Being new at this, I am trying to determine why I should learn CF over ASP
(or vice versa).
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/competitive/
Tom Chiverton
You don't have to be a mad scientist to believe in ColdFusion
I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages) and some j2ee.
Why?
Because what CFMX does is translate CFML pages into some servlets
(correct me if I am wrong) so why learning CF(providing you don't
know it already) when you can learn Java(JSP and stuff).
As I see it CF is far
that we see fit Hate to say it but my days on the list
are numbered...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP
I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP
I'm hard pressed not to move all of my future development to .Net. AS
much as I love CF and how well I know it, Being a Windows application
developer, I can't not switch to .NET it will allow me to have all of
our programmers on 1 platforma dn deploy our applications
Good point.
-Original Message-
From: Gary W. Sullivan II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP
Well, Kim... Keep in mind that you can still be a .NET guru and live in
harmony with CF!!!
I, too, am a Windows App
Objet : RE: CF vs ASP
I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages) and some
j2ee.
Why?
Because what CFMX does is translate CFML pages into some servlets
(correct me if I am wrong) so why learning CF(providing you don't
know it already) when you can learn Java(JSP and stuff).
As I
Oh my, the reasons are endless. Here is my $.0002
1. ASP has (last time I checked) awful access to database info. The steps
to do a simple query were nuts. CF database access is much more intuitive.
2. A lot easier to learn, if you don't know VB or some other programming
.
Stace
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP
I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages) and some
j2ee.
Why?
Because what CFMX does is translate CFML pages
Rizal Firmansyah wrote:
WOW!
Jochem, this is weird.
First i thought the first time cfmail being executed within .cfm script,
it creates an email-msg file containing all data, including attachments if any.
No, just a reference to the attachment.
But apparently it doesn't :(
Do you
Matt Liotta wrote:
The problem here is that cfmail doesn't block while the file is in the
spool. You are either going to need to adapt your code to support some
sort of asynchronous events or use a mail library you can serialize e.g.
javax.mail.
Hence my comment about first figuring out how
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Attempting to show that CF is a more rabid development platform than
ASP...
Petco* has low-cost clinics every two weeks. You seem to be frothing at the
mouth.
cf_tongueInCheek
* Large pet supply chain in the U.S.
-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Matt
I think the problem is that the alternative being discussed is from
MSoft and the natural reaction is to barf if something is being shoved
down your throat -- common
I know the whole CF and why people are using it issue has been hashed out
quite a bit but I would like to add my two cents coming from a different
background than most web developers.
I started my programmer career with C. In C you have absolute control over
everything going on in your program.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
People on this list are amazing. I haven't pointed out anything that is
wrong with CF in this thread. I have simply pointed out that sometimes
other solutions are better, which is far from hating CF.
---
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Matt Liotta wrote:
The problem here is that cfmail doesn't block while the file is in
the
spool. You are either going to need to adapt your code to support
some
sort of asynchronous events or use a mail library you can serialize
e.g.
javax.mail
]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 6:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
People on this list are amazing. I haven't pointed out anything that
is
wrong with CF in this thread. I have simply pointed out that
sometimes
other
Knew this was going to be a big thread...
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ:
- Original Message -
From: Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Knew this was going to be a big thread...
---
How about CFvsASP-Talk !! ;-)
- Gyrus
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work: http://www.tengai.co.uk
play: http://www.norlonto.net
- PGP key
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
I know the whole CF and why people are using it issue has been hashed out
quite a bit but I would like to add my two cents coming from a different
background than most web developers.
I started my programmer career with C
]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:22 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Sure... but the same could be said about ANY programming language.
But this isn't ANY-Talk. This is CF-Talk and we are discussing CF vs.
ASP, which makes it relevant.
I certainly don't believe ColdFusion is the ultimate solution
]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:22 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Sure... but the same could be said about ANY programming language.
But this isn't ANY-Talk. This is CF-Talk and we are discussing CF vs.
ASP, which makes it relevant.
I certainly don't believe ColdFusion is the ultimate solution
lists for it!)
Jimmy
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Sorge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
I know that I am chiming in late here, but here goes.
Learning another language can never hurt. Case in point. I put all of my
Would that be with the CFSHUTTLE tag? Mr. Sulu, instantiate the fuel tank
separation CFC!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 7:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
sorry, i didnt mean to come across like that, if you read
Shack) you might have your foot in the door with
the I am flexible and constantly expand my horizons argument.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
thank you bryan!
let matt be matt, i
On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 09:11 , Matthew R. Small wrote:
Intranets are one thing I can think of. I have an intranet here that I
wrote last year using CF - because I am most experienced at CF.
