Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
Larry Vaden ha scritto: AFAIK, that's the status of the clones at this time. Still unexplained is why 'host www.yahoo.com 208.67.220.220' and 'host www.yahoo.com 8.8.8.8' got completely different answers. For what I know OpenDNS (208.67.222.222, 208.67.220.220) does some more caching and

Re: [CentOS] limiting yum url question

2011-02-02 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Xinhuan Zheng wrote on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:33:17 -0500: That's what I thought. Is there a good resource that I can take a look for how to setting up a local repository server? The wiki on centos.org explains that if you want to setup your own repository with your own packages. If you just want

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Kai Schaetzl
looking for smarter questions on this list. This list is not a where is list. Thanks. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 07:08 AM, Hal Davison wrote: Looking for glibc++6.2 and higher. Are you sure you have your version numbers right ? glibc lives in the 2.x version-space these days ( and has for many years now ) - KB ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] ~/.forward file?

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Spook ZA spoo...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 February 2011 05:41, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Any idea what it might be for? Procmail... If a mail message gets sent to the user with a .forward file, the message will be forwarded to all

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Hal Davison h...@faams.net wrote: Greetings ALL... V 5.5 Gnome. Desktop Looking for glibc++6.2 and higher. When looking for RPM's from CentOS and similar distributions, or for RPM's that can be ported to CentOS and RHEL, http://rpm.pbone.net/ is your dear,

[CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
The speedups in building RPM's with mock from the EPEL packages for RHEL 6 are *profound*, especially if your environment is like mine and you have thousands of user id's. The issue seems to be the handling of /var/log/lastlog and similar files, which are otherwise quite large and take significant

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 01:52:37 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Hal Davison h...@faams.net wrote: Greetings ALL... V 5.5 Gnome. Desktop Looking for glibc++6.2 and higher. The signal to noise ratio of this list is getting quite horrible. From

Re: [CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 01:01 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Karabhir, what are the odds of encouragng a switch to http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora-epel/6/mock-1.1.8-1.el6.src.rpm, and backporting it to centos/5/5/extras ? It's working very well for me, and I think it would be a helpful improvement in RPM

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Drew
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Drew Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood. --Marie Curie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Drew
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Drew Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood. --Marie Curie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Lorenzo Quatrini lorenzo.quatr...@gmail.com wrote: Larry Vaden ha scritto: AFAIK, that's the status of the clones at this time.  Still unexplained is why 'host www.yahoo.com 208.67.220.220' and 'host www.yahoo.com 8.8.8.8' got completely different answers.

[CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread James Bensley
So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to correct this so I'm wondering, if I had mounted that vdi as a secondary device on another

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread Giles Coochey
On 02/02/2011 15:44, James Bensley wrote: So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to correct this so I'm wondering, if I had

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:44:01 + CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote: So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to correct this

Re: [CentOS] Setting up persistent LUNs

2011-02-02 Thread Dvorkin, Asya
Thank you, Alexander! I am not sure why it said /b/sde1 because I copy/pasted it... Thank you again, Asya On Feb 1, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 01.02.2011 18:38, schrieb Dvorkin, Asya: Hello everyone, I am trying to setup persistent LUNs and having problems. I've

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Cia Watson
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:24:34 +0100 valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, who do I need to contact to become CentOS tester? When is first alpha due for release and testing? From what I've been able to gather from the list, as I'm not part of the dev testing team;

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Hal Davison
On 2/2/2011 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: looking for smarter questions on this list. This list is not a where is list. Thanks. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Could you direct a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:00 PM, Cia Watson wrote: From what I've been able to gather from the list, as I'm not part of the dev testing team; there won't be an 'alpha' or 'beta', there will just be a final release 'when it's ready'. We aren't sure when that will be, but it will probably be within a few

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5 (was: Static assignment of, SCSI device names?)

