On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
Hey there -
This morning I ran the yum updater through Webmin as I do every month
or so - after about two hours I realized that I still had the same
updating screen going - and no response. Seemed strange.
Simple
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:17, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
As to the question below - I have that directory, but not that file.
yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1 (from CentOS 5.2) has /usr/share/yum-cli/i18n.py
yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos (from CentOS 5.3) no longer has that file.
Probably
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:23, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
I have always wondered about the sanity of using python for system
administration tools, but this should be a yum file in /usr/share/yum-cli/.
I found i18n on my CentOS 5.3 Desktop. It's in /etc/sysconfig/
The
Hi Filipe -
Clearly I have indeed got things broken -
# rpm -q yum
package yum is not installed
So I downloaded the rpm for a reinstall as you suggested - but clearly
I have more to get and install -
I downloaded to my home directory and ran the rpm -Uvh from there
# rpm -Uvh --force
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:40, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
# rpm -Uvh --force yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
rpm = 0:4.4.2 is needed by yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch
rpm-python is needed by yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:40 -0600, Dan Roberts wrote:
Hi Filipe -
Clearly I have indeed got things broken -
# rpm -q yum
package yum is not installed
So I downloaded the rpm for a reinstall as you suggested - but clearly
I have more to get and install -
I downloaded to my home
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:40, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
# rpm -Uvh --force yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
rpm = 0:4.4.2 is needed by yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch
rpm-python is needed by
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 16:00, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I wouldn't recommend that you use '--force' for any rpm commands unless
you know what you're doing.
I suggested the --force just in case the RPM database already had the
yum package registered, but the package was
Ok - something truly bad appears to have happened.Yes, I will
concede that cycling the system was a bad thing - but after two hours
it should have returned from the update, still I was bad.
There are indeed updates that it wants - and I went back to the site
to get them, but then things
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:06 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 16:00, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I wouldn't recommend that you use '--force' for any rpm commands unless
you know what you're doing.
I suggested the --force just in case the RPM
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Once yum is basically working you might be able to
yum install yum-utils
and
yum-complete-transaction
to pick up where you left off. I had to do this on one box where the
update process kicked me off and died with a bunch of duplicate
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:06 -0600, Dan Roberts wrote:
snip
I know very little about this, but maybe Felipe et al can fill in the
holes.
I recall times that folks on the list indicated an rpm rebuild db be
done. Is that possibly needed here?
Did the glibc get updated? If so/not what should be
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 16:06, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
There are indeed updates that it wants - and I went back to the site
to get them, but then things continue to show up as missing.
# rpm -Uvh --force rpm-4.4.2-48.el5.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Once yum is basically working you might be able to
yum install yum-utils
and
yum-complete-transaction
to pick up where you left off. I had to do this on one box where the
update process kicked me off and died with
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Once yum is basically working you might be able to
yum install yum-utils
and
yum-complete-transaction
to pick up where you left off. I had to do this on
on 4-22-2009 11:18 AM Dan Roberts spake the following:
Hmmm -
# rpm -uv glibc*
-uv: unknown option
Ok - so I go with -Uv instead
# rpm -Uv glibc*
error: File not found by glob: glibc*
But this is strange because I know that glib-2.0 is there - fairly
easy to confirm - is something
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Olaf Mueller daily-pla...@istari.de wrote:
Hello,
if running 'yum update' on a CentOS 5.3 workstation, that was upgraded
from CentOS 5.2, I run into the following error with perl.
Any hints?
DId you use cpan to update or install any perl modules? Have you
Hello,
if running 'yum update' on a CentOS 5.3 workstation, that was upgraded
from CentOS 5.2, I run into the following error with perl.
[...]
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package perl.i386 4:5.8.8-18.el5_3.1 set to be updated
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Olaf Mueller wrote:
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/sqlitesack.py, line 94, in
_read_db_obj
setattr(self, item, _share_data(db_obj[item]))
TypeError: unsubscriptable object
We're somehow seeing this error all over the place, which seems to be a
problem with multiarch. See bug
Jim Perrin wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Olaf Mueller daily-pla...@istari.de
wrote:
if running 'yum update' on a CentOS 5.3 workstation, that was
upgraded from CentOS 5.2, I run into the following error with perl.
[...] It could also be a corrupted package. Try a 'yum clean
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Hello.
Olaf Mueller wrote:
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/sqlitesack.py, line 94,
in
_read_db_obj
setattr(self, item, _share_data(db_obj[item]))
TypeError: unsubscriptable object
One question: Your system has been updated to 5.3?
