Re: [CentOS-docs] Spacewalk Client Tools from Stahnma

2009-11-03 Thread Marcus Moeller
Dear Patrice. I updated to howto to avoid the use of the Stahnma repository. However, the rhel-instnum package is not availablie in EPEL or the Spacewalk official repository. Is this package still required in Spacewalk version 0.6? Yes, you are still in need of rhel-instnum on a CentOS box.

Re: [CentOS-docs] Spacewalk Client Tools from Stahnma

2009-11-03 Thread Patrice Guay
Marcus Moeller wrote: Dear Patrice. I updated to howto to avoid the use of the Stahnma repository. However, the rhel-instnum package is not availablie in EPEL or the Spacewalk official repository. Is this package still required in Spacewalk version 0.6? Yes, you are still in need of

Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 5.4 Network install

2009-11-03 Thread Ed Heron
From: Toshikazu Aiyama, Sunday, November 01, 2009 1:07 AM I have just completed to write up the procedure to install 5.4 through network There is an interesting article that that you might want to read at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PXE/InternetInstallation

Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 5.4 Network install

2009-11-03 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Am 01.11.09 09:07, schrieb Toshikazu Aiyama: I'm not really sure what you are trying to accomplish here: Do you want to add something to the wiki? Then the following text is way too special and needs simplification and despecialisation. 4. Label the volume to be installed # mkfs.ext3 -L

Re: [CentOS-docs] Update latest CentOS-5 version on FrontPage to 5.4

2009-11-03 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Am 02.11.09 06:37, schrieb Timothy Lee: Dear all, The captioned change should be performed by someone with the right permissions. Oh, oops. Thanks, Ralph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1550 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 kernel - security and bug fix update

2009-11-03 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1550 kernel security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1550.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-63.EL.ia32e.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1550 Important CentOS 3 i386 kernel - security and bug fix update

2009-11-03 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1550 kernel security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1550.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-63.EL.i586.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1549 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 wget - security update

2009-11-03 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1549 wget security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1549.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/wget-1.10.2-0.30E.1.i386.rpm source:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1549 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 wget - security update

2009-11-03 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1549 wget security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1549.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/wget-1.10.2-0.30E.1.x86_64.rpm

Re: [CentOS-virt] SATA vs RAID5 vs VMware SOLVED

2009-11-03 Thread Philip Gwyn
A short follow up to indicate how I solved my problem : - moved all the ram files to /dev/shm - downgraded host to CentOS 4.8 (was 5.2) - Moved virtual disks to RAID1 (was RAID5) - Spread the virtual disks over various raidsets (was all on same raidset) The first element alone was not

Re: [CentOS-es] Raid 1 PROLIIANT MLT150G6

2009-11-03 Thread César Sepúlveda B
El Viernes, 30 de Octubre de 2009 16:21, Juan Cordoba escribió: Amigos ya configure mi server hp proliant MLT150G6 con 2 discos duros sata de 250 G via hardware smart array B110i sata raid con la tecla f8 a Raid 1+0, pero al momento de realizar las con Centos 5.3 particiones aperecen 2 discos

Re: [CentOS-es] Raid 1 PROLIIANT MLT150G6

2009-11-03 Thread domingov
Raid 1+ 0 ??? ... no crees que es un mirror, comunmente llamado raid0 On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:59:57 -0300, César Sepúlveda B kropotki...@gmail.com wrote: El Viernes, 30 de Octubre de 2009 16:21, Juan Cordoba escribió: Amigos ya configure mi server hp proliant MLT150G6 con 2 discos duros sata

Re: [CentOS-es] Centos for Sparc

2009-11-03 Thread Oscar Osta Pueyo
Hola, El dt 03 de 11 de 2009 a les 11:49 -0500, en/na Gino Francisco Alania Hurtado va escriure: Sres.. he querido colaborar con la comunidad efectuando un manual breve de Centos for Sparc , note que no hay mucha info en la red sobre este tema , asi que con esto quizas alguien que tuvo esa

Re: [CentOS-es] Raid 1 PROLIIANT MLT150G6

2009-11-03 Thread Oscar Osta Pueyo
Hola, El dt 03 de 11 de 2009 a les 10:31 -0600, en/na domin...@linuxsc.net va escriure: Raid 1+ 0 ??? ... no crees que es un mirror, comunmente llamado raid0 Un mirror es 1, 0 es la suma de espacios... http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID -- Oscar Osta Pueyo _kiakli_

