component.
OK I'm a SOHO with a single server trying to setup a VM.
What you're saying is that RHEL/CentOS should not care about my needs
because there's a Good Reason(TM) for the way things currently are.
We won't have this problem with IPv6...
--
Regards,
Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS
on systems I put together. Embedded guys try to understand and
simplify...
Rob
--
GPLv3: as worthy a successor as The Phantom Menace, as timely as Duke Nukem
Forever, and as welcome as New Coke.
--
Regards,
Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS
NetSecSpec Ltd
+44 (0) 7983 877438
http://www.coochey.net
http
in a manner that would allow me to determine where these packets
might be going or from where they originate?
tp://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I used to quite like iptraf for a quick summary view of the traffic use.
Don't know if there is a CentOS package for it.
--
Regards,
Giles Coochey
are not running IPv6 and you're blocking
protocol 41 (note this is not port 41, but _protocol_ 41) then you
should mitigate most of the IPv6 issues. I would normally assume that
your demarc points have a default policy to drop unknown / unspecified
traffic.
--
Regards,
Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Can he not use http://vault.centos.org/4.9/updates/ as a repository for
updates?
--
Regards,
Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS
NetSecSpec Ltd
+44 (0) 7983 877438
http://www.coochey.net
http
On 2012-05-16 13:19, Shiv. NK wrote:
Hello Dear Friends,
it is CentOS Release 6.2, ntpd is running but do not see bounded to
the
port udp:123
any guidelines would be very much appreciable.
[root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntlp | grep ntpd
nothing in output
[root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntl |
On 15/05/2012 15:56, Shiv. NK wrote:
Hi List Members,
i understand that perhaps i should not ask this question here. But you all
are technical. Therefor, has anyone ever monitor the VPN traffic using any
open source tools such as Zabbix/Nagios/Cacti? or any other
Thanks
Can you provide
On 15/05/2012 16:10, Shiv. NK wrote:
Can you provide a somewhat less generic term for the VPN traffic?
If the VPN has an interface, then you can monitor this like you monitor
any other interface, yes with Nagios / Cacti and the like...
Dear Glies,
Thanks for the information sent. VPN is
,
Giles Coochey, CCNA Security, CCNA
NetSecSpec Ltd
giles.cooc...@netsecspec.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 7983 877 438
Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
http://www.netsecspec.co.uk
http://www.coochey.net
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
are only
interested in receiving email from a few 'known' domains... it could
work. Seems it would be easier to just blacklist all and whitelist the
few? If it is just for internal... perhaps a webmail system with no
outside email ability would be the way to go?
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
a milter. It doesn't
queue the mail and check later - the mail is checked after SMTP DATA and
the decision to reject the email is made there and then.
So, no, SA does not work after the email gets in the queue, as you say.
That is dependent on implementation.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
configuration
mechanism, and will ignore your slapd.conf configuration if that
mechnism already exists.
I think this config is in /etc/openldap/slapd.d/
Try backing up and removing that folder, then your slapd.conf
configuration will actually be read.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey, CCNA Security
On 20/04/2012 12:35, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 19.04.2012 23:42, schrieb Giles Coochey:
On 19/04/2012 01:28, Larry Martell wrote:
18) If you're on AOL, don't worry about anything I've said here.
You're already a fucking laughing stock, and there's no hope for you.
Oh, that fateful day when
On 19/04/2012 01:28, Larry Martell wrote:
18) If you're on AOL, don't worry about anything I've said here.
You're already a fucking laughing stock, and there's no hope for you.
Oh, that fateful day when AOL joined usenet, and usenet died.
___
on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
And your INPUT chain rejects everything that is not matched by those
lines above it.
You'll need a:
-A INPUT -p udp --dport port -j ACCEPT in there before you go to REJECT.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
UK Mobile: +44 7983 877 438
Business Email
On 14/03/2012 14:56, Arif Hossain wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 14:11 +, Giles Coochey wrote:
--ms00020507030501060609
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 14/03/2012 13:59, Arif Hossain wrote:
On Wed
if they
just thought they needed _a_ System Administrator.
