Jerry Geis a écrit :
I was getting MANY emails from XXX.hinet.net - kind of filled my mqueue
directory.
I stopped sendmail. removed all the files in mqueue, added to sendmail
access a REJECT for hinet.net
This certainly seems to help - but is that the correct way to take care
of this sort
Robert Heller a écrit :
[snip]
Linux does not care about file *names*.
indeed Linux does not. but desktop managers do. That said, *.exe attacks
should only affect systems running Wine.
[snip]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Robert Heller a écrit :
At Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:07:05 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert Heller a écrit :
[snip]
Linux does not care about file *names*.
indeed Linux does not. but desktop managers do. That said, *.exe attacks
Are you sure? I would think that
Plant, Dean a écrit :
Hi list,
I have a requirement for a mail server that only allows email to pass
with a particular word in the subject line.
Reading the header checks docs for Postfix I thought I may be able to
add this rule:
!/^Subject: .*dingdong/ REJECT Need to add dingdong to
Anne Wilson a écrit :
On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
blank
Hi,
Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for?
Hi, Vandaman. I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a
test. CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew
ankush grover a écrit :
Hi Friends,
I have configured Postfix mail server on Centos for relaying mails
from 5 linux servers (including itself) within the same LAN. The
postfix mail server should relay mails from these 5 linux servers for
specific domains only. For example hosts
Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:21:48 -0500:
nslookup
is deprecated.
it's no more deprecated (should we say: it is re-precated? :). I don't
have a pointer right now (but run it and you should no more get a
warning...).
Did you try with host? May
Anne Wilson a écrit :
I have a problem with local mail on this netbook. I'm
sure it's something obvious, but I could use another
brain's input.
that would require surgery. you could try another brain's output
instead ;-p
Fri, 2008-11-28 13:15:27 - TCP Packet -
Source:192.168.0.7,58711
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Thanks Mouss and others. I have now more than enough to get on with.
mouss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (2.11.2008 19:39):
why comma? isn't LF better (one user per line)?
LF or comma, it doesn't matter much. I said comma, because I am going to
utilize the list to build
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
This is not CentOS-specific, hence OT.
I need a list of all email users on my system (there are hundreds of them).
The list could be extracted from /etc/aliases and the virtusertable.
Does anyone know of a script that would do this automatically? It would have
to
- exclude
Erick Perez a écrit :
Hi,
I have a customer with a sun cobalt running Sendmail 8.10.2/8.10.2 and
we are phasing out the sun cube due to some limitations. So we have
installed a new centos 5.x server.
the format of our current emails are [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the new
format will be [EMAIL
Roberto Pereyra a écrit :
Hi
Please I would like to delete all users date mail (not accounts) in my
mail server box.
I using Centos 5 and Virtualmin with postifx (maildir) and dovecot and
sasl auth.
Once I erased simply the files in the maildir folders and broke the
dovecot setup
Jussi Hirvi a écrit :
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only argument list too long as feedback.
I doubt this.
Paolo Supino a écrit :
Hi
I didn't think of checking if Sendmail is the one sending the email or
not. I will have to check this out.
I will only have access to this server next Wednesday. So until then I
can't check anything or post anything ...
If you find that it's sendmail, use
Paolo Supino a écrit :
Hi
I have a CentOS 4.2 server with postfix. The problem I'm having is
that postfix insists on using $myhostname in the from field even if I
Prove that it is postfix that does so, and not Sendmail. show logs.
instruct it to use $mydomain in /etc/postfix/main.cf or
Sean Carolan a écrit :
We have an issue with some customers who refuse to accept ICMP traffic
to their mail servers. It seems that they have put Mordac, preventer
of information services in charge of their firewall policy
Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200:
If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you
might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is
set.
But if it's not set? Shouldn't most devices have it not set?
