Re: [CentOS] Problems with ProxyPass to a local ip (using SSL)

On 02/29/2016 05:19 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: But I am doing some mistakes because every time I'm receiving a loop error. ... ... ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.5:5100/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.5:5100/ RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/(.*)

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:53:54AM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Might be slightly OT as it isn't necessarily a CentOS related issue. > > I've been using WD Reds as mdraid components which worked pretty well > for non-IOPS intensive workloads. > > However, the latest C7 server I built, ran

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Might be slightly OT as it isn't necessarily a CentOS related issue. > > I've been using WD Reds as mdraid components which worked pretty well > for non-IOPS intensive workloads. > > However, the latest C7 server I built, ran into problems with them on > on a Intel C236

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

On 3/1/2016 9:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: However, the latest C7 server I built, ran into problems with them on on a Intel C236 board (SuperMicro X11SSH) with tons of "ata bus error write fpdma queued". Googling on it threw up old suggestions to limit SATA link speed to 1.5Gbps using

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

I discovered, amidst great initial pain, that most, if not all, of the problems I had with SATA disks were caused by SATA cables and not by the disks themselves. Intermittent problems, such as disks randomly not showing up in RAID groups, were solved when I replaced the cables with proper

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

any chance your SATA cables aren't up to SATA3 (6gbps) performance levels ? In my experience, that's the most likely cause. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

However, the latest C7 server I built, ran into problems with them on on a Intel C236 board (SuperMicro X11SSH) with tons of "ata bus error write fpdma queued". Googling on it threw up old suggestions to limit SATA link speed to 1.5Gbps using libata.force boot options and/or noncq. Lowering the

[CentOS] problem restoring ssl and vlc

greeting. a short while ago, i may have gone to a site i should not have. maybe. after visiting, i decided i would check for rpm updates. when yumex opened to available packages, it showed that; openssl.x86_64 0:1.0.1e-42.el6_7.4 was available, so i checked it, then clicked install button.

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 02/03/16 15:57, Anthony K wrote: > This command output is odd: > > yum update --security > ... > No packages needed for security; 118 packages available ... > Why does yum not consider this CESA a security update? Cherry-picking updates is not supported by CentOS, this is because each package

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 03/01/2016 09:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/01/2016 09:17 PM, Peter wrote: >> On 02/03/16 15:57, Anthony K wrote: >>> This command output is odd: >>> >>> yum update --security >>> ... >>> No packages needed for security; 118 packages available >> ... >>> Why does yum not consider this

Re: [CentOS] problem restoring ssl and vlc

to pass time waiting for reply, went thru kde application launcher. found this progs have no icon: cheese audit logs media player note pad regedit wineconfig winefile winehelp wine software uninstall wine wordpad audio cd extractor running chkrootkit, shows

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

On 3/2/16, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Sorry, we don't seem to have any Supermicros with that m/b, but with the > ones we have (all X9* m/bs), as well as our many Dells, old Penguins > (rebranded Supermicro), and HPs, we've had no trouble at all with them, > other than the

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

On 3/2/16, John R Pierce wrote: > any chance your SATA cables aren't up to SATA3 (6gbps) performance levels ? The cables came with the SuperMicro board so I certainly hope they haven't started cheapening out on those :D In any case, the cables shouldn't be the problem

[CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

This command output is odd: yum update --security ... No packages needed for security; 118 packages available However, this command says there's an OpenSSL update: yum update openssl ... ---> Package openssl-libs.x86_64 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.2 will be updated ---> Package openssl-libs.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 03/01/2016 09:17 PM, Peter wrote: > On 02/03/16 15:57, Anthony K wrote: >> This command output is odd: >> >> yum update --security >> ... >> No packages needed for security; 118 packages available > ... >> Why does yum not consider this CESA a security update? > > Cherry-picking updates is not

Re: [CentOS] Problems with ProxyPass to a local ip (using SSL)

On Mon 29.Feb'16 at 9:05:13 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/29/2016 05:33 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > >More info in my ssl_error.log: > > > >Mon Feb 29 14:32:06 2016] [info] [client 10.64.118.59] SSL handshake failed: > >HTTP spoken on HTTPS port; trying to send HTML error page > >[Mon Feb

[CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

Might be slightly OT as it isn't necessarily a CentOS related issue. I've been using WD Reds as mdraid components which worked pretty well for non-IOPS intensive workloads. However, the latest C7 server I built, ran into problems with them on on a Intel C236 board (SuperMicro X11SSH) with tons

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

On 03/01/2016 09:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: Since I'm likely to use Reds again, it is a bit of a concern. So wondering if I just happen to get an unlucky batch, or is there some incompatibility between the Reds and the Intel C236 chipset, or between Red / C236 / Centos 7 combo or the

Re: [CentOS] Any experiences with newer WD Red drives?

On 3/2/16, Alice Wonder wrote: > Is it possible to build a vanilla kernel to boot from and test if same > issue exists? Unfortunately no, had to get the server out ASAP so already swapped the Reds with the vendor for HGSTs. ___

Re: [CentOS] ssh issues with centos 6

On 02/29/2016 02:07 PM, Warren Young wrote: so i enacted rngd -r /dev/urandom -o /dev/random That’s essentially bogus. If /dev/random is blocking due to insufficient entropy, feeding false entropy in from urandom buys you nothing, other than to fool /dev/random into thinking it has more

Re: [CentOS] Problems with ProxyPass to a local ip (using SSL)

Am 01.03.2016 um 12:31 schrieb C. L. Martinez : > On Mon 29.Feb'16 at 9:05:13 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 02/29/2016 05:33 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: >>> More info in my ssl_error.log: >>> >>> Mon Feb 29 14:32:06 2016] [info] [client 10.64.118.59] SSL handshake >>>

Re: [CentOS] RasPi 3.x and RH-based Distro (Slightly OT)

On 29/02/16 17:59, Benjamin Smith wrote: > With the release of the Rasberry Pi 3.x, I think we have a platform I could > jump on board with. Performance has just been lacking until now! > > But I really don't want to jump the "RH ship" - I'd rather stick with an > environment I am comfortable

Re: [CentOS] RasPi 3.x and RH-based Distro (Slightly OT)

On 02/29/2016 01:00 PM, Jos Vos wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:26:24PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> join the arm-dev list ( https://lists.centos.org ) CentOS has a great >> story across the entire ARMv7 and v8 platform, with every major vendor >> in the ARM 64bit platform working with

Re: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:43:32PM -0500, Jason Brooks wrote: > I'm getting this dep error trying to install this: > > Error: Package: 1:docker-1.10.2-5.git0f5ac89.el7.x86_64 > (virt7-docker-common-candidate) >Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.13.1-114 >Removing:

[CentOS-virt] oVirt Host 3.6.3 available

oVirt 3.6.3 has been released yesterday upstream [1]. Host packages are now available in testing repository [2] and will be released soon. You can find more information on how to test it in oVirt How To wiki page[3] [1] http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/announce/2016-March/000237.html [2]

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:0298 CentOS 6 findutils FASTTRACK BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:0298 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0298.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0301 Important CentOS 6 openssl Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0301 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0301.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0302 Important CentOS 5 openssl Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0302 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0302.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available

- Original Message - > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" > To: centos-virt@centos.org > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 9:17:59 AM > Subject: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available > > Docker 1.10.2 has just been built for virt7-docker-common-candidate >

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0301 Important CentOS 7 openssl Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0301 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0301.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: