Thanks Dan,
Do you have any specific links that you've come across and deemed authoritative
for some of those techniques?
There's a lot of CFGRID examples but some lead to broken javascript errors in
IE or other buggy functionality.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Eric . wrote:
...
Playing with some CFGRID examples on ColdFusion 9, I noticed some
major slowdown without a lot of records being loaded. Being on a
locally hosted server off my workstation that concerned me even more.
I like jqGrid. cfgrid bit me in the butt when I moved to Railo. jqGrid fixes
that
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Will Tomlinson wrote:
Playing with some CFGRID examples on ColdFusion 9, I noticed some
major slowdown without a lot of records being loaded. Being on a
locally hosted server off my workstation that concerned me even more.
I like jqGrid. cfgrid bit me in
. Being on a locally hosted
server off my workstation that concerned me even more.
I have a lot of CRUD pages for various parts of a management system we're
re-writing as a Software-as-a-Service app that would be great candidates for
a CFC that creates a CFGRID (or something similar) with dynamic
Playing with some CFGRID examples on ColdFusion 9, I noticed some major
slowdown without a lot of records being loaded. Being on a locally hosted
server off my workstation that concerned me even more.
I have a lot of CRUD pages for various parts of a management system we're
re-writing
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Eric . wrote:
...
Am I just not customizing CFGRID well enough, or am I on to something you've
realized as well?
I don't know about cfgrid specifically, but the principal is sound,
and works, and there are tricks to make it work better (splitting up
some stuff
I have been very pleased with CodeSmith. I wrote a template that dives into a
database and creates the 4 CRUD statements for every table in the database. I
am using SQL Server 2008, but it works with 2005 as well. I would be glad to
share the templates with you should you decide to use
On Monday 19 Apr 2010, Justin Scott wrote:
Just curious what people are using to make/manage CRUD screens these days
for data management applications. Anything new in this area over the last
couple of years?
ColdFusion Builder has a wizard.
--
Helping to enthusiastically cultivate low-risk
?event=page.categoryid=14
Terry Ryan's ORM Jumpstart does a nice job with mapping ORM relationships.
http://trorm.riaforge.org/
HTH
G!
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Justin Scott
jscott-li...@gravityfree.comwrote:
Just curious what people are using to make/manage CRUD screens these days
Just curious what people are using to make/manage CRUD screens these days
for data management applications. Anything new in this area over the last
couple of years?
-Justin
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community
_
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
Peter Boughton wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a comparison / overview of the various different
CRUD code generators available?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
I don't know of a comparison. I know I like Illudium, because I can
adjust the XSLT to make it output as I would like it.
Yeah, the XSLT is good for flexibility, although the constant lt; gt; is
frustrating!
Would be much more readable with a dummy cf: namespace instead.
However, I couldn't
although the constant lt; gt; is frustrating!
Hmm, that should be amp;lt; amp;gt; then.
i.e. the escaped equivalent of and
Not sure why they're getting converted.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
Boughton bought...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a comparison / overview of the various
different CRUD code generators available?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release
Does anyone know if there's a comparison / overview of the various different
CRUD code generators available?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http
But they are not digging through a hay stack. In my same example if
a property manager for Rosharon logs in they typically only have 2-3
properties they can even see or search through because the system
already knows to limit things based upon the user. That is far from a
needle in a
But they are not digging through a hay stack. In my same example if a
property manager for Rosharon logs in they typically only have 2-3
properties they can even see or search through because the system already
knows to limit things based upon the user. That is far from a needle in a
haystack.
Actually, no, not that group of people at all. They were accustomed to
referencing properties by their physical location because that is how their
old systems worked and how they talk of them in person, which is why I
initially did not put any IDs within emails or the website. What happened
is
I speculate they like it because they no longer have to list off a
few unique features and just one. It certainly gets cumbersome trying
to figure out which rosharon property someone is talking about when
you have multiple street addresses tied to multiple segments but the
person working at
Sorry stepped away from the computer a couple days to get married WOOT!
now back to work crackwhip /
What I've come up with is:
cfquery name=Insert_user_provider_services datasource=#DSN#
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT
ups_id_pk,ups_provider_fk,ups_client_fk,ups_service_fk
FROM
ACK i was missing my # signs!!! new wife must have stolen them!
cfquery name=Insert_user_provider_services datasource=#DSN#
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT
ups_id_pk,ups_provider_fk,ups_client_fk,ups_service_fk
FROM user_provider_services
WHERE ups_provider_fk =
On For some reason a former employer drilled it
into the team that Auto incrementing PK's were dead weight if you could
composite a key with existing data
Joe Ceiko holds that theory and considering he's so influential in the
relational db world...
http://24.254.1.94:8000/snap823/DataMan.cfm
(Have not re-test it thoroughly)
Who could use something like that?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
You tried to access the Developer Edition from a disallowed IP ...
oops got a live server you can toss it on?
