RE: win2k server - repair/reinstall lanman server service

2003-09-11 Thread Mike Brunt
Isaac, have a dig around here, this site has loads of Win 2k utilities etc. http://www.sysinternals.com/ Hth Kind Regards - Mike Brunt Webapper Services LLC Web Site http://www.webapper.com Blog http://www.webapper.net Webapper Web Application Specialists -Original Message- From: S.

Re: Win2K Server

2003-06-13 Thread Ben Densmore
Mike, here is a pretty good list of what each service does and which ones to disable for faster boot up. http://www.blackviper.com/WIN2K/servicecfg.htm Ben - Original Message - From: Michael Tangorre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:13 PM

RE: Win2K Server

2003-06-13 Thread Sicular, Alexander
If you are doing a security audit be sure to check netstat -a, for a list of open ports. Also get fport utility from www.foundstone.com as it maps ports to processes. Gl, alex -Original Message- From: Michael Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:13 PM To:

SOLVED Re: Win2K Task Manager

2003-03-18 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Well apparently all I had to do was double-click on any portion of the grey area of the Task Manager window to get the tabs back. My only question is WTF kinda functionality is that ;-) Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. t.

RE: Win2K Task Manager

2003-03-18 Thread Mark W. Breneman
Just did that the other day too. 2x click on the edge of the window to get your goodies back. Mark W. Breneman -Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer -Network / Web Server Administrator Vivid Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vividmedia.com 608.270.9770 -Original Message- From:

Re: Win2K SP3 killed my IIS

2002-10-16 Thread David Hannum
. Can't figure it out, but hey, it's running!!! Dave - Original Message - From: Bob Haroche [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: Re: Win2K SP3 killed my IIS Hmm... First, can you un-install SP3 via the control panel? Second

Re: Win2K SP3 killed my IIS

2002-10-15 Thread Bob Haroche
Hmm... First, can you un-install SP3 via the control panel? Second, in the past I've had trouble with Zone Alarm loading at start up hanging other services, including IIS and the IIS admin console. If you have ZA, try disabling it at start up or even un-installing it. Good luck. PS. Next

Re: Win2K SP3 killed my IIS

2002-10-15 Thread Doug
Subject: Re: Win2K SP3 killed my IIS | Hmm... | | First, can you un-install SP3 via the control panel? | | Second, in the past I've had trouble with Zone Alarm loading at start | up hanging other services, including IIS and the IIS admin console. If | you have ZA, try disabling it at start up or even

Re: Win2K SP3 killed my IIS

2002-10-15 Thread Neil H.
Can you RE-SP2 over SP3? I thought MS removed that option but it might be worth a shot? Or possible remove IIS and Re-Add it. Neil - Original Message - From: Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:07 PM Subject: Re: Win2K SP3 killed my

Re: Win2k Clock....

2002-10-03 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Brook wrote: What is the best/correct way to set the time on a webserver? UTC and link it to a NTP server (usually there is some standards agency like NIST that offers this service). Makes it a lot easier to synchronize logfiles if necessary. If you have multiple servers, consider running

Re: Win2k Clock....

2002-10-03 Thread Brook
Wholly acronyms batman At 08:48 PM 03/10/02 +0200, you wrote: Brook wrote: What is the best/correct way to set the time on a webserver? UTC and link it to a NTP server (usually there is some standards agency like NIST that offers this service). Makes it a lot easier to synchronize

RE: Win2k Clock....

2002-10-03 Thread Tom Nunamaker
www.acronymfinder.com -Original Message- From: Brook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:12 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Win2k Clock Wholly acronyms batman At 08:48 PM 03/10/02 +0200, you wrote: Brook wrote: What is the best/correct way to set

Re: Win2k Clock....

2002-10-03 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Brook wrote: Wholly acronyms batman UTC: Coordinated Universal Time, has taken over the role of GMT as worldwide standard time NTP: Network Time Protocol, a way for computers to tell eachother what time it is NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology Jochem

Re: Win2k Clock....

2002-10-03 Thread Brook
haha, thanks... At 09:00 PM 03/10/02 +0200, you wrote: Brook wrote: Wholly acronyms batman UTC: Coordinated Universal Time, has taken over the role of GMT as worldwide standard time NTP: Network Time Protocol, a way for computers to tell eachother what time it is NIST: National Institute

RE: Win2k Clock....

2002-10-03 Thread Everett, Al
NetTime is really good for this. http://nettime.sourceforge.net/ -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Win2k Clock Brook wrote: What is the best/correct way to set the time

Re: Win2k Error -- Possible CF Crashing?

2001-06-11 Thread Paul Hastings
The browser was unable to retrieve a list of servers from the browser master \\SOMESERVER on the network etc... its usually a good idea to turn off computer browser service on all but your DC or RAS servers. cleared up a boat load of vodoo network problems for us.

