On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 08:12 -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catch
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 10:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
/etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
Or you can edit
/etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
and change line 64
$Config{'mailto'} =
I persuaded a reluctant friend to buy a new computer. I enthusiastically
extolled the joys and benefits of Centos and promised to install it on
his new machine - dual booting with Micro$oft Windoze 7.
His super-duper new laptop arrived. Acer, AMD 4 core, fast etc. but not
as nice looking as my
Mark wrote:-
About 5 years ago, I had to install a wireless card in my tower, and it's
an ATH9xx, I *think* - I can check this evening, if that's relevant. I was
running SuSE, and had to find drivers from madwifi. A few minutes of
googling found...
Jerry Franz wrote:
For a new laptop your best hope for a successful native install is
probably Ubuntu 10.10. Laptops in particular are difficult platforms for
hardware support and CentOS5 is not 'cutting edge'. If you want CentOS
on it to work well, you will probably need to wait for
Brian Mathis wrote:
CentOS is great for servers,
I agree. I have 2 VPS and two desktop servers on it.
but absolutely not for a new person
you're trying to get to try Linux. This approach actually hurts Linux
since people think oh I tried Linux and it sucked.
The only thing that 'sucks'
Mark Roth wrote:
You do understand the relationship of CentOS to RHEL, right?
Right :-)
Once upon a time Red Hat was free. Then they decided to exist purely on
support fees. Meanwhile a bunch of supporters invented a downstream
variant called Centos. They worked very hard to remove all the
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:12 -0500, Rob Kampen wrote:
running centos 5.5 on 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5
I'm running 5.5 but with 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 (64 bit).
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:01 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
processing power of a mid-nineties Cray supercomputer... and they run like
an 8088 (ok, maybe an 80286), just for all the eye candy: style, not
content.
Give me the good old 6502 any day and its mainframe predecessor with a
36 bit
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:25 -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:20:34 am Always Learning wrote:
Then one day a big bad wolf called Oracle of very expensive Oracle SQL
fame swallowed Red Hat, like they swallowed MySQL, Solaris, Open Office
and Visual Box. The long
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 13:12 -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
At Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:49:39 + CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Anyone any idea what kernel version Centos 6 will have ?
Probably whatever Fedora Core 12 (?) has. Whether this will work on
your friend's laptop is
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 13:46 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
snip
Thanks for the Ubuntu recommendation. I tend to buy the DVD's and
install from them. I have VBox running Win98SE on a Centos desktop
because I want to run software and applications from 1992 (my own
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:27 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Surely you mean stuff from the rising sun Illumos and OpenIndiana!
Nope. Not convinced by what I read about them.
Still have my unused Open Solaris disks from 2008.05 and my single CD of
Red Hat Linux v.6 from 1999. :-)
--
With
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 21:29 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/25/11 8:49 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Cobol was the second language I leaned in 1967 from a hardware
manufacturer's tutor who didn't have a clue. The first was Easycoder (an
assembler type) which I loved.
do you mean
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:29 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:41 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
My RHEL 6 machine (fully updated) has kernel 2.6.32-71.14.1.
Alright, that's it, I want Centos 6 now!
Me too. Yes please Mr Centos.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:49 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Benjamin Smith wrote:
On my hard disk, I have my /home, /boot, and / directories each on their
own partitions, and when I'm upgrading my Fedora, I just format / and
/boot,
and leave /home alone. Although I've transfered it a few
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 18:44 +1100, Les Bell wrote:
Paul, if you want a basic explanation of the rationale behind the Linux
Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, you might enjoy this article from a course I
wrote years ago - it's a little dated, but still applicable today.
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 09:58 -0500, Brian Mathis wrote:
You may not be aware of the locate command? Nightly there is a job
that runs (updatedb) that scans the disk and saves file locations.
Locate searches this database instead of you have to do a 'find'. The
only thing it won't get are
Hallo,
I wanted to avoid typing-in my password every occasion I remotely
logged-on to a server.
I created my SSH keys and copied the public part to the server and
renamed it authorized_keys.
