I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
told me that I was wrong and it was at -21. I then asked if there was a
way to get a
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:59 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, James Bunnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed CentOS
3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS 5 was one
kernel
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 08:48 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:45:36AM -0600, James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:35 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to
centos
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 16:57 +0100, Martyn Drake wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:54 PM, James Bunnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you expect people to use OSS and be treated like crap? being treated like
crap is the competitor's job.
Regardless of OSS or professional paid support
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2008 16:42:47 James Bunnell wrote:
ts been
nearly 2 weeks since any update of progress to 5.2 has been announced.
On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really need
an
update
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:01 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I expect people who feel they are treated like crap to do one of two
things:
1. Get involved to try and make things better (I guess you could
argue you are doing this albeit in a really ineffective manner :)
2. Move on to
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:19 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
This is open source etiquette. It differs from business etiquette
where you are more than welcoem to berate and yell and holler about
things because you're paying someone a lot of money.
the etiquette is rudeness
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:36 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really
need an
update on that?
i only asked. an answer such as what was given
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:52 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Frame your questions and reactions with these things in mind, develop a
bit thicker skin. Run everything said by a developer type through the
nerd tact filter too:
http://www.mit.edu/~jcb/tact.html
This applies for any
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 14:51 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
Apparently Oracle is the only ISV that's figured out that CentOS *is*
RHEL.
I was just told in no uncertain terms that it is not RHEL.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
There is a IRC channel in the Freenode network for #fedora-newmexico
users, if interested.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What are the requirements to get a Centos IRC cloak in freenode? Thanks
in advance.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
14 matches
Mail list logo
