On 01/09/2014 12:38 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi,
On 01/08/2014 02:47 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
One thing that struck me in Karanbir's message was the marketing
mumbo-jumbo such as the next generation of emerging technologies and
a platform that is easily consumed.
Karanbir usually writes
On 01/09/2014 12:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'd throw SMEserver, ClearOS, and the old (up to CentOS5) version of
K12LTSP in that bucket too. Maybe someone will roll a new K12LTSP
that comes up working as installed again now.
The focus from the project side is going to be creating the infra
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Is this for real? Oracle are apparently a thorn in the side to RH and
thus all the changes to C6 that caused lots of delays .. if this
changes as indicated, doesn't that negate all those changes and give
Oracle a leg up to getting their clone to
From: Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Is this for real? Oracle are apparently a thorn in the side to RH and
thus all
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Is this for real? Oracle are apparently a thorn in the side to RH and
thus all the changes to C6 that caused lots of delays .. if this
changes as indicated, doesn't that
On 1/9/2014 11:26 AM, David Miller wrote:
At this point I really don't see why RedHat doesn't just offer RHEL + updates
+ extra channels for free and then only charge for support. This would put
them on a real equal ground with Canonical.
I suspect doing so would cut heavily into their
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 1/9/2014 11:26 AM, David Miller wrote:
At this point I really don't see why RedHat doesn't just offer RHEL +
updates + extra channels for free and then only charge for support. This
would put them on a real equal
On 01/09/2014 08:26 PM, David Miller wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Is this for real? Oracle are apparently a thorn in the side to RH and
thus all the changes to C6 that caused lots of delays .. if
On 1/9/2014 11:53 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
It is same with SuSE and OpenSuSE, right?
opensuse is more like fedora
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
___
CentOS mailing
David Miller wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
snip
Look at it another way - we are not working with the RHEL teams, we are
working with the RH open source and standards team ( that has no real
input into
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:18:10PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tell them you can try it out, and if they like the results, they can pay
for a license and support for RHEL, the real thing, and that's a *lot*
easier sell.
Especially if there's a migration script to convert existing CentOS
On 9 January 2014 13:35, Leslie S Satenstein lsatenst...@yahoo.com wrote:
As I see it, more and more alternatives to Oracle are in the market.
Hadoop, is cutting into Oracle's revenue.
So, RH needs to concentrate on promoting JBOSS and a version of HADOOP.
Don't worry about Oracle.
Fedora
Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
My first thought as well. Redhat already has Fedora as a testing
ground. So for Redhat acquiring another free distribution makes me
wary,
unnecessarily so maybe...
One thing that struck me in Karanbir's message was the marketing
mumbo-jumbo such as
hi,
On 01/08/2014 02:47 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
One thing that struck me in Karanbir's message was the marketing
mumbo-jumbo such as the next generation of emerging technologies and
a platform that is easily consumed.
Karanbir usually writes better than that, so I suppose that someone
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
the voip setup for home/small users is the best example. if
asterisk@home were done as a part of the centos community, how cool
would that have been?
I'd throw SMEserver, ClearOS, and the old (up to CentOS5) version of
15 matches
Mail list logo