David Hláčik a écrit :
Hello guys,
I do not know how it is posible :
*vi /etc/postfix/main.cf http://main.cf*
# INTERNET HOST AND DOMAIN NAMES
#
# The myhostname parameter specifies the internet hostname of this
# mail system. The default is to use the fully-qualified domain
Michael Peterson a écrit :
Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500:
You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that contains
Servername entries.
No, the ':80' is ok.
No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he was using
a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi
Biz_User needs to switch to Sales_User, and I tried following in
sudoers:
Biz_User ALL=(Sales_User) ALL
but I get following error when I run sudo su - Sales_User
Sorry, user Biz_User is not allowed to execute '/usr/bin/su -
Sales_User'
as root on
MHR wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Don't top post.
Bottom post instead.
2. Don't hijack another thread with new unrelated info.
Create a new thread for a new topic.
3. Trim your responses.
Leave in the attribution lines of any included previous posts,
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mouss wrote on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:20:09 +0200:
oh please no. hotmail don't delete my mail and I don't have an SPF
record. no do yahoo/gmail. and this was before I implemented DKIM. and
I've recently worked for a project where SPF didn't help with hotmail
Well
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I think this conversation is at a point where it would make
more sense
on a yahoo / email specific list.
Agreed! Its amazing to see the childishness of not being able
to get one's server in order, ignoring Yahoo's FAQ's and then
this kind of BS.
Thanks,
Josh.
Um, no
Josh Donovan wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Yeato hell with yahoo. I will just make all
members use a different
email service. Aint worth the effort.
I think this conversation is at a point where it would make
more sense
on a yahoo / email specific list.
Agreed!
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:23:50 +0200:
That's supposed to help with what regarding his problem?
Hotmail seems to delete all mail from domains without SPF if it's not
coming from the MX. Yahoo might be doing the same.
oh please no. hotmail don't
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
AFAIR yahoo only looks for proper SPF records and then looks at content
so far. My users interact with them all the time.
Out of curiosity: What happens if you don't have SPF records?
you'll be beaten to death by SPF fans. other than that, nothing.
Bob Hoffman wrote:
AFAIR yahoo only looks for proper SPF records and then looks at
content so far. My users interact with them all the time.
Out of curiosity: What happens if you don't have SPF records?
Ralph
Initially when I had to deal with sending to yahoo I would
get a mix of mail
Andrew Norris wrote:
Back to the PTR RR:
$ dig +short MX bobhoffman.com
10 mail.bobhoffman.com.
$ dig +short A mail.bobhoffman.com
72.35.68.59
$ dig +short -x 72.35.68.59
bobhoffman.com.
^^^
mail.bobhoffman.com != bobhoffman.com
so what?
Bob Hoffman wrote:
If we ignore the surrounding IPs (too many without rDNS), he
has a very simple setup, that should not cause any problems.
generic PTRs are a different matter.
Surrounding ips? A lot was from my computer to the smtp server..the rest was
just mine.
It is really simple,
RobertH wrote:
prove what?
if the machine with an rDNS of bobhoffman.com sends mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and is the MX of this domain, would anybody think
this is a forgery?
Mouss... I mean Ratatouille :-)
I'm feeling hungry now!
Answer: Possibly
Depends on many factors doesn't
Bob Hoffman wrote:
$ host 72.35.68.56
Host 56.68.35.72.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) $ host
72.35.68.57 Host 57.68.35.72.in-addr.arpa. not found:
3(NXDOMAIN) $ host 72.35.68.62 Host 62.68.35.72.in-addr.arpa.
not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
same for the IPs that don't belong to you in
Andrew Norris wrote:
John Kordash wrote:
mail.bobhoffman.com != bobhoffman.com
Careful here. Email senders have nothing to do with MX records.
Email receivers do.
I believe bobhoffman.com is the email sender in this case.
I would doubt this is an issue. Any split in/out mail server is
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Apparently now when I send an email from my yahoo account to the server, it
just disappears. So now yahoo is eating the mail going to me.
can you try after changing your hostname from
mail.creativeprogramdesigners.com to bobhoffman.com. I mean the name
that appears in
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:00 -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
And to follow up on the whole Domain keys.
