Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for Centos/RHEL and Fedora,
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 00:52 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the
Can someone direct me to some simple instructions or a repo that I can enable
to get snort installed on my CentOS 5.1 boxes?
--Thanks,
Jake
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:40:08 -0400
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RPMFusion has their own mailing lists; consider asking there.
I did exactly that, before posting my question here. Didn't see anything that
looked like a recent overall progress update. The last post to the
Dear All,
I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine
now i have a query with apache
1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of
centos 5
cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl
also
httpd -l | egrep mod_perl
prints nothing
if mod
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine
now i have a query with apache
1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of
centos 5
cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl
also
httpd -l | egrep mod_perl
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 12:16, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
Every day I see in logwatch that my signatures are updated, and the
database notified, but if I try to scan a file manually it tells me that
my signatures are 55 days old.
I think clamscan looks for the db files
Am Dienstag, den 17.06.2008, 16:28 -0600 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Benjamin Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Mike wrote:
Just read on planet centos that you can easily install apt on Centos too
using yum.
Why would you want to
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 15:43, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
At 14:48 +0200 17/6/08, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
It doesn't here:
Is your copy installed from rpm/yum or compiled from source? Mine's the
latter.
rpmforge.
I should have said - mine is rpmforge, too.
Anne
Anne Wilson wrote:
freshclam.conf was root:root, so I've fixed that. Running your strace
command
gives me
strace -eopen clamscan
open(/etc/freshclam.conf, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/var/clamav/daily.cld, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/var/clamav, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 12:36:20 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
freshclam.conf was root:root, so I've fixed that. Running your strace
command gives me
strace -eopen clamscan
open(/etc/freshclam.conf, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/var/clamav/daily.cld, O_RDONLY) = 3
I will be out of the office starting 06/18/2008 and will not return until
06/19/2008.
Probably I will be back to the office by this afternoon, but I'm not sure.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mike wrote:
Just read on planet centos that you can easily install apt on Centos too using
yum.
However, I get :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apt
Loading installonlyn plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing
fabian dacunha wrote:
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine
now i have a query with apache
1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of
centos 5
cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl
also
httpd
Barry Brimer wrote:
I'd like to consolidate some services that have been assigned by IP
(dns, syslog etc.) onto one machine by giving it IP aliases to accept
connections for the old addresses until all the references are fixed.
However, I'd like to have it use it's original IP as the source
Any news on this? Will we see a POWER version of CentOS 5?
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is evil.
The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
I'd like to consolidate some services that have been assigned by IP (dns,
syslog etc.) onto one machine by giving it IP aliases to accept
connections for the old addresses until all the references are fixed.
However, I'd like to
Luke S Crawford wrote:
Well I have up to 4GB of run windows and I can have the other 4GB for
dom0, so if I can get OpenVZ or linux vserver running on there, I can
use that to run my linux VM's.
But xenexpress limits you to 4Gb of physical ram total
see
Don't take this as a definitive answer, but I have multi-aliased CentOS
boxen.
I find that outgoing connections always come from the main IP address,
not the aliases. In particular these boxen are web servers hosting
multiple sites, hence the multi-IP and connections to the database all
Meenoo Shivdasani wrote:
There is a bug with nss_ldap and bash32 ... I created a new RPM for the
nss_ldap that is currently in our testing repo.
Johnny,
I was wondering if that RPM includes the security fixes detailed in
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0389.html
Yes, it contains all
Nasreddine Kroun wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 06/18/2008 and will not return until
06/19/2008.
Probably I will be back to the office by this afternoon, but I'm not sure.
Stop sending these notices to the list. We dont really care
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Any news on this? Will we see a POWER version of CentOS 5?
we're getting the 32 and x86_64 versions of centos-5.2 done now, as soon
as they are released we will goto work on the powerpc and ia64 varients
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL
Frank Cox wrote:
Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:35:13 +0900
Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for the rpm for gparted.
It's in the rpmforge repository
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge
I have found something quite old:
Strange, when I run
sudo yum whatprovides pam_krb5.so
I get
pam_krb5.i3862.2.14-1
centos5-base-rep
Matched from:
/lib/security/pam_krb5.so
pam_krb5.so
If the yum command is failing to report this package, then check your
yum.repos.d files and make sure they aren't
Nicholas wrote:
Herrold,
I meant RH, in terms of the RHEL distro. I look forward to have centos
gain the LSB, what is needed for the pass thru? is the main CentOS
community interested?
As for the rest, thank you for the sharing of info.
The LSB should be concern to encourage developers to
Frank Cox wrote:
Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to
be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but
it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo
over (FC6 - EL5).