Re: [CentOS-es] Centos for Sparc

2009-11-03 Thread Gino Francisco Alania Hurtado
Ok , en la noche lo reviso como subirlo On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:47:02 +0100, Oscar Osta Pueyo wrote Hola, El dt 03 de 11 de 2009 a les 11:49 -0500, en/na Gino Francisco Alania Hurtado va escriure: Sres.. he querido colaborar con la comunidad efectuando un manual breve de Centos for

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda Servidor Dell Power Edge 1800

2009-11-03 Thread William Diaz Pabón
Yo tuve problemas con un DELL también instalando un Centos 5.1 y se soluciono actualizando la BIOS que descargue de la página oficial de DELL para la referencia del pc. Trate de hacer eso a ver si te ayuda en algo. El 3 de noviembre de 2009 17:37, Cesar Augusto Martinez Cobo

Re: [CentOS-es] Raid 1 PROLIIANT MLT150G6

2009-11-03 Thread Raul Arboleda
En las controladoras de compaq se usa el 1+0 como espejo,. En mi parecer no estas cargndo el controlador de la tarjeta smart array baja el controlador y lo llamas usando en el boot linux dd. Saludos Raúl Eduardo Arboleda Zapata Ingeniero de Sistemas Unninca Cel +573 300 620 66 13    +573

Re: [CentOS-es] Actualizar centos 4 a 5.4

2009-11-03 Thread Cesar Erices
ok gracias -- Sin más que decir se despide de Usted, muy atentamente Cesar Erices Vergara Ingeniero en Gestión Informática Analista de Sistema Santiago - Chile ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-es] [l-plug] Backtrack

2009-11-03 Thread Ernesto Celis
El 2 de noviembre de 2009 14:33, Kennet Christopher Salinas Rodriguez ksali...@gruporocio.com escribió: !!! Claro!, bootea desde el cd; llega a cargar pero se queda al momento cargar el fondo de BACTRACK, he probado el cd booteador en varias laptops y si bootea pero ninguna me lee el WIFI o

Re: [CentOS-es] Raid 1 PROLIIANT MLT150G6

2009-11-03 Thread Oscar Osta Pueyo
Hola, 2009/11/3 Raul Arboleda raularbol...@une.net.co En las controladoras de compaq se usa el 1+0 como espejo,. Y en las demás, es un raid anidado, también lo puedes denominar raid 10 Ya he puesto antes el artículo de la wikipedia... -- Oscar Osta Pueyo oostap.lis...@gmail.com _kiakli_

Re: [CentOS-es] Backtrack

2009-11-03 Thread Ernesto Celis
El 2 de noviembre de 2009 16:52, Kennet Christopher Salinas Rodriguez ksali...@gruporocio.com escribió: Buenop, pense q linux es linux, no quería ofender sip estoy investigando pero veo q SOLO funciona con ciertos modelos específicos de red. No ofendes, pero esta lista no es la indicada para

Re: [CentOS-es] Actualizar centos 4 a 5.4

2009-11-03 Thread Ernesto Celis
El 3 de noviembre de 2009 06:38, Cesar Erices caeri...@gmail.com escribió: Estimados listeros, necesito actualizar un server centos 4.0 a la ultima version estable, la verdad que este centos es un servidor de correos y esta generando mucho trafico, ayer debimos eliminar cerca de 2500 mail

Re: [CentOS-es] Backtrack

2009-11-03 Thread Kennet Christopher Salinas Rodriguez
Buenop, pense q linux es linux, no quería ofender sip estoy investigando pero veo q SOLO funciona con ciertos modelos específicos de red. Salu2! De: Ernesto Celis [mailto:celisdelafue...@gmail.com] Enviado el: Lunes, 02

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda Servidor Dell Power Edge 1800

2009-11-03 Thread Raul Eduardo Arboleda Zapata
Hola Cesar como vas, mira de esta pagina puedes bajar los controladores de tu maquina http://support.dell.com/support/downloads/driverslist.aspx?os=RH52catid=-1dateid=-1impid=-1osl=SPtypeid=-1formatid=-1servicetag=SystemID=PWE_1800hidos=WNEThidlang=spTabIndex=scanSupported=FalsescanConsent=False

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda Servidor Dell Power Edge 1800

2009-11-03 Thread Oscar Osta Pueyo
Hola, Una de las ventajas de usar rhel o centos es que hay fabricantes, como dell, que certifican que la combinacion sistema - equipo funcione. Ves a la pag. de dell y mira si esta certificado. En caso afirmativo, y como se comentaba en el correo anterior, seguro que esta la solucion. 2009/11/4,

Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?

