On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 07/03/2009 02:01 PM, Digvijay Patankar wrote:
Hi all,
I am Digvijay.
Username : dbpatankar
you need a user FirstnameLastname - so DigvijayPatankar maybe ?
I don't really get what do you want to mean by
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 00:24 +0100, luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
snip
Is there a sitemap for the wiki website? Maybe that would help. Also,
as I sugested earlier, was the site(s) added through google webmaster
tool?
---
Sitemap? Yes.
As discussed months ago was confirmed that it was (the wiki)
Hola Gente,
Estoy necesitando ayuda para configurar mi Wifi Atheros como AP.
Les detallo mi hard:
01:07.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. Atheros
AR5001X+ Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01)
Instalado:
madwifi-0.9.2.1-2.el5.rf
Salida del LSMOD:
lsmod | grep ath
dm_multipath
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
I have yesterday after some typos, sent my ext3 RAID5 array to the
void...
I want to recreate it now, but I read on
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Disk_Optimization
that you can optimize the filesystem on top of the RAID.
Will this
enough is enough already.
can some centos admin please discipline, ban and/or get rid of Radu-Cristian
FOTESCU aka beranger...@yahoo.ca
please?
not only has he physically threatened a contributor, his language behavior
are more than inappropriate for such a professional
Hi All,
We have installed CentOS 5.3 x86_64 in an HP DL585 server with AMD Opteron
64 bit processor and 16 GB RAM. The kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 . Now
this has thrown an error message in /var/log/message,
Jul 3 21:41:11 db1 kernel: EDAC k8 MC0: general bus error: participating
JohnS a écrit :
yum install Sabayon.i386
This looks exactly like the tool I need. But isn't the project abandoned?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
The project is a confluence of a sub-project under the cAos project,
Is this still true? Is Centos still officially associated with cAos? Or
was that supposed to be in the past tense?
-geoff
-
Geoff Galitz
Blankenheim NRW, Germany
http://www.galitz.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus James A. Peltier spake:
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
I have yesterday after some typos, sent my ext3 RAID5 array to the
void...
I want to recreate it now, but I read on
luc...@lastdot.org schrieb:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Steven Vishootsir_funz...@yahoo.com wrote:
hello all,
I have a setup that is raid 1 and put the mirrored drive back in and now it
is still showing as degraded saying: raid1: raid set md6 active with 1 out
of 2 mirrors with this
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:02 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
For example, the RHEL
deployment guide mentions NFSv2, NFSv3 and NFSv4... but as much as I
poke around, I don't even find a way to checkout which one of the
version I'm running.
---
That's because you have to specify what version of
JohnS a écrit :
It is in the man page which is astonishing to me.
Neither 'man nfs' nor 'man exports' specify any version. But I tried
again to mount the NFS share, this time by specifying a filesystem, like
this:
# mount -t nfs4 raymonde:/data /home/shares
Here's what I got this time:
---BeginMessage---
Frank Cox a écrit :
There isn't much to setting up a simple NFS fileserver and client mount. Set
up /etc/exports on the server (this assumes your client is 192.168.0.3)
/whatever/where-ever/ 192.168.0.3(rw)
Start the nfs service. Create a mount point on the client
mkdir
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
JohnS a écrit :
It is in the man page which is astonishing to me.
Neither 'man nfs' nor 'man exports' specify any version. But I tried
again to mount the NFS share, this time by specifying a filesystem, like
this:
# mount -t
Greetings,
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Kurian Thayilkurianmtha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We have installed CentOS 5.3 x86_64 in an HP DL585 server with AMD Opteron
64 bit processor and 16 GB RAM. The kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 . Now
this has thrown an error message in
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
BUT... when someone from the Centos team makes a statement like
...latest release has many up-to-date desktop packages... or any
other statement that might imply, suggest, hint, or even smell of
breaking compatibility with RH, for whatever reason,
On 07/04/2009 08:07 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
The project is a confluence of a sub-project under the cAos project,
Is this still true? Is Centos still officially associated with cAos? Or
was that supposed to be in the past tense?
No, CentOS has nothing to do with caos in quite a few years now
Now where would the proper place be to put a route for load balancing like:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via xx.yy.51.46 dev eth2 weight 3
nexthop via aa.bb.166.2 dev eth3 weight 1
Hey Doug,
Congrats! Now that we have helped you, it is your turn to help us! :-D
Let us
the end of this circle for me
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Akemi Yagiamy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Ned Slidern...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Didi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Akemi Yagiamy...@gmail.com wrote:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2558/3679382429_d535f79823_o.jpg
(info offered
I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard
that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5.
Though I'm partial to AMD processors, and would like to use one in my
new configuration, that's not a requirement, if the most appropriate
board happens to be
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Keith Keller kkel...@speakeasy.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 02:18:57PM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
If you do run without page space, you should configure the kernel
overcommit
options.
Is there a good, consistent, complete source of documentation for
: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090704/b369c720/attachment-0001.bin
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http
fred smith wrote:
I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard
that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5.
What role is that system going to play?
I assume server because I'd put money down that in excess of
99% of CentOS installations are servers. (that number
Kurian Thayil wrote:
I understand this is an error message from Error Detection And Control
module and just wanna confirm that this is not a kernel or software related
issue. If Hardware related is it confined only to the Physical memory stick
installed or processor related? Any hint on this??
Karanbir Singh wrote:
also, I completely lost interest in this thread when it went into
ranting lands, guess it might be worth catching up on.
not really. :-/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:48:37 +0200
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Any idea what might go wrong here?
firewall problem?
Try disabling your firewall and see if it works. If it does, then here is my
note about how to do make NFS work through a firewall.
HOW TO SET UP A FIREWALL THAT ALLOWS NFS
Create the
What exactly does the announcement mean to the CentOS community?
From what point in the past to what point present/future should the
user community be concerned?
Once you find the final culprit, how sure will you be whether any
issue is/was malicious vs benign?
Do you perform regular server
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
BUT... when someone from the Centos team makes a statement like
...latest release has many up-to-date desktop packages... or any
other statement that might imply, suggest, hint, or even smell of
breaking compatibility with RH,
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Subject:
Re: [CentOS] Getting started with NFS
From:
Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net
Date:
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:33:31 +0200
To:
Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net
To:
Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net
Frank
Thanks everybody for the detailed hints and answers, on the list as well
as offlist.
I got myself a second sandbox PC today, and I just installed two
vanilla CentOS 5.3 systems on them. It'll be much easier to figure out
the innards of NFS without the constantly nagging fear of breaking
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Niki Kovacscont...@kikinovak.net wrote:
Thanks everybody for the detailed hints and answers, on the list as well
as offlist.
I got myself a second sandbox PC today, and I just installed two
vanilla CentOS 5.3 systems on them. It'll be much easier to figure out
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:18:56AM -0700, nate wrote:
fred smith wrote:
I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard
that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5.
What role is that system going to play?
I assume server because I'd put money down that in
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
What exactly does the announcement mean to the CentOS community?
This is not an easy answer.
From what point in the past to what point present/future should the
user community be concerned?
This happened currently. And as far as we can say now it only concerned
our CMS
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Angenendtra+cen...@br-online.de wrote:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
What is the level and mitigation of damage control - current and
future?
What are you trying to get at? This issue *only* concerned our web
server. None of the machines actually doing the
35 matches
Mail list logo
