Giles did you try cfthrow? Everytime you use cfthrow you'll get a
faultEvent in the Flex side.
--
João Fernandes
http://www.onflexwithcf.org
http://www.riapt.org
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
Many thanks, I'll try that next time I'm working on this project.
On Dec 14, 2007 8:46 AM, João_Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Giles did you try cfthrow? Everytime you use cfthrow you'll get a
faultEvent in the Flex side.
--
João Fernandes
http://www.onflexwithcf.org
well, I would assume you still need Actionscript, its just hidden from
you...
-Original Message-
From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 July 2003 15:25
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Remoting?
With the advent of the Firefly components and the shadows of Royale,
what is
To be more marketable than the next guy or girl :-)
The more you know.
- Original Message -
From: Candace Cottrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: SOT: Remoting?
With the advent of the Firefly components and the
I know all that ;)
But I am doing a preso at the local Cfug on remoting and someone
brought up the question, Basically stating that Flash remoting will die
when Royale comes out.
Just wondering how much time I am wasting teaching these folks
something that'll be dead by the New Year...
Subject: Re: Remoting?
I know all that ;)
But I am doing a preso at the local Cfug on remoting and someone
brought up the question, Basically stating that Flash remoting will die
when Royale comes out.
Just wondering how much time I am wasting teaching these folks
something that'll be dead
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Remoting?
I know all that ;)
But I am doing a preso at the local Cfug on remoting and someone brought
up the question, Basically stating that Flash remoting will die when
Royale comes out.
Just wondering how much
Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 July 2003 15:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Remoting?
Candace,
The Firefly components use Remoting, it may be hidden somewhat, but it
is still using Remoting.
As for Royale, obviously there is very little anyone can say publicly
about
PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 July 2003 15:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Remoting?
Candace,
The Firefly components use Remoting, it may be hidden somewhat, but it
is still using Remoting.
As for Royale, obviously there is very little anyone can say publicly
about that (besides what is at
http
Ben...
I know you proabably can't answer this...
but when you say a different class of developers I wonder what
exactly this means...
I can't/won't speak for Ben, but I don't think it's any secret that with the
advent of Flash MX, MM is trying very hard to break the perception that
Flash is
I got the same error message and i have discovered it has to do with the
WebService not being at the location on xmethods.net
--
===
Graham Pearson, System Administrator / Certified Webmaster / Published
Northern Indiana
Are you running CFMX with Updater 3 installed?
chris
-Original Message-
From: Allan Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Remoting - Access from Flash to web services - BabelFish
I downloaded the Babelfish sample application source
Yes I have Updater 3 installed
--- Chris Kief [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you running CFMX with Updater 3 installed?
chris
-Original Message-
From: Allan Clarke
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Remoting - Access from Flash
I don't agree with that. I can see the wsdl:
http://www.xmethods.net/sd/2001/BabelFishService.wsdl
Cheers
Allan
--- Graham Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the same error message and i have discovered
it has to do with the
WebService not being at the location on xmethods.net
--
I don't agree with that. I can see the wsdl:
http://www.xmethods.net/sd/2001/BabelFishService.wsdl
Cheers
Allan
--- Graham Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the same error message and i have discovered
it has to do with the
WebService not being at the location on xmethods.net
--
/documents/enable_flash_webse
rvices.htm
Let me know how that goes for you...chris
-Original Message-
From: Allan Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Remoting - Access from Flash to web services - BabelFish
Yes I have Updater 3
me know how that goes for you...chris
-Original Message-
From: Allan Clarke
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Remoting - Access from Flash to web
services - BabelFish
Yes I have Updater 3 installed
--- Chris Kief [EMAIL
Whoops...sorry bout that...got to the stack trace and stopped reading :)
Not sure what that bad version error is...
chris
-Original Message-
From: Allan Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Remoting - Access from Flash to web
I see what your trying to do do, but somewhere, something has to poll to see
if an update has happenned. How does the CFC know if there was an update? Do
you mean a DB update?
BTW, it's a great question. Looking forward to other's responses.
-Frank
- Original Message -
From: Tim Blair
I see what your trying to do do, but somewhere, something has
to poll to see if an update has happenned. How does the CFC
know if there was an update? Do you mean a DB update?
Think of it in terms of a private messaging system: one user of the site
sends another user a message which gets
Hediard
www.benorama.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 17 mars 2003 15:26
À : CF-Talk
Objet : Re: Remoting...
I see what your trying to do do, but somewhere, something has to
poll to see
if an update has happenned. How does the CFC know
FlashCom hides all the complexity of the socket connection
and notification mechanism. It's really great!
I agree that it's great in principle, but from all the swearing coming
from one of our guys developing with FlashComm I'd say that the current
release isn't up to scratch for a production
Alternatively, is there a way around it? Say having flash call the CFC
straight away (once) and the CFC will wait until an update has occurred,
then return the new data to Flash, whereupon Flash will update and call
the CFC again, which will wait etc etc etc...
How about creating an
You have gotten a lot of good advice on this thread, but to answer your
original question:
On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 09:05 AM, Tim Blair wrote:
When you make a call to createGatewayConnection() from within the
Action
Script, what happens? What I mean is, does Flash make a call to the
You should place the CFM files on the same server that the COldFusion server is on.
Sure it's possible to use a webserver A to map a network drive to webserver B running
ColdFusion scripts, but that's subject to internal network failures and is ill
advised. Heck, you could even create an
25 matches
Mail list logo
