Looks good. The important part is that it references the drive when
doing the installation.
What do you mean?
The problem is that grub stage1 is loaded but its instructions for
locating stage2 point it to another disk which may or may not be at the
location stored. That was the problem
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional
ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users and several machines in
a cluster
Very. We have a single Linux box facing the Internet which
runs everything through postfix, amavisd, and clamav to weed out
the phishing and worms that attack the Microsoft virus, Windows,
then hands off messages that pass to the internal cluster using
round-robin DNS as the poor-mans load
What does fsbench say? It has the best writing performance too?!?
No, according to the fsbench results, ReiserFS wins on Read Performance,
but XFS is, approximately, four times more faster on write.
I said that the ReiserFS have the best performance based on my
read/write server statics,
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007, Christopher Chan wrote:
What does fsbench say? It has the best writing performance too?!?
No, according to the fsbench results, ReiserFS wins on Read Performance,
but XFS is, approximately, four times more faster on write.
I said that the ReiserFS
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dell poweredge 400SC here with an LSI scsi card.
I installed Centos4 a while ago and put it in a datacenter. I rebooted
many weeks after, and the machine didn't come back up. So I went to the
datacenter tonight to find out that the server was stuck at
grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored
partition?
Yes
What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot?
That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booting
properly. What could I do to avoid this situation in the future?
Heitor Augusto M Cardozo wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Heitor Augusto M Cardozo wrote:
Hi all,
In last year, i had made some research and benchmarks based on CentOS
4 to know which filesystem is better for Maildir: ReiserFS, XFS or
EXT3.
My conclusion was as follows:
- EXT3: reliable
On CentOS 5.0, a had the same benchmarks and now, EXT3 and XFS seems
to had better or equivalent performance on Read and Create Random
files. One of this tests, using bonnie++, show this:
# bonnie++ -d /mnt/sdc1/testfile -s 8192 -m `hostname` -n
50:15:5000:1000
bonnie++? Not
Rogelio wrote:
My apologies if this question has been previously answered, but could
anyone here provide me with resources that I might use to help build a
case for exclusively using CentOS in an enterprise environment?
(Approximately 200 servers)
Long story short, I've used a little of
Heitor Augusto M Cardozo wrote:
Hi all,
In last year, i had made some research and benchmarks based on CentOS 4
to know which filesystem is better for Maildir: ReiserFS, XFS or EXT3.
My conclusion was as follows:
- EXT3: reliable but very slow to read many small files.
- ReiserFS: best
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's always worth seeing what wine under CentOS can do, but I wouldn't get my
hopes up that it will fill the shoes of windows because of lots of
compatibility problems. Still, it's worth a shot.
reactos! reactos!
...
...
...
Why are you all looking at me like
Andreas Kuntzagk wrote:
Hi,
I have setup a webserver on CentOS 4.5 with NameVirtualHost.
Two VirtualHost should be reachable by port 80 from outside, while the
third (default) should be only reachable by https from outside but by
http from inside.
Since all share the same IP firewalling seems
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 02:48 -0500, Miark wrote:
I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that
be happening?
The cups service opens
Miark wrote:
I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that
be happening?
Do your firewall rules DROP or REJECT?
___
Johnny Hughes wrote:
John Thompson wrote:
On 2007-11-12, Alain Spineux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 10:55 PM, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grub came up on reboot, suggesting that it did indeed overwrite the lilo
boot record in the MBR, but grub was unable to load
Paul Norton wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Do you sometimes find anvil missing? I wonder if you can strace
master and see what it is doing or waiting for...
This happened again this morning. I see the anvil process died -
22815 ? Z 0:13 [anvil] defunct
# strace -p 22799
Process 22799
Do you sometimes find anvil missing? I wonder if you can strace master
and see what it is doing or waiting for...
This happened again this morning. I see the anvil process died -
22815 ? Z 0:13 [anvil] defunct
# strace -p 22799
Process 22799 attached - interrupt to quit
futex(0xb7bc2bec,
John Thomas wrote:
Paul Norton said the following on 11/07/2007 10:57 AM:
Postfix is dying on one of my servers almost nightly. This system is
running CentOS5 with postfix-2.3.3-2.