Giles Coochey
+44 (0) 7983 877438
CCNAS, CCNA, CCENT
NetSecSpec Ltd
--
Message sent via my webmail account.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 2012-02-09 15:35, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Hello all,
How can I configure yum to download updates when I need to
authenticate to a Microsoft Forefront proxy?? I have tried to
configure http_proxy variable as a
http_proxy=http://DOMAIN\\user:passwd@proxy:port/;, but it doesn't
works ... I
On 2012-02-09 15:35, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Hello all,
How can I configure yum to download updates when I need to
authenticate to a Microsoft Forefront proxy?? I have tried to
configure http_proxy variable as a
http_proxy=http://DOMAIN\\user:passwd@proxy:port/;, but it doesn't
works ... I
On 2012-02-09 15:57, C. L. Martinez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net
wrote:
On 2012-02-09 15:35, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Hello all,
How can I configure yum to download updates when I need to
authenticate to a Microsoft Forefront proxy?? I have tried
On 2012-02-02 15:39, Ned Slider wrote:
I would recommend removing reject_unknown_client from your
smtpd_sender_restrictions.
I would not recommend that, I would recommend you fix your DNS. If you
have a lot of mail throughput perhaps run a caching-DNS server or proxy
to improve performance
On 02/02/2012 17:35, Ned Slider wrote:
On 02/02/12 15:44, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 2012-02-02 15:39, Ned Slider wrote:
I would recommend removing reject_unknown_client from your
smtpd_sender_restrictions.
I would not recommend that, I would recommend you fix your DNS. If you
have a lot
On 2012-02-01 13:21, B.J. McClure wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 15:09 +0200, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
Hello list.
I have install centos-release-6-2.el6.centos.7.x86_64 and I cant
find
squirrelmail.
Does any know why?
Check epel repo.
squirrelmail-1.4.22-2.el6.noarch : webmail client
On 2012-02-01 14:40, Alain Péan wrote:
Le 01/02/2012 15:24, Giles Coochey a écrit :
Hello list.
I have install centos-release-6-2.el6.centos.7.x86_64 and I
cant
find
squirrelmail.
Does any know why?
Check epel repo.
squirrelmail-1.4.22-2.el6.noarch : webmail client
On 2012-01-23 15:13, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 16:23, Phil Schaffner
philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
I'd have a look at why an apparently Internet-facing server is 5
point
releases, plus a lot of subsequent errata, behind the current 5.7
release level; and what resultant
On Wed, January 18, 2012 00:52, John R Pierce wrote:
I'd expect with a firewall-centric OS distribution like pfSense, a dual
core 2-3Ghz I3 could easily keep up with gigE and quite complex rule
sets, several network zones. No storage requirements at all, unless you
plan on keeping your
Best reason I can think of is application feature deprecation.
If an update contains changes to the default configuration file then the
file will normally be installed with the '.rpmnew' extension.
If an application decides to deprecate and phase out options which you
actually use in the current
On 11/01/2012 00:31, Mail Lists wrote:
On 01/10/2012 05:54 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
Hi All,
I have set up three servers in a development environment. Via CR
they're updated to Centos 6.2
It appears that these servers have postfix installed on them by
default, which unfortunately I'm not very
On Wed, January 11, 2012 10:09, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/11/12 12:50 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
I don't really have the enerygy to do that, thanks anyway. I'll
uninstall postfix and use sendmail. Just thought maybe there was a
quick way to keep the default MTA on the system.
the first google
On 11/01/2012 10:33, Benjamin Hackl wrote:
$ cat /etc/postfix/main.cf
myorigin=yourdomain.com
relayhost=your.smarthost.com
smtp_sasl_auth_enable=yes
## you probably want to limit how postfix authenticates
# smtp_sasl_security_options=noanonymous
# smtp_sasl_mechanism_filter=login
On 11/01/2012 17:36, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 11/01/2012 10:33, Benjamin Hackl wrote:
$ cat /etc/postfix/main.cf
myorigin=yourdomain.com
relayhost=your.smarthost.com
smtp_sasl_auth_enable=yes
## you probably want to limit how postfix authenticates
# smtp_sasl_security_options=noanonymous
On Tue, January 10, 2012 17:15, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
One *could* argue that Java is a bug, being a) so error-prone, b) so
vulnerable to attack, and c) so huge and slow, and shouldn't be
allowed
But you'd be wrong on all counts.