However, I believe that had I written it in ASP, I would have not
encountered the numerous
-357-1847
http://www.showstopperonline.com
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 09:11 , Matthew R. Small wrote:
Intranets are one thing I can think
On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 11:25 , Matthew R. Small wrote:
Well, just to put your comments in perspective, let me ask a question:
Did you research other technologies to see if there was one better
suited to the need of your intranet?
Yes, we already use BroadVision, Perl CGI, ASP... we
Use the right tool for the job. And if you have to ask if you should keep
all your eggs in one basket then I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Perez, Jimmy wrote:
Hello all,
I am a CF certified developer (missed advanced by three points) but am thinking of
expanding
as much as we all love CF, it is NEVER a good idea to put all your eggs in
one basket.
let me repeat that for emphasis.
IT IS NEVER A GOOD IDEA TO KEEP ALL YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET.
in my own experience, companies are more likely to be in favor of someone
with one or two specialties, but with a
Sooner or later you, as a web developer, will run into a situation where CF
is not an option (client choice, server restrictions, etc.). When this
happens, if you haven't learned ASP/VBScript, or some other suitable
technology, then you probably won't be able to work on the project.
With ASP
My .02 is:
If you 'put all your eggs in one basket' you lock yourself out of another
potentially rewarding market: the website/application UPGRADE.
People may have existing sites in .asp, .php, etc that are perfectly usable
and functional... and they want to add functionality. If you only know
As long as the price is right... :)
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Use the right tool for the job. And if you have to ask if you should keep
all your eggs in one basket then I
Keeping in mind the movements toward J2EE in the recent CF release, I would
recommend looking into
the Java/JSP world. It will help you with your future CF work, but also open
a world of possibilities
outside CF as well. Also you can run Java/JSP for free. I recently did it on
a huge production
I have found myself doing projects in VB, VBScript, ASP, Cold Fusion, PHP,
Perl etc... It doesn't hurt to know. It came in handy for me. Some I learned
while using them :)
Shawn Regan
pacifictechnologysolutions
15530-B Rockfield Blvd. Suite 4
Irvine, CA 92618
949.830.1623
w w w . p t s 1 . c o
Being that I'm finally going to learn some ASP and PHP, I have a quick
question regarding ASP and ASP.NET. I have taken a quick look at ASP 2 or 3
(can't remember which) which was long enough to know that it was never going
to be a favourite like CF. My question is what is the difference
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
My .02 is:
If you 'put all your eggs in one basket' you lock yourself out of another
potentially rewarding market: the website/application UPGRADE.
People may have existing sites in .asp, .php, etc
Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Perez, Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
As long as the price is right... :)
Thanks
getting a job or a competitor.
Robert Everland III
Web Developer Extraordinaire
Dixon Ticonderoga Company
http://www.dixonusa.com
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
CASE IN POINT
Hello all,
I am a CF certified developer (missed advanced by three points) but am
thinking of expanding my horizons/marketability. I have started getting
up to speed in ASP/VBScript but the question keeps coming up: should I
even spend any time doing this or should I just concentrate on
-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
CASE IN POINT
TOO MANY LINES/CHARACTERS OF BS VBSHIT CODE
Dim MyMail
Dim MsgText
Set MsgText = Request.Form(FirstName
Learn ASP as much as you can. This way, it is easier to re-write
everything in CF.
At 02:43 PM 8/26/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Hello all,
I am a CF certified developer (missed advanced by three points) but am
thinking of expanding my horizons/marketability. I have started getting
up to speed
Yeah but unless you're hosting it for them, they will have
to pay an additional amount of money to buy CF Server to
run that easier code. While certain things like that are
much easier to code in CF, if you're trying to get a
customer and it's a big site, $500 could be the difference
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Oh
No reason to buy an older ASP book if that's what you mean. The
languages are basically the same, except for VBScript finally being
typed, and getting decent error handling.
ASP has always been more about integrating COM objects than anything.
A tag in cf = com object in asp...
The CLR is
:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Oh please! You're comparing apples to oranges. Just because all of the
cfmail code is hidden from you; it doesn't mean it isn't there.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL
of goods, not to mention the time you'll save
them too.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Yeah but unless you're hosting it for them, they will have
to pay an additional
Oh please! You're comparing apples to oranges. Just because
all of the cfmail code is hidden from you; it doesn't mean
it isn't there.
While I don't buy Tony's comparison in full (there are certainly cleaner
ways to write the ASP code), I think you're missing the point. Sure, all the
same
in a lot of situations.
Benjamin S. Rogers
http://www.c4.net/
v.508.240.0051
f.508.240.0057
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
CASE IN POINT
TOO MANY LINES/CHARACTERS OF BS VBSHIT
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Jon Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
No reason to buy
://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Matt I think Tony is bang on. Yes the additinal code may be hidden
from
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Matt I think Tony is bang on. Yes the additinal code may be hidden from
us,
but because of that fact we can develop faster and reduce development
costs
for clients.
