Hi
I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
username: boel
subject: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2
location: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios
content: A security feature of centos 5.2 SELinux prevents the access
from the apache httpd server to the needed /var/nagios files.
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
Hi
I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
username: boel
Hmmm. We really do prefer FirstnameLastname.
subject: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2
location: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios
content: A
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
Hi
I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
username: boel
Hmmm. We really do prefer FirstnameLastname.
subject: nagios incompatibility with
Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
Hi
I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
username: boel
subject: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2
location: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios
content: A security feature of centos 5.2 SELinux prevents the access
from the apache httpd
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:24 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
workaround is to execute the
lostson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:39 -0400, JohnS wrote:
...
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics
JohnStanley
I was reading yours over today and yes they are very similar, hopefully
i can get edit permissions soon and we can get it all squared away.
Might want to
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:24 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
workaround is to execute the command: chcon -R httpd_sys_content_t
/var/nagios
Is that still
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:09:43PM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
lostson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:39 -0400, JohnS wrote:
...
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics
JohnStanley
I was reading yours over today and yes they are very similar, hopefully
i can
From: Vitor Afonso Strabello, Friday, September 11, 2009 5:51 PM
Also I got one link about this. I think that is better a checkou, not sure
if this will be usefult:
http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6747
Have a nice weekend,
Vitor
Yes, that is an excellent article. It has a a few things
Phil Schaffner wrote:
lostson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:39 -0400, JohnS wrote:
...
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics
JohnStanley
I was reading yours over today and yes they are very similar, hopefully
i can get edit permissions soon and we can get it all
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Over the weekend, I played with the elrepo-testing version. It was
pretty much (after having installed the nvidia drivers from NVidia)
nvidia-uninstall
to get rid of what I'd downloaded.
Then
yum --disablerepo=*
Am 14.09.09 19:23, schrieb Ned Slider:
Do we need to decide what the official (or preferred) CentOS Way is for
this? Or do we just present all the options without prejudice?
There are (to my knowledge) the Nvidia binary installer, dkms driver
from rpmforge, kmdl package from ATrpms, and a
Hi Akemi,
KVM uses a para-virtualized approach?
With para-virtualized guests or with 32-bit guests running a single CPU
there is no need to simulate the IO-APIC.
Kind regards
Nils
-Original Message-
From: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On
On 09/14/2009 04:53 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Hildebrand, Nils, 232
nils.hildebr...@bamf.bund.de wrote:
Hi Akemi,
KVM uses a para-virtualized approach?
Not at this moment according to this Red Hat virtualization guide:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Hildebrand, Nils, 232
nils.hildebr...@bamf.bund.de wrote:
Hi Akemi,
KVM uses a para-virtualized approach?
Not at this moment according to this Red Hat virtualization guide:
Hola,
Tengo dos segmentos de red, anteriormente separados, cada uno con su
DHCP server, que han sido unidos por un vínculo inalámbrico en modo
bridge. Ahora necesito que las estaciones Ubuntu 8.10 en el segmento A
acepten solamente las ofertas DHCP del servidor en el segmento B. Para
esto he
Saludos.
SELInux rules :P
#setup - Firewall configuration - Boton Customize, allí agregas el puerto
del webmin
2009/9/14 Enrique Quezada equez...@kike.ath.cx
Hola, otra vez molestandolos despues de no encontrar una
solucion...acabo de instalar webmin 1.480 en un servidor con centos
Hola amigos buenos dias, les escribo en primer lugar para saludarlos y
anticipadamente agradecerles por la ayuda que me puedan brindar, tengo un
servidor IBM serie 3200 con sistema operativo CentOS 5.3, y a la ves tengo 3
usuarios con Sistema Operativo Ubuntu 9.04 Juanty, por favor e trado de
¿te aparece el puerto 1 abierto cuando das por ejemplo un nmap a tu
servidor desde otra computadora? O con algún otro escaner que te diga cuales
puertos están abiertos.
mensaje original-
De: Sociedad Peruana del Climaterio i...@climaterio.org.pe
Para:
Hola, otra vez molestandolos despues de no encontrar una solucion...acabo
de instalar webmin 1.480 en un servidor con centos 5.3, en el proceso de
instalacion ningun inconveniente, lo probe accediendo desde el mismo equipo y
todo ok, pero no se puede acceder desde otro equipo de la red.