2011-02-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 02:06:15 am Chuck Munro wrote: The real key is to carefully label each SATA cable and its associated drive. Then the little mapping script can be used to identify the faulty drive which mdadm reports by its device name. It just occurred to me that whenever

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Matt
From what I've been able to gather from the list, as I'm not part of the dev testing team; there won't be an 'alpha' or 'beta', there will just be a final release 'when it's ready'. We aren't sure when that will be, but it will probably be within a few weeks after CentOS 5.6 is Thats spot

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Matt wrote: I am excited about CentOS 6.x though. Aren't there supposed to be some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. Why not start a new thread with 'CentOS-6 interesting

[CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread John Doe
Hi, I just installed a new server and my final yum update fails... I have rpmforge and rpmforge-extras, but with yum priorities... # grep enabled /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf enabled = 1 # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo | grep priority\|^\[ [base] priority=1 [updates] priority=1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Matt
I am excited about CentOS 6.x though.  Aren't there supposed to be some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. Why not start a new thread with 'CentOS-6 interesting upcoming features' :) Your right.

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread m . roth
Kwan Lowe wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote: So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:33 PM, Matt wrote: I am excited about CentOS 6.x though. Aren't there supposed to be some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? There is a distinct shift towards KVM as the virt-platform of choice, but I still feel the management tools around it are

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote: I am excited about CentOS 6.x though.  Aren't there supposed to be some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. Why not start a new thread

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Tom Bishop
Spot on KB, I like KVM but the management tools are just not quite there, unless your a big installation and can run RHEV on a windoze server. I know they are moving towards an open source RHEV implementation but it appears that it will take awhile to get there. I still plan to use KVM but will

[CentOS] Was, Re: CentOS 6.0 alpha testers, is features (actually syslogd)

2011-02-02 Thread m . roth
Karanbir Singh wrote: On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Matt wrote: I am excited about CentOS 6.x though. Aren't there supposed to be some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. Why not start a new thread

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote: Spot on KB, I like KVM but the management tools are just not quite there, unless your a big installation and can run RHEV on a windoze server.  I know they are moving towards an open source RHEV implementation but it appears

Re: [CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
John Doe wrote: Hi, I just installed a new server and my final yum update fails... I have rpmforge and rpmforge-extras, but with yum priorities... # grep enabled /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf enabled = 1 # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo | grep priority\|^\[ [base]

Re: [CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:29 PM, John Doe wrote: # yum list | grep tcp_wrappers\|nfs-utils nfs-utils.x86_64 1:1.0.9-47.el5_5 installed nfs-utils-lib.x86_64 1.0.8-7.6.el5 installed tcp_wrappers.i386 7.6-40.7.el5 installed tcp_wrappers.x86_64

[CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
Hello CentOS Community Members, What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago on the isc.org mailing list. Is there any support among the CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 05:22 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? Did you ask them ? what did they say ? Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current vintage for such

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread David Brian Chait
It takes fewer resources to back-port for and support a single suite of software over the lifespan of a major revision than would be needed to fix issues introduced by the major evolution of a large number of packages over the course of a 5-7 year product cycle. -Original Message-

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Gordon Messmer
If you have an RPM package with unmet dependencies, the way to install it is: yum localinstall packagename Yum will resolve the dependencies using the available repositories. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/02/2011 09:22 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? Directives in the configuration files have changed. Users of RHEL expect to be able to update their systems without anything

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should be in 5.6 soon ? Karanbir, WIth a lot of due respect, no, not exactly, since 9.7.0-P2 (if I'm reading it correctly) was released almost a year

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Alan Hodgson
On February 2, 2011 10:02:03 am Larry Vaden wrote: Is there that much distrust of the current output of leading authors that we need to wait a long while? You don't need to wait at all. Build your own packages or install from source. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 06:02 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: I was thinking more along the lines of /isc/bind9/9.7.2-P3/, released 2 months ago. If you feel that its the version you need or want, CentOS wont mind if you were to build it and run it yourself. Is there that much distrust of the current output

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 06:10 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: If you feel that its the version you need or want, CentOS wont mind if you were to build it and run it yourself. btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus repo would be a great place to host such a package :) One of the best

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: [1]: I say that with a pinch of salt though - EL6 is a tad overdue. A lot of new projects and services need a codebase newer than whats on offer in C5. I agree with you 100%+.