On Jan 16, 2008 3:19 PM, Don L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://24.254.1.94:8000/snap823/DataMan.cfm
(Have not re-test it thoroughly)
Who could use something like that?
Joe Ceiko holds that theory and considering he's so influential in the
relational db world...
I assume that's sarcasm; not being a mover in the relational db world I
wouldn't know :P
I'd opt for the new primary key and unique constraint on the
columns everytime. Zero headache. The unique
Joe Ceiko holds that theory and considering he's so
influential in the relational db world...
I assume that's sarcasm; not being a mover in the relational
db world I wouldn't know :P
No, it's not sarcasm. Joe Celko is very well known and respected in that
community.
Dave Watts, CTO,
oops, sorry, accesssing my old version cf admin on the same box is a pain in
??? but hang on...
You tried to access the Developer Edition from a disallowed IP ...
oops got a live server you can toss it on?
On Jan 16, 2008 3:19 PM, D
No, it's not sarcasm. Joe Celko is very well known and respected in that
community.
Yeh, I see! Just googled primary keys business logic (cos I'm
interested) and his name came up straight away:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000817.html
Some varying and strong opinions of him; I
ok, just brought the dead horse back alive now :)
some may say user friendly enough, so, it's not for the general public...
thanks.
oops, sorry, accesssing my old version cf admin on the same box is a
pain in ??? but hang on...
Ok, so I did some googling because I wanted to know WHY it was 'best
practice' to add a surrogate key to the table and why to rail against the
idea of using 'natural keys' as primary keys.
I stumbled across perhaps the longest thread I have ever read completely, it
starts in November 2001 and the
ACK i was missing my # signs!!! new wife must have stolen them!
I hear that's a common problem with newlyweds. :)
--
s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch
isn't it time for a change?
ph: 503.236.3691
http://onTap.riaforge.org/blog
On Jan 16, 2008 6:52 PM, s. isaac dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ACK i was missing my # signs!!! new wife must have stolen them!
I hear that's a common problem with newlyweds. :)
hmmm... you think she only married him for his # signs? :)
--
Scientists tell us that the fastest animal on
http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6136whichpage=1
Heh... read the article... Had never heard anyone complain before about
arbitrary primary keys... and honestly, it strikes me as being rather
odd... I've only ever heard people complain about meaningful keys
actually. But it just
ACK i was missing my # signs!!! new wife must have stolen them!
I hear that's a common problem with newlyweds. :)
hmmm... you think she only married him for his # signs? :)
Yeah, gotta be careful. She might be a # digger. :)
--
s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch
isn't it time for a
Heh... read the article... Had never heard anyone complain before about
arbitrary primary keys... and honestly, it strikes me as being rather
odd... I've only ever heard people complain about meaningful keys
actually. But it just seems really odd to complain that hey, it's a
challenge to
I used to think that people do not care to see the primary key so in my last
big application I did not display them(unique numeric IDs) in most places.
After about 6-8 months it was found that the users want to see those keys
and that they use them to reference things. For example they rather say
I think reading the article will make your mind up either way about
the wisdom of not using 'auto increments' / surrogate pks (I realise
they are not the same thing).
This in particular
===
2) The definite possibility of historical data contamination. If you
leave your company, and
But if you had 10 records and then deleted the 10th and then created a new
record,
you had a much greater risk of that record being contaminated with
information from the previous record that had been there
..
Excellent point :)
I used to think it odd how dbs don't fill in the gaps with
I used to think that people do not care to see the primary key so in
my last big application I did not display them(unique numeric IDs) in
most places. After about 6-8 months it was found that the users want
to see those keys and that they use them to reference things. For
example they
I am time and again asked to build a cross join table with 2-3 primary keys.
Also i am asked time and again to build a table that doesn't use a auto
incrementing Primary key.
This is usually to port an antiquated system to SQL and web enable it (think
AS400).