Hola, otra vez molestandolos despues de no encontrar una
solucion...acabo de instalar webmin 1.480 en un servidor con centos
5.3, en el proceso de instalacion ningun inconveniente, lo probe
accediendo desde el mismo equipo y todo ok, pero no se puede acceder
desde otro equipo de la
¿en el firewall tienes permitido las conexiones al puerto 1?
El 14 de septiembre de 2009 11:29, Sociedad Peruana del Climaterio
i...@climaterio.org.pe escribió:
Hola, otra vez molestandolos despues de no encontrar una
solucion...acabo de instalar webmin 1.480 en un servidor con
2009/9/14 Eduardo Grosclaude eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com:
Hola,
Tengo dos segmentos de red, anteriormente separados, cada uno con su
DHCP server, que han sido unidos por un vínculo inalámbrico en modo
bridge. Ahora necesito que las estaciones Ubuntu 8.10 en el segmento A
acepten solamente
Muchas gracias a todos, exactamente como me dijeron, tuve que habilitar el
puerto 1 y todo funciono a la perfeccion.
Muchas gracias.
- Original Message -
From: Juan Pablo Botero
To: centos-es@centos.org
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es]
NAda mal muy buena tu propuesta ... por ni no hay problema !! a ver que
dicen los demas compañeros
El 14 de septiembre de 2009 15:57, Enrique Quezada
equez...@kike.ath.cxescribió:
Hola todos, quería proponerles complementar el importante soporte que
colaborativo que mantenemos en forma diaria
Pues yo aunque soy novato en linux, apoyo la prouesta
El día 14 de septiembre de 2009 17:51, I.S.C. William Lopez Jimenez
william.koalas...@gmail.com escribió:
NAda mal muy buena tu propuesta ... por ni no hay problema !! a ver que
dicen los demas compañeros
El 14 de septiembre de 2009 15:57,
Bueno yo tambien soy novato y acabo de bajarme un cliente de IRC e
instalarlo, ingrese al canal y converse con el artifice de esta propuesta,
la cual suena mas que interesante ya que podria ser un punto de encuentro
mas para todos los usuarios tanto noveles como expertos en Centos.
Slds.
Hola busca en este enlace creo que ahi encontraras algo de utilidad
http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/manuales-indice
El día 14 de septiembre de 2009 16:03, Gisella Rojas Romero
yashag...@gmail.com escribió:
Gracias por aceptar mi solicitud.
Necesito la ayuda de un manual como
2009/9/14 Gisella Rojas Romero yashag...@gmail.com:
Gracias por aceptar mi solicitud.
Necesito la ayuda de un manual como configurar sendmail en centos. seria de
gran ayuda ya que se trata de un seminario.
de ante mano muchas gracias
Saludos
Gisella
Gracias por aceptar mi solicitud.
Necesito la ayuda de un manual como configurar sendmail en centos. seria
de
gran ayuda ya que se trata de un seminario.
de ante mano muchas gracias
Saludos
Gisella
Saludos Gisella, mira aquí son dos partes:
hola
mira, la gente de centos prefiere tenerlo todo dentro de centos.org y
así se controlan mejor las cosas. Es mejor para evitar tener que
coordinar con diversos admins.
están planeando es.centos.org la idea es ir traduciendo los contenidos.
Tienen un wiki en español que se puede llenar.
Dear All,
I have tried out with cdrecord option and i find out the only the
disc is erasable and not erasable
information alone and i can't able to find out the disc is empty and
disc size
Please can any one help me.
Thanks in advance
Regards
-S.Balaji
Robert Heller wrote:
Hey,
attila.ma...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
I’m having a linux box running with Centos 5.3 x86 (kernel
2.6.18-128.7.1.el5xen) which is freezing time to time and can’t login
neither trough console.
The only thing what I can do, to pass the situation is to power off/on
the pc.
The pc
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:55, Marcelo M. Garcia
marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm trying to set the terminal size in /usr/share/vte/termcap/xterm, but
it seems that CentOS doesn't look at this file.
Works for me (CentOS 4, opening
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 22:23 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:23:19 +1200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
A fault on our SAN dropped us down to a read-only filesystem
Just run fsck and follow the prompts. Do this in single user mode.
That could be fun in a
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
worry about that. What there was to worry about is the following: Lance
is the only one, who can make active changes to the centos.org
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
worry about that. What there was to worry about is the following: Lance
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
worry about that. What there was to worry about
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
worry
You could put them into /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config
Excellent! Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
/etc/syscontfig/network-scripts/rule-ethX
Check out /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes to see exactly how
things are processed.