I found at least 30 people online who have the same issue, but they have
working DKIMs but still being junked.
Yeayahoo...whee.
well it's not just yahoo as I know for
admin wrote:
It's worth checking that /etc/sysconfig/network also has whatever
hostname you wish to use configured in it.
To effect changes, it may be necessary to restart the network:
service network restart
no need to restart, just run the hostname command to set your system
hostname.
mouss wrote:
admin wrote:
It's worth checking that /etc/sysconfig/network also has whatever
hostname you wish to use configured in it.
To effect changes, it may be necessary to restart the network:
service network restart
no need to restart, just run the hostname command to set your
nate wrote:
Mad Unix wrote:
However, am thinking to do the following
mysqlhotcopy --allowold --flushlog -u lt;username --password=lt;password
lt;dbname /var/backups/mysql/
mysqlhotcopy doesn't support InnoDB last I checked(past week).
InnoDB is generally the suggested engine to use for
Lunix1618 wrote:
Hello all,
Anyone of you success to install virtual email with Postfix, MySQL and
Dovecot on CentOS 5.2 ? I am running: mysql-server-5.0.45-7.el5,
postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql and dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 on CentOS
5.2 box and can not make it work.
All deamons
Lanny Marcus wrote:
My email is on gmail.com IMAP and yes,
If it's on imap, then forget about TB mbox files. the messages are on
the server (TB can cache messages, but you are not supposed to know how
it exactly does. so don't play this game).
I could start over with
Thunderbird by
horas simalango wrote:
New be in linux!
Currently I have Install DNS, Email and Web server using centos 4.3.
All functions are running properly!
What anti virus and anti spam recomended for me to install to my
server? What I have to configure after installing anti virus and anti
spam?
Would some
ABBAS KHAN wrote:
Being as a Windows geek tho, I consider Linux as a more powerful server
operating system than Windows. When I saw OS comparison at
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/linux/server-security.mspx I
was shocked! Showed it to a friend and he felt like being brainwashed
Anne Wilson wrote:
I've just signed a bunch of keys using the caff tools. A few minutes ago they
started bouncing back at me, with the above error.
Received: by anne-wireless.lydgate.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id CA4B230EF7; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:15:39 +0100 (BST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote on Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:47:04 + (UTC):
Does anyone know how a program, script or shell user can best determine
whether the machine is running on bare metal or is a VMware guest?
AFAIK, VMWare uses vmnet32 drivers for ethernet and possibly others
Ned Slider wrote:
[snip]
I don't think anyone is suggesting running SSH on a non-standard port as
a sole means of defence, but rather as part of a layered approach where
it is very effective in what it is designed to do - namely to vastly
reduce the number of random brute-forcing attempts
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am building the Clonezilla live CD now
is there any reason why your system sends multiple References: headers:
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is invalid according to RFC2822, section 3.6, where
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:28:28PM -0400, Ray Leventhal enlightened us:
I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into
the following instruction:
-
Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on
the server, please make
Ray Leventhal wrote:
-
Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig
on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management
- Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary
configuration.
Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't
Jordi Prats wrote:
I've no iptables, I'm using a PIX to firewall them :)
did you open the ports on the pix?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Jay Leafey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jordi Prats wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a firewalled NFS server. I've configured my server
(CentOS
Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-9-2008 6:14 PM Tony Schreiner spake the following:
Jay Leafey wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:16 -0400:
However, you didn't provide any of the information I asked for.
You are not talking of www.bc.edu,
Pam Astor wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to set up a private family web site for genealogy, and want to set up Apache Authorization access control for this site, and once the user has logged in has access to the entire site. I’ve been reading the info at
Johnny Tan wrote:
Like many of you, I like to avoid modifying /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
as much as possible. Instead, modifying or adding files in
/etc/httpd/conf.d
However, because /var/www/html is declared within the main httpd.conf
and certain directives are set along with AllowOverride
Tom Brown wrote:
I would like to use the above config, i think.
