Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/17/2015 11:17 PM, aditya hilman wrote: I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also already configured the master - slave dns. But i've problem with external-view zone transfer. Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip, which is not

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Michael Volz
Hi Niki, md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? Regards Michael - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr An: CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2015

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-18 Thread Rob Kampen
On 02/18/2015 08:17 PM, aditya hilman wrote: Hi folks, I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also already configured the master - slave dns. But i've problem with external-view zone transfer. Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread g
i am going to sit the rest of this out and read Michael's book. ;-) -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 18/02/2015 09:59, Niki Kovacs a écrit : └─sdd3 8:51 0 76,4G 0 part └─md127 9:127 0 229G 0 raid5 / Any idea what's going on ? Ooops, just saw it. /dev/sdd3 apparently has the wrong size. As to why this is so, it's a mystery. I'll investigate further into this. (Since

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-18 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 18.02.2015 um 12:26 schrieb Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com: Am 18.02.2015 um 08:17 schrieb aditya hilman aditya.hil...@gmail.com: Hi folks, I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also already configured the master - slave dns. But i've problem

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread g
On 02/18/2015 03:01 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: Le 18/02/2015 09:59, Niki Kovacs a écrit : └─sdd3 8:51 0 76,4G 0 part └─md127 9:127 0 229G 0 raid5 / Any idea what's going on ? Ooops, just saw it. /dev/sdd3 apparently has the wrong size. As to why this is so, it's a mystery.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Michael Volz
Hi Niki, in fact all of the sdX3 partitions are of size 76.4G. Maybe they were created by the installer as part of a partition scheme and you forget to resize them when removing other partitions from the scheme? Anyway, it should be fine if you recreate the partitions with the right size and

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-18 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 18.02.2015 um 08:17 schrieb aditya hilman aditya.hil...@gmail.com: Hi folks, I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also already configured the master - slave dns. But i've problem with external-view zone transfer. Based on the logs, the master notify to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a écrit : Hi Niki, md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? [root@nestor:~] # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:00 232,9G 0 disk ├─sda1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread g
On 02/18/2015 01:23 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: Le 18/02/2015 08:09, Niki Kovacs a écrit : Apparently no spare devices have been created. So why do I only have 226 GB of disk space under CentOS, when I had roughly 650 GB under Slackware? An idea just crossed my mind. Could it be that 'df' is

Re: [CentOS] Help with routing question.

2015-02-18 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: We have a host that has multiple IPv4 addresses aliased to eth0. The primary address is 216.185.71.x and the alias is 192.168.6.x. This host connects to devices on both netblocks without problems. Only default

Re: [CentOS] Help with routing question.

2015-02-18 Thread Antonio S. Martins Jr.
Hi James, Simply remove the GATEWAY line from the eth0:192 interface config :D Then you'll had only one default gateway. And the source IP to all unknown address will be the routeable one. Att., Antonio. - James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca escreveu: De: James B.

[CentOS] Help with routing question.

2015-02-18 Thread James B. Byrne
CentOS-6.6 We have a host that has multiple IPv4 addresses aliased to eth0. The primary address is 216.185.71.x and the alias is 192.168.6.x. This host connects to devices on both netblocks without problems. Only default routing is used and it looks like this: #ip route 192.168.6.0/24 dev

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo versioning tools?

2015-02-18 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote: On 02/17/2015 02:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions don't match? Something like mock but

Re: [CentOS] Help with routing question.

2015-02-18 Thread Steve Clark
Hi James, Antonio is correct. The default address is used when the destination address is not on a subnet that is on one of your local interfaces. Any packet destined for an address on the 192.168.6.0/24 subnet will automatically be sent with a source address of 192.168.6.1 Same with any

Re: [CentOS] Setting up new spacewalk server

2015-02-18 Thread Eckert, Doug
Trying to use minimal ISOs The 64-bit CEL 7.0 and 6.6 look ok so far. but when I try to set up the CEL 6.6 i386, but I get the following - The initrd could not be found at the specified location: /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386/images/pxeboot/initrd.img It does have the initrd.img file in

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a écrit : md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? I just spent a few hours experimenting with the CentOS 7 installer in a VirtualBox guest with four virtual hard disks. I can

Re: [CentOS] Setting up new spacewalk server

2015-02-18 Thread Eckert, Doug
ISO pulled from http://mirror.rackspace.com/CentOS/6.6/isos/i386/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso # df -h /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /var/ISO/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso 339M 339M 0 100% /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 #

Re: [CentOS] Setting up new spacewalk server

2015-02-18 Thread Eckert, Doug
Same is true for i386 6.5 and 6.4 minimal. I gave up after seeing the same thing on 3 ISOs, but it probably follows all the way down to 6.0. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Eckert, Doug doug.eck...@dowjones.com wrote: ISO pulled from

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a écrit : md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? I just spent a few hours experimenting with the CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit : installer is organized around mount points is correct, and what gets mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions. Says who? -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web :

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 19/02/2015 05:43, Chris Murphy a écrit : My personal view on installers is extremely biased toward the user staying out of trouble, they shouldn't have to read documentation for a GUI installer. A *user* never has to even see - or use - an installer. A USER has to USE a computer, by which

