OK It's extremely rude to cross post the same question across multiple
lists like this at exactly the same time, and without at least showing
the cross posting. I just replied to the one on Fedora users before I
saw this post. This sort of thing wastes people's time. Pick one list
based on the
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 01:46:15 -0500
Tim Dunphy wrote:
/dev/sda1 9.9G 9.3G 49M 100% /
49mb out of 9.9gb is less than one-half of one percent, so the df command is
probably rounding that up to 100% instead of showing you 99.51%. Whatever is
checking for free disk space is likely
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-February/458923.html
I don't see how the VG metadata is restored with any of the commands
suggested thus far. I think that's vgcfgrestore. Otherwise I'd think
that LVM has no idea how to do the LE to PE mapping.
In any case, this sounds like
Hey all,
Ok, so I've been having some trouble for a while with an EC2 instance
running CentOS 5.11 with a disk volume reporting 100% usage. Root is on an
EBS volume.
So I've tried the whole 'du -sk | sort -nr | head -10' routine all around
this volume getting rid of files. At first I was
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:24 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote:
I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again
with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate
it.
What is the right way to
OK so ext4 this time, with new disk images. I notice at mkfs.ext4 that
each virtual disk goes from 2MB to 130MB-150MB each. That's a lot of
fs metadata, and it's fairly evenly distributed across each drive.
Copied 3.5GB to the volume. Unmount. Poweroff. Killed 3rd of 4. Boot.
Mounts fine. No
On 2/27/2015 10:46 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
I'm at a loss to explain how I can delete 190MB worth of data, reboot the
instance and still be at 100% usage.
190MB is less than one percent of 9.9GB aka 9900MB
BTW, for cases like this, I'd suggest using df -k or -m rather than -h
to get more
On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote:
I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again
with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate
it.
What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left?
take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
And this is why I don't like LVM to begin with. If one of the drives
dies, you're screwed not only for the data on that drive, but even for
data on remaining healthy drives.
It has its uses, just like RAID0 has uses. But
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:24:57 -0800
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote:
What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left?
take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 1000s of files of 100s of
pages each, with the index cards
And then Btrfs (no LVM).
mkfs.btrfs -d single /dev/sd[bcde]
mount /dev/sdb /mnt/bigbtr
cp -a /usr /mnt/bigbtr
Unmount. Poweroff. Kill 3rd of 4 drives. Poweron.
mount -o degraded,ro /dev/sdb /mnt/bigbtr ## degraded,ro is required
or mount fails
cp -a /mnt/bigbtr/usr/ /mnt/btrfs## copy to a
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512
bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making
On 2/27/2015 8:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
And this is why I don't like LVM to begin with. If one of the drives
dies, you're screwed not only for the data on that drive, but even for
data on remaining healthy drives.
with classic LVM, you were supposed to use raid for your PV's. The new
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:44 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 2/27/2015 8:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
And this is why I don't like LVM to begin with. If one of the drives
dies, you're screwed not only for the data on that drive, but even for
data on remaining healthy drives.
Ok, sorry about that.
On Sat, February 28, 2015 9:13 am, Chris Murphy wrote:
OK It's extremely rude to cross post the same question across multiple
lists like this at exactly the same time, and without at least showing the
cross posting. I just replied to the one on Fedora users before I saw
On 27/02/15 13:27, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 02/27/2015 02:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the
following approach:
1. Install minimal system.
2. yum groupinstall X Window System
3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session
On 02/27/2015 02:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the
following approach:
1. Install minimal system.
2. yum groupinstall X Window System
3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts
4. Install
Hi all :-)
This is my first post: I'm coming from debian/bsd world.
A question about repositories:
minimal installation (version 7) provides:
CentOS-Base.repo
CentOS-CR.repo
CentOS-Debuginfo.repo
CentOS-fasttrack.repo
CentOS-Sources.repo
CentOS-Vault.repo
I known there are others repositories
On 27/02/15 12:30, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi all :-)
This is my first post: I'm coming from debian/bsd world.
A question about repositories:
minimal installation (version 7) provides:
CentOS-Base.repo
CentOS-CR.repo
CentOS-Debuginfo.repo
CentOS-fasttrack.repo
CentOS-Sources.repo
Helo,
on
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7
in
3. And what if I want the old naming back?
is written:
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-net.rules seems necessary to override
/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-net.rules
According to my experience, the text should be changed to:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:19:55AM +0100, Timothy Kesten wrote:
I'd like to install cyrus-imapd 2.4 in CentOS6.
Found rpm cyrus 2.4 for CentOS6 on rpmseek.
cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-30.1.x86_64.rpm
But there are conflicts with postfix 2.6.6.
