CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0967 Moderate
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0967.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.2.centos4.i386.rpm
httpd-devel-2.0.52-41.ent.2.centos4.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0988 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0988.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c9d9261d1e0b5ce5efe84b307b28d36f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0988 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0988.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
d9eb2d4b0e23d818337b428cb140eabc
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 19:18 -0700, Jason Taylor wrote:
Michael:
I was following the tutorial at http://www.howtoforge.com/centos_5.0_xen I
was not aware that virt-manager is GUI only.
Xend does start and I can do everything listed in the tutorial until I get
to the virt-manager part.
Michael Hall wrote:
One thing: you want to use the Xen 3.2 rpms provided by xen.org for serious
production work on CentOS and not the one coming with CentOS. Suggest you read
the archives of the list for all tips and caveats.
On the downloads page at xen.org I can only see source tarballs for
Hola [EMAIL PROTECTED] y comunidad de listero te envio lo solicitado
Postfix http://www.server-world.info/note?os=ce5p=mailf=1
Con ldap http://www.server-world.info/note?os=ce5p=ldapf=1
Saludos http://www.server-world.info/
Rrodriguer GT
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hola a todos tengo el sgt problema, un usuario final de la empresa
recibe correos spam desde su propia cuenta a alguna persona ya le paso
algo como esto??
*De:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Enviado el:* miércoles, 05 de noviembre de 2008 15:16
*Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hola:
Aunque no diste mayor informacion sobre tu configuracion, Me parece que lo
puedes hacer es un Bonding de las tarjetas de red.
te dejo algunos link que te pueden ayudar.
http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2006/05/12/blog/manu/como_hacer_bonding_en_rhel4_y_clones
Estimado...
En tu anterior post lei que tienes implementado shorewall...buscando por hay
encontre este link de la documentacion.espero te ayude, no puedo darte
mas pistas por que de redes me declaro un neofito.
Es exactamente la estructura que describes.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:44:43PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
You may want to see if the device driver for your device has been
blacklisted in order to protect it.
...
Please
-1) no top post
-2) trim your replies
This card works:
08:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit
Rilawich Ango wrote:
Hi all,
I have installed Centos completely. However, the LAN doesn't work.
Below is the message after I issue. How can I make it work?
00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82567V-2 Gigabit
Network Connection
this intel driver is for 82567 and others..
Hello
Our server runs CentOS 5.2, kernel 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5xen x86_64, in the
domU under Xen, and dom0 runs same version of OS. The CPU is AMD
Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+.
We're experiencing some strange failures with several services, most
notable web service and jabber
subj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Rilawich Ango wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:06:25 +0800:
Below is the setting.
This is not what was asked for, read again.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS
Scott Silva wrote:
on 11-11-2008 11:11 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Jerry Geis wrote:
I saw were it said if I dont correct Something I'll be back on the list.
I'm trying to figure out want Something is.
Not sending mail should do the trick. Our server was in CBL because it
John wrote:
Ralph Wrote:
BTW: It would be great if you could fix your mail client so one can see
which parts of a mail were written by you and which were written by
others. http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html - it is
written for usenet, but most of it also applies to mailing
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Don't try to compare NFS and iScsi : they aren't working at the same
level : iScsi works at the 'block level' while other Network File
Systems (like NFS, CIFS, etc ...) work more at the 'file level'
Hmmm. CIFS works at block level (SMB == Server Message Blocks).
2008/11/17 Michael A. Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Attached is my config file.
I'm curious how they differ.
Mike, my current xorg.conf is attached. It is a little different than
the first one made because I've diddled with the Nvidia settings
utility. I've also attached a virgin one generated
On Nov 17, 2008, at 5:36 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Don't try to compare NFS and iScsi : they aren't working at the same
level : iScsi works at the 'block level' while other Network File
Systems (like NFS, CIFS, etc ...) work more at the 'file level'
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:54, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# ls -l /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 13 18:38 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 -
libstdc++.so.5.0.7
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 733168 Jan 8 2007 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 804212
Or you could boot up with knoppix or some other livecd so the filesystem is
not in use and mount both drives and do a:
mkdir /mnt/org
mount /dev/hdx /mnt/org
mkdir /mnt/bckup
mount /dev/hdx /mnt/bckup
cp -af /mnt/org/* /mnt/bckup/.
Won't this command choke if there are too many files? I
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:16 +, Tom Brown wrote:
Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout
package update repo deploy
I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out there that can
take code from a repository and build rpm's in a continuous integration
Tom Brown wrote:
I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out there that can
take code from a repository and build rpm's in a continuous integration
type manner? I have been hunting around for such a tool and so far not
seeing anything obvious as i dont want to reinvent the wheel
Gordon McLellan wrote:
Does anyone have experience using the Supertrak EX16650 sas controller
under Centos 5.2?
Do you know what the pci id's are for the device ?