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: On 02/02/2011 06:10 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: If you feel that its the version you need or want, CentOS wont mind if you were to build it and run it yourself. btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should be in 5.6 soon ? Karanbir, WIth a lot of due respect, no, not exactly,

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:22:12 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hello CentOS Community Members, What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported

Re: [CentOS] Squid and SELinux

2011-02-02 Thread Marcos Lois Bermúdez
Thks, It's clear now for me, i have a lot of figths with SELinux, but i need to learn more, so i don't want deactivate it, allow squit to search home_root_t seems to be good, so i try to make the correct thinks and prepare a partition outside the home dir for squid. A lot of thks for your

Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 09:31:43 am Larry Vaden wrote: * The host/dig/nslookup utilities queried only servers from resolv.conf. With this update, the utilities query the servers specified on command line instead of in resolv.conf and the issue is resolved. ( BZ#561299) The official

Re: [CentOS] what pkg contains libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3

2011-02-02 Thread Don Krause
It's a symlink to /usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so, from compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-138 -- Don Krause Head Systems Geek, Waver of Deceased Chickens. Optivus Proton Therapy, Inc. P.O. Box 608 Loma Linda, California 92354

[CentOS] Centos + python + sqlalchemy + mysql

2011-02-02 Thread przemolicc
I am trying to use the following set (all from standard repositories): centos (5.5) + python 2.6 + sqlalchemy + mysql. However while running my script I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File ./oraping2.py, line 43, in module main() File ./oraping2.py, line 23, in main db =

Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 09:31:43 am Larry Vaden wrote: * The host/dig/nslookup utilities queried only servers from resolv.conf. With this update, the utilities query the servers specified on command line instead of in

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus repo would be a great place to host such a package :) One of the best advantages of CentOS is that we're not tied down to the EL codebase in any repo outside the

[CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread mcclnx mcc
We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory Utilization is 92.02%, crossed warning (80) or critical (90)

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Sean Hart
On 2/2/11 1:58 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory Utilization is 92.02%,

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Scott Silva
on 2/2/2011 1:58 PM mcclnx mcc spake the following: We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Stephen Harris
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:58:19AM +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote: We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory

[CentOS] [OT] Best way to get dhcpd messages piped to a web service.

2011-02-02 Thread Jason Pyeron
Starting off, it is important not to loose any dhcp messages, especially during log rotation. My first thought on this would be to add a fifo to syslog.conf and slup from it, like: # perl -ne 'm/.../ WWW::Curl ...' /var/log/messages.fifo Does anyone see a more proper way? tail -F / -f

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Dr. Ed Morbius
on 05:58 Thu 03 Feb, mcclnx mcc (mcc...@yahoo.com.tw) wrote: We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5 (was: Static assignment of SCSI device names?)

2011-02-02 Thread Chuck Munro
On 02/02/2011 09:00 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 02:06:15 am Chuck Munro wrote: The real key is to carefully label each SATA cable and its associated drive. Then the little mapping script can be used to identify the faulty drive which mdadm reports by its

Re: [CentOS] Centos + python + sqlalchemy + mysql

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 08:32 PM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: I am trying to use the following set (all from standard repositories): centos (5.5) + python 2.6 + sqlalchemy + mysql. However while running my script I get: I would recommend you use the python 2.6 from EPEL, and the setuptools / pip from

[CentOS] kernel errors

2011-02-02 Thread Michel Donais
For monday this week I began to receive these advice by email from the server; Wht's the meaning? Disk read problem or else? - Kernel Begin WARNING: Kernel Errors Present I/O error: dev 08:02, sect...: 4Time(s) Additional sense