2009-11-03 Thread David Suhendrik
Check sendmail or other mta service's and shutdowk / kill process... Regards, David - Original Message - From: Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2009 1:44:37 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help? On Mon, Nov 02, 2009, ML

Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?

2009-11-03 Thread Corey Chandler
ML wrote: Hi All, Is anyone versed in Zimbra? Extremely-- and I know that Zimbra is flat out not supported under CentOS, by their own decision. If this is community edition, it's a different kettle of fish entirely. I have most things working except some MTA issue. I tried posting on the

[CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory

2009-11-03 Thread Wahyu Darmawan
Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you please help me? Thank you. Rgds, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory

2009-11-03 Thread Corey Chandler
Wahyu Darmawan wrote: Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you please help me? Thank you. Rgds, Integrate how? What's your desired end state? -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___

Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory

2009-11-03 Thread Wahyu Darmawan
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Corey Chandler li...@sequestered.netwrote: Wahyu Darmawan wrote: Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you please help me? Thank you. Rgds, Integrate how? What's your

Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory

2009-11-03 Thread Corey Chandler
Wahyu Darmawan wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Corey Chandler li...@sequestered.net mailto:li...@sequestered.net wrote: Wahyu Darmawan wrote: Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you

Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory

2009-11-03 Thread iteeqg
What kind of help you need? 在2009-11-03,Wahyu Darmawan wahyu.darma...@gmail.com 写道: Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you please help me? Thank you. Rgds, ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/03/2009 12:09 AM, Todd Denniston wrote: Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the CentOS team keeps it around to do the matching builds? The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the only version we work with on the

Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory

2009-11-03 Thread Fabian Arrotin
Wahyu Darmawan wrote: Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you please help me? Thank you. The squid website explains that clearly .. which part don't you undersand ?

Re: [CentOS] Server packet loss and becomes unresponsive

2009-11-03 Thread Geoff Galitz
  Does ifconfig or dmesg show any errors?   If the answer to those is no, I'd start running sar to see if there is abnormal behavior which could indicate a hardware problem.   Of course, another possibility is a DDOS.  Do you have any kind security monitoring or protection in place? -geoff

Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory

2009-11-03 Thread Joseph L. Casale
The squid website explains that clearly .. which part don't you undersand ? http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/#Authentication I'll just add that the ntlm helper won't work under Windows 7/Windows Server 2008 R2. If you are starting from scratch, set up Kerb Auth as that will work with

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: Looks like you are doing everything just fine.  Perhaps, we should move this conversation to the

[CentOS] Nagios check_file size in another machine

2009-11-03 Thread kebo jantan
Dear all any one can help me??? I am aware of monitoring disk space using nagios (disk partitions with check_disk). Now, I have a situation that I would like to monitor size of an individual file through nagios. e.g /var/lib/mysql/somedatabase/vlog.myd, this file will grow very fast and i

Re: [CentOS] Nagios check_file size in another machine

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/03/2009 12:48 PM, kebo jantan wrote: I'm already used 'check_file' but this can't solved my problem. The file in another machine, that 'check_file' can't do it. Look into how nagios runs its tests over a ssh connection or snmp info or nrpe. -- Karanbir Singh London, UK|

Re: [CentOS] Nagios check_file size in another machine

2009-11-03 Thread kebo jantan
I just already. This on client [r...@xmen ~]# ps -ef | grep -i snmp root 10505 10172 0 20:06 pts/000:00:00 grep -i snmp [r...@cyclop ~]# ps -ef | grep -i nrpe root 10507 10172 0 20:06 pts/000:00:00 grep -i nrpe [r...@xmen ~]# ps -ef | grep -i ssh root 8899 1 0 Oct26 ?

[CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Alan McKay
Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at : - CentOS on bare metal - CentOS on ESXi 4.0 with local disk - CentOS on ESXi with 1 VM

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Oliver Ransom
On 03/11/2009, at 11:52 PM, Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at : - CentOS on bare metal - CentOS on

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Ryan Cox
I'd recommend a quick read through this post: http://lethargy.org/~jesus/writes/disk-benchmarking-with-dd-dont And then browse through the docs for these tools and pick the one that suites your needs best: http://www.iozone.org/ http://sysbench.sourceforge.net/ http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread przemolicc
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 09:22:57AM -0400, Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at : - CentOS on bare metal

