On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just played with one of my test vmware ipcop images and set it to dhcp
on
our internal network (which should simulate your natted connection
through
your adsl modem) for the red interface and I was able to dig +trace
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
snip
I have it working, with one glitch (cannot get to the IPCop web
interface from my Desktop) in the Backup IPCop box.
Did you remember to use the alternate port? E.g on my local net
https://homegroanfirewall:445/cgi-bin/index.cgi
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
snip
I have it working, with one glitch (cannot get to the IPCop web
interface from my Desktop) in the Backup IPCop box.
Did you remember to use the alternate port? E.g on my local net
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:08 AM, William L. Maltby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
snip
I have it working, with one glitch (cannot get to the IPCop web
interface from my Desktop) in the Backup IPCop box.
Did you remember to use the alternate
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have it working, with one glitch (cannot get to the IPCop web
interface from my Desktop) in the Backup IPCop box.
Did you remember to use
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have it working, with one glitch (cannot get to the IPCop web
interface from my Desktop) in the Backup IPCop box.
It's working fine now!:-) I have the 2 updates installed and I
backed it up to my Desktop. Trying to
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Question: The next time I connect our Backup IPCop box, should I put
the 2 IP addresses for opendns.com there, or, the IP of our ADSL
Modem? Which will be faster? If I understand, you have the IP
on 7-13-2008 10:06 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I just played with one of my test vmware ipcop images and set it to dhcp on
our internal network (which should simulate your natted connection through
your adsl modem) for the red
on 7-13-2008 10:06 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I just played with one of my test vmware ipcop images and set it to dhcp on
our internal network (which should simulate your natted connection through
your adsl modem) for the red
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No !!! Don't change it there. That is the IP address sent to your dhcp
clients for them to use for dns. If you set that to 127.0.0.1, no one will
find anything.
You
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 17:23 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/12/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[240kB png]
DON'T EVER DO THAT AGAIN.
You just sent out ~1GB of data.
As of now (as that already happened last week), the maximum message size
for this list
On 7/13/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
again. Lanny
FYI: When you have a large thing to post publicly there are sites such
as http://pastebin.com/ and others. Googling will get you some.
Bill
Bill: You'd attached your file, Friday night. I attached mine, when I
replied. That
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I just played with one of my test vmware ipcop images and set it to dhcp on
our internal network (which should simulate your natted connection through
your adsl modem) for the red interface and I was able to dig +trace
google.com
with
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 11:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/13/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
again. Lanny
FYI: When you have a large thing to post publicly there are sites such
as http://pastebin.com/ and others. Googling will get you some.
Bill
Bill: You'd attached
William L. Maltby wrote:
It wasn't a bad thing to do. IMO the bad thing to do was for someone to
rebuke you in such a short manner when you had made the list aware
of your noobiness.
Had I seen your attachement first (which somehow got around me), you
would have gotten the notice. That has
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 21:41 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
It wasn't a bad thing to do. IMO the bad thing to do was for someone to
rebuke you in such a short manner when you had made the list aware
of your noobiness.
Had I seen your attachement first (which
William L. Maltby wrote:
Q: since you have seen me on here for a long time and know that I am
generally observant of the courtesies, would you have shouted at me in
the same way?
Yes, sure.
Your answer should provide insight to future hapless victims of your
wrath. :-)
Ah, wrath would have
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I am up and running on our normal IPCop box again. Last night, I
changed the DNS Settings in the ADSL Modem, from using the DNS Servers
at our local ISP, to those of opendns.com http://opendns.com and
that probably will help a lot, until I can get IPCop configured
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I am up and running on our normal IPCop box again. Last night, I changed the
DNS Settings in the ADSL Modem, from using the DNS Servers at our local ISP,
to those of opendns.com and that probably will
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
My understanding is that IPCop provides a Caching DNS Proxy, not a Caching
Name Server. Being a proxy means it forwards any queries that it can't
answer from it's own cache to full DNS Servers (caching or not).
I
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If your ADSL modem can act as a DNS server, then you can point IPCop to that
for DNS, but you can't point IPCop to itself (127.0.0.1) because it is only
a proxy - not a full DNS server. In my view, for DNS your IPCop
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Question: The next time I connect our Backup IPCop box, should I put
the 2 IP addresses for opendns.com there, or, the IP of our ADSL
Modem? Which will be faster? If I understand, you have the IP
addresses in your IPCop box and that bypasses your ADSL Modem.
TIA, Lanny
My
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[240kB png]
DON'T EVER DO THAT AGAIN.
You just sent out ~1GB of data.
As of now (as that already happened last week), the maximum message size
for this list is 50kB.
So people: Trim your mails :)
Ralph
pgpr6cPHknP7f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 7/12/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[240kB png]
DON'T EVER DO THAT AGAIN.
You just sent out ~1GB of data.
As of now (as that already happened last week), the maximum message size
for this list is 50kB.
So people: Trim your mails :)
To: Ralph and everyone
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Question: Awhile ago, I got into the configuration settings for our
ZTE ADSL Modem.
For the change to me having my own Caching DNS Server, in the settings
for the ADSL modem at this time, using the DNS servers at our ISP:
Primary DNS
On 7/11/08, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
You would set the primary dns to 127.0.0.1 and if you want set the
secondary
dns to what your primary dns was set at. You might have to play with
the
options to have dhcp assigned red and still be able to set your
On 7/11/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Unless your IPCop box is assigned a dynamic IP address?
No. It has a Static IP address.