Re: [CentOS] kernel errors

2011-02-02 Thread John R Pierce
On 02/02/11 4:42 PM, Michel Donais wrote: For monday this week I began to receive these advice by email from the server; Wht's the meaning? Disk read problem or else? yes, disk IO errors of the bad sector type, on device 08:02, whatever that is in your system. appears to be on different

Re: [CentOS] kernel errors

2011-02-02 Thread Michel Donais
Thank's for the answer, That's what I was expecting.for the worst. I will replace it tomorrow morning. --- Michel Donais - Original Message - From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 7:53 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] kernel errors

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5

2011-02-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On 2/2/11 5:57 PM, Chuck Munro wrote: The use of the new RHEL-6/CentOS-6 'udevadm' command nicely maps out the hardware path no matter the order the drives are detected/named, and since hardware paths are fixed, I just have to attach a little tag to each SATA cable with that path number on

Re: [CentOS] ~/.forward file?

2011-02-02 Thread Spiro Harvey
I'm just poking thru our previous sysadmin's user adding script and saw reference to a ~/.forward file containing the users email address. Any idea what it might be for? It's a tricky one to Google ;-) The ancient art of Google-fu takes many years to perfect. But sometimes the most mundane

Re: [CentOS] Centos + python + sqlalchemy + mysql

2011-02-02 Thread Michael Semcheski
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:32 PM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: I am trying to use the following set (all from standard repositories): centos (5.5) + python 2.6 + sqlalchemy + mysql. However while running my script I get: I can't comment on the error you're getting specifically, but you might

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Best way to get dhcpd messages piped to a web service.

2011-02-02 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 03/02/11 12:45, Jason Pyeron wrote: [snip] Does anyone see a more proper way? That depends. What are you really wanting to achieve? Might your problem be better solved by looking at the dhcp leases file instead, or are you really just interested in the logs? search.cpan.org reveals

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 03/02/11 10:58, mcclnx mcc wrote: We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory Utilization is 92.02%,

Re: [CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: On 02/02/2011 04:29 PM, John Doe wrote: # yum list | grep tcp_wrappers\|nfs-utils nfs-utils.x86_64               1:1.0.9-47.el5_5       installed nfs-utils-lib.x86_64           1.0.8-7.6.el5          installed

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5

2011-02-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 08:04:43 pm Les Mikesell wrote: I think there are ways that drives can fail that would make them not be detected at all - and for an autodetected raid member in a system that has been rebooted, not leave much evidence of where it was when it worked. If

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:58 PM, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it.  This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say:

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread John R Pierce
On 02/02/11 1:58 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: Since server have 128 GB RAM and only 1 application. I really don't belive that. Does there has some way can check memory utilitation ? while your app is running, $ top as everyone has said, remember to add the 'cached' and 'buffered' to the

Re: [CentOS-docs] The AIDE section of the Hardening CentOS wiki page

2011-02-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: The broken link is to a section of the blog of Jim Evolution Perrin. Are you still around Jim? If so, will you please fix it.  :-) Yep, that'd be my fault.

Re: [CentOS-virt] OT: Recommendations for a virtual storage server

2011-02-02 Thread Kelly Alger
I may be wrong on this compdoc, but I'm pretty sure it's a pretty bad idea to have the host (Dom0 for me, in Xen) doing anything other than hosting the system for the DomUs. As far as the 'best' setup for your NAS server, it really depends on how much you know about Linux. Openfiler is really

[CentOS-virt] Trouble with virtio storage

2011-02-02 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
I am trying to get a custom Centos 5 image going under Openstack Nova (a cloud framework). Trouble I have is that for whatever reason virtio storage doesn't work for me. For example if the VM is started using these options os typehvm/type

Re: [CentOS-virt] Trouble with virtio storage

2011-02-02 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
Answering my own question :-). I had to recreate the initrd with virtio stuff included ie. mkinitrd --with virtio_pci --with virtio_blk --with virtio_net --with virtio_balloon --with virtio -f /boot/initrd-$(uname -r) $(uname -r) Somehow I thought it was already included :-/. Vladimir

Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas MySql Socket UNIX - TCP

2011-02-02 Thread Cartman
Desde la consola: /* INGRESAR A LA CONSOLA MYSLQ */ mysql -u USUARIO -h HOST -p /* PREGUNTA EL PASSWORD DEL USUARIO */ /* ESTANDO EN LA CONSOLA MYSQL*/ grant all privileges on DATABASE.* to 'USUARIO'@'CLIENTE' identified by 'CLAVE' with grant option; /* Donde: DATABASE= nombre de base de

[CentOS-es] ayuda DHCP y DNS

2011-02-02 Thread Julio Cesar
hola lista necesito montar dos servicios claves en mi red un servidor DNS en centos y otro DHCP, y que el DHCP actualize los registro DNS porfavor si alguien lo ah logrado prodria pasarme algun manualito o sitio donde este echo saludos -- Julio Cèsar Carballo Lòpez Administrador de Red

Re: [CentOS-es] ayuda DHCP y DNS

2011-02-02 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
Julio Cesar wrote: hola lista necesito montar dos servicios claves en mi red un servidor DNS en centos y otro DHCP, y que el DHCP actualize los registro DNS porfavor si alguien lo ah logrado prodria pasarme algun manualito o sitio donde este echo saludos un día de esto lo pruebo, pero

Re: [CentOS-es] ayuda DHCP y DNS

2011-02-02 Thread Julio Cesar
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:34:23 -0500, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com wrote: Julio Cesar wrote: hola lista necesito montar dos servicios claves en mi red un servidor DNS en centos y otro DHCP, y que el DHCP actualize los registro DNS porfavor si alguien lo ah

Re: [CentOS-es] ayuda DHCP y DNS

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony Mogrovejo
tambien recomendaria Dnsmasq +1 Sls El 2 de febrero de 2011 11:26, Julio Cesar jce...@geotech.cu escribió: On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:34:23 -0500, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com wrote: Julio Cesar wrote: hola lista necesito montar dos servicios claves en mi red un

Re: [CentOS-es] ayuda DHCP y DNS

2011-02-02 Thread Xavier Mauricio Tirado L.
No entiendo de dnsmasq pero yo uso dhcp y dns nativos del centos lo q se necesita es generar una clave y que el dhcp alimente el dns en google hay algunos manuales al respecto quiza no debas encerrarte en el tema de CentOS sino leer otros al final Linux es virtualmente igual Xavier

Re: [CentOS-es] ayuda DHCP y DNS

2011-02-02 Thread Julio Cesar
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:36:56 -0500 (ECT), Xavier Mauricio Tirado L. xtir...@ambiente.gob.ec wrote: No entiendo de dnsmasq pero yo uso dhcp y dns nativos del centos lo q se necesita es generar una clave y que el dhcp alimente el dns en google hay algunos manuales al respecto quiza no

[CentOS-es] Sistema Operativo Solo Web

2011-02-02 Thread Javier Laušić
*Estimados:* Alguien me puede recomendar alguna distribución de Linux que tenga al arrancar solo acceso a Web (idealmente firefox) Algo como es el ClearOS, pero para clientes. gracias..!! * Atte.* - *Javier Laušić R.* Movil: +56 9 84057030 E-Mail : jav...@lausic.cl Web :

Re: [CentOS-es] Sistema Operativo Solo Web

2011-02-02 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
Javier Laušić wrote: *Estimados:* Alguien me puede recomendar alguna distribución de Linux que tenga al arrancar solo acceso a Web (idealmente firefox) Algo como es el ClearOS, pero para clientes. eyeos gracias..!! * Atte.* - *Javier Laušić R.* Movil: +56 9 84057030

Re: [CentOS-es] Sistema Operativo Solo Web

2011-02-02 Thread Oscar Osta Pueyo
Hola, 2011/2/2 Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com: Javier Laušić wrote: *Estimados:* Alguien me puede recomendar alguna distribución de Linux que tenga al arrancar solo acceso a Web (idealmente firefox) Algo como es el ClearOS, pero para clientes. Te puede servir