Yes, I have
Hi
I have a system that I'm trying to run `yum update` on. It fails with the
following error:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/xdelta.1.gz from install of xdelta-1.1.4-1.el5.rf
conflicts with file
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
I have a system that I'm trying to run `yum update` on. It fails with
the following error:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/xdelta.1.gz from install of
Dan Carl wrote on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:43:14 -0600:
Removed perl-Math-BigInt
now Mailscanner won't start
because the forced modules probably overwrote the original built-in
version, so that after removal nothing was left.
Cross my fingers and hope I won't run into any perl problems,
try
Dan Carl wrote on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:48:23 -0600:
add check_obsoletes = 1 does nothing
Not in this situation, as you didn't tell everything last time ;-)
file /usr/share/man/man3/Math::BigInt.3pm.gz from install of
perl-Math-BigInt-1.89-1.el5.rf conflicts with file from package
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Dan Carl wrote on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:48:23 -0600:
add check_obsoletes = 1 does nothing
Not in this situation, as you didn't tell everything last time ;-)
Sorry, I usually post too much info
Correct. But there is no such file in CentOS. You installed the
Dan Carl wrote on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:27:30 -0600:
If I remove the conflicting perl packages won't this break MailScanner?
No. It might break your Perl, though, if it overwrote anything from Perl.
In that case you want to reinstall Perl.
I doubt he would install them if they weren't needed.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Dan Carl wrote on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:27:30 -0600:
If I remove the conflicting perl packages won't this break MailScanner?
No. It might break your Perl, though, if it overwrote anything from Perl.
In that case you want to reinstall Perl.
Removed
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Dan Carl wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:13:50 -0600:
I followed the Wiki instructions for setting up *yum-priorities*.
I added the rpmforge repo
I installed clamd without a problem.
Now when I go to update I get conflicts with perl-Math-BigInt.
add
Dan Carl wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:13:50 -0600:
I followed the Wiki instructions for setting up *yum-priorities*.
I added the rpmforge repo
I installed clamd without a problem.
Now when I go to update I get conflicts with perl-Math-BigInt.
add check_obsoletes = 1 to the
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 16:36, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
If you really need the newer version you might have to --force it.
Bad advice. This is the exactly same reason why installing from CPAN
is not recommended under CentOS.
RPM is designed to prevent you from installing
I followed the Wiki instructions for setting up *yum-priorities*.
I added the rpmforge repo
I installed clamd without a problem.
Now when I go to update I get conflicts with perl-Math-BigInt.
Is the only solution to uninstall the base version and then install the
rpmforge version?
According the
on 1-30-2009 1:13 PM Dan Carl spake the following:
I followed the Wiki instructions for setting up *yum-priorities*.
I added the rpmforge repo
I installed clamd without a problem.
Now when I go to update I get conflicts with perl-Math-BigInt.
Is the only solution to uninstall the base
--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Dan Carl d...@bluestarshows.com wrote:
From: Dan Carl d...@bluestarshows.com
Subject: [CentOS] Yum update conflicts perl-Math-BigInt
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 1:13 PM
I followed the Wiki instructions for setting up
*yum
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Mark Pryor wrote:
--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Dan Carl d...@bluestarshows.com wrote:
From: Dan Carl d...@bluestarshows.com
Subject: [CentOS] Yum update conflicts perl-Math-BigInt
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 1:13 PM
I
It gets as far as telling me:
Total download size: 207 M
It doesn't ask if its ok. But
if I type yenter it reports:
Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages:
Then it does nothing. I can't kill it
with CRTL-C, but I killed the yum process
with kill -9 from another window.
I retried it several
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 19:46 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
It gets as far as telling me:
Total download size: 207 M
It doesn't ask if its ok. But
if I type yenter it reports:
Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages:
Then it does nothing. I can't kill it
with CRTL-C, but I
It doesn't ask if its ok. But
if I type yenter it reports:
Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages:
Then it does nothing. I can't kill it
with CRTL-C, but I killed the yum process
with kill -9 from another window.
I retried it several times; same result.
tried deleting
tried deleting /var/lib/rpm/__* after killing all yum processes?
Yum has command line options to do its housecleaning which I would
try first.
yum help clean
What does deleting the __db files do that the yum clean all doesn't?
(which I notice doesn't delete those specific files)
--
Spiro
on 1-12-2009 12:24 PM Spiro Harvey spake the following:
tried deleting /var/lib/rpm/__* after killing all yum processes?
