-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Christopher Chan
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:49 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
While we are at it, disks being directly connected to
Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 3:35 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
I'm running the same kernel and ntp versions and I'm having no problems
at all on ntp servers or clients.
If my previous suggestions didn't help maybe you could share contents of
the following files and output of some commands
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Well, Nagios is more for outage/alerts were I was looking more for
trending.
Thats why I was originally using Cacti w/Nagios plugin.
There are plenty of graphing/trending addons for Nagios, I moved to
Icinga and use PNP4Nagios with it.
I also
On 13 April 2011 18:08, Jim Nelson j...@broadtime.com wrote:
On 4/13/2011 12:28 PM, John Doe wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering if there are specific steps to take to install CentOS on
SSDs...
By example, no swap partition?
Format with a flash fs?
Sysctl parameters?
Thx,
JD
We're running
On 13 April 2011 21:06, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org wrote:
Running v5 64bit on a Dell 1950.
/var/log/messages was full of ntpd[7313]: frequency error -1707 PPM
exceeds tolerance 500 PPM messages. There was a lot of messages about
the system limit for the maximum number of semaphore
I was wondering if you have normal internet access on that machine. I
found out that somehow systems I set up just freeze and are horribly
slow when there is no internet access. Terminnal would take few minutes
to open, and if I try several terminals all would open at once once
system is
On 04/13/2011 10:31 AM, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the
On 04/13/2011 09:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, John Jasen jja...@realityfailure.org wrote:
snipped my stuff
Every now and then I hear these XFS horror stories. They seem too impossible
to believe.
Nothing breaks for absolutely no reason and failure to know where
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 04:54:01 AM Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 12, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
...
As matter of interest, what hardware do you use? i.e. what CPU's, size
of RAM and RAID cards do you use on this size system?
Everyone always recommends to use
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is perfect.
All clients can get from this machine with no issues. As soon as
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is perfect.
All clients can get from this machine with no issues. As
[Donning my Nomex/Kevlar/non-friable asbestos suit here]
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 12:25:49 AM Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 4/14/11, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote on 04/13/2011 12:55 PM:
CentOS is ... right now ... deployed on 29% of web
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 09:04 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, John Jasenjja...@realityfailure.org wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Tue, Apr
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 07:26 AM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan
alain.p...@lpp.polytechnique.fr
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:54 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Christopher Chan
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:49 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Christopher Chan
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 2:34 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
Oh yeah, we are on PCIe and NUMA architectures now. I
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 01:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/13/11 9:51 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I'm was stuck trying to decide whether to go for the cheaper RAID 5
setup and possibly getting killed by the IOPS penalty and the risk
associated with rebuild time, or figure out a way to
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 09:04 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, John Jasenjja...@realityfailure.org
wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Tue, Apr
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:15 PM, William Hooper whooper...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bernard Fay bernard@enodegroup.com
wrote:
Hello group,
I have a CentOS 5.5 server freshly installed.
When I do a yum updated package_name, I have referenced to 5.6. Why?
On Apr 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, John Jasen jja...@realityfailure.org wrote:
On 04/13/2011 09:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, John Jasen jja...@realityfailure.org wrote:
snipped my stuff
Every now and then I hear these XFS horror stories. They seem too impossible
to
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it
rather practical for regular plain vanilla partitions, but for more
advanced stuff and filesystems, fdisk is probably better.
For filersystems 2TB, you're
On 4/14/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
since this is the centos list, I really didn't want to suggest this, but
if I was building a 20 or 40TB or whatever storage server, I do believe
I'd be strongly consider using Solaris, or one of its variants like
OpenIndiana, with ZFS.
ZFS
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:07:55PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 4/14/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
since this is the centos list, I really didn't want to suggest this, but
if I was building a 20 or 40TB or whatever storage server, I do believe
I'd be strongly consider
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it
rather practical for regular plain vanilla partitions, but for more
advanced stuff and filesystems, fdisk is probably
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Kjellström
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 3:31 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 08:55 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 09:04 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, John Jasenjja...@realityfailure.org
wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 02:56:54 PM rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
...
Steve,
I'm managing machines with 30TB of storage for more then two years. And
with
good reporting and reaction we have never had to run fsck.
That's not the issue.
The issue is rebuild-time.
The longer it takes,
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:11 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:07:55PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 4/14/11, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
since this is the centos list, I really didn't want to suggest this, but
if I was building a 20 or 40TB or
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:29:29 AM Matthew Feinberg wrote:
Thank you everyone for the advice and great information. From what I am
gathering XFS is the way to go.
A couple more questions.
What partitioning utility is suggested? parted and fdisk do not seem to
be doing the job.
My
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:37:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
I used XFS extensively when I was running mail server farms for
the mail queue filesystem and I only remember one or two incidents when
the filesystem was marked read-only for no reason (seemingly - never had
the time to find
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:07 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 4/14/11, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
since this is the centos list, I really didn't want to suggest this, but
if I was building a 20 or 40TB or whatever storage server, I do believe
I'd be strongly consider using
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:54 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:37:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
I used XFS extensively when I was running mail server farms for
the mail queue filesystem and I only remember one or two incidents when
the filesystem was marked read-only
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:47 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:29:29 AM Matthew Feinberg wrote:
Thank you everyone for the advice and great information. From what I am
gathering XFS is the way to go.