Re: [CentOS] OFFTOPIC MAILSERVER PROBLEM WITH JAMMCONSULTING.COM Re: Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-03 Thread Drew
Your neil and webmaster addresses reject mail from sasktel.net (the largest ISP in Saskatchewan, Canada), my own mailserver (melvilletheatre.com), and gmail.com. Your mailserver definitely needs some attention and repair. Not to be an ass Frank but have you considered the mail config on your

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at : - CentOS on bare metal - CentOS on ESXi 4.0 with local disk -

[CentOS] CentOS Social, London, UK : 10 Nov 2009

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
Hi Guys, Some of us are yet-again going to be getting together for a CentOS Beer evening on the 10th Nov 2009 at the Kings and Queens. The Pub is mostly quiet during the week, has a fair selection of drinks and is central enough to most people in the city. The full address is : King Queens,

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread nate
Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at : - CentOS on bare metal - CentOS on ESXi 4.0 with local disk -

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Rod Rook
This is just a followup post for those who would like to know how this conversation developed. The details are in this ELRepo mailing list thread: http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2009-November/000102.html In short, the write support offered by the kernel (hence kmod-ntfs) is quite

Re: [CentOS] info about hdds in raid

2009-11-03 Thread Boris Epstein
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: If you can see activity lights, you can 'cat /dev/sd? /dev/null' to make them busy, one at a time (where ? is a, b, c, etc). hahaha, I've done that, only my version

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Ross Walker
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at : - CentOS on bare

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Rod Rook rod.r...@gmail.com wrote: In short, the write support offered by the kernel (hence kmod-ntfs) is quite limited.  Alan Bartlett pointed to this section of the kernel Kconfig file: The only supported operation is overwriting existing files, without

Re: [CentOS] Nagios check_file size in another machine

2009-11-03 Thread John Doe
From: kebo jantan jantan.keb...@gmail.com Now, I have a situation that I would like to monitor size of an individual file through nagios. e.g /var/lib/mysql/somedatabase/vlog.myd, this file will grow very fast and i would like to monitor if the size of this file crosses 1.5 G. I'm already used

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Rod Rook
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Rod Rook rod.r...@gmail.com wrote: In short, the write support offered by the kernel (hence kmod-ntfs) is quite limited. Alan Bartlett pointed to this section of the kernel Kconfig file:

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Rod Rook rod.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: I can write, rename, create folders and files under kernel -2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 Using the in-kernel ntfs module (kmod-ntfs) ? Yes. Interesting (and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 57, Issue 31

2009-11-03 Thread Tim_Davis
Message: 27 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:13:26 -0400 From: Robert Spangler mli...@zoominternet.net Subject: Re: [CentOS] Syslog do not work To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Message-ID: 200910302113.26256.mli...@zoominternet.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On Friday 30

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Rod Rook
Interesting (and curious). That means that the description in the Kconfig file is obsolete. Thanks for your input. My attempt to write to NTFS produced a permission denied message. This needs more investigation. Akemi You could have saved lots of time and efforts if you cared to read

[CentOS] LSI SAS snmp agent

2009-11-03 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Anyone set this up in CentOS? Can you shed some light on the requirements, does it require the LSI module, or does the rhel provided module work just fine? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] smartmontools

2009-11-03 Thread m . roth
I'm in the process of rolling out the upgrade from (mostly) 5.3 to 5.4. One of my servers started throwing the following: Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:0: FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s DT (12.5 ns, offset 62) Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:1: FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s DT

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Rod Rook wrote: Interesting (and curious). That means that the description in the Kconfig file is obsolete. Thanks for your input. My attempt to write to NTFS produced a permission denied message. This needs more investigation. Akemi You could have saved lots

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote: funny. Rod, that wiki page ends with: Written and currently maintained by AkemiYagi. Comments/improvement welcome. I guess the Akemi you replied to had read that page :-D . and I suspect you are

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-03 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote: and I suspect you are actually using ntfs-3g... Indeed, this has to be looked into. Rod, could you show us the output from: rpm -qa

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Les Mikesell
Ross Walker wrote: On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at

Re: [CentOS] DNS log file question

2009-11-03 Thread Corey Chandler
James B. Byrne wrote: I am trying to sort out a configuration problem with y slave servers, more on that in a following message, but while I was examining the system log on one of those servers I saw this: Nov 3 12:30:43 inet04 named[18110]: client 174.88.12.107#60136: query (cache)

Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-03 Thread Matt
Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup system for CentOS? Just google for -- cheap vps centos -- and see what you find.  You can SCP your compressed backups into an account quite easily.  We do this for a mysql database backup.  You could also use a cheap web hosting account with

