On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
If this is a problem, I suggest that you find a paid for service
contract where you can be rude to the people with whom you interact.
i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake
James Bunnell wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
told me that I was wrong and it was at -21. I then asked if there
James Bunnell wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
told me that I was wrong and it was at -21. I then asked if there
James Bunnell wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
told me that I was wrong and it was at -21.
lftp
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
James Bunnell wrote:
i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to
centos. damage is done. on the next major upgrade, i will
return to rhel and will not professionally recommend centos
either privately,personally, or in the realm of a business.
thanks for seeing my side of the
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:59 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, James Bunnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed CentOS
3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS 5 was one
kernel
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:45:36AM -0600, James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:35 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to
centos. damage is done. on the next major upgrade, i will
return to
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 08:48 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:45:36AM -0600, James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:35 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to
centos.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:54 PM, James Bunnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you expect people to use OSS and be treated like crap? being treated like
crap is the competitor's job.
Regardless of OSS or professional paid support - *nobody* deserves to
receive abuse of any kind. If you dislike the
On Thursday 05 June 2008 16:42:47 James Bunnell wrote:
ts been
nearly 2 weeks since any update of progress to 5.2 has been announced.
On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really need an
update on that?
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Thursday 05 June 2008 16:54:08 James Bunnell wrote:
you expect people to use OSS and be treated like crap? being treated
like crap is the competitor's job.
It's no-one's job to be treated like crap. Under any circumstance.
You're not going to find many volunteers who react well to being
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 16:57 +0100, Martyn Drake wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:54 PM, James Bunnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you expect people to use OSS and be treated like crap? being treated like
crap is the competitor's job.
Regardless of OSS or professional paid support -
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2008 16:42:47 James Bunnell wrote:
ts been
nearly 2 weeks since any update of progress to 5.2 has been announced.
On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really need
an
update on that?
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:01 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I expect people who feel they are treated like crap to do one of two
things:
1. Get involved to try and make things better (I guess you could
argue you are doing this albeit in a really ineffective manner :)
2. Move on to
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:04 PM, James Bunnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and i agree with you. banning in irc is an insult when based on nothing but
personal disagreement. swearing is a knee-jerk defense to the abuse of irc
operators and admittedly should not have happened.
Is this an apology I
James Bunnell wrote:
i was told early on, that it took an invite to get involved.
Subscribing to centos-devel or starting a SIG or doing a project on
http://projects.centos.org/ does not require *any* invitation and that
is where involvement starts. Well, it even does start on a lower level -
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:19 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
This is open source etiquette. It differs from business etiquette
where you are more than welcoem to berate and yell and holler about
things because you're paying someone a lot of money.
the etiquette is rudeness
James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really need
an
update on that?
i only asked. an answer such as what was given here earlier would have
sufficed. is that so hard?
But it is the
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:36 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really
need an
update on that?
i only asked. an answer such as what was given
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:35:18AM -0600, James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:19 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
This is open source etiquette. It differs from business etiquette
where you are more than welcoem to berate and yell and holler about
things
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:52 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Frame your questions and reactions with these things in mind, develop a
bit thicker skin. Run everything said by a developer type through the
nerd tact filter too:
http://www.mit.edu/~jcb/tact.html
This applies for any
James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:19 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
snip
i have a little familiarity with open source, perhaps more than noted,
and i what i am seeing here is centos saying that since we're not paid,
we dont care. i think there are many projects that would not
Johnny Hughes wrote:
2. You can not be a ass on our IRC channels, or on our mailing lists.
I object to your language on the list!
You MUST use the word an as a preposition to a noun beginning with a vowel!
What is this world coming to!
-Ross
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
2. You can not be a ass on our IRC channels, or on our mailing lists.
I object to your language on the list!
You MUST use the word an as a preposition to a noun beginning with a vowel!
What is
I think we've fed the troll enough for this month.
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:01 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
snip
This is open source etiquette. It differs from business etiquette
where you are more than welcoem to berate and yell and holler about
things because you're paying someone a lot of money.
Respectfully, when I was doing this
28 matches
Mail list logo
