Christopher Chan wrote:
Okay, Les helped me with that one. RAID1 on the network. So you would have
to use GFS or something like that with it and have the service down on the
secondary unless it was sendmail you were running.
No and yes. You can just use ext3 on both nodes as you normally
DRBD works approximately like raid1 mirroring. Unless something breaks
it shouldn't add much latency since the duplicate disk will run at
approximately the same speed as the master.
RAID1 + network latency. Got it.
___
CentOS mailing list
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I am sorry but I do not share that view for incoming mail. The latency
in getting the mail replicated probably is longer than it takes to do
the actually delivery to the mail store.
I am not sure what you mean by the word 'replication' but in
John R Pierce wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
That default setting is no longer applicable today. Users will scream
if they find out that their mails have been sitting in the queue for a
day. For today's businesses, one day can make or break a deal and so
email, being a much faster form of
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Okay, Les helped me with that one. RAID1 on the network. So you would have
to use GFS or something like that with it and have the service down on the
secondary unless it was sendmail you were running.
No and yes. You can just use ext3 on both
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Okay, Les helped me with that one. RAID1 on the network. So you would
have to use GFS or something like that with it and have the service
down on the secondary unless it was sendmail you were running.
No and yes. You can
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
No and yes. You can just use ext3 on both nodes as you normally only
have the one on the primary node mounted - the other one is not accessed
by anything. And yes, with heartbeat you just failover to the second
node, if the first one is dead.
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
No and yes. You can just use ext3 on both nodes as you normally only
have the one on the primary node mounted - the other one is not accessed
by anything. And yes, with heartbeat you just failover to the second
node, if the
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 23:50 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
snip
Besides, as John already pointed out, emails in the spools can hang
around for days. I believe most MTA's only discard completely after
7days of non delivery.
That default setting is no longer
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
There are primary/primary setups possible with drbd and gfs if you need
both nodes to be exported at the same time - but that's not needed nor
recommended in a failover situation.
Why would it not be recommended for a failover situation?
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
There are primary/primary setups possible with drbd and gfs if you need
both nodes to be exported at the same time - but that's not needed nor
recommended in a failover situation.
Why would it not be
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Because it would be shooting cannons at birds in this particular case.
If you need to expose both nodes to the public all the time, you
probably also run the software on both nodes - which would be more of a
cluster than a failover setup :)
But,
Christopher Chan wrote:
Sorry, I did not read your mail through properly. Not mounted on the
secondary, okay. Anyway, quite a fair bit off complexity there in making
sure the network block device does not get mounted by both boxes at the
same time.
Is it really worth the complexity when
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
- What does our upstream think about this?
- What do the OpenSSH developers think about this?
Someone is going to need to ask those questions of the people...
I don't think the OpenSSH devels really do care about that - there is no
discussion whatsoever on the
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
- What does our upstream think about this?
- What do the OpenSSH developers think about this?
Someone is going to need to ask those questions of the people...
I don't think the OpenSSH devels really do care about that - there is no
discussion
Frank Cox wrote:
I have a number directories under /opt on computer jack. I want some
(not all) of them to appear in /opt on computer jill.
I have the /opt directory on jack mounted on jill under /mnt/jack
If I go into the /opt directory on jill and do this:
ln -s /mnt/jack/opt/files .
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Does anyone know the point of the patch in the first place? That is, why
would a distro-specific modification have been needed at all? I don't
suspect an intentional compromise here but I'm curious
Hello all, I've been googling and haven't found an answer. I have a
Centos 4.6 box that is having an issue since the last yum update. The
nss_ldap and kernel packages were the only packages installed/updated.
When I try to run yum I now receive:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum update
There was a
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
I have a number directories under /opt on computer jack. I want some
(not all) of them to appear in /opt on computer jill.
I have the /opt directory on jack mounted on jill under /mnt/jack
I'm not clear
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
I need to build a NFS CentOS 5.1 based server with LVM and snaphosts
for disaster recovering to serve storage to three ESX servers for a
development dept. I have 500 GB for storage. Data that I need to store
on this server is 150 GB and can grow to 210 GB to the
I am using kickstart to automate installs. working nicely.
I now have a box with 2 NIC cards and I am getting prompted for which
nick to use.
I have a line like:
network --device eth0 --bootproto dhcp --hostname tmp.msgnet.com
in my kickstart.
This line does not seem to be enough to say
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Jerry Geis wrote:
I am using kickstart to automate installs. working nicely.
I now have a box with 2 NIC cards and I am getting prompted for which nick to
use.
I have a line like:
network --device eth0 --bootproto dhcp --hostname tmp.msgnet.com
in my kickstart.
This
on 5-16-2008 8:14 AM Carol Anne Ogdin spake the following:
Dear Mr. Singh:
I understand you prefer this medium. I have practical experience with
alternatives that have offered measurable and definite benefits to the
communities they serve.