[CentOS] DNS log file question

2009-11-03 Thread James B. Byrne
I am trying to sort out a configuration problem with y slave servers, more on that in a following message, but while I was examining the system log on one of those servers I saw this: Nov 3 12:30:43 inet04 named[18110]: client 174.88.12.107#60136: query (cache) 'www.soundunwound.com/A/IN' denied

[CentOS] Proper configuration for DNS slaves and masters

2009-11-03 Thread James B. Byrne
I have the following layout DNS01 - Master DNS02 - Remote slave DNS03 - Local network slave The master is configured so: acl HLLnetworks { 209.47.176/24; 216.185.71/24; }; options { allow-query { any; }; allow-recursion {

Re: [CentOS] DNS log file question

2009-11-03 Thread nate
James B. Byrne wrote: Again, I remind potential respondents that I get the digest so please send me a direct copy of any reply to the list. 174.88.12.107 is trying to use your system for recursive queries. nate ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread Todd Denniston
Karanbir Singh wrote, On 11/03/2009 04:57 AM: The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the only version we work with on the buildsystems. depending on what you are doing, that issue might or might not be relevant. Thanks for yours and Mr. X's feedback. Off to

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools

2009-11-03 Thread Corey Chandler
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm in the process of rolling out the upgrade from (mostly) 5.3 to 5.4. One of my servers started throwing the following: Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:0: FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s DT (12.5 ns, offset 62) Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:1:

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Tracy Phillips
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Dan Burkland dburk...@nmdp.org wrote: I am a little new to managing large numbers of CentOS/RHEL servers and was wondering what you experienced sysadmins prefer, Spacewalk or Puppet? Chef showed up on my radar this morning. Have you seen it or used it. Looks

Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread David Hrbáč
Todd Denniston napsal(a): I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Ray Van Dolson
Also, I believe cobbler functionality is being included in Spacewalk. Though I haven't delved too deeply into either yet (we do use RHN Satellite 5.0.x), I need to evaluate whether Spacewalk/newer versions of Satellite can manage hosts *other* than RHEL easily. I'd hate to maintain both a

Re: [CentOS] Server packet loss and becomes unresponsive

2009-11-03 Thread Timothy
do you have remote console access i.e. DRAC or ILO ? No. did you mention if any recent OS or other software updates like 5.3 to 5.4 or otherwise? It is a newer box w/ 5.4 installed. someone could be DOS'ing the server ??? Does not appear that way and if it was I would imagine console should

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Corey Chandler
Karanbir Singh wrote: On 03/11/09 21:13, Ray Van Dolson wrote: Also, I believe cobbler functionality is being included in Spacewalk. spacewalk 0.6 is able to deploy machines with cobbler and do initial snippet management too. At that point I pass it over to puppet personally.

Re: [CentOS] LSI SAS snmp agent

2009-11-03 Thread Ross Walker
On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Anyone set this up in CentOS? Can you shed some light on the requirements, does it require the LSI module, or does the rhel provided module work just fine? The LSI SAS SNMP module is an add-on to the RH

Re: [CentOS] Server packet loss and becomes unresponsive

2009-11-03 Thread mark
Timothy wrote: snip did you mention if any recent OS or other software updates like 5.3 to 5.4 or otherwise? It is a newer box w/ 5.4 installed. someone could be DOS'ing the server ??? Does not appear that way and if it was I would imagine console should still work but it does not. do

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 03/11/09 21:13, Ray Van Dolson wrote: Also, I believe cobbler functionality is being included in Spacewalk. spacewalk 0.6 is able to deploy machines with cobbler and do initial snippet management too. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Dan Burkland
Mark, What would you recommend for a larger environment then? Dan Burkland NMDP Helpdesk Technician 3001 Broadway Street N. E. Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55413-1753 Phone (612) 362-3411 Toll Free: (800) 526-7809 Ext. 8123 -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Nagios check_file size in another machine

2009-11-03 Thread Keith Keller
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 08:08:27PM +0700, kebo jantan wrote: I just already. This on client [r...@xmen ~]# ps -ef | grep -i snmp root 10505 10172 0 20:06 pts/000:00:00 grep -i snmp [r...@cyclop ~]# ps -ef | grep -i nrpe root 10507 10172 0 20:06 pts/000:00:00 grep -i nrpe

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 03/11/09 19:23, Dan Burkland wrote: I am a little new to managing large numbers of CentOS/RHEL servers and was wondering what you experienced sysadmins prefer, Spacewalk or Puppet? They are not really the same thing - puppet tends to be more policy and role centric while spacewalk is more

[CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Dan Burkland
I am a little new to managing large numbers of CentOS/RHEL servers and was wondering what you experienced sysadmins prefer, Spacewalk or Puppet? Thanks, Dan Burkland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?