Ross, you are wrong on that front
On 6/16/08, Daniel Chen (yongnche) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw there's one Commercial Support in Support menu on CentOS main
page, but it's blank. Actually I'm looking for the commercial support
for CentOS, is there anyone or organization which is doing this?
Thank you very much.
Daniel: I
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Not to start a repo flame war,
nice try.
-- Rex
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive.
It installed and booted after install.
I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should,
on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up
and all
and the last error I get is:
label / not found.
What went wrong?
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive.
It installed and booted after install.
I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should,
on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up
and all
and the last error I get is:
label / not found.
Rex Dieter wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Not to start a repo flame war,
nice try.
Nice catch =:D
scnr,
Ralph
pgp9vAWrQalU9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to
be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but
it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo
over (FC6 - EL5).
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Not to start a repo flame war,
nice try.
Nice catch =:D
I had to preface it with that, so I wouldn't seem like a total troll!
Now if you excuse me, since my work is done here, I have a bridge to crawl
under...
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of
course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable
items like closed source drivers and codecs which should be isolated.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
Apt may easy to install and user friendly ... heck, it may even be better
than yum, however it is not officially supported. The officially supported
way to do updates on CentOS is yum ... and yumex is in the CentOS
We have a cron job that needs to run every 15 minutes throughout
business hours. The first run is at 8:00, the last run is at 17:00. Is
it possible to specify this time range in a single line?
*/15 8-17 * * 1-5 will run 8:00 - 17:45. That's not what I want.
Likewise
*/15 8-16 * * 1-5 will
Jerry Geis wrote:
I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive.
It installed and booted after install.
I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should,
on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up
and all
and the last error I get is:
label / not found.
What went
How does one specify a particular version of a software package to yum to
install? Is this even possible? What happens to superceded pacjkages in
repos? Are they simple removed/discarded?
yum install package-X.Y.Z-A.el5 ???
The reason I ask is if a yum update goes awry for some reason then how
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than
actually work out what the problem is trick :/
Oh, cool (for me), someone took over for me
mhr
BFG
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive.
It installed and booted after install.
I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should,
on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up
and all
and the last error I get is:
label /
James B. Byrne wrote:
How does one specify a particular version of a software package to yum to
install? Is this even possible? What happens to superceded pacjkages in
repos? Are they simple removed/discarded?
yum install package-X.Y.Z-A.el5 ???
The yum version in 5.2 will have a
Environment:
- CentOS 5.1,
- Apache 2.2.3
- php 5.1.6
- phpMyAdmin 2.11.6
- MySQL 5.0.22
Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products.
All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an
error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/
on
Jerry Geis wrote:
/ I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive.
// It installed and booted after install.
//
// I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should,
// on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up
// and all
// and the last error I get is:
//
// label
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of
course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable
items like closed source drivers and codecs
John R Pierce wrote:
To start, you could either label a filesystem as '/' or, you can just
change that root= line to point at a real filesystem.
what WOULD be the 'real device' in the case of a USB thumbdrive?
since its the boot device, would it necessarily be enumerated first,
hence
Jerry Geis wrote:
Running e2label /dev/sda1 reports that in fact the partition is /
My kernel boot line is infact root=LABEL=/
My issue here is that I did the initial install. This install boots with
the LABEL=/ just fine.
After the custom kernel build it does not boot. I'm trying to find out
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should /
could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast
majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works,
it wont.
This is a CentOS users list. It is for users
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 7:32pm, Herta Van den Eynde wrote
Environment:
- CentOS 5.1,
- Apache 2.2.3
- php 5.1.6
- phpMyAdmin 2.11.6
- MySQL 5.0.22
Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products.
All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an
error:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs.
Assuming that all software ever needed by anybody exists in Fedora
On 6/18/08, Nasreddine Kroun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 06/18/2008 and will not return until
06/19/2008.
Probably I will be back to the office by this afternoon, but I'm not sure.
I suggest that you get another email account, for this and any other
mailing
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:43:53PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have not changed the line to try root=/dev/sda1 as I was trying to
make it work the same way.
That might be worth trying, its a simple hack and it will tell you if
your kernel even boots or not.
Also,
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should /
could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast
majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works,
it wont.
This is a
Thanks for the suggestions, Joshua.
I'm using the standard apache config, which rules out suggestion 1.
SELinux is enabled, but I'm new to it. How could that cause this effect?
Kind regards,
Herta
2008/6/18 Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 7:32pm, Herta Van den
Bent Terp wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs.
Assuming that all software ever needed by anybody exists in
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
What went wrong?
Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than
actually work out what the problem is trick :/
Jerry,
You have been posting a lot of questions and getting a
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists at karan.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos wrote:
/ Jerry Geis wrote:
//
// What went wrong?