That said I still think it's
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
And wait until you get a project that utilises a lot of COM objects...
ASP and ASP.NET handles COM a lot easier that CF 5 and especially MX.
You need to use the tool that fits the job
:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
And the first time they want to do full text searching, or basic
graphing, or simple things like handling file uploads or using POP (or
LDAP or server side HTTP) you'll need to be add-on modules and
components that will cost you more than the $500
Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
I'll sell you an object you can call from ASP in one line just like
cfmail for $200. Attempting to show that CF is a more rabid development
platform than ASP
: CF vs. ASP
Oh please! You're comparing apples to oranges. Just because
all of the cfmail code is hidden from you; it doesn't mean
it isn't there.
While I don't buy Tony's comparison in full (there are certainly
cleaner
ways to write the ASP code), I think you're missing the point. Sure
anyhow, the truth of the matter is thisif i can
develop rich cf applications for companies
in half the time, that it might take an asp coder
to do it, with half the code, i will, and until something
better comes along, thats what im doing...
I am not disagreeing that CF is faster to
I know that I am chiming in late here, but here goes.
Learning another language can never hurt. Case in point. I put all of my
eggs in one basket and stuck to just CF. Although I have a good job that
pays very well, I am finding that I am starting to regret limiting
myself to just CF. Currently
]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 7:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
anyhow, the truth of the matter is thisif i can
develop rich cf applications for companies
in half the time, that it might take an asp coder
to do it, with half the code, i will, and until something
better comes along
Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
speak for yourself matt, since you dont
have confidence in your work being the biggest
baddest web apps in the world, it doesnt
surprise me that you dont find cf
M. Fitch
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
http://isitedesign.com
**
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
speak
cake! with, can you guess ladies and gentsCF
peace.
tw
-Original Message-
From: Fitch, Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Tony,
A little fired up? Biggest baddest apps in the world. Cnn.com,
yahoo.com
-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
speak for yourself matt, since you dont
have confidence in your work being the biggest
baddest web apps in the world, it doesnt
surprise me that you dont find cf as the same.
its a shame, a darn shame, you
Matt Liotta wrote:
I am not disagreeing that CF is faster to develop in. I am simply
pointing out that it is not because one particular feature takes less
lines to code in CF than another language. I suspect that just as much
time is spent in another language learning an email library's API
What's more important here is where will you, the CF developer, be if
macromedia goes out of business. I remember speaking to a business basic
guru that took business basic to the limits; even writing bad ass web
apps.
__
Your
but, to put it blatantly honest, its all about perspective...
in my mind, if im not building the biggest baddest web apps
in the world, then im building nothing...and who is the judge
of that? me. and really, only me. thanks.
So if I hire you to create hello world in CF, will it be the
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
but, to put it blatantly honest, its all about perspective...
in my mind, if im not building the biggest baddest web apps
in the world, then im building
Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Matt Liotta wrote:
I am not disagreeing that CF is faster to develop in. I am simply
pointing out that it is not because one particular feature takes less
lines to code
]
[connecting people, places and things]
-Original Message-
From: Pablo Varando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
You know to this day it still amazes me things people say! Kinda like the
old Mac is better than Microsoft, or even
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this is a really loaded question... but what is it that you want it
to do?
I want to spool email with attachments and be able to delete the
attachments right away.
Since the mail in the spoolfolder simply stores a reference to the file
and only attaches the
: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this is a really loaded question... but what is it that you want
it
to do?
I want to spool email with attachments and be able
-
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Matt Liotta wrote:
I am not disagreeing that CF is faster to develop in. I am simply
pointing out that it is not because one particular feature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How often are you sending your mail? In most cases with email, you want to
send it right away... in which case, the attachment would be deleted after
the mail was sent.
Right, after it is sent. Not after it is spooled.
What type of setup/application are you
about that for a bit
Pablo Varando
http://www.cfpablo.com
http://www.easycfm.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Well that is just what I was getting at. It is nice
://www.cfpablo.com
http://www.easycfm.com
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How often are you sending your mail? In most cases with email, you
to the garage, and get the hammer. :-)
-Novak
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Well that is just what I was getting at. It is nice that CF has all this
wrapped up
26, 2002 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
The emai spooling in most cases happens so fast, it's not really even
understandable why you'd want to delete the attachemtn first anyways.
In most cases you don't even realize the spooled email is there. How big
are
the files you are spooling? Maybe
Not necessarily. Truth is that by having it all built in on one place,
you
are simplying your life, not to mention that when you do run into
trouble
it's easier to get help and solutions.
