I was wondering if anyone has come across any blogs or info about converting
complex dot net data structures returned from a WSDL into something usable
in ColdFusion.
For example
Documentation: http://www.eac.com.au/websvc/eac.asmx?op=getRegions
Parameters * accKey of type string. A
I am about to head off to sleep. But what does aTestReturn.get_any() return?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
I am about to head off to sleep. But what does
aTestReturn.get_any() return?
Just wondering if it is some sort of .net dataset. If so check cflib.org. I am
pretty sure it has a conversion function for those.
(Otherwise, never mind. I will just head back to sleep. zzz ...)
I've got Harlan - an ad server program. It's _old_ and rusty and - I'm
ashamed to say - makes use of Flash Forms. But it's free to use and
modify.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Ben Conner b...@webworldinc.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there any current modules for these two functions that are
Yea.. skipped over the cannot map .htm extension part.. duh!
Which also probably means the hosting service wont install the Rewrite
module also.
Guess my post was a waste of electrons...
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:h...@ilsweb.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:41
I have no problem with calling a spade a spade (and the OP's boss is most
decidedly a bureaucratic tool), and if that prevents me from being hired by
another tool, all the better.
Pete
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Phillip Vector
vec...@mostdeadlygame.comwrote:
Just to point out.. These
Documentation: http://www.eac.com.au/websvc/eac.asmx?op=getRegions
Parameters * accKey of type string. A valid Access Key as
provided by
EAC.
* sState of type string. This parameter is
ignored at this stage as NSW is the only valid value
Returns All
if you are prepared to think outside the CF box, then try this.
http://www.openx.org/
http://www.openx.org/Russ
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Raymond Camden rcam...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got Harlan - an ad server program. It's _old_ and rusty and - I'm
ashamed to say - makes use of Flash
Hi all.
I have been able to output my values from the xml (YAY!!) using xmlSearch
(Thanks Guys).
Here is my code:
cfscript
myxmldoc =
XmlParse(E:\domains\aawit.net\wwwroot\Microsoft-Diversity-AAWIT116obs.xml);
title= XmlSearch(myxmldoc, /jobs/job/title);
location =
If you're using SQL Server, it'll auto-handle the XML directly with no
pre-parsing with CF (SEE
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186918.aspx ):
cfstoredproc procedure=BulkInsert
cfprocparam type=In cfsqltype=CF_SQL_LONGVARCHAR
value=#varContainingXML#
/cfstoredproc
PROCEDURE
stick it inside a cfsavecontent
--
Russ Michaels
www.bluethunderinternet.com : Business hosting services solutions
www.cfmldeveloper.com: ColdFusion developer community
www.michaels.me.uk : my blog
www.cfsearch.com : ColdFusion search engine
**
*skype me*
Turns out what is causing the error is the line
EditDate=cfqueryparam value=#now()# cfsqltype=cf_sql_timestamp
the EditDate is a datetime field.
Any ideas?
thanks!
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
database have built in functions for getting the current date, so you don't
need to use CF.
e.g. for sql server use
editdate - getDate()
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Nicki Tabb vnt...@alaska.edu wrote:
Turns out what is causing the error is the line
EditDate=cfqueryparam
I have the following:
length: xxxstart [ ] end [ ]
I would like to test for the following conditions:
* must be an integer
* start and end must be evenly divisible by 3
* end cannot exceed length
CFINPUT works for type test, but not sure how to generate the javascript
I am trying to replace this:
CFhttp URL=http://localhost:8082/; method=post
cfhttpparam name=address value=68 N 4000 W
type=formfield
cfhttpparam name=addressline2 value= type=formfield
cfhttpparam name=city value=Cedar City
type=formfield
We're trying to integrate electronic signing of PDF files with
Docusign and would appreciate any tips or suggestion anyone who has
done this may have. We're running CFMX7. We create PDFs dynamically
and would like to allow people to sign these online without needing to
print them out and
Not sure if it's just and oversight, but you've got address in the
CFHTTP version and address1 in the jQ version.
As for the error, don't you get the response struct in Firebug if you
click on the URL?
On 5/6/2011 6:11 PM, David Mineer Jr wrote:
I am trying to replace this:
CFhttp
Hi Christopher, and thanks for the link. I'll check it out and try to get
somewhere with it over the weekend.
Regards,
Stephen
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Christopher Taylor
christopher.tay...@docusign.com wrote:
We're trying to integrate electronic signing of PDF files with
Docusign
Nice catch. I also had address2 instead of addressline2. I changed those
and still nothing.
I get the code pasted above for the post info when I click on the link, but
the response info is blank. That's what has me flustered. I get nothing
back. The link turns red and I can alert that there
K, hold up. This has something to do with the ip address of the calling
function. This program can only be called from the local server i.e.
localhost. cfhttp must call from localhost and so it works. jQuery.post()
must call from the client ip address and therefore won't ever work.
So I
This program can only be called from the local server i.e.
localhost. cfhttp must call from localhost and so it works.
You could easily write a little CF-based form post proxy that would
take in the request and re-post it internally and pass the results
back to the client.
-Justi
If the page you are trying to call is not web accessible then that indeed
would be your problem, can;t you just put in the same folder as the rest of
the site so that you can call it from Jquery ?
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Justin Scott leviat...@darktech.org wrote:
This program can
The cfhttp portion works from the same page. And for the program it uses
You have to define the ip addresses that it listens on, so of course your
options are limited there. It is only for an internal app, but building it
like everything else using CF is what works best for me.
---
David
Hello.
I have been a lurker on this board for a while, and never thought I was
qualified enough to offer opinions. Well, that has not changed.
But now I could really use some advice on how to gear up quickly to handle a
ton of traffic on a cf9 site.
I can't really go into the details,
Curious why you are going with Windows 2003 x86 ( I assume you already have
these licenses) over 2008 R2 x64 the speed difference is humungous.
Also how much of this are you purchasing new as to comparing with what you
already have?
I am wondering whether it might be cheaper to throw more
On 7/05/2011 11:57, Rob Rhodes wrote:
I have 4 cf9 standard licences, and four servers running win2k3 x86 (fairly
fast processors and 4gb ram each). I have a fifth win2k3 server x64 running
SQL Server 2005. These servetrs are recent installs and do not have any
other sites on them.
My
Yes, it's because that's what I have. And honestly, I am only a little
familiar with Win2K8, which seems a bit quirky to me. And I am worried that
inexperience with it would lead to some problem I could not fix.
I know Win2K3 fairly well. You just set it up and it goes and goes, no
problem. I
We found 2K8 R2 so good that we are now trashing our oldest machines and
moving to 2K8 wherever possible, the advantage is so great and it is not
quirky, it is much easier than 2K3 once you get used to the new IIS, etc.
I'd even stick my head out and say 2K8 R2 is a good operating system...
Simplest thing to do would be to put the cfhttp call into a cfc, then call
that from jQuery.
andy
-Original Message-
From: David Mineer Jr [mailto:min...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 7:53 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Replace cfhttp with jquery.post()
K, hold up. This has
Yeah it does take a little getting used to the new UI changes, but the
functionality and operations are still the same.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Kym Kovan [mailto:dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au]
Sent: Saturday, 7 May 2011 1:46 PM
To:
Perhaps you are right about 2K8 being faster and better, but changing
from an OS you know to one you don't know with a launch commitment a
week away doesn't seem like a very good idea to me.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Kym Kovan dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au wrote:
We found 2K8 R2 so good that
31 matches
Mail list logo