A couple more questions.
What partitioning utility is
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:00PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:11 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:07:55PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 4/14/11, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
since this is the centos list, I really
On 4/14/2011 9:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:37:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
I used XFS extensively when I was running mail server farms for
the mail queue filesystem and I only remember one or two incidents when
the filesystem was marked read-only for no reason
2011/4/14 Peter Kjellström c...@nsc.liu.se:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 02:56:54 PM rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
...
Steve,
I'm managing machines with 30TB of storage for more then two years. And
with
good reporting and reaction we have never had to run fsck.
That's not the issue.
The
On 04/14/2011 08:04 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Then try both for your use case and your hardware. We have wide raid6 setups
that does well over 500 MB/s write (that is: not all raid6 writes suck...).
/me replaces all of Peter's cache with 64MB modules.
Let's try again.
If you are trying
On 4/14/2011 7:32 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
HAHAHAAAAHA
The XFS codebase is the biggest pile of mess in the Linux kernel and you
expect it to be not run into mysterious problems? Remember, XFS was
PORTED over to Linux. It is not a 'native' thing to
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:13:19 PM Steve Brooks wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it
rather practical for regular plain vanilla partitions, but
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:15:10 PM Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Kjellström
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 3:31 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System
2011/4/14 Peter Kjellström c...@nsc.liu.se:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:13:19 PM Steve Brooks wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it
rather
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:54:34 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:37:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
I used XFS extensively when I was running mail server farms for
the mail queue filesystem and I only remember one or two incidents when
the filesystem was marked
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:20:23 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Same here, CentOS5 and ext3. Rare and random across identical hardware.
So far I've blamed the hardware.
I don't have that luxury. This is one VM on a VMware ESX 3.5U5 host, and the
storage is EMC Clariion fibre-channel, with the
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:41:07 AM Peter Kjellström wrote:
The default behaviour for ext3 on CentOS-5 is to remount read-only, as a
safety measure, when something goes wrong beneath it (see mount option
errors in man mount). The root cause can be any of a long list of hardware
or
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
thx so much!!
lewis.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 4/14/2011 12:06 PM, admin lewis wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
APC's website has a UPS Selector feature that will recommend a UPS
based on your equipment.
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:37:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
I used XFS extensively when I was running mail server farms for the
mail queue filesystem and I only remember one or two incidents when the
filesystem was marked read-only for no reason (seemingly - never had
the
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, admin lewis adminle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
It depends on how long you want it to run. Your choice is a
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, admin lewis
adminle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
UPS and Power Supplies
2011/4/14 Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com:
On 4/14/2011 12:06 PM, admin lewis wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
APC's website has a UPS Selector feature
On 4/14/2011 11:36 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
It depends on how long you want it to run. Your choice is a small UPS
to give your
server
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, admin lewis adminle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
It depends on how long you want it to
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, admin lewis
adminle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com wrote:
We lose power fairly frequently here, and need the UPSs to keep
things going long enough to get generator backup started. I have
found that the APC UPSs really don't like cheap generators. We
had a week long power
Partially echoing what was already said:
- Stick to APC
- Avoid the low end workstation models like the plain BackUPS.
As a minimum get a BackUPS-Pro. SmartUPS are better.
- Use the sizing app on the APC web site
- Careful of your mains power. Besides what was mentioned for
generators,
What's the current state of the art with this black magic?
It looks like there are a vast number of tuning options and the ones
that typically show up in advice are:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
read raw = yes
write raw = yes
oplocks = yes
max xmit = 65535
dead time = 15
getwd
On Apr 14, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, John Jasen jja...@realityfailure.org
wrote:
On 04/13/2011 09:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, John Jasen
jja...@realityfailure.org wrote:
snipped my stuff
Every now and then I hear
On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...
openindiana is under the Illumos project umbrella. They aren't going to
use anything else.
someone suggested Solaris Express, that has no patches or updates unless
you subscribe to annual support at
On 04/14/11 9:06 AM, admin lewis wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
apc smartups or eaton powerware woudl be my choices.1000VA should be
fine.
avoid
On 04/14/11 9:49 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
UPS and Power Supplies are not all the same.
If the UPS has a stepped voltage output (not smooth sine wave like the
local public grid has) in large enough steps to mess up the power
supply, you wind up with no UPS in effect.
CLEARLY if there are
On 04/14/11 10:54 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
Partially echoing what was already said:
- Stick to APC
I'd take Eaton Powerware (fka Best Power) over APC any day.
http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Backup-Power-UPS/5125.aspx
or similar for this application. I'd take one of those up
apcupsd doesn't work with new APC UPS's. APC has changed to some
proprietary protocol, microlink?, for talking to their UPS's, so apcupsd
doesn't work any more or at least not fully. There has been some discussion
about this issue on the apcupsd users email list.