Again, it is only easier when the built-in solution works. I am not sure
why you are having such a hard
Sure... but the same could be said about ANY programming language.
But this isn't ANY-Talk. This is CF-Talk and we are discussing CF vs.
ASP, which makes it relevant.
I certainly don't believe ColdFusion is the ultimate solution for
EVERY
job,
just like I don't use a pipe wrench when I
Pablo Varando wrote:
The emai spooling in most cases happens so fast, it's not really even
understandable why you'd want to delete the attachemtn first anyways.
I don't. I've just been asked to build it.
In most cases you don't even realize the spooled email is there.
I see a problem in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Pablo Varando wrote:
The emai spooling in most cases happens so fast, it's not really even
understandable why you'd want to delete the attachemtn first anyways.
I don't. I've just been asked to build
wouldn't be on this list
Pablo Varando
http://www.cfpablo.com
http://www.easycfm.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
Not necessarily. Truth is that by having it all
gratzie pablo, eloquently stated !!!
tw
-Original Message-
From: Pablo Varando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
I will agree that at times there are good tools you can implement to get
the
job done faster.
A few
:]
Pablo Varando
http://www.cfpablo.com
http://www.easycfm.com
- Original Message -
From: Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
gratzie pablo, eloquently stated !!!
tw
-Original Message
The reason I said:
I'm sitting here asking myself, why you hate ColdFusion so much
is because every time some one replies to your answers/posts, you seem
to
find something wrong from that.
I am just having a technical debate. My personal feelings don't enter
into it. If I let my personal
]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
The reason I said:
I'm sitting here asking myself, why you hate ColdFusion so much
is because every time some one replies to your answers/posts, you seem
to
find something wrong from that.
I am just having a technical debate
in the present]
[connecting people, places and things]
-Original Message-
From: Pablo Varando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Not necessarily. Truth is that by having it all built in on one place, you
are simplying your life
Pablo Varando wrote:
Well what code are you using to loop through and send the emails?
cfset thefile = d:\cdr\p.jpg
cfmail from=#email# to=#email# subject=test
cfmailparam file=#thefile#
test
/cfmail
cffile action=delete file=#thefile#
Error in the mail.log:
over ASP.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2002 1:57 p.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs. ASP
The reason I said:
I'm sitting here asking myself, why you hate ColdFusion so much
is because every time some one replies
i guess the cfx_sleep tag to pause that for a second or two
wouldnt suffice here?
tw
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Pablo Varando wrote:
Well what code are you using
Ok, and how are you calling this page? From a URL or via Customtag(Include)?
Pablo Varando
http://www.cfpablo.com
http://www.easycfm.com
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: CF vs
://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 7:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF vs. ASP
Pablo Varando wrote:
Well what code are you using to loop through
Interesting question... I was just making the same argument (on another
list) for CF vs WiTango (replacement for Pervasive's Tango).
Tango was/is (approximately) DWMX, CFMX/JRun and a pretty good RDBMS
all rolled into one --- with the ability to develop web and desktop
applications on/for
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 05:56 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
Well that is just what I was getting at. It is nice that CF has all
this
wrapped up functionality, but it comes at a price. That price is
control. Sure there is usually a way to get it to do what you want, but
that generally takes
Claro!
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 06:07 PM, Pablo Varando wrote:
The truth is that THAT is the beauty of Coldfusion, an all in one
solution
that is really affordable and easy to use.
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority
Matt
I think the problem is that the alternative being discussed is from
MSoft and the natural reaction is to barf if something is being shoved
down your throat -- common sense and merits adide!
Dick
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 06:20 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
People on this list are
At 09:14 AM 8/27/2002, you wrote:
cfset thefile = d:\cdr\p.jpg
cfmail from=#email# to=#email# subject=test
cfmailparam file=#thefile#
test
/cfmail
cffile action=delete file=#thefile#
Error in the mail.log:
Error,scheduler-4,08/27/02,04:03:47,,Sending failed; nested
exception is:
to know how to user their
technology.
Marianne Daye
Programmer/Analyst
-Original Message-
From: Thane Sherrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF VS ASP - let the trolling being
At 12:06 PM 4/3/02 -0800, David Schmidt wrote
explain
better.
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-Original Message-
From: Daye, Marianne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF VS ASP - let the trolling being
I have to agree that CF is easier
you brought up here. Please explain
better.
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-Original Message-
From: Daye, Marianne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF VS ASP - let the trolling being
I have
.
Marianne Daye
Programmer/Analyst
-Original Message-
From: Thane Sherrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF VS ASP - let the trolling being
At 12:06 PM 4/3/02 -0800, David Schmidt wrote:
If he's willing to fork
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