Can I ignore this conflicts or is there a suitable
Saludos amigos listeros vuelvo a pedir su ayuda les comento mi problema
lo he podido solventar a medias paso a explicar lo que he realizado:
En el servidor Linux he creado esta regla a nivel de firewall
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i eth3 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.197.0/24
On 27/02/15 09:54, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the
following approach:
1. Install minimal system.
2. yum groupinstall X Window System
3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts
4. Install
Hope that at least gets you started.
Hi Ned, thanks for help :-)
Pol
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Suena a topico pero desactiva selinux!
El 27/02/2015 16:42, Aldo Rivadeneira aldo.rivadene...@gmail.com
escribió:
Lo único que puedo detectar es que activaron IPv6 y eso requiere de un
reinicio de sistema para que lo tome activo.
El segundo detalle es el raid no se si te este causando
All,
Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora user
and may
blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request.
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are
On 27 February 2015 at 13:49, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
All,
Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora
user and may
blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request.
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:49:23PM +, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
But, when looking through the source code for this version on the CentOS
servers I only see:
http://vault.centos.org/6.6/updates/Source/SPackages/
[ ] glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.src.rpm27-Jan-2015 23:13 15M
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:49:23 +
ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.32 system on 2015-01-27.
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.src.rpm 27-Jan-2015 23:13 15M
The date on that rpm matches the compiled on date that you posted.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~
Greg Bailey wrote:
On 02/27/2015 02:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the
following approach:
1. Install minimal system.
2. yum groupinstall X Window System
3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts
4.
Lo único que puedo detectar es que activaron IPv6 y eso requiere de un
reinicio de sistema para que lo tome activo.
El segundo detalle es el raid no se si te este causando problemas la
controladora seria cosa de validar si actualizaron el kernel y exista un
problema con ello.
Como comentan seria
Le 27/02/2015 16:01, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
That's*weird* . Why would you even want hidden groups?
Weird and... not very intelligent. To say it politely.
:o)
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web :
Is there a reason why you need 2.4 vs. the 2.3 package from the CentOS6
repos?
Mike
On 02/27/2015 05:19 AM, Timothy Kesten wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'd like to install cyrus-imapd 2.4 in CentOS6.
Found rpm cyrus 2.4 for CentOS6 on rpmseek.
cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-30.1.x86_64.rpm
But there are
I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS
6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but the
other server, not so much.
ls /mountpoint/directory eventually times out (directory being the NFS
mount). mount -t nfs server:/location/being/exported
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS
6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but the
other server, not so much.
ls /mountpoint/directory eventually times out (directory being the NFS
mount). mount -t nfs
Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512
bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512
bytes/sector drives any more.
Some have better 512e emulation than others. Looking for some advice on
which to avoid and which are recommended. Thanks.
On 2/27/2015 12:53 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512
bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512
bytes/sector drives any more.
Some have better 512e emulation than others. Looking for some advice on
Apparently CentOS-7 - Base is failing, what does that mean? How do I
contact the upstream for the repo? How do I find a working upstream?
More info from command execution:
do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out
do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out
I just installed centos 7, yum is acting strange, experiencing RPC
time-outs. Sometimes when I disable the additional repos (epel and
rpmforge) it seems to make things act normal. But not this time (see below).
Could I have some misconfiguration? Network glitch? What hypotheses should
I be
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS
6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but
the
other server, not so much.
ls /mountpoint/directory eventually times out (directory being the NFS
On 02/27/2015 01:11 PM, Dave Burns wrote:
Apparently CentOS-7 - Base is failing, what does that mean? How do I
contact the upstream for the repo? How do I find a working upstream?
More info from command execution:
do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out
do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out
Steven Tardy sjt5a...@gmail.com a écrit :
DCB requires Priority Flow Control(PFC) aka 802.1Qbb.
Flow Control is 802.3x.
The two are often confused and not compatible.
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ethernet-controllers/ethernet-controller-i350-datasheet.html
Mentions flow control
i know , i have configured
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38 PM, CS DBA cs_...@consistentstate.com wrote:
Hi All;
anyone have any info on setting up a L2TP over IPSEC client vpn
connection?
Thanks in advance
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:36:58AM +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Le 26/02/2015 15:53, David Both a écrit :
Ok, I understand, now. I just leave multiple desktops in place and
switch between them as I want. But perhaps you have reasons to do it as
you do. That is one thing I really appreciate about
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
do_ypcall is a NIS error message. (Previous NIS was called yellow
pages; the yp in do_ypcall is a reference to that).
Maybe you have hosts: files nis in /etc/nsswitch.conf or something
else that's causing the OS to
Dear All,
I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server.