Hi All,
I have set up three servers in a development environment. Via CR they're
updated to Centos 6.2
It appears that these servers have postfix installed on them by default,
which unfortunately I'm not very well acquainted with.
All I want is a quick and dirty way to enable these hosts
On Fri, January 6, 2012 16:42, Alan McKay wrote:
Might be overkill but cacti or Nagios+PNP would do this...
PNP? What's that ? I already have Icinga installed.
http://docs.pnp4nagios.org/pnp-0.4/start
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, November 14, 2011 13:39, Phil Savoie wrote:
Hi All,
Using the following to ssh into my home to get mail, I suddenly get this:
ssh -o TCPKeepAlive=yes -o ServerAliveInterval=240 -L
110:192.168.100.108:110 phil@FQDN
phil@FQDN's password:
bind: Cannot assign requested address
On 21/10/2011 16:27, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote:
I have two Centos 6 servers running BIND.
I have configured the two servers to run internal zones as a master /
slave setup.
My gateway runs DNSmasq and I would like all other
Hi All,
I have two Centos 6 servers running BIND.
I have configured the two servers to run internal zones as a master /
slave setup.
My gateway runs DNSmasq and I would like all other requests for lookups to
be sent to the DNSmasq system.
I have added the following:
forward first;
On Fri, October 21, 2011 12:14, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote:
Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap?
This are lots of docs.
But DO NOT DO IT.
A Samba 3.x DC is very very *obsolete*. The Windows world has moved on
On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:23, Johnny Hughes wrote:
There is SOME QA ... just not all the QA that they get as part of the
main release.
They are not right off the build and into the server ... we do our
functionality test suite prior to pushing CR (and other tests, and look
for repo
On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:39, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of
systems.
I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc...
Am I receiving security updates via 'yum update', which
On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Giles Coochey wrote:
So Centos 6.0 is EOL?
not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you?
Read this:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
___
Thanks. I see
On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:24, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/21/2011 09:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
However, if I install whatever latest version of an operating system
distribution. I expect to be able to run something that will give me
stable security-updates for that distribution
On Mon, July 11, 2011 16:43, Keith Beeby wrote:
Hi,
So first daft question with Centos 6 (someone had to be first!) I've setup
Centos 6 as a Server but as with Centos 5 it used to boot into the GUI but
v6 doesn't do this, startx etc doesn't seem to work to launch the GUI
Any suggestions on
On 09/07/2011 23:20, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Craig White wrote:
The reality is that applications are becoming more and more web based
SAAS and as the costs of specific applications needed on specific
platforms (ie, Quickbooks) rise, web based SAAS will replace them. The
point is that for end
rate?
CentOS 5.5 Gnome, I mostly use Firefox and Thunderbird.
Check your key modifiers, sometimes they get stuck - serves us right for
eating biscuits at the keyboard.
By key modifiers I mean (Ctrl-L, Alt, AltGr, Ctrl-R, Fn etc...)
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems
doesn't work,
and consider turning it off a best-practice. This should be avoided -
once autonegotiation is turned off, it will not work by definition,
creating a self-enforcing problem.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
On 10/07/2011 10:40, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote:
Can your company afford to be without your apps and data for a couple of
weeks, while some hacker organisation has it?
I think not.
But it's not like you can't do both. The Cloud
On 10/07/2011 11:22, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote:
Well, do both then, but at double the cost!! The whole point to CEOs
and CFOs about going with the Cloud is that they will save money on
IT infrastructure and possibly get rid of
On 10/07/2011 11:40, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote:
The reference to 'porn' was meant to be a light hearted reference to 'your
personal stuff', as opposed to 'your work stuff'.
Okay, you've made good points. Sorry about
On 10/07/2011 12:57, John R Pierce wrote:
On 07/10/11 1:46 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
Fiber is not a CSMA/CD medium, it's a Point to Point medium - Duplex
is meaningless.
so is twisted pair.
ha... ha... of course, interesting.
I guess what I was trying to say is that for fiber connections
an unmanaged switch then it's time to change
provider :-) - they obviously are cheapskates and don't have any change
management control on their systems.