Yum has command line options to do its housecleaning which I would
try first.
yum help clean
What does deleting the __db files do that the yum clean all doesn't?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Agile Aspect agile.asp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - when I'm running CentOS 4.4, and I run the
command
yum update nfs
which version of NFS do I get - the version for
CentOS 4.4, or the version for CentOS 4.7
(which I presume is the latest release)?
Any
Hi - when I'm running CentOS 4.4, and I run the
command
yum update nfs
which version of NFS do I get - the version for
CentOS 4.4, or the version for CentOS 4.7
(which I presume is the latest release)?
Any help would be appreciated.
--
Article. VI. Clause 3 of the constitution of the
Somewhere in the process of doing a yum update from a terminal window
open in an NX/freenx desktop session, the whole session blew up -
perhaps when ssh restarted or when freenx was updated. The yum update
did not complete beyond that point and the session was gone when I
reconnected. Is
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Somewhere in the process of doing a yum update from a terminal window
open in an NX/freenx desktop session, the whole session blew up -
perhaps when ssh restarted or when freenx was updated. The yum update
did not
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Somewhere in the process of doing a yum update from a terminal window
open in an NX/freenx desktop session, the whole session blew up -
perhaps when
]# yum update
Loading priorities plugin
Loading fastestmirror plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirror.hmc.edu
* updates: mirrors.versaweb.com
* kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org
* extras: centos-distro.cavecreek.net
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:01 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9 is needed by package
nspluginwrapper
Something missing?
This is a known issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455601
Akemi
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:01 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9 is needed by package nspluginwrapper
Something missing?
This is a known issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455601
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
]# yum update
Loading priorities plugin
Loading fastestmirror plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirror.hmc.edu
* updates: mirrors.versaweb.com
* kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org
* extras:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
]# yum update
Loading priorities plugin
Loading fastestmirror plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirror.hmc.edu
* updates: mirrors.versaweb.com
* kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org
*
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
]# yum update
Loading priorities plugin
Loading fastestmirror plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 10:52 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
snip
hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one
volume
group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more,
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:37 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
On 5/12/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
10696956 4597688 5547128 46% /
/dev/hda3 102486 22174
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:21 -0500:
LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
LV Size10.53 GB
And the output of pvdisplay.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 21:11 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:21 -0500:
LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
LV Size10.53 GB
And the output of pvdisplay.
[EMAIL
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
snip
hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume
group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical
frontend for LVM in your desktop).
From your grub.conf we know that it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
snip
hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume
group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical
frontend for LVM in your desktop).
From
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
Mount it and have a look at that partition, does it contain the same stuff
as
your /boot partition?
And this question?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 10:52:16 -0400:
The proper location of the grub.conf is:
/mnt/hda8/grub/grub.conf
right, if that is the boot partition, there won't be a boot directory.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
10696956 4597688 5547128 46% /
/dev/hda3
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 01:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
snip
No, surely not. Windows installs only to one partition, the one you selected
for installation. The other three are only NTFS partitions and can be used by
Windows, but unless your wife installs something on them or puts data on them
On 5/7/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500:
Kai: I am not using Windows Boot Manager. Grub comes up, as on the 2
boxes, where things are working properly.
Just to be sure, it's really grub? You get a somewhat blueish screen
wrote on Thu, 8 May 2008 09:39:15 -0500:
Ah. This is where the problem on her box probably comes from! Last
November, when I installed Windows XP, in English, my native language,
I did not understand something in Microsoft's English. There were four
(4) partitions for Windows (C,D,E,F) and
MHR wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
How can I correct this, so the box
will boot the latest kernel? TIA! Lanny
As root,
MHR wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:48 -0700, MHR wrote:
snip
As root, go to the directory where the rpms are located (you can use
'find' for this if you don't alreayd know) and run:
Mark: Syntax for the find
On 5/7/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+cento AT br-online.de wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Scott: Great! If I can locate kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 and
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 I can use the rpm -e command to remove them
and then yum update again and that should update the kernel in her box.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Thu Mar 15 19:57:35 EDT
2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
After rebooting the box, it is still on the original kernel, rather
than on the new kernel.
I just installed
wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 05:27:25 -0500:
I just installed kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 again. Was that
correct or not?
As you removed it earlier, yes. There doesn't seem to be any dependancy
for it. AFAIK it's not necessary for operation, anyway, it's only
necessary if something has to
Michael Simpson wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 12:15:35 +0100:
do you have any mention of the new kernel in /etc/grub.conf?
Note, this is only a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf !
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On 5/7/08, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 05:27:25 -0500:
I just installed kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 again. Was that
correct or not?
