I have heard some grumblings about security but nothing specific.
-Original Message-
From: Yager, Brian T Contractor/NCCIM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Help with why I shouldn't use ASP.NET
Hello CF'ers...My management came to
Hello CF'ers...My management came to me asking for pro's
and con's about ASP.NET. I don't know much about it. Can
anyone help me out here? Hint...I'm not looking for GOOD
things to say about it either!
Well, actually, it is pretty good, all things considered. If you were using
ASP.NET,
You have to pay the developers more, because of the higher learning curve.
Flash integration is going to be better in CF.
Visual Studio is absolutely horrid at visual design unlike DW. So you have
to pay for two IDE's...or have seperate designers and coders.
Net Server has been delayed until next
One good reason is that CFMX will automatically play nice with .NET and with J2EE -
which are the 2 technologies competing fiercely for the same share. CFMX is sort of
like switzerland during the war g.
-Original Message-
From: Yager, Brian T Contractor/NCCIM
[mailto:[EMAIL
with why I shouldn't use ASP.NET
You have to pay the developers more, because of the higher learning curve.
Flash integration is going to be better in CF.
Visual Studio is absolutely horrid at visual design unlike DW. So you have
to pay for two IDE's...or have seperate designers and coders.
Net Server
-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Help with why I shouldn't use ASP.NET
You have to pay the developers more, because of the higher learning curve.
Flash integration is going to be better in CF.
Visual Studio is absolutely horrid at visual design unlike
Biggest reason for not using .Net yet, is that it STILL is not officially
released.
Yes, the Studio.Net is commercially available, and there's a fair bit of
info out there on .Net. But, the .Net framework is not official yet.
By contrast, Cold Fusion has it's 5th official version available,
Yes, the Studio.Net is commercially available, and there's a
fair bit of info out there on .Net. But, the .Net framework
is not official yet.
That's not really correct. The .NET Framework is official, and available.
You can't get it bundled with Windows, but that doesn't make it unofficial.
arguments out of the water.
It's a good day... I learned something today
Shawn Grover
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Help with why I shouldn't use ASP.NET
Yes, the Studio.Net is commercially
9 matches
Mail list logo