//
// Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than
// actually work out what the problem is
Hi ya'll,
I built a new CentOS 5.1 server for a client, housing a Lotus Notes / Domino
server, and various other virtualized IBM software server guests, and soon
will have to physically move that server to another distant location.
My question is that I will need secure access to those servers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Leafey
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:35 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [SPAM]Re: [CentOS] using windows ad accounts for centos 5
Isaac Gonzalez wrote:
Hi I read and used the article
--- On Wed, 6/18/08, Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/
on this server.
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 10:32 AM
Environment:
-
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry,
You have been posting a lot of questions and getting a lot of help as
well. Maybe it's time for you to give something back to the
community? For example, it would be nice if you could respond to the
question
on 6-18-2008 5:52 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following:
Mike wrote:
Just read on planet centos that you can easily install apt on Centos
too using yum.
However, I get :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apt
Loading installonlyn plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading
on 6-18-2008 6:34 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following:
Meenoo Shivdasani wrote:
There is a bug with nss_ldap and bash32 ... I created a new RPM for the
nss_ldap that is currently in our testing repo.
Johnny,
I was wondering if that RPM includes the security fixes detailed in
Gary wrote:
Hi ya'll,
I built a new CentOS 5.1 server for a client, housing a Lotus Notes / Domino
server, and various other virtualized IBM software server guests, and soon
will have to physically move that server to another distant location.
My question is that I will need secure access to
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:38:49 +0100
Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rpmfusion never intended to support CentOS or any EL distro, they are
very much Fedora centric, so you should go talk to them about it
The very first line on the web page at http://rpmfusion.org says RPM Fusion is
a
on 6-18-2008 10:32 AM Herta Van den Eynde spake the following:
Environment:
- CentOS 5.1,
- Apache 2.2.3
- php 5.1.6
- phpMyAdmin 2.11.6
- MySQL 5.0.22
Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products.
All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an
error:
Hi,
Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki
page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin.
I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter
any problems. I used priority=1 and protect=1 on base
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:41:00 -0500
Monty Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also believe you can port (tunnel?) VNC through ssh, but I have only
heard about that, so I may be off here.
You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and any number of web pages
contain step-by-step
ceejay cervantes wrote:
Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time?
No it isn't.
Use priorities (newer) as it allows more flexible control
over protectbase (older).
Other then that your configs look fine.
-Ross
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
what does your /etc/httpd/conf.d/phpmyadmin.conf
look like? By default, it has a Allow 127.0.0.1 in it.
Scott Silva wrote:
| on 6-18-2008 10:32 AM Herta Van den Eynde spake the following:
| Environment:
| - CentOS 5.1,
| - Apache 2.2.3
| - php
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:24:40 +0100
Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And do any of those repo's listed there produce rpms for EL ?
Even if they don't do it today, perhaps they are planning to start with the
launch of rpmfusion. Or not. I'm just going on what the rpmfusion web page
says,
Frank Cox wrote:
Is there anything new to report?
(This question still hasn't been answered.)
if you go ask on the Fedora lists and their own lists at rpmfusion, I am
sure they will tell you :D Ignacio already did hint at what the
situation was though.
--
Karanbir Singh :
on 6-18-2008 12:13 PM Frank Cox spake the following:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:41:00 -0500
Monty Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also believe you can port (tunnel?) VNC through ssh, but I have only
heard about that, so I may be off here.
You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and
Hi Frank,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:13:12 -0600 UTC (6/18/2008, 2:13 PM -0500 UTC my time),
Frank Cox wrote:
I also believe you can port (tunnel?) VNC through ssh, but I have only
heard about that, so I may be off here.
F You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and any number of
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:02:53 -0500
Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see I can run this as a service also, but I can't seem to find the VNC
client (for Windows) in any directory. Would I get this off of the realvnc
site, or is it included in the CentOS 5.1 distro?
Why would you expect to find a
I thought I would turn here before giving up. I am trying to install Twiki
4.2 on CentOS 5 with all updates. (I also tried Twiki 4.1.2 as well)
I am running a custom rolled Apache 2.2.8 server and custom rolled PHP 5.2.6
(built with oracle support). These work and are rock solid. I've been using
Gary wrote:
My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not
just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS
program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high port, but
I am sure just about any program will allow this to be manually
Hi Scott,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:58:09 -0700 UTC (6/18/2008, 2:58 PM -0500 UTC my time),
Scott Silva wrote:
You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and any number of web pages
contain step-by-step instructions for how to make it work.
S And with putty and XMing you can even do it
2008/6/18 Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
on 6-18-2008 10:32 AM Herta Van den Eynde spake the following:
Environment:
- CentOS 5.1,
- Apache 2.2.3
- php 5.1.6
- phpMyAdmin 2.11.6
- MySQL 5.0.22
Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products.
