On Feb 1, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Richmond wrote:
> OK I have cheated and hacked and all sort, but got it installed from
> version 6 repo because it seems version 7 i686 doesn't exist.
CentOS might support the 7 i686 alt-arch, but Fedora EPEL does not. So there
aren’t any packages in EPEL7 for
Richmond wrote:
> John Pierce wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 1:31 AM wwp wrote:
>>
>>> Definitely, ntfs-3g is from the EPEL repo:
>>> # yum info ntfs-3g
>>> Installed Packages
>>> Name: ntfs-3g
>>> Arch: x86_64
>>>
>> but is it available in x86 32 bit ?
>>
>> me, I've never
John Pierce wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 1:31 AM wwp wrote:
>
>> Definitely, ntfs-3g is from the EPEL repo:
>> # yum info ntfs-3g
>> Installed Packages
>> Name: ntfs-3g
>> Arch: x86_64
>>
>
> but is it available in x86 32 bit ?
>
> me, I've never trusted ntfs on linux, and
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 1:31 AM wwp wrote:
>
> Definitely, ntfs-3g is from the EPEL repo:
> # yum info ntfs-3g
> Installed Packages
> Name: ntfs-3g
> Arch: x86_64
>
but is it available in x86 32 bit ?
me, I've never trusted ntfs on linux, and would rather have a windows
Hello Richmond,
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:03:51 + Richmond wrote:
> I should think this is quite a basic question but what I have tried so
> far hasn't worked. I have centos altarch 7 and I want to mount an ntfs
> volume.
>
> (I am beginning to suspect it is not available for 32 bit so I will
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:07:50PM +0100, wwp wrote:
Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found
nothing yet.
Perhaps open a ticket in bugzilla against EPEL for that component if one
doesn't already exist?
John
--
Hello John,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 06:09:35 -0600 John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:07:50PM +0100, wwp wrote:
Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found
nothing yet.
Perhaps open a ticket in bugzilla against EPEL for that
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 23:36 -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
I'm looking for ntfs-3g. I'm getting lots of hits through google, but I'm
suspicious of some of the sites.
The one rpm I downloaded from rpmfind wouldn't install because of some
missing library. Where's a good place to get the tarball?
hello,
I install it on every laptop from epel repo.
I tried rpmforge repo as wel, that would sometimes give me read-only usb
connectivity.
Greetings, J.
Op 14-03-13 07:36, Al Sparks schreef:
I'm looking for ntfs-3g. I'm getting lots of hits through google, but I'm
suspicious of some of the
Try
yum install ntfs-3g
On Mar 14, 2013 2:36 AM, Al Sparks data...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm looking for ntfs-3g. I'm getting lots of hits through google, but I'm
suspicious of some of the sites.
The one rpm I downloaded from rpmfind wouldn't install because of some
missing library. Where's a
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Ron Loftin wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 23:52 +0530, Ritika Garg wrote:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from
the hard disk to the
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Robert Heller a écrit :
Will FAT support the larger external disks, such as the .5TB and larger?
I read the replies to my previous posts, and I get your point, since I
didn't know about the various limitations. It's probably due to the fact
that we're
On Sunday, December 05, 2010 04:29:47 pm Niki Kovacs wrote:
I've been following this thread, and I'm wondering: why bother with NTFS
in the first place?
It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange. While there is a
ext2 module for OS X, and there is HFS+ filesystem support for
On 12/06/10 8:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange.
ugh. disk file systems were really not intended for data interchange,
especially not NTFS. use the network.
___
CentOS mailing list
On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:02:20 pm John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/06/10 8:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange.
ugh. disk file systems were really not intended for data interchange,
especially not NTFS. use the network.
In a dual-boot
At Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:02:20 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 12/06/10 8:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange.
ugh. disk file systems were really not intended for data interchange,
especially not NTFS. use the
On 12/06/10 11:12 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
In a dual-boot scenario?
ugh. dual booting is a pain in the derriere. use a VM if its for
software testing or whatever.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:41:46 pm John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/06/10 11:12 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
In a dual-boot scenario?
ugh. dual booting is a pain in the derriere. use a VM if its for
software testing or whatever.
