on 2-25-2010 1:44 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
Hi all,
I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 5:53 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
All repositories are hard to use with other repositories. Yum
epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts
with the base.
Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that
epel was a bit dodgy as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened
though. ;-)
the following is my opinion, and nothing
On 2/26/2010 2:20 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts
with the base.
Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that
epel was a bit dodgy as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened
though. ;-)
the
Hi all,
I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
r...@mach012 ~/ [0]# rpm -qa backuppc
backuppc-3.1.0-1.el5.centos
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
Doing the same search for RHEL5 gave me two packages (one for i386 and one
for
x86_64); v3.1.0-5.
Not from Red Hat.
I thought all packages available from the prominent American upstream
provider
got a treatment from the CentOS
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:32 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
Doing
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
Doing the same search for RHEL5 gave me two packages (one for i386 and
one for x86_64); v3.1.0-5.
Not from Red Hat.
No, from epel.
epel is just another third party repo.
I thought all packages available from the
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:50 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
[...]
3.1.0-5 from one repo is not necessarily better
Sorin, I've seen you posting on this list for a long time. There is no
excuse that you don't know the simplest FAQs about CentOS.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
On 2/25/2010 3:44 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
r...@mach012 ~/ [0]# rpm
On 2/25/2010 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Sorin, I've seen you posting on this list for a long time. There is no
excuse that you don't know the simplest FAQs about CentOS.
I'm not sure there is any reasonable way to understand the state of 3rd
party repositories. If there were, they'd
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:06:11 -0600:
I'm not sure there is any reasonable way to understand the state of 3rd
party repositories. If there were, they'd probably fix their conflicts
and avoid them in the future...
This wasn't what I referred to. He seemed to be unaware
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:52 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
[...]
Looking more closely I saw that the RHEL5-packages
14 matches
Mail list logo
