On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Do some of the checkbox installs omit it? I just ran into this on a
system where I chose the 'web server' install, then wanted to run
gparted remotely.
Yes, it's definitely possible to install without it. I've done the same as
you when setting up
On 10/29/11 12:58 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
Yes, it's definitely possible to install without it. I've done the same as
you when setting up servers and had to add xauth afterwards to get remote X
working. It's a real gotcha for people who don't know about it, as other than
DISPLAY not being
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
well, there's the subtle clue that the first time you log onto a
particular account with X forwarding, xauth prints a message about
saving the .Xauth file
Sure, but that means you're looking for absence of an info message (that you
typically don't
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 07:28:27 AM John Hodrien wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
well, there's the subtle clue that the first time you log onto a
particular account with X forwarding, xauth prints a message about
saving the .Xauth file
Sure, but that means
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 04:36 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's a bad thing if you think clones should exist at all.
Realistically, we would all probably be better off jumping ship the
day of the fedora/EL split, but I've just been too lazy to learn to
spell apt-get.
/me is puzzled. You
On 10/28/2011 12:47 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 28/10/11 18:31, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Patrick Lists
centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
How is, say, being
required to pay a license fee as a consequence different from losing
something you have already
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 04:36 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's a bad thing if you think clones should exist at all.
Realistically, we would all probably be better off jumping ship the
day of the
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I can tell you that we have been contacted by upstream to make sure we
**UNDERSTAND** the new AUP restrictions on distribution. I can also
tell you that we (CentOS) are doing everything in our power to meet the
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
interface. I installed CentOS 5 on it some time ago and everything is
fine. When I was reviewing my kickstart setups I found that the ipw2200
Vreme: 10/29/2011 05:36 PM, Les Mikesell piše:
Also, there is probably room for a public, if not legal, complaint
about gpl compliance if the source and binary components they
distribute don't match in a way that you can rebuild a binary that
works the same. Of course there is a lot of
Vreme: 10/29/2011 07:41 PM, Ron Loftin piše:
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
interface. I installed CentOS 5 on it some time ago and everything is
fine. When I was
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:17 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 10/29/2011 07:41 PM, Ron Loftin piše:
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
interface. I installed
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:56 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 04:36 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's a bad thing if you think clones should exist at all.
Realistically, we would all probably be better off jumping ship the
day of the fedora/EL split, but I've just
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
/me is puzzled. You spelt it correctly. Maybe not so keen on learning
the intricacies of Debian and the 'Debian way'.
Linux is still Linux and while there is some learning curve, it does
tend to broaden one's
On 29/10/11 18:41, Ron Loftin wrote:
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
interface. I installed CentOS 5 on it some time ago and everything is
fine. When I was reviewing my
On 29/10/11 23:04, Ned Slider wrote:
On 29/10/11 18:41, Ron Loftin wrote:
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
interface. I installed CentOS 5 on it some time ago and
I did not mean to stir up anything.
I was simply asking if I was looking in the wrong place for an update to 6.1
or where are the ISO's?
I cannot find anything out there as far as an update.
Thanks
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:58 PM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Do some of the checkbox installs omit it? I just ran into this on a
system where I chose the 'web server' install, then wanted to run
gparted remotely.
Yes, it's
Vreme: 10/30/2011 12:31 AM, Jerry Geis piše:
I did not mean to stir up anything.
I was simply asking if I was looking in the wrong place for an update to 6.1
or where are the ISO's?
I cannot find anything out there as far as an update.
Thanks
Jerry
Sorry to be blunt, but you are not
Vreme: 10/30/2011 12:12 AM, Ned Slider piše:
I'm not sure why they're not showing up on rpmforge as the package is
still showing in their git tree:
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/tree/master/specs/ipw2200-firmware
Maybe you should ask / file an issue with repoforge.
I am not sure if I
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Cliff Pratt wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:58 PM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Do some of the checkbox installs omit it? I just ran into this on a
system where I chose the 'web server' install, then wanted to
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 07:26:04 PM John Hodrien wrote:
ssh tells you when it creates a .Xauthority file for the first time. Why does
it do that?
Being totally pedantic here, but isn't it /usr/bin/xauth that issues the
message telling that the .Xauthority file has been created?
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 06:31:46 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
I cannot find anything out there as far as an update.
This has been a useful discourse since the new difficulties that the team is
facing are now more widely known. Sometimes the pot needs a good stirring, and
this time we got what
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 23:12 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
On 29/10/11 23:04, Ned Slider wrote:
On 29/10/11 18:41, Ron Loftin wrote:
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 07:26:04 PM John Hodrien wrote:
ssh tells you when it creates a .Xauthority file for the first time. Why
does
it do that?
Being totally pedantic here, but isn't it /usr/bin/xauth that issues the
25 matches
Mail list logo