The Promise website claims RHEL 5.2 support was added Sept '08. I
figure the card might very well be detected, but how about the
Hi
Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout
package update repo deploy
I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out there that can
take code from a repository and build rpm's in a continuous integration
type manner? I have been hunting around for such
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Gordon McLellan wrote:
Does anyone have experience using the Supertrak EX16650 sas controller
under Centos 5.2?
Do you know what the pci id's are for the device ?
The Promise website claims RHEL 5.2 support was added Sept '08. I
figure the card might very well be
Guy Boisvert wrote:
... and we have many problems with that approach which most of the time
uses Java.
I've never seen one that did use java, having used the proxy's for
Areca, 3ware, adaptec and MSI.
I have many servers in production (mostly Winblows boxes, i know it's
bad but it's not my
Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout
package update repo deploy
I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out there that can
take code from a repository and build rpm's in a continuous integration
type manner? I have been
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Tom Brown wrote:
Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout package
update repo deploy
I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out
there that can take code from a repository and build rpm's
in a continuous integration type manner? I
http://www.autobuild.org reports to support Perforce. I've only used it w/
svn.
mjc
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout package
update repo deploy
I know this could be scripted but are
on 11-15-2008 11:59 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:17 PM, nate centos-T6AQWPvKiI1cRAk/[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't leave a monitor attached to the server all the
time. The server is in a shared cabinet @ a 3rd party ISP,
Scott Silva wrote:
Does it have any out of bandwidth management like Dell's drac or HP's ILO?
in the original post he said...
The CPU is an Intel Q9300 Core 2 Quad, with 8 GB RAM, on an Intel Motherboard
and upon further questioning...
The motherboard is a Intel DG35EC -
on 11-15-2008 3:32 PM John R Pierce spake the following:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
No, the motherboard doesn't support ECC RAM. The motherboard is a
Intel DG35EC -
http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/DG35EC/DG35EC-overview.htm
midrange business desktop board. I use a DG33TL
Hi All,
I have a shuttle SN78SH7 with a Seagate ST31500341AS (1.5Tb) drive. With
windows Vista it sees the drive and can install to it. So far with GRML
or CentOS5.2 they do not seem to be able to see this drive. Is there a
particular setting I need or does CentOS not support installation
Am 18.11.2008 um 03:30 schrieb Philip Manuel:
Hi All,
I have a shuttle SN78SH7 with a Seagate ST31500341AS (1.5Tb) drive.
With windows Vista it sees the drive and can install to it. So far
with GRML or CentOS5.2 they do not seem to be able to see this
drive. Is there a particular
It uses a NV chipset,
nVidia GeForce 8200,
http://au.shuttle.com/product_detail_spec.jsp?PI=939 . I added an Intel
Ethernet card to get over the Marvell Ethernet issue, and a NVIDIA
8600GT card.
I forgot to add I used no additional driver disks to get Vista to see
the disk.
Phil.
Rainer
Philip Manuel wrote:
It uses a NV chipset,
nVidia GeForce 8200,
http://au.shuttle.com/product_detail_spec.jsp?PI=939 . I added an Intel
Ethernet card to get over the Marvell Ethernet issue, and a NVIDIA
8600GT card.
I forgot to add I used no additional driver disks to get Vista to see
the
We tend to use CentOS for our desktops as well, hence the request to
this mailing list. We do not wish to have Ubuntu installed.
Thanks
nate wrote:
Philip Manuel wrote:
It uses a NV chipset,
nVidia GeForce 8200,
http://au.shuttle.com/product_detail_spec.jsp?PI=939 . I added an Intel
64-bit flash is here, well alpha stage:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
Here is what I did:
yum remove flash-plugin
mozilla-plugin-config -i -f -v (might not be necessary)
Deleted this one /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
placed libflashplayer.so
Hi all,
I have a server, with an Intel DG35EC motherboard, Q9300 CPU, 8GB
Kingston DDRII RAM which can't take a lot of load. I have 4 XEN VPS's
on there, which doesn't consume more than 4GBM RAM at this stage. Yet,
the machine sky rockets at some times. I've moved the XEN VPS's to
another server,
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I have a server, with an Intel DG35EC motherboard, Q9300 CPU, 8GB
Kingston DDRII RAM which can't take a lot of load. I have 4 XEN VPS's
on there, which doesn't consume more than 4GBM RAM at this stage. Yet,
the machine sky rockets at some times. I've moved the XEN
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 11-15-2008 3:32 PM John R Pierce spake the following:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
No, the motherboard doesn't support ECC RAM. The motherboard is a
Intel DG35EC -
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:19 AM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I have a server, with an Intel DG35EC motherboard, Q9300 CPU, 8GB
Kingston DDRII RAM which can't take a lot of load. I have 4 XEN VPS's
on there, which doesn't consume more than 4GBM RAM at
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 11-15-2008 3:32 PM John R Pierce spake the following:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
No, the motherboard doesn't support ECC RAM. The motherboard is a
Intel
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:19 AM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I have a server, with an Intel DG35EC motherboard, Q9300 CPU, 8GB
Kingston DDRII RAM which can't take a lot of load. I
45 matches
Mail list logo