My command line is: ssh r...@xx.com -p 1234
The output shows the logging-on routine wants 3 types
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 02:48 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On 27/01/2011, at 7:45 PM, Always Learning wrote:
server /root/.ssh
id_rsa.authorized_keys -rw
But, the name of the file with a copy of your public key should be
$HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys. And the permissions
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:35 +1300, Cameron Kerr wrote:
Also, it should be named authorized_keys, not id_rsa.authorized_keys
B I N G O **
I can now log-in with just my home made command .s2
Thanks a lot.
That cured it. Brilliant.
Many thanks again.
--
With
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 02:39 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Also, there's a stack of reasons that DSA is preferred to RSA for SSH
keys these days. When you generate your private keys, use ssh-keygen
-t dsa, not rsa.
RSA is the default if no cypher type is declared on the command line.
I've
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:33 +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
you expect Passwordless SSH. If so,
I wanted a quick effortless automated log-on.
# ssh-keygen -t rsa ( passphrase should be empty )
Yes I did exactly that but following advice from this mailing list have
changed to DSA
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 06:40 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
*NEVER* use password authentication for root
(passwords are easier to brute force 'cos people choose bad passwords).
Use ssh public key access for root, with appropriate restrictions
(eg from=).
You haven't seen my long and difficult
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 23:05 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
cpanel is pure crap.
It is a ghastly and frustrating nightmare. Command line, even for a
Linux beginner like me, is far superior. It is amazing that people pay
lots of money to use it.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 06:57 -0600, David Christensen wrote:
If pw less access is something you prefer use a kerberos based service like
FreeIPA/RedhatIPA. No need for ssh keys, and pw aren't stored locally. You
can log in as a regular user and sudo su - to root, which can be done during
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:01 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
You haven't seen my long and difficult (for others) password (uppercase,
lowercase, and digits). It is unlikely ever to succumb to brute
force. :-)
Ah, no. Where can you log in as root from? If it's
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:05 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 23:05 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
cpanel is pure crap.
It may be crap, but a) I haven't seen any ISPs that offer shell access for
the better part of a decade, at least, and b) consider the enTHUsistic
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:27 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Security through obscurity doesn't work.
It certainly helps defeat most potential intruders but not the most
determined. IPtables does help too.
Are you familiar with nmap?
Yes. I used to read the bloke's circulars when I was on
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 07:35 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/27/11 5:46 AM, Always Learning wrote:
-rw--- 1 root root 404 Jan 27 03:23 id_rsa.authorized_keys
how many times do you have to be told that the filename is
authorized_keys, NOT id_rsa.authorized_keys
Once. How many
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:40 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We also run fail2ban at work. Very nice, installs (along with shorewall),
and creates a temporary blacklist, blocking an IP that's tried five, I
think, times to break in. All configurable, btw.
Thanks. I'll add that to the list to
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:30 +0100, Michel van Deventer wrote:
Lots from China, Russia and some South American countries. Sometimes
even from my own country ! (Netherlands).
Attempts from Holland always, in my experience, come from Leaseweb IPs
but complaining to them produces no results.
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 14:50 +, John Hodrien wrote:
All configurable via /etc/updatedb.conf if your local needs differ.
How does one remove it ?
yum erase updated ?
It is not present in any CRON.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:36 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
yes it is: /etc/cron.daily/mlocate.cron
No trace. That is probably why it never worked for me.
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:36 +, John Hodrien wrote:
If it's installed, it should have a cron job here:
/etc/cron.daily/mlocate.cron
The package is called mlocate, as has already been mentioned in this thread.
Appears not to have been installed. No trace of anything in /var/lib
either.
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:05 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
so you prefer giving the apache user write access to /var/www ?
Is this really a good thing...?
I agree with the group advice though, if you have several users
modifying the website content of course.
Apache is wonderfully
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 11:30 +0100, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 03/02/2011 11:24, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a Linux rescue CD with driver for a SLI MegaRAID 8708?
You might try the Gentoo Live CD with the domegaraid boot option.
Try Parted Magic 5.9 (the latest). It is
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 04:01 -0800, John Doe wrote:
From: James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com
-How to add a new user?
$ useradd
-bash: useradd: command not found
(This is the same for my normal user and when logged in as root)
First, normal user not finding useradd is normal.
