Dear Russ.
Why not granting Edit rights (and I mean full Edit Group Access) to
anyone who has already contributed good stuff.
Then there should be something like a Wiki Admin group which will
track changes and correct them || start discussion on the MLs if
necessary.
because creating a
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Brian Mathis
brian.mathis+centosd...@gmail.com wrote:
What you currently have is the lock model, and with few admins the
idea of opening up the system seems like a bad one because those
admins will need to deal with all those errors, but this is not the
case.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Marcus Moeller m...@marcus-moeller.de wrote:
It's not about creating problems but finding solutions. If no one has
the right to fix errors in articles
There are around 80 people who have that right *right now*.
Ralph
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Will Fitch w...@phpfever.com wrote:
Dear Russ.
It's not about creating problems but finding solutions. If no one has
the right to fix errors in articles and if every minor change has to
be discussed over and over again on the ML, it's the dead of a vital
wiki.
+1
-20
This continuing drama is beginning to remind me of the Miller Great taste,
less filling commercials of old (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_Lite)...
It's the same damn beer/CentOS people! ;) [?]
347.png___
CentOS-docs mailing list
From: Ralph Angenendt, Friday, October 02, 2009 6:11 AM
We already have 70 people who would be able to do so (no idea how
many of these accounts are still in use). Do I see those going over
pages? Rarely, it's nearly always the same persons.
I'm OK with helping to update/maintain the wiki.
On 25-Sep-2009 Benjamin Franz wrote:
And I just learned something new. According to
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/105144;jsessionid=DE9B4FFB861971525BEDBD8
984F6A670?start=15tstart=0
if you use /dev/shm for your tmpDirectory you don't pay the 'double the
memory' penalty. I am
Saludos :
Tengo instalado un centos 5.3 y me corre de maravilla .
Necesito instalr un gestor documental como nuxeo pero he encontrado poca
documntacion sobre la instalacion . alguien ha tenido esta experiencia . sera
que encontrare mas documentacion sobre alfresco (otro gestor documetal ) .
Hector Martínez Romo wrote:
hola
He instalado bind sobre centos 5 , pero no encuentro el archivo de
configuracion /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf .
saludos.
___
Saludos.
La aplicación fue desplegada en JBoss?
Para esto es necesario usar la utilidad ant.
2009/10/2 Juan Manuel R. juan...@yahoo.es
Saludos :
Tengo instalado un centos 5.3 y me corre de maravilla .
Necesito instalr un gestor documental como nuxeo pero he encontrado poca
documntacion
El vie, 02-10-2009 a las 14:25 -0300, Gustavo E escribió:
Hector Martínez Romo wrote:
hola
He instalado bind sobre centos 5 , pero no encuentro el archivo de
configuracion /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf .
saludos.
creo que tenes que instalar estos paquetes
El 2 de octubre de 2009 15:59, Hardy Beltran Monasterios
h...@hardy.com.boescribió:
El vie, 02-10-2009 a las 14:25 -0300, Gustavo E escribió:
Hector Martínez Romo wrote:
hola
He instalado bind sobre centos 5 , pero no encuentro el archivo de
configuracion
--
From: Gustavo E r...@unixstate.com.ar
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:25 PM
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Consulta sobre bind
Hector Martínez Romo wrote:
hola
He instalado bind sobre centos 5 , pero no encuentro el
eso fue lo que realice, pero bueno lo creo manualmente como dices, muchas
gracias!!!
El 2 de octubre de 2009 15:52, Eduardo Atenas
eduardo.ate...@gmail.comescribió:
--
From: Gustavo E r...@unixstate.com.ar
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:25
El vie, 02-10-2009 a las 16:10 -0400, Hector Martínez Romo escribió:
El 2 de octubre de 2009 15:59, Hardy Beltran Monasterios
h...@hardy.com.bo escribió:
El vie, 02-10-2009 a las 14:25 -0300, Gustavo E escribió:
Hector Martínez Romo wrote:
hola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Giovanni Tirloni spake:
| On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Timo Schoeler
| timo.schoe...@riscworks.netwrote:
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Hi list,
|
| I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64
Good Morning--
I'm looking to shore up security in my system and with communications.
Can you point me to the proper version of GnuPG for CentOS 5.3 (Final)?
