Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On 10/22/2015 12:40 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> Hi, >> >> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 >> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP >> people one month ago [1]. >> >> Now, our

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for image malware detection?

Well. (clamd) clamscan should work. -- Eero 2015-10-22 20:50 GMT+03:00 Kay Schenk : > Hello all -- > > This is not a CentOS specific question, but I have a feeling some of you > are involved in enterprise malware efforts, so here goes. > > Does anyone have recommendations

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 - Serial Console and Flow Control

Huge thanks to those who chimed in. An issue of PEBKAC on my part (but I was s close!). Once I got serial over LAN functioning I took the time pre-production to figure out exactly what options are necessary. Here's a recap of what I discovered. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Lamar Owen

Re: [CentOS] Centos User Privileges.

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi list, I've installed C 7.1.1503 and I've noticed that simple user can run from bash shutdown -h now/reboot without getting special permission (sudo, su). The machine is a VM without GUI (tested also on physical machine). From reddit I've got a

[CentOS] Centos User Privileges.

Hi list, I've installed C 7.1.1503 and I've noticed that simple user can run from bash shutdown -h now/reboot without getting special permission (sudo, su). The machine is a VM without GUI (tested also on physical machine). From reddit I've got a suggestion: removing/comment out "-session

Re: [CentOS] Centos User Privileges.

Il 22/10/2015 10:49, John Hodrien ha scritto: On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi list, I've installed C 7.1.1503 and I've noticed that simple user can run from bash shutdown -h now/reboot without getting special permission (sudo, su). The machine is a VM without GUI (tested also

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1924 Important CentOS 6 qemu-kvm Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1924 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1924.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hi, > > So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 > however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP > people one month ago [1]. > > Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:20:02PM -0300, Juan Bernhard wrote: > If you want to change to a log term support, you should use php 5.6, this is > under active development now. > centos packagers mantainers should listen the PHP developers in this topic, > they are the ones who really knows PHP But

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1925 Important CentOS 5 kvm Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1925 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1925.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS-es] Fail2Ban quitar notificacion por correo ?

Yo mismo me respondo: Al actualizar a la ultima versión y leer el Changelog vi esto: * action.d/iptables-common.conf - All calls to iptables command now use -w switch introduced in iptables 1.4.20 (some distribution could have patched their earlier base version as well) to provide this locking

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for image malware detection?

An http proxy + clamav (or more AVs)? (if for web sources) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Kay Schenk" > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 18:50:41 > Subject: [CentOS]

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: >> >> El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribió: >>> Kai, >>> >>> It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's >>> not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud.

Re: [CentOS-es] Fail2Ban quitar notificacion por correo ?

A mi desde que se upgradeo la ultima vez que no me muestra las reglas del Iptables. Estaba pensando en hacer un post a la lista, y ahora con tu mail ya me anime a soltar la duda si alguien se ha enfrentado a problemas con Fail2ban Saludos, David El día 22 de octubre de 2015, 14:22, angel

[CentOS-es] Fail2Ban quitar notificacion por correo ?

Buen dia. Estoy recibiendo mas de 100 correos diarios se intentos de conexion a mi puerto SSH, al principio eran pocos y pasaba :D... pero ahora han incrementado y me estan fastidiando. Intente editar mi configuracion omitiendo el correo, pero falla el reinicio. Les indico mi actual config. de

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribió: >> Kai, >> >> It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's >> not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. >> Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development

[CentOS] Recommendations for image malware detection?

Hello all -- This is not a CentOS specific question, but I have a feeling some of you are involved in enterprise malware efforts, so here goes. Does anyone have recommendations for malware detection that includes detection in image files? I'm looking for something that could be integrated into a

Re: [CentOS] EFI netboot to kickstart install

On 22/10/2015 03:25, Grant Street wrote: Hello All Up until now we have been using standard PXE boot to do kick start installs of centos boxes. With recent machines however they come by default as EFI boot. We can set them to legacy but I would like to solve this before this option goes

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 128, Issue 6

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

[CentOS] Centos 7, ATI/AMD video, fonts

A newly built CentOS 7.1 system, with an ATI/AMD video card. I installed the proprietary driver (this is a Dell, and they had their own rpm), and after I ran aticonfig --initial, init 3, then init 5, and we have a working video. Excerpt the fonts are atrocious. All the letters seem to be missing

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On 10/22/2015 03:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El 22/10/2015 a las 03:00 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió: >> >> On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribió: > Kai, > >

Re: [CentOS-es] Fail2Ban quitar notificacion por correo ?

Gracias por su respuesta David, verificare lo que comentas porque actualmente si le muevo a la parte de "sendmail" dentro de jail.conf, simplemene sale error al reiniciar el servicio, como que la sintaxis necesita otro parametro :S, y tengo que regresarlo a como lo tenia con las notificaciones al

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI/AMD video, fonts

On Thu, October 22, 2015 4:20 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > A newly built CentOS 7.1 system, with an ATI/AMD video card. I installed > the proprietary driver (this is a Dell, and they had their own rpm), and > after I ran aticonfig --initial, init 3, then init 5, and we have a > working video.

Re: [CentOS-es] Iniciar sesion y levantar VirtualBox ?