Some of us really do need to dual-boot, for whatever reason
On 12/6/10 1:57 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:41:46 pm John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/06/10 11:12 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
In a dual-boot scenario?
ugh. dual booting is a pain in the derriere. use a VM if its for
software testing or whatever.
Some of us really do need
On Monday, December 06, 2010 03:50:49 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
But you could easily run Linux under Virtualbox or vmware. While still
running OS X.
I'd rather not do that, as performance does suffer to a degree, and Linux is my
primary environment, not my secondary one. Further, you then add a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ritika Garg said the following on 05/12/10 19:22:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from the hard
disk to the
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 23:52 +0530, Ritika Garg wrote:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from
the hard disk to the system but not from the system to the hard
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Ritika Garg ritikagar...@gmail.com wrote:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from the
hard disk to the system but not from the
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 13:40 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Ritika Garg ritikagar...@gmail.com wrote:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to
On 12/05/10 19:22, Ritika Garg wrote:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from the
hard disk to the system but not from the system to the hard disk.
The
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Ritika Garg ritikagar...@gmail.com wrote:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I
Ritika Garg a écrit :
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from
the hard disk to the system but not from the system to the hard disk.
I've been following
I've been following this thread, and I'm wondering: why bother with NTFS
in the first place? If you have a mixed environment where you need
Windows to access your external hard disk, you might as well format it
with a FAT filesystem. Linux supports FAT natively, without making you
jump
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net wrote:
Ritika Garg a écrit :
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from
the hard disk to the
At Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:29:47 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Ritika Garg a écrit :
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from
the
Robert Heller a écrit :
Will FAT support the larger external disks, such as the .5TB and larger?
I read the replies to my previous posts, and I get your point, since I
didn't know about the various limitations. It's probably due to the fact
that we're 100% GNU/Linux here. I haven't booted
Hi,
ext3 is very reliable, i never had such issues (fsck after a power
failure, yes... but no data loss). so i whould say its a hardware issue.
Greetings
On 08/12/2010 10:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi guys,
I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
experience and a
2010/8/12 Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org:
Hi guys,
I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
experience and a little curiosity.
Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
From: Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org
Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That
thing happened for years and it was fine
On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi guys,
I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
experience and a little curiosity.
Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:55:29 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi guys,
I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
experience and a little curiosity.
Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
no admin was available to
On Thursday, August 12, 2010 04:55:29 am Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That
thing happened for
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Benjamin Franz wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware
issue?
On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi guys,
I don't mean to incite
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
and I suspect you are actually using ntfs-3g...
Indeed, this has to be looked into.
Rod, could
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dag Wieers d...@wieers.com wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
rpm -qa kmod\*
and
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko`
(if this command gives you a list of your current directory, then
please don't post the output)
Beware that even when the
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Looks like you are doing everything just fine. Perhaps, we should
move this conversation to the
This is just a followup post for those who would like to know how this
conversation developed. The details are in this ELRepo mailing list
thread:
http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2009-November/000102.html
In short, the write support offered by the kernel (hence kmod-ntfs) is
quite
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Rod Rook rod.r...@gmail.com wrote:
In short, the write support offered by the kernel (hence kmod-ntfs) is
quite limited. Alan Bartlett pointed to this section of the kernel
Kconfig file:
The only supported operation is overwriting existing files, without
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Rod Rook rod.r...@gmail.com wrote:
In short, the write support offered by the kernel (hence kmod-ntfs) is
quite limited. Alan Bartlett pointed to this section of the kernel
Kconfig file:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Rod Rook rod.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I can write, rename, create folders and files under kernel
-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5
Using the in-kernel ntfs module (kmod-ntfs) ?
Yes.
Interesting (and
Interesting (and curious). That means that the description in the
Kconfig file is obsolete. Thanks for your input.
My attempt to write to NTFS produced a permission denied message.