I have had a similar problem, but Postfix continues to operate. I am
running CentOS 5.0 with all updates as a
John Thompson wrote:
On 2007-11-09, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know...he did say that he restored lilo to get his FC1
installation working again. grub should not have problems picking up its
second stage unless it rests beyond the 1024 cylinder and there is no
LBA
Do you sometimes find anvil missing? I wonder if you can strace master
and see what it is doing or waiting for...
This happened again this morning. I see the anvil process died -
22815 ? Z 0:13 [anvil] defunct
# strace -p 22799
Process 22799 attached - interrupt to quit
futex(0xb7bc2bec,
Simon Jolle wrote:
Hi Centos Users
What are the advantages of 64 Bit and respective 32 Bit installation
of Centos? With PAE 32 Bit installation can address huge amount of
RAM. As a desktop system, I prefer 32 Bit installation because of
teething troubles in 64 Bit Linux world.
Intel does
Paul Norton wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Paul Norton wrote:
Postfix is dying on one of my servers almost nightly. This system is
running CentOS5 with postfix-2.3.3-2.
In the morning (after noticing it died) I try to run `service postfix
stop` and I get a failed start. Running `ps ax
Garrick Staples wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:12:33PM -0600, John Thompson alleged:
On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any clues what I did wrong?
Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list
That leads to the question, where is the partition for the
/boot for the Centos5 kernels located and is there LBA support in the BIOS?
should have been: where is the partition for the /boot filesystem that
holds the centos5 kernels located...
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what gave me this idea, but I decided
to comment out the swap partition in /etc/fstab
and reboot my laptop. I did not run swapoff directly at
any time.
I'm running more things now than I would ever dream of
to hammer my 500MB of memory, but I still notice
John R Pierce wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
configure your sendmail to use your ISP's mail server as a 'smarthost'.
How is that going to help the dest mta verify his address?
it won't have to. his ISP will accept mail from its own customer's
IP address, same as if they were end
Any clues what I did wrong?
Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list where grub and lilo
users like me are subscribers. Don't complain about grub. grub gives you
far more power than that piece of trash called
Peter Loron wrote:
I have a CentOS 5 machine at home, behind a NAT gateway. Among other
things, I'm running mdadm in monitor mode to alert me to RAID failures.
I want it to send messages to my main email address. Any messages I send
from the home CentOS box to that email address are being
Nothing to do with your ip. Just use an email address that Google can
verify and again, it has NOTHING to do with sendmail.
...I don't know where I got Google from :-D
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
configure your sendmail to use your ISP's mail server as a 'smarthost'.
How is that going to help the dest mta verify his address?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Sieve is a library, integrated into lmtpd, while procmail is a standalone
process (and eats resources).
I thought eating resources was a feature of procmail?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
John R Pierce wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Sieve is a library, integrated into lmtpd, while procmail is a
standalone process (and eats resources).
I thought eating resources was a feature of procmail?
I didn't think procmail ate significantly more resources than any other
delivery
Patrick Lodder wrote:
Hi all,
I have a big e-mail box over at my provider. I receive a lot of e-mail
every day (over 100), which are distributed into different imap-folders
by thunderbird. The problem is that thunderbird must be running
(offcourse) to be able to it's job.
And for
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
solution(maybe I'm search with the wrong keywords). I found fetchmail
procmail, but I wasn't able to figure out if they can do it.
http://imapfilter.hellug.gr/
But then he needs to have imapfilter running. For automated sorting of
email
Shawn Everett wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm 100% sure this is not a Linux issue but I want a second opinion...
I have a Linux server running CentOS. It was been absolutely perfect
without any errors or problems.
Since Monday it has been unable to send email. It is configured to act as
a smart
Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Oct 31, 2007 12:24 AM, Shawn Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
telnet smtp.isp.net 25 generates the following:
Trying a.b.c.d...
Connected to smtp.isp.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
And then nothing. All other machines can connect to smtp.isp.net 25
without a problem.
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Man, I missed that one. Serves me right for switching email accounts. At
least you just poke fun. If Robin Socha was here...we would have endless
fun/torment.
Shall I invite him?
Why, that would be wonderful. Or better not, otherwise I won't
What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply
capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song
to its own mp3 file.
would mplayer do?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Christopher Chan wrote:
What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply
capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each
song to its own mp3 file.
would mplayer do?
