RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-28 Thread Peter Theobald
That's ridiculous. You don't have to enter every possible misspelling, but you should always set up www.mydomain.com and mydomain.com at the same time. It adds about 1 second of work and gains you perhaps 30% more visitors. Where DO you point mydomain.com? At your FTP server? At your firewall?

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-28 Thread Marcus
That's ridiculous. You don't have to enter every possible misspelling, but you should always set up www.mydomain.com and mydomain.com at the same time. It adds about 1 second of work and gains you perhaps 30% more visitors. Where DO you point mydomain.com? At your FTP server? At your

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-28 Thread Peter Theobald
1,500 domains x 10 seconds per domain (automate it down to 1 second per domain!) = approx. 4 hours of work $5,000,000/month x 30% more = $1,500,000/month more. I'll make the DNS changes for you if you give ME the extra money that comes in. Even though the numbers above are 'made up', if you

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-28 Thread Bud
On 12/28/00, Marcus penned: I had spent a great deal of time writing the reasons behind my decision not to include the secondary dns listing, but I decided to get cocky and just reply that... Currently I have over 1,500 websites that generate just over 5 million dollars a month for the company I

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Raymond Camden
I just checked the site and it looks completely different. I bet you hit it during the update. What I _really_ want to know is the name of the techno song used during the intro??? : === Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Dylan Bromby
working fine from here. -Original Message- From: Jay Patton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 10:57 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: figleaf.com Hey Dave, Whats up with figleaf.com? i wanted to play some smackdown durring lunch and the site wont come up? Jay Patton

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Robert Segal
try http://www.figleaf.com/smackdown/splash.cfm -Original Message- From: Jay Patton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:57 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: figleaf.com Hey Dave, Whats up with figleaf.com? i wanted to play some smackdown durring lunch and the site

Re: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Jay Patton
yeah its up now thanks Jay Patton Web Pro USA 406.549.3337 ext. 203 1.888.5WEBPRO www.webpro-usa.com - Original Message - From: "Dylan Bromby" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 11:59 AM Subject: RE: figleaf.com wo

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Jeremy Allen
Inc. -Original Message- From: Dylan Bromby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: figleaf.com working fine from here. -Original Message- From: Jay Patton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 10:57 AM

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Simon Horwith
1400 16th St NW, # 220 Washington DC 20036 202.797.6570 (direct line) www.figleaf.com -Original Message- From: Jeremy Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 2:06 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: figleaf.com I know this may sound a little silly, but a lot of

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Jay Jennings
having to specify the "www." isn't all that silly what if a site is also running an ftp server gopher server, etc. for a domain then you'd want to force the www Ooooh, one of my pet peeves and you guys just keep pushing my buttons. :) There is no _good_ reason to force a user to

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Simon Horwith
- From: Jay Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 2:25 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: figleaf.com I know this may sound a little silly, but a lot of companies like to force you to use the www alias for their websites. I can't believe that's done on purpose. About 1/3

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Dylan Bromby
. -Original Message- From: Jay Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 11:25 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: figleaf.com I know this may sound a little silly, but a lot of companies like to force you to use the www alias for their websites. I can't believe that's done

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread lsellers
having to specify the "www." isn't all that silly what if a site is also running an ftp server gopher server, etc. for a domain then you'd want to force the www Well, grouping the dns's so "www.figleaf.com" and "figleaf.com" map to the same thing wouldn't really be an issue. The

OT: Re: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Todd Ashworth
the machine name too (ftp, gopher, news, mail, bob, whatever). Todd Ashworth - Original Message - From: "Simon Horwith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 2:20 PM Subject: RE: figleaf.com | having to specify the "w

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Marcus
There is no _good_ reason to force a user to type "www." on your URL. None. Period. If you require it, it's a geek thing, not a user thing. Of course, if you don't care about users, then that's another matter. There is a very good reason for a user to type the "www." on my URL. If they

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Simon Horwith
Wednesday, December 27, 2000 2:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: figleaf.com having to specify the "www." isn't all that silly what if a site is also running an ftp server gopher server, etc. for a domain then you'd want to force the www Ooooh, one of my pet peeves and you guy

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Len Conrad
having to specify the "www." isn't all that silly. But it's mostly counterproductive. www.domain.com and domain.com A records both return the the same ip, WTF else do you want to at port 80 of that ip? Having an A record lookup of www and domain.com return different ip's serves what

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread ron
having to specify the "www." isn't all that silly what if a site is also running an ftp server gopher server, etc. for a domain then you'd want to force the www If a user wants to get your ftp or gopher server, then they can enter the full URL. This is just a simple DNS issue we're

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Jeremy Allen
liptIQ Inc. -Original Message- From: Dylan Bromby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 2:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: figleaf.com a lot of companies do in fact do this on purpose. some companies route the 3rd level www component to a server or farm on a specif

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Dave Watts
www.figleaf.com comes up for me, but figleaf.com does not. Probably just an oversight, if it's a DNS thing. Thanks for pointing out this oversight. The A record for figleaf.com was pointing at the old host address. We recently changed our ISP, and this was a leftover. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Simon Horwith
To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: figleaf.com having to specify the "www." isn't all that silly what if a site is also running an ftp server gopher server, etc. for a domain then you'd want to force the www If a user wants to get your ftp or gopher server, then they can enter th

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread ron
Hey Marcus, There is a very good reason for a user to type the "www." on my URL. If they don't, they will not arrive at my sites! I got to http://adtelusa.com/ just fine. Whew. :) Do I register every possible misspelling just in case they are dyslexic? snip NO! That's right. Just two

RE: figleaf.com

2000-12-27 Thread Marcus
Some would argue that having a 60kb image-mapped graphic that serves as the entire content of your home page isn't effective, either, but that's another topic altogether. ;) Oh yes... And I would be one of them... If someone out there could please inform the Vice President of Development