Re: [CentOS] Gateway question

On 10/08/16 16:29, Levente Birta wrote: And as I said this problem is resolved too ... I asked for another way to achieve this When you add a default gateway with: route add default gw 192.168.1.1 dev enp3s0 you'll note that you now have 2 routes with the same metric of 0 (use route -n to

Re: [CentOS] Gateway question

On 10/08/2016 15:28, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:29:15AM +0300, Levente Birta wrote: I read the document again ... and this talk about accessing this multi-homed host from the internet... I have all this configured and working! You say this is working because of the

[CentOS] XRDB not in our centos6.8 build

I am a bit baffled on this. We recently rebuilt all our servers to CentOS release 6.8 (Final) from a prior 6.x centos release. We ran into a couple of problems such as Java not working (just had to yum install java). It was installed, but unable to create a java machine, until I yum

Re: [CentOS] Gateway question

On 09/08/2016 23:11, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 08/09/2016 12:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote: those are both the same network, and the default gateway is a global thing. packets forwarded to 192.168.1.1 could use either 192.168.1.12 or .13, as they are all the same. in reality, they will use the

Re: [CentOS] Gateway question

On 09/08/2016 22:16, John R Pierce wrote: On 8/9/2016 11:51 AM, Birta Levente wrote: I do all this and working on LAN ... all traffic go in/out on the proper interface ... the problem is when I try to access the internet on the second interface how do you try and access the 'internet

Re: [CentOS] Gateway question

On 09/08/2016 23:08, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 08/09/2016 11:51 AM, Birta Levente wrote: If I add "#route add default gw 192.168.1.1 dev enp3s0" all is good, but cannot add that in route-iface file or with "ip route" Are you using the "network" or the "NetworkManager" service to

Re: [CentOS] XRDB not in our centos6.8 build

On 2016-08-10, Dan Hyatt wrote: > > I am a bit baffled on this. > > We recently rebuilt all our servers to CentOS release 6.8 (Final) > from a prior 6.x centos release. We ran into a couple of problems > such as Java not working (just had to yum install java). It was >

Re: [CentOS] Regarding using CentOS on Commercial Appliance

Thanks for the reply. I had already visited the links mentioned by you. The link  https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ talks about non-usage of trademarks in commercial software which is taken care. The link https://www.centos.org/legal/ talks very less about legal terms and condition. Is

Re: [CentOS] Regarding using CentOS on Commercial Appliance

10.8.2016, 10:29, Akshat Kakkar kirjoitti: > Is there some other link which mentions about the License model used by > CentOS. Infact, no where it is mentioned that it follows GPL or not. Just in > that trademarks link below there is some mentioning of Creative Commons 3.0 > but that looks only

[CentOS] Maybe OT - Centos 5 SATA JMicron JMB361 SATA

Hi All, I know Centos 5 is almost EOL and all this is old but I'm helping a colleague who has moved a Centos 5 install on an IDE disk to system with a Foxconn M'board. His idea is to use the SATA interface that's on the Foxconn. The thing boots OK and then gets into a loop trying to

Re: [CentOS] C7 Backup problem

Il 09/08/2016 19:15, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: On Tue, August 9, 2016 11:51 am, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 08/08/2016 11:11 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: |78 | backup-fd | 2016-08-08 09:52:57 | B| F | 191,024 | 7,978,295,072 | T | |79 | backup-fd | 2016-08-08 12:10:31 |

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 138, Issue 4

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] Gateway question

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:29:15AM +0300, Levente Birta wrote: > I read the document again ... and this talk about accessing this multi-homed > host from the internet... > I have all this configured and working! You say this is working because of the output here? # ip route show

[CentOS-announce] Updated Vagrant Box's are now available : 1607

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Updated Vagrant box's are now available for CentOS Linux 7 and CentOS Linux 6 for x86_64. These are available for the Libvirt and the VirtualBox providers in Vagrant. ref: https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/boxes/6