On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Only if that person also wants to support that on the #irc channel and
can explain why we support one type of vserver and don't support the
other :)
a bit harsh -- the wiki article as written is to address
_broken_ vserver matters
http://wiki.cen
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
We use the 4% consensus of left and right borders, and fullsearch is
now the default search behavior.
QA-Lead and Wiki-Mangler decided to incorporate that: See
http://wiki.centos.org/
Thank you again for your great work.
Ralph
PS: We voted
Daniel de Kok wrote:
> Of course, this would require a volunteer who is willing to maintain
> such a set of patches against the kernel. But if someone is willing to
> do this, it can profit from CentOS quality assurance, and guarantee
> good compatibility with CentOS.
Only if that person also want
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
> We use the 4% consensus of left and right borders, and fullsearch is
> now the default search behavior.
QA-Lead and Wiki-Mangler decided to incorporate that: See
http://wiki.centos.org/
Thank you again for your great work.
Ralph
PS: We voted for large circles. Com
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aggree..I would like for the Authors name and Co-Authored names to remain on
> the article they have written.
Since many people feel this is important, maybe we should. But I'd
propose to include a note somewhere on the Wiki that i
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That should block the vast majority of spam, shouldn't it?
On a Dutch forum we were dealing with a considerable amount of spam.
Most spam account creation/posting is done automatically through
scripts. So, we simply added an
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>> vserver is quite popular, especially among debian admins and even among
>> hosting companies, so I am very much in favor of publishing this article.
>
> Has anyone made contact with the admin /
John wrote:
> Just as an
> equal opertunity that the centos "core members" would want there name on
> updated packages. IE "The Package Builder".
umm not true.
We dont have Packager set on any CentOS4/5 rpms anymore - anything that
comes through the buildsystem does not have that. We used to
Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> vserver is quite popular, especially among debian admins and even among
> hosting companies, so I am very much in favor of publishing this article.
Has anyone made contact with the admin / packager at the mentioned repo ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EM