And it
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 20:18 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote:
kernel is:
2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:20 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
GNU/Linux
I'm on Centos 5.5 and the kernel on my desktop machine is
2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 17:52:25 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 14:42 -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
At Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:12:17 +0100 CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
Yes, but S|Single|1 asks for root password to login ...
And he doesn't have the root password ;)
RedHat / RHEL / CentOS does not do that! At least
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:45 +0530, Jatin wrote:
I just installed the CentOS 5.5 version on my toshiba laptop. I did the
configuration that i had for the wireless settings but still i could not
connect to my home wireless network. So someone please guide me on how i
can connect my laptop
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 23:48 +, Ned Slider wrote:
Once we know the device then I'm sure we can point the OP in the right
direction.
Agreed. It's just knowing that the machine is working with wifi (hence
the iwlist) and then discovering what is needed (the lspci).
On my netbook Elrepo
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 15:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
EPEL has a *nasty* habit of upgrading packages and not leaving the old
one behind for reversion or regression testing. ..
All the more reason to introduce a 'local' repository where packages can
accumulate and gracefully grow
One of my VPS stopped working. After the data centre replaced a disk
normal service resumed, then I notices this:
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.35.4 on an x86_64
I always thought Centos 5.x would always be on 2.6.18. Any thoughts?
Hi Brian T. Robert,
Thanks for your input.
I did a uname -a on a selection of Centos 5.5 machines and found the
servers, netbooks and laptops were all a variety of 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5
and 2.6.19-194.32.1.el5-centos.plus. Only the VPS were different most
likely, as Robert suggested, because of
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 16:03 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 11/02/11 03:05, Always Learning wrote:
[...snip...]
Sometimes I just wonder about the luckiness of us non-Windoze people. We
have a really marvellous choice of operating systems (BSDs, Solaris,
Linux et al) and its all free
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:58 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark actually liked DOS
Me too!
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 13:22 -0800, Mark wrote:
There is a third option, hibernation, which you did not mention, but
essentially they are all more or less equally secure - they all
require login password authentication to resume operation once the
computer is brought back.
This is definitely
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:21 -0700, compdoc wrote:
ECC allows for single bit errors to be corrected and multiple bit
errors to be noticed.
I know what it is and I've used it in the past, but I just don't see many
errors going on in desktop computers and servers that use non-ecc ram.
I
LinuxBoot is now CoreBoot at http://www.coreboot.org/
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 14:24 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
I suppose the CentOS devs have other minor duties like feeding families,
taking children to ball games and dance recitals, helping with homework,
etc...
Don't forget all the jobs that need doing in and around the house AND
finding time to
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:49 -0600, lostson wrote:
CentOS - Its Not Just For Servers Ya Know...
Its for amateurs as well as for professionals and it works on VPSs,
servers, desktops, laptops and netbooks.
What a disappointment ... It doesn't work on my mobile phone :-(
--
With best regards,
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 09:37 -0500, John Hinton wrote:
However, if somebody thinks that a project like this should be a paid
project, the source is available for anyone to introduce a new flavor.
And, alternatively there are the RH subscriptions to answer immediate
needs... where you can
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 07:18 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
From everything I've heard on the
various IRC channels the response to that initial call for
help
was, shall we say, lackluster at best.
I, and I suspect many other Centos users too, do not indulge in IRC. We
have
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:52 +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60 (with 2 GB RAM), as
a secondary laptop in order to run CentOS 5 on the field.
One thing you might, or happily might not, have difficulties with is the
wifi driver. Most drivers are
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 14:58 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Nothing happened, not one person beyond the
usual-people actually did anything.
When you have time please tell all of us, preferably on this list, what
resources you need and how 'ordinary' people can help. Give us a list of
tasks that
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:29 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
Further, I'm surprised to learn that Karanbir's employer would go
against Karanbir's presumed advice against allowing such a situation
to develop.
Why don't we give this a break? Nothing more can usefully be written.
KB's employer has
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:50 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
He's a manager! Probably wears a tie! PHB alert g
The guy has problems. His only method of trying to deal with his
problems, and getting away from the stress, is posting on here.
He needs to seek professional help, medically and
There are lots of people in similar circumstances to Larry. He has a recognised
medical syndrome.