As you removed it earlier, yes. There doesn't seem to be any dependancy
for it. AFAIK it's not necessary for
wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 08:53:01 -0500:
-rw--- 1 root root816 May 7 05:08 grub.conf
got changed 5:08 today. Are you sure you booted after that? What does uname
-a show now?
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,2)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title CentOS (2.6.18-53.1.14.el5)
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erm. man find is one of the most hideous manual pages on a linux
system (man tar comes close) - so a bit help from your side would have
been nice.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I have never found this
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 18:30 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
-rw--- 1 root root816 May 7 05:08 grub.conf
got changed 5:08 today. Are you sure you booted after that? What does uname
-a show now?
Kai: Yes, I rebooted, very early this morning. I just tried it again. My
wife had been using MS
Mhr wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 09:53:23 -0700:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I have never found this
particular man page to be bad enough not to consult when needed, even
for the first time (like I did, lo these many eons ago, when it was
even harder to read than now) and the effort
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 13:13:13 -0500:
On
compaq1300, I do *not* have the three boot options (original kernel,
latest kernel and Windows XP). I have two (2) options, if I interrupt
grub: (a) the original kernel (b) other, which is Windows XP
Ok, that explains it. I bet you
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 21:38 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 13:13:13 -0500:
On
compaq1300, I do *not* have the three boot options (original kernel,
latest kernel and Windows XP). I have two (2) options, if I interrupt
grub: (a) the original kernel (b)
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would always use locate for that task, much faster, much easier.
Not being familiar with 'locate,' I found its man page rather
intimidating at first glance. I'll have to study it a little more
carefully, but I should
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I woke up about 430 this morning and I realized that rpm can
locate the file by itself. :-)However, I want to learn how to
use find that Mark (mhr) mentioned!
Lanny (offlist):
Thanks - I really did mean that in a good
mail.gmail.com
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
Mhr wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 14:04:55 -0700:
Not being familiar with 'locate,' I found its man page rather
intimidating at first glance. I'll have to study it a little more
carefully, but I should also note that I ran locate to find my kernel
rpms
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500:
Kai: I am not using Windows Boot Manager. Grub comes up, as on the 2
boxes, where things are working properly.
Just to be sure, it's really grub? You get a somewhat blueish screen that
says booting centos in x seconds, press any key to
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 00:19 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500:
snip
You will need to make a list of all partitions. Not sure what the best way
to do this would be. Probably fdisk. Run fdisk, then type p (for
printing the partition table), then
On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive.com wrote:
Message: 9
?Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 16:31:50 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 07:28:10 -0500:
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5
Ok. I just asked because you never mentioned you had
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much! Lanny
rpm -qa kernel*
And: pup is a frontend to yum is a
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 16:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much!
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 09:25 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 16:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the
On 5/6/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos AT br-online.de wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much!
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
How can I correct this, so the box
will boot the latest kernel? TIA! Lanny
As root, go to the directory
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:48 -0700, MHR wrote:
snip
As root, go to the directory where the rpms are located (you can use
'find' for this if you don't alreayd know) and run:
rpm -ivh kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
Mark: Syntax for the find
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:48 -0700, MHR wrote:
snip
As root, go to the directory where the rpms are located (you can use
'find' for this if you don't alreayd know) and run:
rpm -ivh
On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive.com wrote:
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 16:31:50 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 07:28:10 -0500:
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5
Ok. I just asked because you never mentioned you had actually
On 02 May 2008, Michael Simpson mikie.simpson at gmail.com wrote:
__
On 5/2/08, Lanny Marcus lannyma at gmail.com wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command
On 02 May 2008, Erek Dyskant erek at blumenthals.com wrote:
__
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again,
*Have* you verified that you are not already on the latest kernel?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive.com wrote:
Message: 61
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 13:31:14 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Have* you verified that you are not already on the latest kernel?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Thu
Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 07:28:10 -0500:
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5
Ok. I just asked because you never mentioned you had actually checked.
Just a kernel missing when you update is not proof ;-)
I see that you have priority protections in place. Disable all your extra
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again, and there is a response that no updates
are available. Her box is a Compaq Evo D300v Celeron. During the past
couple of days, when I did yum update, on my daughters box and mine
(Dell
On 5/2/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again, and there is a response that no updates
are available. Her box is a Compaq Evo D300v Celeron. During the past
couple of days, when I did yum
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again, and there is a response that no updates
are available.
Check /etc/yum.conf and see if there's an exclude=kernel line
Regards,
Erek
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again, and there is a response that no updates
are available.
Check
301 - 400 of 452 matches
Mail list logo
