Am I right in that you still have to do some rewrite Apache rules?
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Am I right in that you still have to do some rewrite Apache rules?
Depends on what you want to do. I run Dispatch as an Apache mod_perl handler and
don't need any rewrite rules. If you don't do that, but instead have a normal
.cgi script and want the url to the .cgi script to
Hi,
On 1/30/07, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Now I am using CAP::AutoRunmode currently and I have:
I've never used AutoRunmode with Dispatch so I'm not sure how well they play
together. Anyone else use them together?
well ... I'm using them under CGI only,
Benjamin Reitzammer wrote:
I've never used AutoRunmode with Dispatch so I'm not sure how well
they play
together. Anyone else use them together?
well ... I'm using them under CGI only, until now.
And you have to use CAP::AutoRunmode before using CA::Dispatch in
your instance script.
Robert Hicks wrote:
I am just coming up to speed on this one.
I am wondering if I am reading the pod right.
Am I replacing use base 'CGI::Application' with use base
'CGI::Application::Dispatch'?
No. Dispatch is not a base class for a C::A application. Dispatch sits outside
of your
I am just coming up to speed on this one.
I am wondering if I am reading the pod right.
Am I replacing use base 'CGI::Application' with use base
'CGI::Application::Dispatch'?
Then if my module name is package Abrams I would build a dispatch
table for my runmodes:
sub dispatch_ars {