Gigabit is different.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350
On 09/07/2011 20:13, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I already have several friends lined up for installation. But you
should also be prepared to help them with install and primary setup,
like adding third party repositories for audio/video codecs and
similar. Ljubomir
And the next ten years or
of faffing about and almost always works a treat.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Business Email: giles.cooc...@netsecspec.co.uk
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
Can you avoid the bar.baz.domain.com.domain.com by searching for
bar.baz.domain.com.
(note trailing dot)
??
On Thu, June 23, 2011 11:06, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
As Les wrote in another branch of the thread, search clause is if you
try name
On Thu, June 23, 2011 11:53, John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Giles Coochey wrote:
Can you avoid the bar.baz.domain.com.domain.com by searching for
bar.baz.domain.com.
(note trailing dot)
??
Hmm, good suggestion, that I'd not considered, Thanks. It does appear to
clear that up
On Thu, June 23, 2011 12:07, John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Giles Coochey wrote:
Yes, I'm sure it will depend on the implementation, the trailing dot was
somewhat an educated guess from previous ISC BIND dig tool use. :-)
As for both the A and record, I think you will have
On Thu, June 9, 2011 10:51, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, MR ZenWiz mrzen...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the cross-post, and off-topic at that, but:
This morning I received a very authentic looking email from
info.paypal.com, claiming that Paypal wanted me to update my
, just don't rise to the bait of a troll -
bite once if you really must, but remember they are just trying to add
noise to an otherwise rational discussion group. So it is not worth
getting into an elongated thread about it.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681
, but cannot ping the PPTP gateway, and half minute later
the PPTP got disconnected.
No obvious error message in the PPTP log.
How is this related to centos?
quite but at first glance this looks like a MTU problem.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL
On 03/02/2011 11:24, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a Linux rescue CD with driver for a SLI MegaRAID 8708?
You might try the Gentoo Live CD with the domegaraid boot option.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626
It will give you the same result and mount stuff without the need to
chroot etc...
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
, but not required.
ANy ideas, anyone?
Read the transparent proxy howto... you may need to do SNAT as well as DNAT.
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/TransparentProxy-6.html
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN
too.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
the message and processes it
before the Screensaver sees anything
If you want to disable CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE use the X option DontZap in
your X configuration.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email
and don't need to comply with PCI/DSS
in their offices.
Even companies that do in-house card payment processing only have to
enforce PCI/DSS in their CDE.
I can't speak for HIPPA, SOX etc... but automatic locking is part of IT
best practice.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T
for an engineer to gain access
to a user's PC automatically arises suspicion
Hi Rudi,
Your stance on this is counter-intuitive to me, are you able to cite any
good reference which recommends that administrators know user passwords?
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31
:44
Subject: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 20/01/2011 17:11, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
The message I'm trying to bring across is that users in the company
shouldn't
?
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
CentOS mailing
On 18/01/2011 15:34, Drew Weaver wrote:
Ah, it is a PCI card and there is only one PCI slot..
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Giles Coochey
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:24 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject
Plug and Play OS
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
://www.lindevdoc.org/wiki/irqpoll_(kernel_parameter)
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
capture.cap
It creates a file capture.cap that can be read by a packet analyzer -
e.g. wireshark.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
Gib Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype
,
the horror of it.
Oh, BTW: vim over emacs.
;-)
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
Gib Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On 04/11/2010 13:31, Rob Kampen wrote:
I've been watching this thread and offer the following observation.
some years ago when working in the corporate world - most internet
connections were still via modem - I used to connect via VPN to the
corporate network from remote offices. Even
On 15/10/2010 10:36, John Doe wrote:
From: Paras pradhanpradhanpa...@gmail.com
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow a sequential order that
matches the nics
try installing the firmware available
from Elrepo for this card:
http://elrepo.org/tiki/rt73usb-firmware
Once done, if it still doesn't work provide a directory listing of
/lib/firmware and any other error messages you get.
--
Best Regards,
Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL Mobile: +31 626
On 14/10/2010 08:44, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
Hi all,
i'm following online guides to secure my centos 5.4
it's advised to turn off sendmail service among others.
but how can i forward my /var/log/mail to my webmail ?
http://blog.zloether.com/2009/07/install-ssmtp-in-centos.html
On 14/10/2010 09:11, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Hi all,
i'm following online guides to secure my centos 5.4
it's advised to turn off sendmail service among others.
but how can i forward my /var/log/mail to my webmail ?