RE: Win2K TCP/IP on road

2001-04-26 Thread Peter J. MacDonald
Use netswitcher work great for that purpose. http://www.netswitcher.com Thank You, Peter Peter J. MacDonald II Creative Computing, Inc. 100 Middle Street Lincoln, RI 02865 Phone: 401.727.0183 x123 Fax: 401.727.4998 Portable: 401.965.3661 E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Page: www.creatcomp.com

RE: Win2K, apache, CF4.5sp2 SORTTED IT

2001-04-25 Thread Thomas Chiverton
I found http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/apache.cfm in the end :-) ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives:

Re: Win2K, apache, CF4.5sp2

2001-04-25 Thread Tony Schreiber
In httpd.conf LoadModule coldfusion_module e:\cfusion\bin\apachemodulecoldfusion.dll AddHandler type-coldfusion .mml DirectoryIndex index.mml index.cfm (The .mml stuff is one of my custom extensions) Has anyone got this to work, and is willing to give the httpd.conf lines needed ? The CF

RE: Win2K TCP/IP on road

2001-04-21 Thread Andrew Tyrone
-Original Message- From: Don Vawter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 3:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Win2K TCP/IP on road When I am on the road I need to configure TCP/IP to use DHCP but when I am home I need to use static ip. Is there any way to keep

Re: Win2K TCP/IP on road

2001-04-21 Thread Don Vawter
Thanks Andy. Works like a charm. $9.00 well spent. - Original Message - From: "Andrew Tyrone" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 1:35 PM Subject: RE: Win2K TCP/IP on road -Original Message- From: Don V

RE: Win2K File Associations Not Working

2001-04-11 Thread Dylan Bromby
did you check the execute permissions? -Original Message- From: John McKown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:19 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Win2K File Associations Not Working I just installed 4.5.1 SP2 on a Fresh install of Win 2K. Under the file associations

RE: Win2K File Associations Not Working

2001-04-11 Thread Dharmesh Goel
Hi John, Try this: IIS5.0 --Right click on the machine name and choose properties. Under the section titled Master Properties choose WWW service and then lick on edit. Go to the Home directory panel. Click on Configuration. Under App Mappings, there should be an entry for .cfm extension. If

Re: Win2K File Associations Not Working

2001-04-11 Thread Jon Hall
Perhaps someone who has run into this may be able to help you more, but I'll give it a shot... In IIS is the cfm extensions being processed through C:\CFusion\bin\iscf.dll ? I have a hunch something is not right with IIS though...you say this is a fresh install of Win2k? Did you install any

RE: Win2K File Associations Not Working

2001-04-11 Thread John McKown
Dover, DE 19901 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 302-736-5515 fax: 302-736-5945 icq: 1812513 -Original Message- From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:41 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Win2K File Associations Not Working Perhaps someone who has

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Jason Lees (National Express)
So Far we've not had any problems with the CF on a Win2k server (+1Month), but the hits are quiet low. However I've seen posts from others on the lists that have noted problems though. Jason Lees National Express Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Raymond Camden
I've used CF on Win2k Pro for quite some time, but I am _not_ using it for a 'real' web site. I'm only using it for my development projects. So, traffic is _extremely_ minimal. It works fine for me, though. === Raymond Camden,

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Erika L Walker
Been running it now for over 6 months. Love its stability. Haven't had any problems thus far. In fact, on my home network, I haven't had to reboot the server other than installing new programs.runs 24 a day. Something I couldn't get away with on my previous NT machine. (Nothing to do with CF

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread alistair . davidson
DOn't know about Professional, but we recently migrated CF Enterprise 4.5.2 from NT4sp6 to Win2k with no problems whatsoever. -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2001 15:31 To: CF-Talk Subject: Win2k Anyone had any experience of

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Tony Gruen
We have been running W2K Server and CF 4.5.1 professional for 2 months just fine. We did not upgrade though, we built the server with clean installs of both apps. We are about to install 4.5.2 server update. Tony Gruen sfnetworks -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Greg Jordan
make sure that you check out http://forums.allaire.com/devconf/Index.cfm?Message_ID=683354 -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:31 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Win2k Anyone had any experience of Coldfusion (proffesional)

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread John Fix 3rd
Our servers are W2K with CF 4.5.2 and we've had no problems. John www.cornells.com -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:31 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Win2k Anyone had any experience of Coldfusion (proffesional) running

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Dylan Bromby
we went from CF4.5ENT SP2 on NT4.0SP5/SQL7 to CF4.5ENT SP2 on WIN2KAS/SQL2K and although i don't have anything measurable to offer you, i can tell you it's noticably faster. no problems to speak of. -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Thomas Chiverton
:nods I was wundering if that was jsut teathing troubles, esp. wrt MDAC and Jet... -Original Message- From: Jason Lees (National Express) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 3:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win2k So Far we've not had any problems with the CF