People get problems. Some do not know how to effectively tackle their
major problem so stress increases to a significant and detrimental
extent. Often the person is never fully aware of high stress
From: Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net
Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:03 PM
Subject: sources of bind-9.7.2-P3 rpms for Centos 4.8 and 5.5?
Our site running Centos 4.8 and 5.5 name servers was hacked with
the result that www.yahoo.com is now within our /19 and causing
some grief.
Don't
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 18:32 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday, February 18, 2011 04:15:28 pm Always Learning wrote:
Don't understand what you mean by 'within our /19'.
I think I do; he's an ISP, and apparently someone inside his address block
... has hacked in some way the zone file(s
Hallo Dag,
CentOS 4.0 was released 23 days after RHEL4.0
CentOS 5.0 was released 29 days after RHEL5.0
CentOS 6.0 is *not* released 103 days after RHEL6.0
en ?
This is not a problem for me. I am contented to wait - en jij?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
Hoi Dag,
This was in a direct response to Johnny ;-) No worries, I put the context
back so it's clear *why* I replied this. It's not that I am impatient for
CentOS 6.0. In fact I switched to RHEL6.
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 02:04 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a direct security impact to users.
Could you explain that more fully, please?
I've actually been puzzled why the developers
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 18:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
I admire very much what you and the others have done to provide builds
and a very large repository for the benefit of millions - not only of
Centos users
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:28 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Thanks for the information. Could you drop it in the Wiki? And drop
your notes on this process for CentOS 6 pre-building there, too?
Nico,
Why can't you? And save the developers one more extra job?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:34 -0500, Corey A Johnson wrote:
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in
to what i consider
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 18:04 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
TCP/IP cameras would work with any OS, most just FTP or whatever the
pictures to a webserver you provide, or they run their own server and
you can wget the pics off them. but I've never seen any IP cameras I'd
call really cheap.
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
This issue did not affect the versions of bind as shipped with
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, 5, or 6.
James Hogarth wrote:
He obviously has a fascination with
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:23 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
This issue did not affect
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 00:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:47:13 -0600:
This message is RECALLED
Please stop this! Please understand that there is a reply button on your
mail client, use it!
I thought 'recall' was a Micro$oft facility. Centos is a
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:08 +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many
security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:02 -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
for these applications in CentOS 5?
wireshark
postgresql
krb5
java-1.6.0-openjdk
java-1.6.0-sun
Don't use anyone of these privately (on desktop, laptop etc.)
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:10 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Um, don't use kerberos? Or postgresql? Or Sun's, er, Oracle's java? I
can't see that going over well.
Sorry to let everyone down. I can't get too excited about these
outstanding security patches. After 5 hours of trying, I can still
Today I received an allocation of IP6 addresses for some servers. I can
'play' with the last 2 of the 8 IP6 address segments.
I always thought, mistakenly, IP6 was 6 segments, because it was IP6.
IP4 had 4 segments. However IP6 is actually IP version 6 and it has 8
segments. The other
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:24 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/26/11 12:12 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Because : is sometimes used in an address to indicate the start of a
port number, example http://www.anyonejunk.com:1234, the IP6 address can
be enclosed within [ ] with the port number
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 21:33 +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
With IPV6, you don't need to run it on a different port.
Just bind it to a different IP in the same prefix ;-)
So, that port-8080 stuff will be gone pretty soon.
Very interesting point.
In a year or two.
Cough-cough.
That long?
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:41 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/26/11 12:33 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
With IPV6, you don't need to run it on a different port.
Just bind it to a different IP in the same prefix ;-)
So, that port-8080 stuff will be gone pretty soon.
In a year or two.
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 20:58 +, sheraz...@yahoo.com wrote:
IPv6 has twice (8) segments compared to IPv4 however each segment
is 2 octets making IPv6 address space 4 times (128 bits) compared
to IPv4 (32 bits).
Oct... means 8.
Each segment of an IP6 segment can contain 4 hexadecimal
Octets
Thanks for pointing-out my misunderstanding.