To update to CentOS 5.5 with current updates (especially the kernel!)
What could be so insecure about using sendmail localy?
Don't start the daemon, so it is not listening...
Or the firewall will block the port anyway...
If the mail is sent to a trusted mail server, there is no risks.
Am I missing something?
On a hardened, production, well configured server
On 14/10/2010 11:48, Scott Robbins wrote:
http://blog.zloether.com/2009/07/send-email-from-linux-shell.html
This also, you will note, sends email through (in the example) through
gmail, that is, going outside the machine.
I thought that was what the OP requested?
On 14/10/2010 14:45, Ritika Garg wrote:
Want to install CentOS 5.5 by burning the image on DVD. On the
link:http://mirrors.hns.net.in/centos/5.5/isos/x86_64/, there is a
list given. CentOS-5.5-x86 64-bin-DVD.torrent is in the list. So is
the download of the .iso possible only through
On 13/10/2010 18:37, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Benjamin Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote:
On 10/13/2010 09:28 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What's happening is, it is showing up under one of the two MAC's:
either 00:0a:cd:1a:c1:71 or 00:00:00:00:c1:71. If you reboot it
On 13/10/2010 19:00, Timo Schoeler wrote:
On 10/13/2010 06:46 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
I've tended to find that when a card is failing the MAC address starts
setting itself to FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF not 00:00:00:XX:XX:XX
FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF is broadcast.
Sorry... in order to qualify my statement
On 13/10/2010 19:31, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone seen something like this before:
I want to use a laptop as a KVM console. Basically when a technician
goes to one of our datacentres, or clients he has to look for a free
LCD, keyboard mouse to connect to a server (no network
On 13/10/2010 20:35, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 13/10/2010 19:31, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone seen something like this before:
I want to use a laptop as a KVM console. Basically when a technician
goes to one
On 13/10/2010 20:52, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote:
Yes, for the lower end of the market you won't find that capability
built in, but going forward - if you're looking for a server that is
going to be co-located then remote
On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
need to have a security update?
___
What is your IP? :-D
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, October 7, 2010 14:05, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
You can register on this site if you use linux on your desktop, to
prove that we have at least more than 1% market share today :-)
http://www.dudalibre.com/gnulinuxcounter?lang=en
I don't get it... I use Windows on the desktop and UNIX on
On Mon, September 13, 2010 15:28, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hello,
we have one application which gets some data from our database but
to print just one result it connects many times to the database over WAN.
Of course there are some performance related problems with this type of
work.
I'd
On Sun, September 12, 2010 07:42, Richard Gliebe wrote:
Now I need the right sendmail.cf entries for SASL-AUTH (we don't work
with *.mc Files or similar. We directly edit the sendmail.cf files ;-)
I don't know if this is complete, but you could try the following:
# list of authentication
But, when I'm trying to send an email, the user still becames:
Relaying denied. Proper authentication required.
Before SASL, the user becomes only Relaying denied
In Outlook 2003 in Email Preferences, the authentication for smtp is
activ.
the outgoing server (SMTP) needed
On Fri, September 10, 2010 05:51, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I've been trying to do traffic shaping on one of my public servers and
after reading up, it seems like the way to do so is via tc/htb.
However, most of the documentation seems at least half a decade old
with nothing new recently.
On Fri, September 10, 2010 13:20, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 9/10/10, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/09/10 8:51 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
So I'm wondering is tc the current and recommended method for traffic
shaping on CentOS or is there some newer method that has
Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server what
seems
like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
Eg today I see
---
403 Forbidden
/phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s)
/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s)
404 Not
On Wed, August 25, 2010 16:19, Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert,
On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow
and
On Tue, August 24, 2010 17:29, Rob Kampen wrote:
Yesterday I installed pam_shield and followed the testing suggested and
thought all was well.
today I find that I cannot get to my email account, I can login via ssh
okay (uses keys) but su and sudo give
segmentation faults. I am guessing due
101 - 197 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