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Kevin Gilchrist
While not directly related to CF and Win2K here's an article from ZDNet saying that MS is going to find it hard to encourage people to upgrade to Windows XP because Win2K is so stable! http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2698247,00.html

Re: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Mark Woods
we have had CF problems on our win2000 server, which appear to be related to CFHTTP. ColdFusion service has hung on numerous occasions (i.e. service not actually stopped, just failing to reply to requests - though sometimes continuing to log). There seems to be two possibilities, which I will

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Tony Schreiber
I loathe upgrading OS's. I will always do a clean install of the new OS whenever possible. However, the upgrades I've done of Win2k from NT4 have worked perfectly and the entire upgrade procedure in Win2k is better than any previous Microsoft OS I've used... We have been running W2K Server and

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Kurt Ward
We are have been running Win2k SP1 with Apache and CF 4.5.1 SP2 for several weeks without problems under pretty high traffic (~5m page hits/month). The server is a little more reliable, but I don't really see a speed improvement over NT 4. Kurt -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Lee Fuller
log files from 40 different machines! ;) - Lee -Original Message- From: Kevin Gilchrist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 8:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win2k While not directly related to CF and Win2K here's an article from ZDNet saying

Re: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread zac
Thomas Chiverton wrote: We're thinking of moving to that from NT4, and was wundering if there were any issues (speed, lag etc.) that would make this a Good Thing, or weather it all just gets rosy and faster ? Are you having problems with your NT4 server? I'm a firm believer in not upgrading

RE: Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread paul smith
I'm sure M$ is already working on the right Win2K SP to fix this ;-) At 11:34 AM 3/21/01 -0500, you wrote: While not directly related to CF and Win2K here's an article from ZDNet saying that MS is going to find it hard to encourage people to upgrade to Windows XP because Win2K is so stable!

Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Greg Wolfinger
I havn't even herd of SP3 for Win2k.where was SP2??? --=@ greg @=-- - Original Message - From: "S R" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:08 PM Subject: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest htmlDIVHello,/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVI cannot

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Alexandre Dornback
SP3 for SQL 7.0 -Original Message- From: Greg Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 9:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest I havn't even herd of SP3 for Win2k.where was SP2??? --=@ greg @=-- - Original Message

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Phoeun Pha
what are SP's for, and are they free? -Original Message- From: Greg Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest I havn't even herd of SP3 for Win2k.where was SP2??? --=@ greg

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Andy Ewings
8890. -Original Message- From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 February 2001 17:16 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest what are SP's for, and are they free? -Original Message- From: Greg Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Aidan Whitehall
what are SP's for, and are they free? SP = service pack. When a product has been in use for a period of time, bugs and holes are patched by the release and installation of a service pack. As time goes by SP1 will be superceded by SP2, etc. -- Aidan Whitehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netshopper UK

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Dave Watts
I cannot register a server from in SQL 7.0 using enterprise manager. I am trying to connect from a Win2K workstation to a Win2k server. The win2k is running with SP3 and the strange thing is that I have installed installed SP3 on my machine and rebooted, but when I go to the Sql server

Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Greg Wolfinger
before installing one. --=@ greg @=-- - Original Message - From: "Phoeun Pha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest what are SP's for, and are they free? -Origina

Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Greg Wolfinger
Oh okI was like "where have i been, i only have SP1" Sorry, not help to you with SQL7.0. --=@ greg @=-- - Original Message - From: "Alexandre Dornback" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:18 PM Subject

Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Howie Hamlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest what are SP's for, and are they free? ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.

Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread S R
htmlDIV PSorry I meant SP3 for SQL SERVER 7.0BRBR/P/DIV DIV/DIV DIV/DIVgt;From: "Greg Wolfinger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Subject: Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest DIV/DIVgt;Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:1

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Zachary Bedell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -Original Message- From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:16 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest what are SP's for, and are they free? SP == Service Pack. I.E. a whole

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread S R
;Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Subject: RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest DIV/DIVgt;Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:15:59 -0600 DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;what are SP's for, and are they free? DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;-Original Message- DIV/DIVgt;From

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Phoeun Pha
sow ahst the difference between an upgrade and a service pack? i'm prolly sure it has to do with functionality -Original Message- From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 11:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest SP = Service

RE: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Simon Horwith
Certified ColdFusion Developer Fig Leaf Software 1400 16th St NW, # 220 Washington DC 20036 202.797.6570 (direct line) www.figleaf.com -Original Message- From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win2K and SQL Server