Sorry, but I can't see how ifup-routes will ever process rule-ethX. A
quick search for rule on ifup-routes (on any file in the
network-scripts directory) gets
Sorry, but I can't see how ifup-routes will ever process rule-ethX. A
quick search for rule on ifup-routes (on any file in the
network-scripts directory) gets no results.
Are we running the same version? Mine is CentOS release 4.8 (Final).
___
CentOS
2009/9/12 Eugene Vilensky evilen...@gmail.com:
I have restricted the port range for passv and opened iptables,
ip_conntrack_ftp (sp?) is loaded, and port 20 and 21 are opened.
I'm not sure it can solve the problem, but I recommend loading
ip_nat_ftp instead.
Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
time off from projects from time to time, so there
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:01 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
Ummm. That mostly has been resolved around a month ago, you might want
to check dates on things you mail somewhere.
Btw the homepage says:
More information will
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:01 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
Ummm. That mostly has been resolved around a month ago, you might want
to check dates on things you mail somewhere.
Btw the
On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
time off from projects from time to
On 09/14/2009 07:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
snip
The CentOS project has the domain names in question, we have released
4.8, we have some packages from 5.4 in question, and everything is 100%
solved from a technical stand point.
The above SHOULD have said packages from 5.4 in QA testing
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some
On 09/14/2009 07:42 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
The sound is
Hi,
I am running 32-bit Firefox-3.5.3 on Centos-5.3 (64-bit kernel) on a Dell
Precision M65 laptop. This is likely a Adobe problem, but maybe someone else
has seen this before. Please CC me, as I only receive the digest version of the
list.
When using the 10.0.32.18-release version of the
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Do you ask Slackware or Gentoo or Debian or Ubuntu to explain the same
things?
However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
require anyone to donate to the project to use the software.
Tone down, please.
Ralph
However, we are NOT accepting monetary donations at this point. We will
not accept monetary donations until there is something in place where
more than one person has to approve any spending and some kind of
committee is in place to manage incoming and outgoing funds.
ooh, ouch. A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
| However, we are NOT accepting monetary donations at this point. We will
| not accept monetary donations until there is something in place where
| more than one person has to approve any spending and some kind
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
require anyone to donate to the project to use the software. We do have
expenses (like DVDs to hand out, posters to print, rooms to pay for at
Linux conferences,
On 09/14/2009 08:51 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
require anyone to donate to the project to use the software. We do have
expenses (like DVDs to hand out, posters
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:23, Diogo Sperb Schneider
di...@kildare.ind.br wrote:
Sorry, but I can't see how ifup-routes will ever process rule-ethX. A
quick search for rule on ifup-routes (on any file in the
network-scripts directory) gets no results.
Are we running the same version?
Hey folks,
A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
I really like this idea and would like to learn more about it. Are
there some examples out there?
I have lots of custom config info and think this would be an
On Monday 14 September 2009 10:59:58 am Ralph Angenendt wrote:
The release notes will have a section if/which packages have been
removed or are new to the release (or have been updated).
Thanks for clarifying Ralph. All clear now.
All the best,
Jorge
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Hello everyone,
Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will
it
be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
Or is it possible for the new point release to include NEW packages that
weren't on the base
Hello everyone,
Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will it
be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
Or is it possible for the new point release to include NEW packages that
weren't on the base relase (in this case CentOS
I am working on setting up an NFS server, which will mainly serve files
to web servers, and I want to setup two bonds. I have a question
regarding *which* bonding mode to use. None of the documentation I have
read suggests any mode is better than other with the exception of
specific use cases
Rick Barnes wrote:
Since my switch *does* support 802.3ad, including layers 2,3 and 4
hashing, should I use mode=4? Or would one of the other modes be
better for providing fail-over and link-aggregation, specifically
balance-tlb or balance-alb.
Use 802.3ad, also if performance is really an
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 09:12 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/14/2009 08:51 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
require anyone to donate to the project to use the
Hi,
I am running 32-bit Firefox-3.5.3 on Centos-5.3 (64-bit kernel) on a Dell
Precision M65 laptop. This is likely a Adobe problem, but maybe someone
else has seen this before. Please CC me, as I only receive the digest
version of the list.
When using the 10.0.32.18-release version of the
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:51 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Hello everyone,
Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will
it
be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
Yes.
