On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 11:00 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Steve Comrie wrote:
Sorry for the OT post, but things seem quiet around here so I don't
imagine
this would disturb anyone too much. =)
I've got a project upcoming that's going to include a server
I hate to be picky, but if we're all overriding it anyway, then why
shouldn't it just stay the way it is? Having it give a simple default
for people who are just starting seems reasonable. (Although I can see
why people who don't use H::T might want to remove the dependency.)
When I started
[Oops. Don't reply to this list enough, so I forgot and just sent this
to Sean... ]
On Sep 30, 2004, at 2:52 PM, Sean Davis wrote:
I am building a cgi::application that queries pretty extensively (at
least for me) from a MySQL database. I am having trouble with
maintainability, as the SQL
On Friday, October 1, 2004, at 07:46 AM, Sean Davis wrote:
snip
I'm thinking that I have two options:
1) open a second database handle directly to DBI (not ideal)
2) inherit DBI methods in my ntDBH package
Actually, in my design, the CGI::Session code is in my SuperApp
subclass, so it does use
Ed,
I think it's not saying that $authcode is undefined, it's saying that
$dbh is. Looking at:
my $dbh = $q-param( 'mydbh' );
Usually I store my database handle in the CGI::App object ($self), not
the CGI.pm query object ($q). Is it possible that you're doing the
same? Of course if
Alas, there are still a few of us (just me?) using standard CGI rather
than
mod_perl
Dan
Nope, Dan. Not just you -- me too. And I probably should mention that
we're on a shared University box, too. So CGI through a wrapper at
that. :-) Although I actually don't mind that part, since it
On Sep 8, 2005, at 6:08 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
I would cover (or mention) TT before HT::Dot. It's much more popular
and
a staple in the perl community. I know the boook will target people
who
aren't perl programmers, but it's important to let existing perl
programmers that we're not
Michael wrote:
Cees Heek wrote:
Yes, except that in your subclass example, the fact that you create a
new 'cgiapp_init' method will override the 'cgiapp_init' method in
your base class. That means the 'cgiapp_init' method in your base
class will not get executed. That may be desired, but if