I have an VG call vg_hosting consisting of 4 PVs each contained in a
separate hard drive (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1, and /dev/sdd1).
And this LV: lv_home was created to use all the space of the 4 PVs.
Right now, the third
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:38:06PM -1000, Dave Burns wrote:
What makes you think NIS is involved?
Is Errno 12 a clue? I tried searching for (do_ypcall: clnt_call: rpc: timed
do_ypcall is a NIS error message. (Previous NIS was called yellow
pages; the yp in do_ypcall is a reference to that).
On 2/27/2015 4:25 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote:
Right now, the third hard drive is damaged; and therefore the third PV
(/dev/sdc1) cannot be accessed anymore. I would like to recover whatever
left in the other 3 PVs (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, and /dev/sdd1).
your data is spread across all 4 drives, and
- Original Message -
| Dear All,
|
| I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server.
| I have an VG call vg_hosting consisting of 4 PVs each contained in a
| separate hard drive (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1, and /dev/sdd1).
| And this LV: lv_home was created to use all the
Thank you, John for your quick reply.
That is what I hope. But how to do it? I cannot even activate the LV with
the remaining PVs.
Thanks,
Khem
On Sat, February 28, 2015 7:34 am, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/27/2015 4:25 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote:
Right now, the third hard drive is damaged; and
Dear James,
Thank you for being quick to help.
Yes, I could see all of them:
# vgs
# lvs
# pvs
Regards,
Khem
On Sat, February 28, 2015 7:37 am, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| Dear All,
|
| I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server.
| I have an VG
The default for fdisk, parted, and gdisk is starting the first
partition on LBA 2048, which is 8 sector aligned. You don't need any
options. The alternative is to simply not partition the drives or the
resulting RAID and just format it.
Chris Murphy
___
On 2/27/2015 4:37 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| I was able to create a new PV and restore the VG Config/meta data:
|
| # pvcreate --restorefile ... --uuid ... /dev/sdc1
|
oh, that step means you won't be able to recover ANY of the data that
was formerly on that PV.
--
john r pierce
Dear John,
I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again
with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate
it.
What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left?
Regards,
Khem
On Sat, February 28, 2015 7:42 am, John R Pierce wrote:
On
Hello James and All,
For your information, here's the listing looks like:
[root@localhost ~]# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda1 vg_hosting lvm2 a-- 1.82t0
/dev/sdb2 vg_hosting lvm2 a-- 1.82t0
/dev/sdc1 vg_hosting lvm2 a-- 1.82t0
/dev/sdd1
On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 07:25 +0700, Khemara Lyn wrote:
I have tried with the following:
1. Removing the broken PV:
# vgreduce --force vg_hosting /dev/sdc1
Physical volume /dev/sdc1 still in use
Next time, try vgreduce --removemissing VG first.
In my experience, any lvm command using
On 02/27/2015 04:16 PM, Dave Burns wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
do_ypcall is a NIS error message. (Previous NIS was called yellow
pages; the yp in do_ypcall is a reference to that).
Maybe you have hosts: files nis in /etc/nsswitch.conf or
Hi,
Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the
following approach:
1. Install minimal system.
2. yum groupinstall X Window System
3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts
4. Install applications as needed.
This morning, the package
Hi Folks,
I'd like to install cyrus-imapd 2.4 in CentOS6.
Found rpm cyrus 2.4 for CentOS6 on rpmseek.
cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-30.1.x86_64.rpm
But there are conflicts with postfix 2.6.6.
Can I ignore this conflicts or is there a suitable version of ppstfix
available?
Thx
Timothy
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Eriksson
thomas.eriks...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:
This has nothing to do with yum.
You are using NIS for name lookup and your NIS server is not responding.
NIS is working fine, at least, for what I expect it to do.
What makes you think NIS is
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512
bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512
bytes/sector drives any more.
512n drives still exist, although they tend
Chris Murphy wrote:
snip
The emulation implementations don't come into play if the alignment is
correct from the start. The better implementations have significantly
less pathological behavior if alignment is wrong, but that's
anecdotal, I don't have any empirical data available. But I'd say
On 2/27/2015 3:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Alignment's easy: using parted (the user-hostile program), if you do go in
with parted -a optimal /dev/drive, and do
mkpart pri ext4 0.0GB 100% (for non-root drives, for example), it's
aligned correctly.
i found -a optimal to do weird things, and
Try
yum groupinstall Xfce
or
yum groupinstall MATE Desktop
or
yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop
or
yum groupinstall Server with GUI
suomi
On 02/27/2015 10:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the
following approach:
1. Install
64 matches
Mail list logo