Probaste PROXMOX.??? Atte Jose Manuel GPG Key ID: UBCMEOLVQMHEILINJBE El Jueves 22 de octubre de 2015 13:18, Death User escribió: Deberías crear un archivo vboxMaquina1 en el directorio /etc/init.d/, los archivos en este directorio deben tener un formato que

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

El 22/10/2015 a las 03:00 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió: On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribió: Kai, It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On 10/22/2015 1:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote: Im not saying that they must remove this package, but they also should include the newer version. I use freebsd (and its not a toy distro like fedora), and you have several ports, php, php54, php55 and php56 to choose whatever you need. Please,

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI/AMD video, fonts

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:20:17 -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > A newly built CentOS 7.1 system, with an ATI/AMD video card. I installed > the proprietary driver (this is a Dell, and they had their own rpm), and > after I ran aticonfig --initial, init 3, then init 5, and we have a > working video.

Re: [CentOS] EFI netboot to kickstart install

On 10/21/2015 07:25 PM, Grant Street wrote: Just wondering if anyone has any experience setting up a net boot server that can be used to kickstart EFI machines? Yep. In ISC dhcpd.conf, use: next-server config.example.com; if option architecture-type = 00:07 {

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On Thu, October 22, 2015 3:45 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/22/2015 03:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote: >> >> El 22/10/2015 a las 03:00 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió: >>> >>> On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El

Re: [CentOS] virt-manager

Try giving the VM a Spice display, instead of VNC, see if that helps. Also, on Windows try Mobaxterm SSH client, it comes with X server built-in, perhaps it behaves less crappy. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - >

Re: [CentOS] virt-manager

On 10/22/2015 4:15 PM, Nux! wrote: Try giving the VM a Spice display, instead of VNC, see if that helps. no idea how to do this, I'm a total newb with KVM. all I actually want to do is attach a USB device to my existing and running KVM, but the instructions for doing this in virtsh are

[CentOS] virt-manager

so... I've been tinkering with KVM again. my desktop is windows, the linux server is remote, so I have a ssh X tunnel running, and XMing running locally, and launch virt-manager. opens fine, shows the VM I created some time ago. I select that VM (which is running centos 6), and

Re: [CentOS] Centos User Privileges.

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi J, thank you for the suggestion. Why team make this possible? What is the purpose? It's a nice flexible setup for a workstation situation. I can have CentOS installed on a workstation, and allow users to reboot it as long as there's noone else

Re: [CentOS] Centos User Privileges.

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, John R Pierce wrote: and its totally inappropriate for a shared server. Which is why you wouldn't configure it for a shared server. I don't understand the problem though, as the defaults *don't* allow this do they?

Re: [CentOS] Centos User Privileges.

On 10/22/2015 2:20 AM, John Hodrien wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi J, thank you for the suggestion. Why team make this possible? What is the purpose? It's a nice flexible setup for a workstation situation. I can have CentOS installed on a workstation, and allow

Re: [CentOS] Security implications of openssl098e on CentOS 7

On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 21:20 +0200, Yamaban wrote: > TL;DR: TL;DQ? -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas con Tarjetas de Red PCI Exp x1.

Fíjate en la máscara de red de tu tarjeta eth0 es 255.255.0.0 y debería ser 255.255.255.0, por ahí va el problema ;) > > shell# ifconfig -a > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa > > inet addr:10.1.0.1 Bcast:10.1.0.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 > > UP BROADCAST

[CentOS] OpenSSL and OpenSSH on CentOS (FIPS enabled)

Hi experts, Current I am doing FIPS gap analysis for our product, can someone help to have a look my questions? Our product is server running under CentOS 6.x, and according to the upstream (RedHat) document, CentOS can be configured to FIPS mode:

Re: [CentOS] EFI netboot to kickstart install

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:25:21AM +, Grant Street wrote: > Hello All > Up until now we have been using standard PXE boot to do kick start > installs of centos boxes. With recent machines however they come by > default as EFI boot. We can set them to legacy but I would like to > solve this

Re: [CentOS-es] Iniciar sesion y levantar VirtualBox ?

Deberías crear un archivo vboxMaquina1 en el directorio /etc/init.d/, los archivos en este directorio deben tener un formato que al menos responda a la llamada con parámetros start | stop y status si quieres que te diga si está arriba o no, para hacer tu script puedes basarte en el archivo

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> Hi, >> >> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 >> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the >> PHP >> people one month ago [1].

[CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

Hi, So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP people one month ago [1]. Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because they want to use the latest version of Zend. They are

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

Have a look at http://softwarecollections.org/ IUS could also be a good choice http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/archive/CentOS/7/x86_64/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Andrew Holway" > To:

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hi, > > So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 > however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP > people one month ago [1]. > > Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

I've been using IUS in the past. They have a good way of naming their rpms, so they don't interfere with the RH rpms. But they don't support older CentOS versions still on extended support as long as I needed them. And they don't provide as much php-related rpms (f.i. pecl-stuff) as remi does.

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST): > It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue > to be supported by Red Hat with security patches. Exactly. Nevertheless, PHP 5.6 is not "bleeding edge" as someone else said. 5.5 and 5.6 are really state of the art and

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

Kai, It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and long term support is absolutely crucial, software needs to run for years on end without glitches,

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote: >> On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >>> >>> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 >>> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the >>> PHP people one

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

El 22/10/2015 a las 12:48 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió: On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote: On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: Hi, So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 however this version of PHP stopped getting security

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

Juan, You need to be aware how RHEL distributes software. Please read https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue to be supported by Red Hat with security patches. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

On Thu, October 22, 2015 11:20 am, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El 22/10/2015 a las 12:48 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió: >> On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote: >>> On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: Hi, So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is

Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers

El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribió: Kai, It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and long term support is absolutely crucial, software