On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Alex Still alex.rans...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:16 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, Alex Still wrote:
Clients are blade servers. The blade chassis have integrated cisco
switches, which are plugged to a cisco 6509. The NFS server is on
another site 40km away, directly connected
[..]
/proc/mounts shows rsize has been negotiated to 1mB
Have you tested the same thing with a Linux NFS server?
The CentOS 5.x kernel has a maximum server [rw]size of 32Kb, so you
would need to use something with a more recent kernel to get [rw]sizes
to be 1Mb.
Haven't tried with a
[...]
On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
definitly something fishy going on. This has been reported on over 20
machines, so I don't think it's faulty hardware we're seeing.
Any thoughts,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
[...]
Well, it's been a long time since I've done troubleshooting on large NFS
networks, but here's an idea...
Are you seeing any kind of packet loss/retransmissions? Take a look at
netstat -s. When I last did this
5 matches
Mail list logo