Has anyone built a Crud system
On Monday 14 Jan 2008, Richard Dillman wrote:
Has anyone built a Crud system that can handle either of these situations?
Why not create a new PK column and use that ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to paradigmatically initiate high-end partnerships
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
, Richard Dillman wrote:
Has anyone built a Crud system that can handle either of these
situations?
Why not create a new PK column and use that ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to paradigmatically initiate high-end partnerships
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
On Monday 14 Jan 2008, Richard Dillman wrote:
An auto Incrementing PK just makes it easier to insert a duplicate.
Not if the column is marked as a PK.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to proactively market bricks-and-clicks infomediaries
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
I am time and again asked to build a cross join table with
2-3 primary keys.
Also i am asked time and again to build a table that doesn't
use a auto incrementing Primary key.
This is usually to port an antiquated system to SQL and web
enable it (think AS400).
Has anyone built a Crud
An auto Incrementing PK just makes it easier to insert a
duplicate.
Not if the column is marked as a PK.
I think that Richard means, it's easier to insert duplicate data values with
a surrogate key. This is certainly true, unless you place constraints on the
natural key as well.
Dave
I have just released an initial version of a component that makes CRUD
operations on XML in CF6 7 a breeze (both in process speed and amount of
code). It will work in CF8 but I am not sure it is neccessary(?).
Riaforge: http://betterxml.riaforge.org/
More info:
http://fusion.dominicwatson.co.uk
And I'm trying to get that Image Cropping Custom Tag working and
nothing seems to be working right at all. I've got a folder under my
webroot (C:\ColdFusion8\wwwroot\test\) that I'm using to just test the
tag, and I've moved the files to my local Custom Tag directory
(C:\ColdFusion8\CustomTags\)
Paste your code and maybe someone can give you a tip =)
Chris Peterson
Gainey IT
Adobe Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer
-Original Message-
From: LHWH Interactive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Crud. I've never actually
On 8/16/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paste your code and maybe someone can give you a tip =)
Honestly? That's part of the problem. I'm having a tough time figuring
out all the path nonesnse. First off, do I have to put all the files
in my ColdFusion8/CustomTags/ directory? And if
Message-
From: LHWH Interactive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Crud. I've never actually USED a custom tag...
And I'm trying to get that Image Cropping Custom Tag working and
nothing seems to be working right at all. I've got a folder under my
-Original Message-
From: LHWH Interactive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 3:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Crud. I've never actually USED a custom tag...
On 8/16/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paste your code and maybe someone can give you a tip =)
Honestly
Lots of questions here.
First off - no, you do not need to use the core custom tags path. When you do:
cf_foo
CF will...
Look in your current folder.
Look in the custom tags folder.
Note that you can define multiple folders in the CF Admin, and in CF8
you can specify folders at runtime.
The
On 8/16/07, Dave Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really need more info on yoiur symptoms.
Well, honestly, I'm just wading thru path errors right now. I think my
problem is just calling pages and paths. If I can get all the pieces
in the right places, I'm pretty sure this will work. I'm using
On 8/16/07, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lots of questions here.
First off - no, you do not need to use the core custom tags path. When you do:
cf_foo
CF will...
Look in your current folder.
Look in the custom tags folder.
Note that you can define multiple folders in the CF
*sigh*
And of course, as soon as I restart and go into my admin, I'm able to
add an additional path in the CF administrator.
Okay okay, this is starting to get a LITTLE clearer. Now that I've got
workable paths, things seem to be getting a little easier to
understand.
Once I get beyond the path
Ok, so why not tell us the _first_ error? :)
On 8/16/07, LHWH Interactive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*sigh*
And of course, as soon as I restart and go into my admin, I'm able to
add an additional path in the CF administrator.
Okay okay, this is starting to get a LITTLE clearer. Now that I've
: LHWH Interactive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 3:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Crud. I've never actually USED a custom tag...
On 8/16/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paste your code and maybe someone can give you a tip =)
Honestly? That's part
On 8/16/07, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so why not tell us the _first_ error? :)
Okay, you got it. I'm spending the evening reading the CF8 docs, and
when I get in tomorrow morning, I'm going to give it another try.
Things SEEM like they're making a little more sense tonight when
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 4:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CRUD
Doesn't the RDS plugin for CFEclipse build back end CFCs as well? I
know it
does not build the exact same thing but was under the impression it
built
something
.