2009-11-03 Thread ABOKHALAF, Nassri Abdellatif
Hi Like said before. Kill all other MTA's and make shore they remain stopped at system start. Regarding Zimbra MTA issues, i've always ended up with dns problems as the cause of mta malfunction. Check if the DNS you provided at /etc/resolv.conf is resolving correctly the zimbra server name.

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread m . roth
Dan Burkland wrote: What would you recommend for a larger environment then? I'm currently supporting the largest environment I've ever done, and we've got under 200 servers, I think. We've got a small package to handle all the configuration files, a system my manager wrote. If I had to

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools

2009-11-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:48:43 -0700 (MST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hi, Corey, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm in the process of rolling out the upgrade from (mostly) 5.3 to 5.4. One of my servers started throwing the following: Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel:

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread nate
Dan Burkland wrote: Mark, What would you recommend for a larger environment then? If I had to choose it would be puppet over spacewalk, though I may use spacewalk for the kickstart and inventory stuff. Note that spacewalk requires oracle(last I checked) so depending on the size of your

Re: [CentOS] Proper configuration for DNS slaves and masters

2009-11-03 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 13:34 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: zone byrnejb.ca { type slave; masters { 216.185.71.33; }; file /var/named/slaves/byrnejb.ca.hosts; }; Which is, as far as I can see, identical. In any case, the real problem

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools

2009-11-03 Thread m . roth
Hi, Corey, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm in the process of rolling out the upgrade from (mostly) 5.3 to 5.4. One of my servers started throwing the following: Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:0: FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s DT (12.5 ns, offset 62) Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel:

Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines

2009-11-03 Thread Les Mikesell
mark wrote: So, what I am looking for really is feedback on what people are using in the wild on multiple machines, and bonus points for people who only use tools and mechanisms already built into the CentOS [base] repo. We are using Spacewalk to manage /etc/sysconfig/iptables files. The

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread m . roth
I am a little new to managing large numbers of CentOS/RHEL servers and was wondering what you experienced sysadmins prefer, Spacewalk or Puppet? If you look at recent posts, you'll know my opinion of Spacewalk (not high, for large values of not, and small values of high). mark

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools

2009-11-03 Thread m . roth
At Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:48:43 -0700 (MST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm in the process of rolling out the upgrade from (mostly) 5.3 to 5.4. One of my servers started throwing the following: Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:0: FAST-80 WIDE

[CentOS] [SOLVED]: Proper configuration for DNS slaves and masters

2009-11-03 Thread James B. Byrne
On Tue, November 3, 2009 13:34, James B. Byrne wrote: In any case, the real problem is that neither slave actually transfers the updated zone file and I cannot figure out why not. I have verified that the master zone file serial number is greater than that of the slave zones. This

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread mark
Ray Van Dolson wrote: Also, I believe cobbler functionality is being included in Spacewalk. Though I haven't delved too deeply into either yet (we do use RHN Satellite 5.0.x), I need to evaluate whether Spacewalk/newer versions of Satellite can manage hosts *other* than RHEL easily. I'd hate

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Ross Walker
On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Ross Walker wrote: On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare

Re: [CentOS] Proper configuration for DNS slaves and masters

2009-11-03 Thread Les Mikesell
James B. Byrne wrote: I have the following layout DNS01 - Master DNS02 - Remote slave DNS03 - Local network slave The master is configured so: acl HLLnetworks { 209.47.176/24; 216.185.71/24; }; options { allow-query { any; };

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 03/11/09 23:42, Corey Chandler wrote: At that point I pass it over to puppet personally. Used to use cfengine, but there are aspects I prefer when it comes to puppet; your mileage may of course vary. well, refer back to my initial email on the subject. Its how you split state and policy -

Re: [CentOS] recommend benchmarking SW

2009-11-03 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Ross Walker wrote: On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, We've got some new hardware and are trying

Re: [CentOS] grub problems

2009-11-03 Thread Devin Reade
m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: This is irritating: I've got a server I just upgraded to 5.4, then rebooted, only to discover that it just *sits* there at the grub boot menu. I looked at grub.conf, and uncommented hiddenmenu (which should have been done long ago). I just saw