Re: Win2K and SQL Server 7.0 quest

2001-02-16 Thread Cary Gordon
Excuse me if I am stating the obvious, but you did connect to the database with the Client Network Utility first, right? Cary At 09:08 AM 2/16/2001 -0800, you wrote: Hello, I cannot register a server from in SQL 7.0 using enterprise manager. I am trying to connect from a Win2K workstation to

RE: Win2k Time

2001-01-22 Thread Cruz, Joseph
(w) 215-573-2798(f) 215-308-0657(p) 215-768-2071(m) -Original Message- From: Bernd VanSkiver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 10:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win2k Time Have you gotten it to actually work

Re: Win2k Time

2001-01-21 Thread Jon Hall
I've used the Atomic TimeSynch from www.analogx.com with no problems in the past. jon - Original Message - From: "Bernd VanSkiver" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 10:55 AM Subject: OT: Win2k Time Has anyone had any luck setting up

RE: Win2k Time

2001-01-21 Thread Cruz, Joseph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Try NET TIME /SETSNTP:timeserver.domain.com This sets a registry entry. Check out http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q223/1/84.ASP?LN=EN-USSD=gnFR =0qry=w32timernk=1src=DHCS_MSPSS_gn_SRCHSPR=WIN2000 for more information. :) Joe

RE: Win2k Time

2001-01-21 Thread Bernd VanSkiver
Have you gotten it to actually work? I have done that and tried many servers, can't get it to work. Bernd VanSkiver [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #: 916324 -Original Message- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:03:56 -0500 From: "Cruz, Joseph" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: Win2k Clustering and CF

2000-10-13 Thread Aaron Johnson
Hey Geoffrey, Check out What's up Gold by IPSwitch. http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/WhatsUp/monitoring.html I don't know how familiar you are with W2k, but you may also want to take a look at the services control panel. W2K has some new features where you can have services automatically

RE: Win2k Clustering and CF

2000-10-13 Thread patrick
Another good monitoring tool is SiteScope from Freshwater Software (http://www.freshwater.com/) Patrick N. -- Original Message -- From: "Aaron Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:35:07 -0400 Hey Geoffrey,

Re: Win2K and CF 4.5.1

2000-08-16 Thread Matthew Fusfield
I run CF 4.51 Enterprise, Spectra, and SQL7 on a test box with W2k Advanced Server. It doesn't take a lot of traffic (pretty much just my own testing) but runs fine with 128 megs of ram. Matt Adam Breaux wrote: Has anyone had any problems running CF 4.5.1 on Win2K Adv Server? Looking for

Re: Win2K and CF 4.5.1

2000-08-15 Thread Tom
I'm running both, and I haven't seen the computer in about 3 months. The box is also running SQL 7, inFusion mail server, IIS and has 196 megs of memory - the server is stilll rockin, excellent performance. On another system, we put CF on it's own dedicated win2k server box, and performance

Re: Win2K and CF 4.5.1

2000-08-15 Thread Jake Hileman
No problemos, no leaks, nothing. Great. jake - Original Message - From: "Adam Breaux" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 8:56 PM Subject: Win2K and CF 4.5.1 Has anyone had any problems running CF 4.5.1 on Win2K Adv Server? Looking for input on

RE: Win2k or NT?

2000-06-23 Thread Rif Kiamil
I would wait till SP2 or 3 on Win2K. -Original Message- From: Aaron Powell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 June 2000 17:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Win2k or NT? I'm going to be getting a dedicated server for my personal website from Digital Nation very soon (being with

Re: Win2k or NT?

2000-06-23 Thread Nick McClure
From what I have done windows 2000 is better. IIS 5 seems to be much more stable than 4 At 10:52 AM 6/23/2000 -0600, you wrote: I'm going to be getting a dedicated server for my personal website from Digital Nation very soon (being with Interland is really starting to suck). I'll be buying

Re: Win2k or NT?

2000-06-23 Thread Jeremy Allen
The real problem, most places are quietly not selling NT 4.0 anymore. You can still buy it in *plenty* of places, but ive noticed more than one place wihch has just removed NT from its product list. That said, I would wait for a year at least for Win2K before I trusted it with anything even

RE: Win2k or NT?

2000-06-23 Thread Kevin Langevin
]] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 1:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Win2k or NT? From what I have done windows 2000 is better. IIS 5 seems to be much more stable than 4 At 10:52 AM 6/23/2000 -0600, you wrote: I'm going to be getting a dedicated server for my personal website from

RE: Win2k or NT?

2000-06-23 Thread Dave Watts
I'm going to be getting a dedicated server for my personal website from Digital Nation very soon (being with Interland is really starting to suck). I'll be buying CF 4.5 and SQL Server 7 and I'm trying to decided if I should go with NT or 2000. I've heard a lot of good things (as well as a