All looks well, but when I
2008/6/18 Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
on 6-18-2008 12:22 PM Milton Calnek spake the following:
what does your /etc/httpd/conf.d/phpmyadmin.conf
look like? By default, it has a Allow 127.0.0.1 in it.
I'm not using it, I just see the attempts. There must be some vulnerability,
at least in
Are you positive that you have all of the required Perl modules (and the
correct versions)?
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/TWiki04x02/TWikiSystemRequirements#Require
d_CPAN_Modules
Twiki is Perl based, so the PHP on your system should be benign
Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/6/18 Mark Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- On Wed, 6/18/08, Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access
/phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, June
Yes.. All perl modules, including the optional ones are installed (including
clean 'make test''s) Yea not sure why I mention the custom PHP version..
Meant to mention the perl version which is 5.8.8.
-C
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Mike Hanby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you positive
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use priorities (newer) as it allows more flexible control
over protectbase (older).
Should we then uninstall the protectbase plugin once we are using the
priorities plugin?
Probably a dumb question, but I think we
MHR wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use priorities (newer) as it allows more flexible control
over protectbase (older).
Should we then uninstall the protectbase plugin once we are using the
priorities plugin?
Probably a dumb
Chuck wrote:
I thought I would turn here before giving up. I am trying to install
Twiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 with all updates. (I also tried Twiki 4.1.2 as well)
I am running a custom rolled Apache 2.2.8 server and custom rolled PHP
5.2.6 (built with oracle support). These work and are rock
Hmmm. That might be correct. I've drilled down into the configure script and
it pukes here:
print STDERR MARK 10.1\n;
$query = new CGI; # It dies on this line
print STDERR MARK 10.2\n;
It never gets to MARK 10.2.
I am using the CPAN version of CGI:
cpan[1] install CGI
CPAN: Storable loaded ok
Maybe this has already been suggested, but is the output identical for
the old and new directories using the following command:
ls -ldZ /var/www/html/{phpMyAdmin,pma}
The Z will show the SELinux security attributes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Please stop top posting - your messages are becoming incomprehensible.
Thanks.
mhr
Sorry that's the default behavior of my email client. I managed to
figure out my issue.
Thanks,
Isaac
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Chuck wrote:
Hmmm. That might be correct. I've drilled down into the configure script
and it pukes here:
print STDERR MARK 10.1\n;
$query = new CGI; # It dies on this line
print STDERR MARK 10.2\n;
It never gets to MARK 10.2.
I am using the CPAN version of CGI:
cpan[1] install CGI
CPAN:
2008/6/18 Mike Hanby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe this has already been suggested, but is the output identical for
the old and new directories using the following command:
ls -ldZ /var/www/html/{phpMyAdmin,pma}
The Z will show the SELinux security attributes.
You found it, Mike!
Joshua
Hello fellow listers! I've got some errors starting to crop up on one of my
CentOS5 boxes. Below is a transcript:
viS 048C664F 2600 4176 2837 (NOTLB)
f1c87b68 0082 c30229e0 048c664f 0e65 f1c87b18 0007 f7bacaa0
f7d97aa0 048c72fc
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a cron job that needs to run every 15 minutes throughout
business hours. The first run is at 8:00, the last run is at 17:00. Is
it possible to specify this time range in a single line?
*/15 8-17 * * 1-5 will run 8:00 -
Hello,
I have an IBM Netvista and since kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2, I have not been able
to upgrade to the latest kernel. If I do, in about 8 hours, the system
becomes sluggish almost unresponsive. Currently I am running 4.6 but with
the kernel mentioned above.
I think I may have figured out the
Thomas Dukes wrote:
So my question is how can I force it to use the driver from kernel
2.6.9-34.0.2? Is it something I need to add to grub.conf?? If so, what?
You could disable kudzu if the driver config you have is what
you want. I always disable kudzu on my systems after they are
installed
Tim Nelson wrote:
There are others with various app names besides vi including httpd, named,
sftp-server, etc.. Is this an imminent hardware failure? Do I have kernel
issues? I've checked the system with lm_sensors and temps are perfectly
normal. Also, performance and operation seems to be
Unfortunately I can't see the top of the errors as there are too many... :-(
I'll throw a console on it and start logging. Is anyone else seeing this sort
of activity? I'm running the latest stock kernel available using yum from the
repos. I'm not using any additional repos(rpmforge, epel,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of nate
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 7:17 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel/harware question
Thomas Dukes wrote:
So my question is how can I force it to use the driver from kernel
dmesg dmesg.log
or
cd /var/log/
ls -lat | more
i liked the old days when dmesg, /var/log/messages and other syslog stuff
was displayed automatically on a tty console. I tried a softlink from
/var/log/messages to tty9, but didn't have any luck. Would it require a tee
or a mod to dmesg?
On
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
