2016 11:34 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:28:33 -0800 Alice Wonder wrote: I don't ordinarily run SELinux and do not have it enabled. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/selinux/2012-May/014626.html QUOTE: Turns out you get the "Could not downgrade policy

[CentOS] CentOS 7 SELinux issue

Trying to add SELinux support to my bitcoin package. Keep getting this on install: SELinux: Could not downgrade policy file /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.29, searching for an older version. SELinux: Could not open policy file <= /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.29: No such file or

Re: [CentOS] Bitcoin for CentOS 7

On 02/24/2016 08:01 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote: Meanwhile banks like Chase charge poor people $12.00 a month just have checking and push debit card paychecks on low income jobs where they charge just for the poor to check how much they have on it. That bad, huh? Yes. They give them one

Re: [CentOS] Bitcoin for CentOS 7

On 02/24/2016 06:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec

Re: [CentOS] Bitcoin for CentOS 7

On 02/24/2016 06:06 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec I believe the only

Re: [CentOS] Bitcoin for CentOS 7

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL

[CentOS] Bitcoin for CentOS 7

For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. With Bitcoin 0.12.0

Re: [CentOS] A repo with latest httpd for http2?

On 02/12/2016 02:23 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote: On 02/12/2016 10:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 2/12/2016 11:13 AM, SternData wrote: Is there a well-run package repo that has httpd-2.4.17 or mod_http2 (or mod_h2)? EL7 comes with httpd-2.4... # yum list httpd ... Installed Packages httpd.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] Python hashlib and ripemd160

works like ./configure --prefix=/opt/python-alternative and then other normal stuff.. -- Eero 2016-02-03 12:52 GMT+02:00 Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net>: Hi - I think the patent monster has struck again. rmd = hashlib.new('ripemd160',binascii.unhexlify(someString)).hexdigest() That

[CentOS] Python hashlib and ripemd160

Hi - I think the patent monster has struck again. rmd = hashlib.new('ripemd160',binascii.unhexlify(someString)).hexdigest() That fails - ValueError: unsupported hash type From some googling, it appears that the supported hash types are from OpenSSL and that means the OpenSSL in CentOS doesn't

[CentOS] [solved] Re: Python hashlib and ripemd160

from Crypto.Hash import RIPEMD That lets me do a ripemd-160 On 02/03/2016 03:18 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: okay it appears there are no suspect patent issues with ripemd160 so either they just didn't include it for some other reason or the issue is elsewhere. On 02/03/2016 03:00 AM, Eero

Re: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System

On 02/01/2016 11:54 AM, Frank Cox wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:44:48 -0600 Chris Adams wrote: Did someone think running "rm -rf /" is a good idea? Quote from one of the people who commented on that article: QUOTE: You have this in a script: rm -rf "${DIRECTORY}"/ Now, you have a bug in

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/25/2016 09:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:20:35PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you have to do something special to get fonts shown that aren't monospace. The default _is_ monospace (specifically

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/25/2016 01:28 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: I personally love Gnome3 on Fedora. It took me about a week to adjust my mindset though -- I did that over a Xmas break. It did help that I read the release notes first (so I was not surprised at the major change) and went through the tutorial the

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/24/2016 06:37 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: Why? Why is it automatic that a text editor should be automatically monospace? (Sure, I use gedit with a monospace font, but that doesn't mean it's not useful with a proportional font). Because text editors are used to edit plain text files where

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/24/2016 11:31 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Hodrien Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 To: CentOS mailing list Cc: Mark LaPierre Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent My opinion is that

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/24/2016 10:23 PM, Hal Wigoda wrote: Isn't this basically a volunteer effort? At one point I believe they were funded by Novel, not sure who is funding the project now. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/24/2016 11:46 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 01/24/2016 11:31 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Hodrien Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 To: CentOS mailing list Cc: Mark LaPierre Subject: Re

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/24/2016 03:40 PM, Peter Duffy wrote: The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself, but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a window had appeared telling me about systemd and asking me if I wanted to use it, or stick with the old init

[CentOS] Just need to vent

Sometimes the direction of UI development in gnome really angers me. For example, when selecting a font for the gedit text editor - there is no way to ask it to only show monospace fonts. It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you have to do something special to get

Re: [CentOS] signing RPM packages with SHA256

On 01/21/2016 09:23 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: %_gpg_digest_algo sha256 Thank you! That worked beautifully. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] signing RPM packages with SHA256

On 01/20/2016 03:32 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 01/20/2016 02:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: hi, I noticed that RPM

Re: [CentOS] signing RPM packages with SHA256

On 01/20/2016 02:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: hi, I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 Signature : RSA

Re: [CentOS] signing RPM packages with SHA256

On 01/20/2016 02:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: hi, I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 Signature : RSA

[CentOS] signing RPM packages with SHA256

hi, I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID ad3b591d147abf59 Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256 Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58 AM PST, Key ID 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5 I'm trying to find where / how to use

<    1   2   3   4   >