A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-22 20:35]:
http://www.fs-output.com/trac/wiki/Nenshi
Is that you then?
Whoa! No, I had not seen that. I’ll have to take a look and see
if our ideas about the design agree sufficiently.
Thanks for the link!
Regards,
No problem!
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-21 21:10]:
I have only seen you post things you don't like.
Heh. So it goes.
So, what would you use?
Well, as I said, both Mason and Petal have things that
immediately put me off – but I’ve yet to use them in anger.
So I don’t
* David Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-22 21:35]:
a) harder to install
(not easier, as the OP suggests) because new users whould then
have to jump through the additional hoops of choosing and then
installing a templating engine. And the choosing would lead new
users to threads full of
* Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-22 20:35]:
http://www.fs-output.com/trac/wiki/Nenshi
Is that you then?
Whoa! No, I had not seen that. I’ll have to take a look and see
if our ideas about the design agree sufficiently.
Thanks for the link!
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis //
I vote a gigantic -1. I like H:T and don't believe it's bad C:A
requires it as a default. Those savvy enough to use TT (or others)
shouldn't be affected by the required install of a simple default.
Mark
# CGI::Application community mailing list
##
* Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-21 03:40]:
I have followed this list for over a year and this is the first
time *I* have seen a request like this. So over and over is
once or twice in a year?
It was Jesse who said Ricardo was “not nearly the first” to ask
about it.
You can correct
* Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-21 03:40]:
Plus, how many Mason-only or TT-only modules are there out
there? More than there are H::T-only modules, right? You can
hardly begrudge us H::T users *our* occasional exclusives, can
you?
Personally, I’m not picking sides. I don’t know what sort
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-21 03:40]:
Plus, how many Mason-only or TT-only modules are there out
there? More than there are H::T-only modules, right? You can
hardly begrudge us H::T users *our* occasional exclusives, can
you?
Personally, I’m not picking sides. I
* Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-21 21:10]:
I have only seen you post things you don't like.
Heh. So it goes.
So, what would you use?
Well, as I said, both Mason and Petal have things that
immediately put me off – but I’ve yet to use them in anger.
So I don’t know if I’ll dislike
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jesse Erlbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-20 04:50]:
I am a big fan of HTML::Template, which is why I put in there
in the first place. In spite of the fact that I have a strong
preference, I made it easy (nay, trivial) to swap in your own
templating system.
Your request
* Jesse Erlbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-20 04:50]:
I am a big fan of HTML::Template, which is why I put in there
in the first place. In spite of the fact that I have a strong
preference, I made it easy (nay, trivial) to swap in your own
templating system.
Your request has been heard, and
* Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-20 00:10]:
Is there a plan to convert HTML::Template from a prereq into a
plugin?
Put me down as a vote in favour.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
# CGI::Application community mailing list
##
12 matches
Mail list logo
