Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

I see that this is as an impulse for Fedora so that we as users do not leave RedHat after the news ... even so I still think how good it is for the linux community this whole situation makes us a good shakeup. Cheers, On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:57 PM Kay Schenk wrote: > Thanks for the info! I

[CentOS] KVM support on RT Kernerl

Hi, I have deployed CentOS 7.6 and then installed RT kernel. Later KVM installed on the same box. I noticed that KVM module was not loaded and then switched to the generic kernel. KVM module was loaded in the generic kernel. Is this a known issue? I would like to use KVM with RT kernel.

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

From: Victor Pereira Sent: January 21, 2021 07:47 > > I see that this is as an impulse for Fedora so that we as users do not > leave RedHat after the news ... even so I still think how good it is > for the linux community this whole situation makes us a good shakeup. While I while I welcome the

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:12 PM Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > From: Victor Pereira Sent: January 21, 2021 07:47 > > > > I see that this is as an impulse for Fedora so that we as users do not > > leave RedHat after the news ... even so I still think how good it is > > for the linux community this

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 4:53 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Fun fact: if a big part of my job didn't consist in teaching Linux and writing books about it, I'd probably be running FreeBSD myself. Understandable. The big part of Microsoft is selling their operating system, for servers included, and even they

Re: [CentOS] Infiniband special ops?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:34 PM lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > Hi guys. > > Hoping some net experts my stumble upon this message, I have > an IPoIB direct host to host connection and: > > -> $ ethtool ib1 > Settings for ib1: > Supported ports: [ ] > Supported link modes: Not reported

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 4:30 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 05:23:24PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 17:15, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: I think from years of posting that FreeBSD is how Valeri's brain works best and that is cool. Some people have certain OS

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:36:44PM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 1/21/21 8:53 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote: > > Is this good news for the "Centos" family? > > > > There is no CentOS "family". CentOS clone is dead and will be now Odd that you say it's dead when 7 doesn't sunset until June

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

Hi Nick, There's always Springdale: https://puias.math.ias.edu/ On 21/01/2021 22:00, Antonio Leding wrote: Thanks Nick, I was just writing a post to solicit opinions on a good goto distro for CentOS replacement.  I am somewhat dubious on wanting to move to free-RHEL and based on what

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 21/1/2021 11:17 μ.μ., Valeri Galtsev wrote: I tried Oracle Linux. After installation it took forever to update yum database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... All this sort of ruled it out for me. Don't worry, Rocky Linux is in good track; Latest update:

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 05:23:24PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 17:15, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > > > > > > I think from years of posting that FreeBSD is how Valeri's brain works best > and that is cool. Some people have certain OS paradigms where they function > best

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Phil Perry wrote: On 21/01/2021 22:40, John R. Dennison wrote: Surely anyone requiring less than 16 licences will now ditch CentOS 7 in favour of RHEL7? Drat. I have 25 systems at home running CentOS 7.9, and one system running OEL 7.9. Steve --

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:15:50PM +, Phil Perry wrote: > > Surely anyone requiring less than 16 licences will now ditch CentOS 7 in > favour of RHEL7? The rest may stay on CentOS 7 for a year or so until there > is a clearer picture around viable alternatives. This may as well become the >

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

The RHEL announcement is of no use to me or my company. We spin up DigitalOcean droplets for each of our client websites/apps. If we were utilising horizontal scaling we'd have even more droplets per website/app. We'd easily have over 16 installations. > On 21 Jan 2021, at 19:57, Scott

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 3:31 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:17:04 -0600 Valeri Galtsev wrote: I tried Oracle Linux. After installation it took forever to update yum database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... All this sort of ruled it out for me. Mind that I have 1 Gbps

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 8:53 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote: > Is this good news for the "Centos" family? > There is no CentOS "family". CentOS clone is dead and will be now replaced with no-cost RHEL, so in market share (over time) CentOS will be replaced with RHEL. CentOS Stream will be used solely by developers

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

Le 21/01/2021 à 23:18, Valeri Galtsev a écrit : > No, I already streamlined Debian routine installation (workstations and number > crunchers), and servers run FreeBSD since lng ago, so I'm all set, and > much > better than in the past ;-) > > Thanks though. Debian has an average of two

[CentOS] Infiniband special ops?

Hi guys. Hoping some net experts my stumble upon this message, I have an IPoIB direct host to host connection and: -> $ ethtool ib1 Settings for ib1:     Supported ports: [  ]     Supported link modes:   Not reported     Supported pause frame use: No     Supports auto-negotiation: No    

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

Thanks Nick, I was just writing a post to solicit opinions on a good goto distro for CentOS replacement. I am somewhat dubious on wanting to move to free-RHEL and based on what you’ve said here, looks like Rocky deserves my attention… If it does indeed become the successor as you’ve

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 17:15, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 21/01/2021 à 22:17, Valeri Galtsev a écrit : > > I tried Oracle Linux. After installation it took forever to update yum > > database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... All this > sort of > > ruled it out for me. > >

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 4:50 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 21/01/2021 à 23:18, Valeri Galtsev a écrit : No, I already streamlined Debian routine installation (workstations and number crunchers), and servers run FreeBSD since lng ago, so I'm all set, and much better than in the past ;-) Thanks though.