Or is it possible for the new point release to
On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you dont waste your time
around this and instead work with projects like chef /
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rick Barnes li...@sitevision.com wrote:
8
Since my switch *does* support 802.3ad, including layers 2,3 and 4
hashing, should I use mode=4? Or would one of the other modes be
better for providing fail-over and link-aggregation, specifically
balance-tlb or
--Mensaje original--
De: Karanbir Singh
Remitente: centos-boun...@centos.org
Para: CentOS mailing list
Responder a: CentOS mailing list
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] LF examples - using site-specific RPMs for config
Enviado: 14 Sep, 2009 12:11
On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
A
2009/9/14 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com:
Hi,
AFAIR, the rule-ethX files (and maybe also route-ethX files) work in
CentOS 5 only. If you're doing that on CentOS 4, I believe the way for
you to load those rules during reboot is adding them to
/etc/rc.local...
I see there are
Alan,
FYI last year, I tried bcfg on Centos5.1 but it was difficult to get
things working. With Puppet things could work, not easily but it
allowed rollback using CVS and ensuring that common config files are
always applied to all machines.
Quoting Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
On
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:35, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
I believe you are referring to my suggestion on a thread discussing
creating scripts on the
Alan McKay wrote:
I have lots of custom config info and think this would be an ideal way
to manage it. Others mentioned puppet and CF engine which probably
have their merits as well. But I don't really have time at the moment
to learn those. Perhaps in this thread we could even discuss
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:35 AM, David Suhendrik da...@pnyet.web.id wrote:
=D, Someone make me confused, and just a make sure here...
I'm so sorry for this...
I was worried too, on the day I first saw the message. But I found (on
that day) that the worst that would have happened would have
At 10:42 PM 9/11/2009, you wrote:
I have been tasked with having a Buffalo Terastation Pro 2 NAS box,
likely to be connected to a Linux box via samba, be the storage device
to back up mostly Ubuntu and Centos systems. The trick is, the
machines to be backed up need to do so in an automated
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 23:55, Dave dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got rpmforge and epel on centos 5.3. I'm trying to do an
install of perl-Image-Info for spamassassin image scanning. The package was
picked up in rpmforge since first, but it is failing to install because a
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 22:42, Scott Ehrlich srehrl...@gmail.com wrote:
I ONLY plan to use samba to mount the NAS to my Linux server, unless
someone comes up with a more secure method,
I don't know if I understand what you mean by the sentence above, but
Samba is *not* secure in the sense
On 9/14/2009 9:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/14/2009 07:42 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On 9/14/2009 9:51 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
require anyone to donate to the project to use the software. We do have
expenses (like DVDs to hand out,
William Warren wrote:
Why do we want to know? Because of one person's disappearance the
project nearly went boom. Because by your own admission(the devs) the
funds were NOT going to further the project. If you can't get a thicker
skin maybe you need a vacation.
Perhaps it's reversed?
I have a small fixed ip network at home, running red hat 9 on two
amd k6 500 Mhz boxes. One has 256 M memory and the other 320 M. They
pretty much meet my needs, but lately I have detected that the internet
sites
I frequent are requiring some more modern software than I can run. I
On 9/14/09 11:14 AM, Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
Another alternative would be setting up an rsync server from where you
download your config files to all servers, that way you edit once and
copy them everywhere you need them, but that is certainly more manual
than what
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Buz Davis buzda...@earthlink.net wrote:
I have a small fixed ip network at home, running red hat 9 on two
amd k6 500 Mhz boxes. One has 256 M memory and the other 320 M. They
pretty much meet my needs, but lately I have detected that the internet
sites
I
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
If the problem is with the RPMforge repository (from your e-mail that
is not completely clear) you should report it on the RPMforge mailing
list:
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
From the
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you dont waste your time
around
On 9/14/09, Jorge Fábregas jorge.fabre...@gmail.com wrote:
Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will
it
be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
Or is it possible for the new point release to include NEW packages that
weren't
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:42 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:35 AM, David Suhendrik da...@pnyet.web.id wrote:
=D, Someone make me confused, and just a make sure here...
I'm so sorry for this...
I was worried too, on the day I first saw the message. But I found (on
hi All,
thanks for the responses.
After being dropped into the
# Filesystem repair
prompt,
( on account of inode 27344909 has illegal blocks )
following warm reboot (via reboot) after finding (SAN ) filesystem in
read-only
mode yesterday morning (possibly because of HBA fault on SAN) , I
89 matches
Mail list logo