Can cyrus-imap work nicely with Maildir ? If so is there one
available thats configured with msql support?
In the past i have used courier-imap but ideally i want to use sieve
if it's just for sieve, you can use dovecot.
Jerry Geis wrote:
All of a sudden I am getting this error this morning.
--
553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see:
http://ordb.org/lookup/?host=mp;{client_addr}
501 5.6.0 Data format error
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Tim Alberts wrote:
So I setup ssh on a server so I could do some work from home and I
think the second I opened it every sorry monkey from around the world
has been trying every account name imaginable to get into the system.
What's a good way to deal with this?
- keep your ssh up to date.
Tom Brown wrote:
I would like to use the above config, i think.
Can cyrus-imap work nicely with Maildir ? If so is there one available
thats configured with msql support?
In the past i have used courier-imap but ideally i want to use sieve
if it's just for sieve, you can use dovecot. it's
Dan Bongert wrote:
mouss wrote:
Dan Bongert wrote:
Hello all:
I have a couple CentOS 4 servers (all up-to-date) that are having
strange command failures. I first noticed this with a perl script
that uses lots of system calls.
thoth(66) /tmp uname -a
Linux thoth.ssc.wisc.edu 2.6.9-67.0.7
vincenzo romero wrote:
Hello all,
I'm getting frustrated attempting to understand; I googled and asked
folks and am unable to get a straight answer.
1. How is the /etc/resolv.conf file maintained ? I do not seem to
get a consistent result when I save resolv.conf configuration from GUI
or by
vincenzo romero wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for
my lab. Brief configuration:
Lab machine --- 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from
hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network)
1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the
James B. Byrne wrote:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Drinkard wrote:
Hello all,
I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got
really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the
software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but
D Steward wrote:
Hi all,
I have 2 servers online and wish them to communicate and exchange
information with each other at times.
I have been developing a web application which is extremely
CPU-intensive, and since I don't want to overload the main server which
deals with the apache/php/mysql
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
nohup will allow you to run a command that is not connected to the shell:
nohup command nohup.log
Devin,
What is the correct way to encapsulate the command if its rather long. Just as
a test, I am trying to run `dd if=/dev/random of=~/test bs=1024 count=5`
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
put everything in a shell script, and run the script.
Yea, I tried that but neglected to see how it behaved from inside an ssh
session. It works there but with plink :(
Back to the drawing board...
I just tried:
% cat /tmp/test.sh
nohup /usr/bin/tail -f
Sam Drinkard wrote:
Hello all,
I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got
really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the
software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but
learned there is also an SA-milter. Can someone tell me
Pam Astor wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm fairly new to Linux and I'm trying to un install a hard drive from my
Centos 5.1 box running KDE. When I built the PC, I installed two 500 gig
maxtors in the tower, then I installed Centos. Now I've decided that I want to
remove the slave drive and use it as
Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 15:33 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I am using open source Alfresco( alfresco.com ), written in java,
which has own code for FTP, CIFS (running on tomcat apache and java).
I need to run tomcat5 as root in order to achieve
Jeff Larsen wrote:
Taking a different approach than others...
Load them back into Outlook Express on a Windows box. Open a gmail
account and enable it for IMAP access. Configure Outlook Express for
gmail/IMAP and copy the messages to gmail folders. Configure T-Bird on
CentOS for gmail/IMAP
Tom Laramee wrote:
Greetings:
i have a pretty stock CentOS 5 machine with ports 80 and 22 exposed, so
my /etc/sysconfig/iptables file is pretty standard/straightforward.
my question is: how is this config file initially generated? i'd
like to
re-create it, and add a couple of rules so
Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi All:
I'm trying to get mysql 5 installed on my CentOS 4.6 installation.