Re: [CentOS] simple http server grab data posted and send to another server - slightly off topic

I did finally find something like this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2506932/how-do-i-redirect-a-request-to-a-different-url-in-python Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 4:15 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 21/01/2021 à 22:17, Valeri Galtsev a écrit : I tried Oracle Linux. After installation it took forever to update yum database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... All this sort of ruled it out for me. Works perfectly here:

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

Le 21/01/2021 à 23:23, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : > I think from years of posting that FreeBSD is how Valeri's brain works best > and that is cool. Some people have certain OS paradigms where they function > best and are able to solve problems better than another system. For other > people it

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:57:19 -0600 Scott Techlist wrote: > So this will muddy the waters for the spin-offs like Rocky Linux, or kill > them? I'd assume at least it would dilute who'd need an alternate Centos > replacement except those with more than 16 servers. Or did I misunderstand > the

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:17:04 -0600 Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I tried Oracle Linux. After installation it took forever to update yum > database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... All this > sort of ruled it out for me. Mind that I have 1 Gbps network... So far I've installed

[CentOS] simple http server grab data posted and send to another server - slightly off topic

Hi All, anyone know how to make a "simple" http server (python -m SimpleHTTPServer 8000) type of stuff - but simply take the incoming data, (should be real small) and when received - send that to a different server . This is different than "redirect" as that is the issue. The device does not

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

Le 21/01/2021 à 22:17, Valeri Galtsev a écrit : > I tried Oracle Linux. After installation it took forever to update yum > database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... All this sort > of > ruled it out for me. Works perfectly here:

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 2:24 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:57:19 -0600 Scott Techlist wrote: So this will muddy the waters for the spin-offs like Rocky Linux, or kill them? I'd assume at least it would dilute who'd need an alternate Centos replacement except those with more than 16

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 1:17 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: After installation it took forever to update yum database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... I don't think mirrors exist. appears updates comes directly from Oracle this way their users/clients know those servers are always there

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

Le 21/01/2021 à 22:39, Valeri Galtsev a écrit : > Maybe my problem was I used yum, not dnf command. Oracle's documentation is at least as well-written as the FreeBSD handbook. https://www.oracle.com/linux/technologies/ -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église -

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 21/01/2021 22:40, John R. Dennison wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:36:44PM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: On 1/21/21 8:53 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote: Is this good news for the "Centos" family? There is no CentOS "family". CentOS clone is dead and will be now Odd that you say it's

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

On 1/21/21 11:40 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:36:44PM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> On 1/21/21 8:53 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote: >>> Is this good news for the "Centos" family? >>> >> >> There is no CentOS "family". CentOS clone is dead and will be now > > Odd that

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

Is this good news for the "Centos" family? On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:35 AM Victor Pereira wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:12 PM Hugh E Cruickshank > wrote: > > > From: Victor Pereira Sent: January 21, 2021 07:47 > > > > > > I see that this is as an impulse for Fedora so that we as users do

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

>See: >https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers/ >and >https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/new-year-new-red-hat-enterprise-linux-programs-easier-ways-access-rhel >-- >J Martin Rushton MBCS So this will muddy the waters for the

[CentOS-docs] [centos/centos.org] branch master updated (1c03052 -> 090dc6e)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. rbowen pushed a change to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. from 1c03052 Update footer. Update meeting calendar. add 090dc6e Add office hours. No new revisions were added by this update. Summary of

[CentOS-docs] [centos/centos.org] branch master updated (bc768ec -> 1c03052)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. rbowen pushed a change to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. from bc768ec Merge #73 `Update calendar entries.` add 1c03052 Update footer. Update meeting calendar. No new revisions were added by this

[CentOS-docs] Request: Remove Ralph from notifications

Hi, folks, Ralph gets notified every time we update a wiki article. However, he has stepped back from the project, and no longer needs to receive these notifications. Is there a way, faster than clicking through every single page in the wiki, to remove him from the notification lists?

[CentOS-docs] [centos/centos.org] branch master updated (090dc6e -> 51c16d6)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. rbowen pushed a change to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. from 090dc6e Add office hours. add 51c16d6 The PASS SIG is retired No new revisions were added by this update. Summary of changes:

[CentOS-docs] Wiki Access for Cloud SiG

I'd like to request access to https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud for the following people: amymarrich jpena AlfredoMoralejo yatinkarel Thanks, Amy *Amy Marrich* She/Her/Hers Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms Red Hat, Inc

Re: [CentOS-docs] Request: Remove Ralph from notifications

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:21 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > Ralph gets notified every time we update a wiki article. However, he has > stepped back from the project, and no longer needs to receive these > notifications. > > Is there a way, faster than clicking through every single page