What tools are available to me to basically attach a database query to
pages that edit, update and delete data?
Do I have to get into an entire framework? Or are there a few
CFCs/Tags out there that only do CRUD?
Thanks!
Cheap plug - have a look at my CFDJ article Building Generic
was
not hurting performance enough to even measure it. I had thought about
expanding it to build my CRUD screens but just have not bothered since we
still use a old set of in-house custom tags for the CRUD.
What I like about this approach is if you change a column size in the DB you
do not have to worry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CRUD
I do this as well, my first version of it stored the table information in
the application scope so I only did that one query. The second version
though I changed to just do a query for table information
08, 2006 3:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CRUD
I do this as well, my first version of it stored the table information in
the application scope so I only did that one query. The second version
though I changed to just do a query for table information before any
insert/updates because found
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CRUD
I do this as well, my first version of it stored the table information
in
the application scope so I only did that one query. The second version
though I
Thanks, I had seen and used the first link but did not know about the
second. Going to have to give it a try this week.
On 8/8/06, Matt Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For code generation, also see Peter Farrell's site:
http://rooibos.maestropublishing.com (beans and Transfer Objects)
or
and update the data into
the tables is cumbersome and tedious.
What tools are available to me to basically attach a database query to
pages that edit, update and delete data?
Do I have to get into an entire framework? Or are there a few
CFCs/Tags out there that only do CRUD
]
615.370.1530 x737
--//-
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CRUD
Warning, plug ahead (but for free, open source product):
Chad,
I have a solution (DataMgr) that does what I think you
I missed that, sorry.
DataMgr only handles the CRUD actions themselves.
For forms, I could offer my sebForms custom tags though...
http://www.bryantwebconsulting.com/cftags/
http://www.bryantwebconsulting.com/cftags/examples/
The version on the site is a little outdated though. I will try
are available to me to basically attach a database query to pages
that edit, update and delete data?
Do I have to get into an entire framework? Or are there a few CFCs/Tags out
there that only do CRUD?
Thanks
which has scaffolding that generates a complete
maintenance program.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2006 15:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CRUD
Let me first start off I am not an OO kind of guy. I like things linear and
easy to read
Im not quite sure what you mean, model or maintenance.
I will read up on the below links! Thanks for the suggestions.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Roche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 11:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CRUD
Chad,
Do you want to do
Chad,
Reactor only creates CFCs that do the standard J2EE like CRUD model (DAO,
Gateway, Active Record), which you can call from your own display and edit
pages,
Model-Glue (version 2.0 of which incoporates reactor) will also create
display and edit pages for you.
Kevin
-Original Message
On 8/6/06, Kevin Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad,
Reactor only creates CFCs that do the standard J2EE like CRUD model (DAO,
Gateway, Active Record), which you can call from your own display and edit
pages,
Model-Glue (version 2.0 of which incoporates reactor) will also create
display
is Eclipse installed.
Damon
I'm wondering if there is a CRUD generator out there that is more
lightweight than say Reactor or PLUM?
What I'm thinking would be useful is something that would generate a
basic
form and a CFC with CRUD methods for table. No XML config, no setters and
getters just
if there is a CRUD generator out there that is more
lightweight than say Reactor or PLUM?
Ok, last post for me for a bit, really:
I've seen a couple of DAO generators, but I'm nut sure if that's what
you mean. I think so tho... lemmme check delicious... umm..
old, but maybe this: *http
I'm wondering if there is a CRUD generator out there that is more
lightweight than say Reactor or PLUM?
What I'm thinking would be useful is something that would generate a basic
form and a CFC with CRUD methods for table. No XML config, no setters and
getters just pass the form as an argument
On 6/9/06, Michael Traher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a CRUD generator out there that is more
lightweight than say Reactor or PLUM?