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/18/2015 11:06 PM, John R Pierce wrote: but, is that lvm integrated raid stuff available in RHEL/CentOS 6 or 7 yet ? /me scribbles postit note to self: google BEFORE hitting send

[CentOS] CentOS Participation in GSOC-2015

2015-02-18 Thread Saket Sinha
Hi Johnny, This is to enquire as to whether CentOS will be participating in GSOC this year? The Mentoring Organization applications are now being accepted for Google Summer of Code 2015. http://google-opensource.blogspot.in/2015/02/mentoring-organization-applications-now.html Regards, Saket

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Well, maybe it's just me. I've started Linux on Slackware 7.1 and used pretty much every major and minor distribution under the sun. I know my way around Slackware, Debian, CentOS, FreeBSD, Gentoo, Arch and many more, and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit : installer is organized around mount points is correct, and what gets mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions. Says who? Because it's ambiguous. A partition might

Re: [CentOS] Rhythmbox Replacement

2015-02-18 Thread Bob Hepple
Mark LaPierre marklapier@... writes: On 02/15/15 22:48, Mark LaPierre wrote: Hey Y'all, I though I would resurrect a long dead mail chain. I'm looking for a good replacement for Rhythmbox. I need a pod catcher to catch podcasts and download them to my HD where I can then move

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Niki Kovacs wrote: Le 18/02/2015 23:12, close, but then, for mysterious reasons, Red Hat decided to cripple it into oblivion. Go figure. One word: desktop. That's what they want to conquer next. OK well there's a really long road to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/18/2015 8:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Niki Kovacsi...@microlinux.fr wrote: Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit : installer is organized around mount points is correct, and what gets mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions. Says who?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:25 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: disks - partition(s) - mdraid devices - PVs - VG - LV - file system. phew. You might be a candidate for LVM integrated raid. It uses the md kernel code on the backend, but it's all LVM tools to create, manage and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/18/2015 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: You might be a candidate for LVM integrated raid. It uses the md kernel code on the backend, but it's all LVM tools to create, manage and monitor. The raid level is defined per LV, instead of all LV's in a VG inheriting the underlying raid. It supports

Re: [CentOS] How to write RPM spec

2015-02-18 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:08:52AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: If you have set up an RPM build server then you should have installed the rpmbuild and rpmdevtools packages. If you have installed the latter then you can use vi (vim/gvim) to automatically create an empty spec template file

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo versioning tools?

2015-02-18 Thread James B. Byrne
On Tue, February 17, 2015 15:20, Les Mikesell wrote: Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions don't match? Something like mock but build-version specific and with the debuginfo packages pulled in? I

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-18 Thread Tris Hoar
On 18/02/2015 07:17, aditya hilman wrote: Hi folks, I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also already configured the master - slave dns. But i've problem with external-view zone transfer. Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip, which

Re: [CentOS] How to write RPM spec

2015-02-18 Thread James B. Byrne
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:36:48 +1300 Jegadeesh Kumar wrote: I setup the RPM build server and read some doc to write the spec files. but i did get it clearly. So can you guys please help me to write a new RPM spec. If you have set up an RPM build server then you should have installed the

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo versioning tools?

2015-02-18 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:29 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: On Tue, February 17, 2015 15:20, Les Mikesell wrote: Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions don't match? Something like

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo versioning tools?

2015-02-18 Thread Jim Perrin
On 02/17/2015 02:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions don't match? Something like mock but build-version specific and with the debuginfo packages pulled in? I'm not

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-18 Thread aditya hilman
On Feb 18, 2015 7:43 PM, Tris Hoar trish...@bgfl.org wrote: On 18/02/2015 07:17, aditya hilman wrote: Hi folks, I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also already configured the master - slave dns. But i've problem with external-view zone transfer. Based

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit : What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset raid5 at the time a mount point is created

[CentOS] Skip creating anaconda-ks.cfg in EL7?

2015-02-18 Thread Nux!
Hello, In EL6 I could well remove /root/anaconda-ks.cfg in %post, but not any more it seems and I like my installs clean. Anyone has any idea how to skip creating this file or deleting during install? I don't want to resort to running scripts upon first boot. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?

2015-02-18 Thread m . roth
Niki Kovacs wrote: Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit : What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset raid5 at the time a

[CentOS] sw raid issue with C5.10-xen

2015-02-18 Thread Dave Stevens
My raid array won't boot, gives a kernel panic - attempt to kill init message and goes into endless reboots. MB is a supermicro 2P with opteron 2376 4-core cpus, centos sw raid, installed C5.3, updated as possible, currently c5.10. 5 seagate 750GB drives as raid-10 and hot spare. we set

Re: [CentOS] Rhythmbox Replacement

2015-02-18 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 02/15/15 22:48, Mark LaPierre wrote: Hey Y'all, I though I would resurrect a long dead mail chain. I'm looking for a good replacement for Rhythmbox. I need a pod catcher to catch podcasts and download them to my HD where I can then move them onto my mp3 player that I take to work