On Sun, June 10, 2018 6:19 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2018-06-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> Frank, I 100% agree with you. The only case with spoofed MAC address and
>> license that may have chance to stand in court will be if all below are
>> true:
>>
>> 1. the company issued perpetual
On 2018-06-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Frank, I 100% agree with you. The only case with spoofed MAC address and
> license that may have chance to stand in court will be if all below are
> true:
>
> 1. the company issued perpetual license.
> 2. the company does not exist
Based on what's
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Frank, I 100% agree with you. The only case with spoofed MAC address and
license that may have chance to stand in court will be if all below are true:
1. the company issued perpetual license.
2. the company does not exist
3. the original hardware died
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/18 15:45, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> On 06/08/18 15:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists
> here
> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several
On 06/08/18 15:45, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On 06/08/18 15:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here
were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and
last owner changed licensing terms and
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 06/08/18 15:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here
>>> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and
>>> last owner changed licensing terms and stopped signing perpetual
licenses.
>>>
On 06/08/18 15:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On 06/08/18 13:48, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I
wonder if this outfit is
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 06/08/18 13:48, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Frank Cox wrote:
> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
>>>
>>> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I
>>> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with
On 06/08/18 13:48, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I
wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of
their license for this
Frank Cox wrote:
>> > so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
>
> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I
> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of
> their license for this software, whatever it may be?
>
> If
> > so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I wonder
if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of their license
for this software, whatever it may be?
If the software licensed to run
On 06/08/18 12:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On 06/08/18 10:27, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John Hodrien wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out
over the last year or so. Thing is, you
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/18 10:27, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> John Hodrien wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out
over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of
On 06/08/18 10:27, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John Hodrien wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out
over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of
course, to boot the system. My manager
> On Jun 8, 2018, at 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out
>>> over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of
>>> course, to
John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out
>> over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of
>> course, to boot the system. My manager found a way to allow us to reboot
>>
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out
over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of
course, to boot the system. My manager found a way to allow us to reboot
without being at the system's
We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out
over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of
course, to boot the system. My manager found a way to allow us to reboot
without being at the system's keyboard, a package called clevis. Works
fine...
18 matches
Mail list logo