This needs more investigation.
Akemi
You could have saved lots of time and efforts if you cared to read
Rod Rook wrote:
Interesting (and curious). That means that the description in the
Kconfig file is obsolete. Thanks for your input.
My attempt to write to NTFS produced a permission denied message.
This needs more investigation.
Akemi
You could have saved lots
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
funny.
Rod, that wiki page ends with:
Written and currently maintained by AkemiYagi. Comments/improvement
welcome.
I guess the Akemi you replied to had read that page :-D .
and I suspect you are
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
and I suspect you are actually using ntfs-3g...
Indeed, this has to be looked into.
Rod, could you show us the output from:
rpm -qa
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Ron Loftin wrote:
ELrepo site, I can mount an NTFS filesystem, and when I type mount
with no options the output tells me that the target filesystem is
mounted read-write. However, when I try to create a file on that
filesystem as root, I get a Permission denied error,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older
version of that other OS that I'm using to check out the ELrepo
version of kmod-ntfs. After installing as per the directions on the
ELrepo site, I
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older
version of that other OS that I'm using to check out the ELrepo
version of kmod-ntfs.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Could you show us the output returned by:
uname -mr
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko`
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko`
uname -mr
2.6.18-164.2.1.el5
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Could you show us the output returned by:
uname -mr
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko`
ls -l
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Something is wrong here. You are missing
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are
pointing to. Are those symlinks red-blinking?
It's
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 16:41 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Something is wrong here. You are missing
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from
kmod-ntfs works, too.
That's what I thought. However, when I mount a partition created with
Windoze 2000, I can read files and directories, but not
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from
kmod-ntfs works, too.
That's what I thought. However, when I mount a partition created with
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Looks like you are doing everything just fine. Perhaps, we should
move this conversation to the ELRepo mailing list because this is now
all about kmod-ntfs and not
On Saturday 31 October 2009 20:12, Ron Loftin wrote:
I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older
version of that other OS that I'm using to check out the ELrepo
version of kmod-ntfs. After installing as per the directions on the
ELrepo site, I can mount an NTFS
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 23:39 -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
On Saturday 31 October 2009 20:12, Ron Loftin wrote:
I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older
version of that other OS that I'm using to check out the ELrepo
version of kmod-ntfs. After installing as
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 23:39 -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
On Saturday 31 October 2009 20:12, Ron Loftin wrote:
I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older
version of that other OS that
On Sat, 23 May 2009, MHR wrote:
This is probably a dumb question, but I've looked around and I can't
find anything on this.
I'm using ntfs-3g now, from rpmforge, to access my M$ Window$ disks
for offline backup and other such menial tasks, and I noticed that the
ntfs file systems are not
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM, MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is probably a dumb question, but I've looked around and I can't
find anything on this.
I'm using ntfs-3g now, from rpmforge, to access my M$ Window$ disks
for offline backup and other such menial tasks, and I noticed that
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
The only possible issue I saw was that after the upgrade to 5.3, it
didn't work. Possibly I needed to wait longer for it to kick in, or
reboot again. Akemi I think commented on that thread.
The issue about NTFS and
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
The only possible issue I saw was that after the upgrade to 5.3, it
didn't work. Possibly I needed to wait longer for it to kick in, or
reboot
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
Akemi: I'm using the stock (32 bit) kernel. As I recall, after I
upgraded from CentOS 5.2 to 5.3 and I couldn't see the NTFS partition,
you wrote
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Dag Wieers d...@centos.org wrote:
Works fine for me in Gnome. Are you using the latest
fuse-ntfs-3g-2009.4.4-2.el5.rf package ?
I am now (just updated) - no problems.
Thanks!
In Gnome I added the Disk Mounter applet to my panel so it is easy to
unmount
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Mark Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attempted to install the ntfs-3g and fuse rpms, without any success
(there were numerous dependancies and could not get libc to install)..
You shouldn't try to compile it, just get the RPM for fuse-ntfs-3g
from
69 matches
Mail list logo