I'll remember 2 octets are really 2 characters (IBM's bytes) = 2 digits,
4 octal numbers or 4 hexadecimal numbers.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:12 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Those of us who've used older mainframes (such as the PDP-10) remember
byte being a synonym for bit field and a byte could be any number of
bits, typically from 1 to 36 (on a 36-bit-wide machine). 7-bit and 9-bit
bytes were quite
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 00:38 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Today I received an allocation of IP6 addresses for some servers. I can
'play' with the last 2 of the 8 IP6 address segments.
I guess Will Rogers was correct
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:48 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
the PDP-10 was in fact considered a mainframe in the 1960s. They were
more commonly called DECsystem-10, or KA10, KL10. the CPU was multiple
cabinets, the KL10 supported up to 4 megawords of ram (where a word was
36 bits). They
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:46 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
The machine has got to be accepted, but it is probably better
to accept it rather as one accepts a drug -- that is, grudgingly
and suspiciously. Like a drug, the machine is useful, dangerous,
and habit-forming. The oftener one
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 20:04 -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok that was weird.
The book or my posting or both ?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:51 -0800, JD wrote:
OK, as a measuring yardstick: approximately how many
months after RHEL5's release date was Centos 5 released?
That might give people an approximate idea.
Currently, I have no RHEL installed. I just joined this list to
enquire about RHEL 6.
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:38 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
At my second computer job in 1967 on a Honeywell H-120 (a baby machine
with 3 tapes which took 1 hour to do a Cobol compilation ...
I have always hoped to find
On https://projects.centos.org/trac/stem/ there is a brief mention of
Stem and VOIP with a request for dial-in numbers.
However there are no links on the page describing STEM. Stem sounds a
bit like the Dutch word for 'voice'.
What type of dialing-in, from the PSTN, numbers are required and how
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:20 -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:24 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
http://21DA:00D3::00FF:FE28:8080
is that...
http://[21DA:00D3::::00FF:FE28:8080]
or
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:49 -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow you actually got a dev to waste time in responding to your post.
I'd say your .
Can we keen this list clean and as polite as possible please? There
might be children about.
By the way, it should have been you're
Thank
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:31 -0400, robert mena wrote:
Me too. Who cares if it comes out within the next 3 months. As long
as they keep releasing the security updates quickly I've given up
on waiting for new releases :(
Do try not to forget Centos is completely free and brought to all
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 19:18 -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
It far and away already has. Dual-booting is a bastard compromise which
forces you to select between altnernative OSs, doesn't allow for
simultaneous access to features (and storage) of both, and generally
necessitates use of some
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 06:43 -0500, Kevin K wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Always Learning wrote:
My dual-booting, actually tri-booting, with Vista (ugh!), Centos
(brilliant) and Fedora 14 (not keen and a bit seriously buggy) allows me
in Linux to access and change the file space
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:28 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
One can find the f word in this forum from last week --- perhaps you
can search it out and help restore some civility, being of a more
civilized society than some others folks, including yours truly :(
Dear Larry,
I have work to do. Lots
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:01 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
No! This is a lame excuse. The developer chose to respond to it. He
could just have ignored that post. He is not required to give any answer.
The developer *chose* to waste time giving a completely useless response.
He could
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 11:15 -0600, Matt wrote:
What are the significant changes from CentOS 4.8 to 4.9 on 32 bit?
Anybody take the plunge already on a production box?
Nope. I'm a modern user :-) using C5.1/2.
Anyone else need a copy of today's Centos Annoucements?
Regards,
Paul.
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 14:36 +0100, Bob Marcan wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:32:34 +
Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
PDP being a 'main franme'? Baby mainframe perhaps when compared to
Honeywell's (later Bull's) Level 66? Level 66 had 36 bit words which
could be used as 6
Does anyone know how to install HTtrack on Centos 5.5 please ?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 13:32 -0400, Josh wrote:
It depends on the FTP server software you use. If you are using VSFTP,
then you want to add or uncomment the following line in
/etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf
chroot_local_user=YES
Save the changes. Restart VSFTPD. This will jail the user to their
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 20:30 +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
The point is it's probably as easy to lose a community if this still
matters to the core CentOS team.
Centos offers free and very reliable Linux with free and very reliable
updates.
The people providing this free service are
1 - 100 of 1055 matches
Mail list logo