In that case,
IIUC the DHCP server from the ISP/modem setup will provide the primary
and secondary servers. I know they can be overridden if you
Lanny Marcus wrote:
You entered them there and you can dig +trace from there. That's
interesting. I would like to discontinue using the DNS Servers at my
ISP, because: (a ) frequently slow (b) sometimes no DNS (c) the recent
problem where I get to opendns.com
Generally your ISP's DNS should
On 7/12/08, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
You entered them there and you can dig +trace from there. That's
interesting. I would like to discontinue using the DNS Servers at my
ISP, because: (a ) frequently slow (b) sometimes no DNS (c) the recent
problem where I
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Good morning to you! It is 647 Saturday night here in Colombia.
___
9:34am Sunday morning here in Australia :)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 19:31 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
snip
I will try to SSH into the ipcop box. I've never tried to SSH into it.
I've always looked at it via the web interface.
Be aware that port 222, no 22, is used for slightly
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 20:07 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/10/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
snip
Still not able to SSH into the IPCop box. Something wrong in the
syntax I tried or SSH didn't get turned on in the IPCop box, via the
web interface, as I thought? The sshd is
On 7/10/08, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ssh ipcop.homelan:222
ssh: ipcop.homelan:222: Name or service not known
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
Try:-
ssh -p 222 ipcop.homelan
Bingo! Ian, I was able to get into the IPCop box. :-) Thank you,
On 7/11/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Sshd is for incoming connections.
You need to enable it on IPCop (using
web interface is easiest). I also suggest using ssh keys instead of
password *if* you want increased security. Paranoia level is the
determining factor.
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 06:49 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/11/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
snip
I cannot dig +trace from my Desktop, as me or as root and I also
cannot dig +trace from the ipcop box as of this time.
Must be either firewall on your desktop or IPCop
on 7-10-2008 5:52 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
When you set up your connection to your provider, do you have a static
address
or dynamic?
Dynamic IP
If static, you had to set your next step resolver in the config.
If you are
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I am looking at it from the web interface. Under DHCP, for the Green
Interface, for Primary DNS, it shows 192.168.10.1If I change that
to 127.0.0.1 I'm done? Other than possibly needing to change a
configuration setting in the ADSL
On 7/11/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/11/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I cannot dig +trace from my Desktop, as me or as root and I also
cannot dig +trace from the ipcop box as of this time.
Must be either firewall on your desktop or IPCop has some
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 16:15 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/11/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
snip
My wife is using her Desktop box (compaq1300) on MS Windows at this
time. I can dig but I cannot dig + trace to her box:
That makes sense. I was thinking that you
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 17:12 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/11/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/11/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I cannot dig +trace from my Desktop, as me or as root and I also
cannot dig +trace from the ipcop box as of this time.
on 7-11-2008 1:48 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I am looking at it from the web interface. Under DHCP, for the Green
Interface, for Primary DNS, it shows 192.168.10.1If I change that
to 127.0.0.1 I'm done? Other than possibly
Scott Silva wrote:
You would set the primary dns to 127.0.0.1 and if you want set the
secondary
dns to what your primary dns was set at. You might have to play with
the
options to have dhcp assigned red and still be able to set your
nameserver
settings.
The ipcop boxes I have are all on
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 09:05 +0930, Ian Blackwell wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
snip
Question: Awhile ago, I got into the configuration settings for our
ZTE ADSL Modem.
For the change to me having my own Caching DNS Server, in the settings
for the ADSL modem at this time, using the DNS
on 7-10-2008 1:55 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/10/08, Rob Townley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why not use the dig command to query your isp dns system to see if
they forward requests to opendns. By the way, OpenDNS is a great way
to help prevent phishing attacks.
Rob: What other
on 7-10-2008 2:04 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/10/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I think I saw a reference, in a thread yesterday, about not having a
package with caching in it's name, if one also has BIND installed. I
am going to try to locate that thread and find
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Try dig +trace emcali.net
It should show all servers your query goes through.
Scott: Please note that I added .co (for Colombia) emcali.net.co
Is this showing which DNS Servers my DNS requests use, or, which DNS
Servers serve their web
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Bind as a caching nameserver is dead easy to install.
Just run yum install caching-nameserver and it will pull everything in.
Then chkconfig named on service named start
Scott: Thanks! I just began a text file: Caching DNS Server and
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Bind as a caching nameserver is dead easy to install.
Just run yum install caching-nameserver and it will pull everything in.
Then chkconfig named on service named start
Scott: Thanks! I just began
on 7-10-2008 2:50 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Bind as a caching nameserver is dead easy to install.
Just run yum install caching-nameserver and it will pull everything in.
Then chkconfig named on service named start
Scott:
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
When you set up your connection to your provider, do you have a static
address
or dynamic?
We get a dynamic IP address when we connect to ADSL.
If static, you had to set your next step resolver in the config.
If you are dynamic, you get
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you want to install a complete router using CentOS?
Is your ipcop box not adequate for your needs?
From what you wrote to me in another reply, ipcop will do the job, as
soon as I can get into it and get it configured the way you said. That
On 7/10/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
When you set up your connection to your provider, do you have a static
address
or dynamic?
Dynamic IP
If static, you had to set your next step resolver in the config.
If you are dynamic, you get what your provider sends with the dhcp
On 7/10/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
your
ipcop should be a caching nameserver. If you have another address there it
will query to that server.
Obviously, I need to change that, so I can run Setup from a terminal
window, run the dig + trace command as you did from one of
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ssh ipcop.homelan:222
ssh: ipcop.homelan:222: Name or service not known
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
Try:-
ssh -p 222 ipcop.homelan
Ian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
CentOS
54 matches
Mail list logo