Thanks,
Dick
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Dick Roth wrote:
Good Morning--
I'm looking to shore up security in my system and with communications.
Can you point me to the proper version of GnuPG for CentOS 5.3 (Final)?
From my fully patched box:-
2.6.18-128.4.1.el5[r...@www CentosIKEL]# yum info gnupg
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Dick Roth
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 12:44 PM
To: CentOS List
Subject: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
Good Morning--
I'm looking to shore up security in my system and with
IMO the default install of gpg is good enough. Remember, you break it, you
get to keep the pieces.
Good enough is in the eye of the beholder. If you want to use gpg-agent
and pinentry, you need gpg2.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of lheck...@users.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:29 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
IMO the default install of gpg is good enough.
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
[...]
A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer with
excessive NFS getattr, lookup and access operations. The weird thing is that
the number of these operations increases over time. I have an mrtg graph
(which I didn't
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Brian Mathis brian.mat...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not connected to the Internet, and not connected to a LAN are very
different things. I doubt VOIP would work if the
At Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:11:19 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
[...]
A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer
with
excessive NFS getattr, lookup and access operations. The weird thing is
that
This is definitely a weird interaction, as neither the screensaver nor its
components actually run on the CentOS machine. I have not checked whether
any other activities in a vnc session cause similar behaviour.
Where does the screensaver's data files (eg where are the quotes stored)
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Dick Roth
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 12:44 PM
To: CentOS List
Subject: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
Good Morning--
I'm looking to shore up security in my
At Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:55:51 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
This is definitely a weird interaction, as neither the screensaver nor
its
components actually run on the CentOS machine. I have not checked whether
any other activities in a vnc session cause
Robert Heller wrote:
This is definitely a weird interaction, as neither the screensaver nor its
components actually run on the CentOS machine. I have not checked whether
any other activities in a vnc session cause similar behaviour.
Where does the screensaver's data files (eg where are
At Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:57:16 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
This is definitely a weird interaction, as neither the screensaver nor
its
components actually run on the CentOS machine. I have not checked
whether
any other activities
This is quite possible, and having just gone thru this recently a few
weeks ago, I thought I post a warning here to hopefully save someone
else from the brain-fart I suffered a few weeks ago. I needed to change
the mount point permissions w/out umounting the filesystems in a few
places, so I
Robert Heller wrote:
Seems odd that caching wouldn't just happen naturally in the nfs client.
I am not sure if it even makes sense to cache NFS files on a nfs client
-- how does the client know that the file might not have changed on the
server? At the very least it has to check the file
HI All,
So I have 5 1U servers (running Windows) that have Ultra 320 SCSI
Drives in them.
The owner of these boxes wants the drives captured in their current
states to .iso or .cdr or something where if the need arises the data
can be viewed, used again, etc.
So what is the best approach?
ML wrote:
HI All,
So I have 5 1U servers (running Windows) that have Ultra 320 SCSI
Drives in them.
The owner of these boxes wants the drives captured in their current
states to .iso or .cdr or something where if the need arises the data
can be viewed, used again, etc.
So what
ML wrote:
HI All,
So I have 5 1U servers (running Windows) that have Ultra 320 SCSI
Drives in them.
The owner of these boxes wants the drives captured in their current
states to .iso or .cdr or something where if the need arises the data
can be viewed, used again, etc.
So what is
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 13:15 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
ML wrote:
HI All,
So I have 5 1U servers (running Windows) that have Ultra 320 SCSI
Drives in them.
The owner of these boxes wants the drives captured in their current
states to .iso or .cdr or something where if the need
Scott McClanahan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 13:15 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
ML wrote:
HI All,
So I have 5 1U servers (running Windows) that have Ultra 320 SCSI
Drives in them.
The owner of these boxes wants the drives captured in their current
states to .iso or .cdr or something
It's still a one-way trip, though, where with clonezilla you can restore back
to the hardware.
Exactly. Once I do this type of operation I've made the decision that
the OS will never need to run on physical hardware again.
___
CentOS mailing list
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/30/2009 07:43 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I have just completed building the RPMS for the CentOS Enterprise IPA
(Identity, Policy, and Audit) Server.
This is based on the sources from the Red Hat Enterprise IPA server.
Documentation can be downloaded here:
38 matches
Mail list logo