On 4/14/2011 1:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 10:54 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
Partially echoing what was already said:
- Stick to APC
I'd take Eaton Powerware (fka Best Power) over APC any day.
http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Backup-Power-UPS/5125.aspx
or similar for
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/14/2011 1:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 10:54 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
Partially echoing what was already said:
- Stick to APC
I'd take Eaton Powerware (fka Best Power) over APC any day.
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:51:02 PM John R Pierce wrote:
switched PC/Server PSU's *so* don't give a bleep about sinusoidal power,
its not funny. first thing they do is full wave rectify the power to
DC, then they run that DC through a high frequency (several 100Khz
usually) oscillator
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:55:51 PM John R Pierce wrote:
http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Backup-Power-UPS/5125.aspx
or similar for this application. I'd take one of those up versus the
same size APC SmartUps any day.
We have a 5KVA Best Ferrups here that has never
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:17:41 PM aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
However if you like XFS, I'll assume you liek IRIX so check the 5dwm
project which is the IRIX desktop for Linux.
Cool. Now if they ported the Audio DAT ripping program for IRIX to Linux, I'd
be able to get rid of my O2.
On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:17:41 PM aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
However if you like XFS, I'll assume you liek IRIX so check the 5dwm
project which is the IRIX desktop for Linux.
Cool. Now if they ported the Audio DAT ripping program for
On 4/14/2011 2:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Keep in mind that pretty much all of them that don't have multiple
battery/control modules and auto-switching (like the big APC Symmetra's)
will have their own failure modes 3 or 4 years out if you just plug
them in and forget them. That is,
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:17:41 PM aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
However if you like XFS, I'll assume you liek IRIX so check the 5dwm
project which is the IRIX desktop for Linux.
Cool. Now if they ported the Audio
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/14/2011 2:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Keep in mind that pretty much all of them that don't have multiple
battery/control modules and auto-switching (like the big APC
Symmetra's)
will have their own failure modes 3 or 4 years out if you just plug
them in and
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:18:23PM -0400, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 11:30 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 9:36 AM, John Jasen wrote:
snipped: two recommendations for XFS
I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous
employer, two cases involving XFS
One was 32 bit, the other 64 bit.
Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 07:26 AM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein
Dear all,
On 04/14/2011 02:11 PM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 14.4.2011 2:31, Manuel Wolfshant napsal(a):
You cannot do that because the translations section must include
[*] the language names expressed in the language of the translation.
For instance in the Romanian release notes I would use
On 04/14/2011 12:24 PM, Timothy Lee wrote:
Dear all,
Actually, I would also like to have translations section included.
There's no need to have languages localised. I could happily live with:
* [:Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6/BrazilianPortuguese:Português do
Brasil] -
Dear all,
On 04/14/2011 05:28 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 04/14/2011 12:24 PM, Timothy Lee wrote:
Dear all,
Actually, I would also like to have translations section included.
There's no need to have languages localised. I could happily live with:
*
Dne 14.4.2011 11:28, Manuel Wolfshant napsal(a):
then let's do it. any objections on the approach suggested by David ?
Agree with Tim, English must be also included. The list also must be
resorted by language.
DH
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
Any further thoughts, If not can the FOG page now be created so I (or
someone) can move the info?
Many Thanks!
Alex
On 12/04/11 16:53, Alex Goffe wrote:
Fantastic, Line has been added!
On 12/04/11 16:50, Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 12 April 2011 16:02, Alex Goffea.s.go...@hfac.keele.ac.uk
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0257 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0257.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
fd30177d2399314531bd8ddb8350c35c
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0257 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0257.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
ab7ac74a7a292daebb31fd1a7a5488bb
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0429 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0429.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7d4813e5c5f378d313b2ba73014f1597
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0429 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0429.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
115718207415fce5549cfeca80bd2eec
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0422 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0422.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
375cb25cb1c59c20bd498f4ae1a024e7
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0422 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0422.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
7d2168502e56e8ab5d2e0a9b440f991d
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0436 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0436.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
8071aa7bb991abbfc8b2f3c27d89cf14
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0436 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0436.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
eaa18c4146ee6a0d6bb4bf9760a9b2b5
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0428 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0428.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
81f281b056e4564c801fa6b9894c9f90
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0428 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0428.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
11df94d1a1fc786525e73cc67b7d7334
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0412 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0412.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
923a30554cca0e7b8350e4e0f9b8dd2d
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0412 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0412.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
c47e21eb3e8f1d664645b1ba5581e3ba
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0430
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0430.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
417f12dc9dc222e52ca47cfb89c0f3d0
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0430
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0430.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f0ede88b5284bbfafff271ebd0a55dce
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0444
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0444.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
407d7b987f8820fc26f3bca7fae3bf8d
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0444
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0444.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
3be76fe55492bf7fc70a0fc6e28632bc
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0427 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0427.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
b6b7145e35e5c19f8c0c97b40a193fe2
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0427 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0427.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
86e3dc07ab5647f7540d62eae6bb34f4
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0420
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0420.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
013d6d99f003f853b9129f78595ea635
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0420
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0420.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
a04e554dc9658f8f620bac8a3e9df993
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0410
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0410.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
82cb40cc9a53be9390faa8a957810f5c
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0410
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0410.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
f3079787e1cf52c571865139a28af0cf
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