I've installed mysql using yum:
yum -y install perl-DBD-MySQL mysql-server mysql php-mysql
mod_auth_mysql phpmyadmin mysqlclient
Yum says it installed fine:
Resolving Dependencies
-- Populating
Ed Morrison wrote:
mouss wrote:
But there isn't a my.cnf file in /etc/
if you want one, you need to create it. the package installs example
file that you can use.
In all my other mysql installs there has always been an /etc/my.cnf
after the installation but you are correct this can
Ed Morrison wrote:
mouss wrote:
# yum install mysql mysql-server php-mysql
# ls -a /var/lib/mysql
. ..
# rpm -qf /etc/my.cnf
mysql-libs-5.0.54-1.el4.centos
# service mysqld start
Initializing MySQL database: [ OK ]
Starting MySQL: [ OK ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lib]# ls mysql
ibdata1
Ed Morrison wrote:
mouss wrote:
# rpm -q mysql-libs
mysql-libs-5.0.54-1.el4.centos
so it's the same version, but:
# rpm -ql mysql-libs|grep /etc
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/mysql-i386.conf
/etc/my.cnf
has /etc/my.cnf. here are the contents if that could help.
# cat /etc/my.cnf
[mysqld]
datadir=/var
Luke Dudney wrote:
There are lightweight SMTP clients that can be used as drop-in
sendmail(1) replacements by speaking directly to a remote SMTP server
instead of dropping the message in the local queue directory. One that
I've used is mini_sendmail
Anne Wilson wrote:
/etc/hosts is fine. All possible connections on the lan are correctly
defined. dns resolution is via my isp, and again the IP addresses are
correctly set. That leaves the security settings, where I believe the
problem is. So, let's start with iptables. I've never worked
Milton Calnek wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
Hi there,
Should the IP address supplied be the actual address for eth0 rather
than the network address?
ie 192.168.0.1/24 rather than 192.168.0.0/24
I dunno...
what does 192.168.0.1/24 mean?
this one is not always accepted.
what does
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
If I have a production mailserver and a series of Linux servers that all
develop mail from logging etc, it seems slightly redundant to have so many smtp
servers installed on each of those boxes simply forwarding mail as I choose to
not have local delivery. Is there a
Jay Leafey wrote:
What I would I like to do is:
- allow 22 from specific IPs
- allow another port (redirected) from anywhere. this port is then
redirected to 22.
I do exactly this with a combination of SSH config options and
iptables rules. In your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file, find the
Les Bell wrote:
mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you consider this security through obscurity, then why not publish
the list of your users on a public web page? after all, you should use
strong passwords, so why hide usernames?
Usernames are comparatively hard to guess, and chosen from
Al Sparks wrote:
do you mean making apache use a specific IP when it proxies the request?
(you really lost me, so I may be misunderstanding). why do need that at
all? whatever IP is used should not matter since the backend will reply
over the socket that was opened by the proxy (be it a
James B. Byrne wrote:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0600, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject Was: [CentOS] Unknown rootkit causes compromised servers
SOME of the script kiddies check higher ports for SSH *_BUT_* I only see
4% of the brute force attempts
Jim Perrin wrote:
Along the lines of staying safe, now is probably a good time to check
your password policies.
1. Don't allow root access to ssh. (modify /etc/ssh/sshd_config)
why isn't this the default?
2. restrict root logins to only the local machine. (modify /etc/securetty)
3. Limit
Al Sparks wrote:
Tried the apache group, and no response. Thought I'd try here.
I have set up a development environment so that it mimics a production
environment.
The production environment has a proxy server (apache 2.x) that sends
requests onto another back-end apache server, and of course
Denis Croombs wrote:
Denis Croombs wrote:
I have 2 Centos servers that are currently giving me grief,
I am getting the error:-
SYSERR(root): timeout writing message to mail.server.co.uk
Resource temporarily unavailable
This is on both servers
Any clues ?
Yes, your MTAs
Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 16:09 +0100, mouss wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 22:46 +0100, mouss wrote:
Craig White wrote:
well, the opportune time to switch is probably when you are starting to
set up a new mail server.
