On 01/04/2016 06:26 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Preparing to build a small replacement server (initially built in 2005)
> and normally for the OS I would buy 2x500GB drives and deploy in a RAID
> 1 configuration.
> Now we have SSD drives available
> - does just a single SSD drive offer the same
Preparing to build a small replacement server (initially built in 2005)
and normally for the OS I would buy 2x500GB drives and deploy in a RAID
1 configuration.
Now we have SSD drives available
- does just a single SSD drive offer the same reliability or is there
advantage in deploying two in
On 2016-01-05, Rob Kampen wrote:
> - does just a single SSD drive offer the same reliability or is there
> advantage in deploying two in a Raid 1 config?
All else being equal, a RAID1 will be more reliable than a single drive,
whether it's magnetic or SSD.
> Also,
On 5 January 2016 at 09:26, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Preparing to build a small replacement server (initially built in 2005)
> and normally for the OS I would buy 2x500GB drives and deploy in a RAID 1
> configuration.
> Now we have SSD drives available
> - does just a
On 1/4/2016 4:26 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
It seems most SSD are in laptop drive size, shape and interface - thus
not a good fit into a server motherboard unless I'm missing something.
- what devices are you using?
server motherboards don't care what size the drives are, that's a
function of
On 2 February 2012 18:19, Matt matt.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
quickly in high I/O
On 02/02/2012 10:19 AM, Matt wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each
On 2/2/2012 5:19 PM, Peter A wrote:
On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC drives
here that from their manufacturer
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each memory location
only has X many writes
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
quickly in
On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard
On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my
On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC drives
here that from their manufacturer have been rated at 3 or more years of
14 matches
Mail list logo