Ok, last post for me for a bit, really:
I've seen a couple of DAO generators, but I'm nut sure if that's what
you mean. I think so tho
Last month at the Portland, Oregon CFFUG, and during Sean Corfield's
presentation he mentioned my HomeSite+/CF Studio CFC CRUD Wizard with a link
to it. Needless to say I was pretty excited. Since that time I have fixed a
few bugs and added a few features. The latest version is now available
I am considering isolating all of my database CRUD in CFC objects. From
previous posts, I understand that if I put two calls to an Update method
inside of a CFTRANSACTION, I failure of the second transaction will not
reverse the first transaction. Is this correct? If so, it seems that I
need
/coldfusion/releasenotes/mx/mx61_fixed_bugs.html
On 2/11/06, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am considering isolating all of my database CRUD in CFC objects. From
previous posts, I understand that if I put two calls to an Update method
inside of a CFTRANSACTION, I failure of the second transaction
Fantastic. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Isolating DB CRUD in CFC objects
If they are in one CFTRANSACTION tag pair, they should be rolled back
together (in versions 6.1
I just posted a new version of the Free CFC CRUD Wizard for HomeSite+/CF
Studio.
http://www.aftershockweb.net/forums/downloads/CFC_CRUD_wizard_b0.6.zip
If you use the wizard, PLEASE post feedback on:
http://www.aftershockweb.net/forums/forums.cfm/ConferenceId/8
I would especially like for you
lol. Great reply. :-)
Thx Barney!
On 11/9/05, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on my experience building custom, app-specific generators, what
I've liked, disliked, and considered...
A generator should be able to be rerun at arbitrary times and update
the CRUD part without
lol. Great reply. :-)
--
John C. Bland II
I do what I can do when I can do it. - Chris Tucker, Money Talks
http://www.gotoandstop.org - Home of FMUG.az
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
Barney,
Sounds like it's almost ready!
On 11/9/05, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on my experience building custom, app-specific generators, what
I've liked, disliked, and considered...
A generator should be able to be rerun at arbitrary times and update
the CRUD part
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 07:02, Barney Boisvert wrote:
Based on my experience building custom, app-specific generators, what
So you're gonna have this rolled out by, say, Friday ?
:-)
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
2007...no specific day...just '07.
j/k
On 11/9/05, Thomas Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 07:02, Barney Boisvert wrote:
Based on my experience building custom, app-specific generators, what
So you're gonna have this rolled out by, say, Friday ?
:-)
--
What is it everyone looks for in a CRUD generator? I see some folks saying
they'd like to see best practices, some want getters/setters, and others
just want a function you pass everything too.
Just a little reserach...
--
John C. Bland II
I do what I can do when I can do it. - Chris Tucker
Based on my experience building custom, app-specific generators, what
I've liked, disliked, and considered...
A generator should be able to be rerun at arbitrary times and update
the CRUD part without affecting anything else. It should create beans
that have getters/setters for properties
In my application.cfm file, I have the following:
cfapplication clientmanagement=yes sessionmanagement=yes name=myApp
!--- If you're not logged in, you step inside this code block ---
cflogin
!--- First, I'm checking to see if the login form variables exist.
Client validation makes sure
]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Crud...I thought I had it down...[cflogin]
In my application.cfm file, I have the following:
cfapplication clientmanagement=yes sessionmanagement=yes
name=myApp
!--- If you're not logged in, you step inside this code block ---
cflogin
Subject: Crud...I thought I had it down...[cflogin]
Importance: Low
In my application.cfm file, I have the following: cfapplication
clientmanagement=yes sessionmanagement=yes name=myApp
!--- If you're not logged in, you step inside this code block ---
cflogin
!--- First, I'm checking to see
Subject: Crud...I thought I had it down...[cflogin]
In my application.cfm file, I have the following:
cfapplication clientmanagement=yes sessionmanagement=yes
name=myApp
!--- If you're not logged in, you step inside this code
block --- cflogin
!--- First, I'm checking to see
on 3/21/03 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you probably need to set your var LoggedIn in the session scope. This wil
make the var available throught the session. the variables scope exists in
the cfm page only.
cfset session.LoggedIn = 0
(mind your cflocks
on 3/21/03 11:44 AM, Raymond Camden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LoggedIn will NOT be defined if you try to login and fail. Notice your
error msg branch doesn't set loggedIn to 0?
Yep, you're absolutely right. I kinda caught that as I was pasting it in,
and corrected it when I changed it to
: Crud...I thought I had it down...[cflogin]
on 3/21/03 11:44 AM, Raymond Camden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LoggedIn will NOT be defined if you try to login and fail.
Notice your
error msg branch doesn't set loggedIn to 0?
Yep, you're absolutely right. I kinda caught that as I
on 3/21/03 12:36 PM, Raymond Camden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to set the value to false _above_ the cfif blocks, and only
turn it to true on a good login.
Okay, now I KNOW I'm doing something right...because that's exactly the
approach I took...
Who knows...one day I might
97 matches
Mail list logo