Your opinions are louder than your putative
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-16-2008 8:14 AM Carol Anne Ogdin spake the following:
..Unfortunately, in
51 years in the computer industry, I've sometimes had to cope with
behaviors
like yours. It still makes me sad to experience such unhappy people who
think that attack is the best way to
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 02:53:50PM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-16-2008 8:14 AM Carol Anne Ogdin spake the following:
Dear Mr. Singh:
I understand you prefer this medium. I have practical experience with
alternatives that have offered measurable and definite benefits to the
communities
on 5-16-2008 8:08 AM Carol Anne Ogdin spake the following:
Les Mikesell questioned, ...who would go there to post any answers? The
answer is the same people who share here...and probably many more who find
this sparse medium harder to navigate. There's a thriving community I
helped create and
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone around for 10 years much less 51 years would know that
Karanbir's style of communication should be considered blunt and not
offensive. It's a common style of communication for developers. I
never take it
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Tom Diehl wrote:
If you are sending secret or sensitive information via unencrypted
email you already have a bigger problem then weather or not google
is harvesting info. Email by design is insecure. Why anyone would
believe otherwise is unclear to me. If you are
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:00 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I read an interesting take on why once. Can't remember the link
though... nerds need to remember that normal folk appreciate niceities
in conversation, and normal folk need to remember that nerds are often
very blunt but aren't really
2008/5/18 Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I was a server running Fedora 6. I want to migrate it to Xen on a
Centos 5.1. Can I make something like
You might want to take a look at this code that Richard has been working on
recently :
on 5-16-2008 4:28 AM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Thursday 15 May 2008 11:22:51 pm Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-14-2008 6:11 PM Jim Perrin spake the following:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Fajar Priyanto
fajarpri-Hlp6NBfSoRe8rHFcjEY/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Googling my own name 'Fajar
So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
days? Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
there?
Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
days? Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
there?
Ray
Awffull - http://www.stedee.id.au/awffull
--
H | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
The principle of Wiki is participation of anyone who wishes to
contribute. That of course raises a question of how we can maintain
the contents correct or appropriate. I agree that having an editorial
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2007-October/000734.html
As you can see in that thread, placing a moderator's name on each page
was opposed by a few core members of the CentOS team. Then
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 08:42:16 -0700
From: gen2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] xen kernel showing only one processor on
SMP
To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS
centos-virt@centos.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
Cordial saludo.
Teniendo en cuenta los actuales o futuros estandares de 10Gb/s o mas
usando fibra optica, ¿que clase de fibra optica recomendarian usar en
cuanto a monomodo o multimodo? ¿Que experiencias han tenido al
respecto? ¿Que equipos -- switchs, tarjetas de red-- recomendarian?
¿Que
El selinux lo tengo desabilitado desde la instalación, sospechando que
fuera eso hice /usr/sbin/setenforce 0 y nada, por si puede ser una pista
adicional, he borrado el fichero y la carpeta /named creados por mi en
/var/log/ y da el mismo error, ni siquiera file not found. El error es:
Hola amigos necesito de su ayuda.
he creado un script en iptables, el cual funciona a la perfeccion, el problema q tengo es que no logro acceder al msn, puedo habilitar el puerto 1863, pero no deseo que toda la lan tenga acceso, pues deseo controlarlo por squid, verificando dentro de mi reglas
--- On Mon, 5/19/08, Maximo Monsalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Maximo Monsalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Permiso denegado en logs de bind
To: centos-es@centos.org
Received: Monday, May 19, 2008, 9:44 AM
Abelardo Ramírez Ferrer wrote:
El selinux lo tengo
Muchas gracias.
hice algunas pruebas y se trataba de un virus que estaba en un servidor de
windows que estaba cachando las direcciones ip en un archivo de texto y no
las dejaba entregar a los usuarios. Lo raro de esto era que a veces si las
asignaba pero de repente perdia conexion con el servidor
El bind no lo tengo chroot. Al final como estoy casi seguro de que es un
pro de permisos y como tal vez como principiante cambie los permisos de
/var/log en alguno de los chmod que di ( lo tengo 0770 root:root no se
si es así como va por defecto), puse el dns_logs en var/tmp/named y sin
pro,
--- On Mon, 5/19/08, Abelardo Ramírez Ferrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Abelardo Ramírez Ferrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Permiso denegado en logs de bind
To: centos-es@centos.org
Received: Monday, May 19, 2008, 2:31 PM
El bind no lo tengo chroot. Al final como estoy
Estimados Amigos,
Se me presento el siguiente problema, cuando trato de enviar correos a
traves de mi servidor de correo me rebotan con el siguiente mensaje:
The original message was received at Mon, 19 May 2008 13:34:35 -0500
from cl02.metamorf.net [127.0.0.1]
- The following
El Monday 19 May 2008 02:58:00 pm Luis Solís escribió:
Estimados Amigos,
Se me presento el siguiente problema, cuando trato de enviar correos a
traves de mi servidor de correo me rebotan con el siguiente mensaje:
The original message was received at Mon, 19 May 2008 13:34:35 -0500
2008/5/19 César Sepúlveda B [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
El Monday 19 May 2008 02:58:00 pm Luis Solís escribió:
Estimados Amigos,
Se me presento el siguiente problema, cuando trato de enviar correos a
traves de mi servidor de correo me rebotan con el siguiente mensaje:
The original message
Roger Peña escribió:
--- On Mon, 5/19/08, Abelardo Ramírez Ferrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Abelardo Ramírez Ferrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Permiso denegado en logs de bind
To: centos-es@centos.org
Received: Monday, May 19, 2008, 2:31 PM
El bind no lo tengo chroot.
El Monday 19 May 2008 03:24:40 pm Luis Solís escribió:
2008/5/19 César Sepúlveda B [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
El Monday 19 May 2008 02:58:00 pm Luis Solís escribió:
Estimados Amigos,
Se me presento el siguiente problema, cuando trato de enviar correos a
traves de mi servidor de correo me
Estimada lista
Tengo un servidor con CentOS 4.6 donde he instalado squid y dansguardian, la
navegación se pone extremadamente lenta cuando ejecuto el filtro de contenido
que esta en la misma maquina, cuando esta solo ejecutándose squid la navegación
es muy rápida, probé incluso solo usando
49 matches
Mail list logo