A google search of mplayer audio
-xr-x 1 root root 104 Jan 1 2006 rpm
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 121 Aug 22 2005 slocate.cron
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 286 Feb 21 2005 tmpwatch
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 158 Feb 18 2006 yum.cron
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
On 10/26/07, *Christopher Chan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
umair shakil wrote:
Dear All Salam,
I have syslog server running logs of network devices, I am facing
problem about two weeks that
my weekly log is not rotating, as i manually runs the script it does,
secondly i put the entry
in cron.daily, still today i checked but no log rotation
Robin Bowes is no longer on the qmail list among others and so there is
very little flaming now there.
Eeek. I meant Robin Socha.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Is this for the same BSD system you asked questions on
before concerning log rotation problems?
Which BSD system borrowed run-parts from Debian?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Jim Perrin wrote:
On 10/26/07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which BSD system borrowed run-parts from Debian?
All of them. Since they're based on debian anyway. See this thread for
details - http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088245.html
One of these days
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Heck, I see lots of circles where they wouldn't trust mysql for an
enterprise application so it seems clear that you are not talking about
stability or performance but rather familiarity and the amount of trust
you have in what you know.
Let's see
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I don't recall ever having a problem with postgresql.
I guess the latest versions are more crash resilient. But still no
builtin replication.
This has gotten far afield of CentOS, but recent vintages of Postgresql
DO support replication
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ah but you cannot just replace it with another radio and expect it to
work...sendmail and postfix have very different interfaces and design. They
have their own ways of handling. Do we have to entertain stuff like
writing/debugging sendmail
I thought the usual ways of doing this were to either use a
high-performance NFS server (netapp filer...) and maildir format so you
can run imap from any client facing server, or to keep the delivery host
information in an LDAP attribute that you find when validating the address.
This is
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 21:21 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
I thought the usual ways of doing this were to either use a
high-performance NFS server (netapp filer...) and maildir format so you
can run imap from any client facing server, or to keep the delivery host
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I thought the usual ways of doing this were to either use a
high-performance NFS server (netapp filer...) and maildir format so
you can run imap from any client facing server, or to keep the
delivery host information in an LDAP attribute that you
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I thought the usual ways of doing this were to either use a
high-performance NFS server (netapp filer...) and maildir format so
you can run imap from any client facing server, or to keep the
delivery host information in an LDAP attribute that you
Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 09:58 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I thought the usual ways of doing this were to either use a
high-performance NFS server (netapp filer...) and maildir format so
you can run imap from any client facing
Heck, I see lots of circles where they wouldn't trust mysql for an
enterprise application so it seems clear that you are not talking about
stability or performance but rather familiarity and the amount of trust
you have in what you know.
Let's see, mysql crashes (elcheapo hardware, happens
Les Mikesell wrote:
Matt Shields wrote:
Anyway, back to my original request. You can use the transport_maps
feature to dynamically lookup lmtp transports on a per account basis.
I have figured it out, and for those that are curious I will post when
I've finished documenting everything.
I
I know that XFS gets all the press about being a great performing file
system ... but if you want the best stability on CentOS, you should at
least consider ext3 instead.
+1
I have worked very hard to get stable code for xfs in centos-4 and
centos-5, and lots of people use it, but (IMHO)
Shawn Everett wrote:
I will be telling them wait for a power loss, wait for the XFS code to
shut down one of its filesystem for no reason, take a good look at the
neverending stream of bug fixes in the mainline kernel, take a look at
those kernel developers who have openly announced they want
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/22/2007 9:21 PM Christopher Chan spake the following:
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through
What I am having a problem is how do I get postfix to transfer the
email to the particular IMAP server that the user account is on. I
know that I need to use lmtp and transport, but all the examples I
have seen show forwarding all email to 1 IMAP server. I would like
Postfix to do a lookup
Matt Shields wrote:
Data changes too frequently to generate the file every x number of
minutes across all smtp servers.
You have to support instantly deliverable mailboxes for new accounts?
The mysql db isn't a single server. It's a master (read/write) with
multiple replicas for read
So, i have been quite moronic in not trying to apply logic initially.
Please leave that term for those who really deserve it. As for not
trying perhaps the lazy label is more suitable :-P
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
umair shakil wrote:
Salam,
Squid actually Proxy will do the trick
Nope. Not if they are installed on those PCs.
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
On 10/19/07, *Arne Pelka* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have two pc using centos 4, these machines need
Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
Where do we join
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the flames and
really learn how qmail works than let them loose with a list
Please excuse me.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
601 - 665 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