Dovecot
Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 22:46 +0100, mouss wrote:
Craig White wrote:
well, the opportune time to switch is probably when you are starting to
set up a new mail server.
Dovecot is mostly featureless POP3/IMAP
Come on. is it holy war time again? should I shoot
Craig White wrote:
well, the opportune time to switch is probably when you are starting to
set up a new mail server.
Dovecot is mostly featureless POP3/IMAP
Come on. is it holy war time again? should I shoot over cyrus software
now or should we keep this list clean? If you like cryus
Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up centos 5.1 to authenticate against an openldap
server. I've got the authentication working, in that i can log in as a
user contained within the ldap database but not in the system
passwd/group files. The problem is instead of a prompt that for
Joe Greenseid wrote:
Quoting Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. nslookup is deprecated, use host
2. it interprets any hostname with a dot in it like an FQDN, e.g. it
transforms abc.def - abc.def.
Host returns the same results.
So there is no way to do name completion on any partial name
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Miark wrote on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:55:32 -0500:
The winning solution
Nevertheless, Bowie's solution is the correct one.
Indeed, 587 is the standard port for mail submission.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2476.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5068.txt
and since
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For sure you will be able to mount /var on your new disk
Thank you very much for it.
but not before you boot single user and copy all the contents across manually
and then modify /etc/fstab to
Eric B. wrote:
but what is the benefit in managing the zone file instead of hosts.*? I
mean, since you put the IP in the DNS zone file, why not put it in
hosts.*?
Looks like I prob. won't have a choice afterall. But was originally
thinking that it would neater and easier to read by have
Les Mikesell wrote:
Miark wrote:
Thanks to everybody for the responses. The winning solution
was Ricks (see below) which worked like a charm after poking a
suitable hole in my firewall.
I missed most of that conversation, but can't you configure postfix to
use smtps on port 465 on both ends
Eric B. wrote:
Can you post your complete hosts.allow and hosts.deny files?
Not much to them actually:
/chroot/tftpd/etc/hosts.allow:
#
# hosts.allow This file describes the names of the hosts which are
# allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
# by the
Eric B. wrote:
I've been working at getting a tftp server up an running in a
chroot jail, and I have finally succeed getting almost everything
working. The server itself works fine, however, it is implemented
as a tcpwrapper application (ie: in.tftpd) and I am having trouble
getting it to
Eric B. wrote:
Hi,
I've been struggling with this problem for the last couple of hours and am
nowhere near solving the problem. I am trying to run a tftp server in a
chroot jail. Now perhaps I am being paranoid, but I would like to have it
launched from within its own jail even if it
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On an ext3 filesystem, what would cause the system to claim it is out of
disk space for a program writing information to disk, when df -h shows
ample GB available and the file is being written to local disk rather
than an nfs-mounted filesystem?
I believe the hard drive
Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 12:13 PM, Filipe Brandenburger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, the datestamp is put by the process that is logging, not by syslog
itself. Maybe when that process started you hadn't configured the right
/etc/localtime and the process still thinks it's running
Les Mikesell wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
Is there a command that will monitor a process for exiting (crash or
normal exit) and
then execute another command based on the said process no longer being
active?
Or is there a wrapper command that runs a process and when that
process exists
due to
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Given my experience in Linux is limited currently, what do you guys
use to monitor logs such as ?messages? on your centos servers? I had
a hardware failure that happened in between
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
I am runnig posfix on Centos 4.4 as a Mailgateway. It only accepts mails for
domains and then forwards mails to Lotus domino Server.
All clients sends outgoing mails to that Lotus domino Server. Then , That
Lotus Domino Server sends mails to Postfix mailgateway.
Centos wrote:
Hello
I am installing Centos from remote location and have no problem if I
upgrade Centos,
however if I will have problem if I go through fresh installation,
because once the fresh
installation finished,at next reboot Centos will ask to define another
user name with its
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
