Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread markus.spring
Am 2014-11-20 14:54, schrieb Bill McCormick: Can someone just reply to this post so I can know that everything is working? It is, Bill. It's just that C::A is working like a charm, so nobody has any questions ;) Markus # CGI::Application community mailing list ##

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread Richard Jones
The list is still active but I don't know if anyone's still developing in CGI::App. I have a legacy app that I maintain, but it seems that more modern frameworks like Dancer(2), Mojolicious, Web::Simple and Catalyst have taken over. Ron also updated CGI::App to CGI::Snapp last year but I'm not

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread Richard Jones
On 20/11/2014 14:17, markus.spring wrote: It is, Bill. It's just that C::A is working like a charm, so nobody has any questions ;) True enough, but I don't think it's attracting many new users or I'd expect more activity on here. Compare to Dancer list, with over 500 msgs in 2014. --

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread Bill McCormick
OK .. It's been some time since I've had to to much Perl/web development. I last worked with C:A over 10 years ago, so I'm just coming back to what I know. Sounds like I need to take a look at Dancer. What is Dancer? Dancer is a simple but powerful web application framework for Perl.

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Richard Jones [20/11/2014 14:17] : The list is still active but I don't know if anyone's still developing in CGI::App. What has me worried is stuff like https://github.com/markstos/CGI--Application/pull/15 I have no issues with applications being deemed feature-full and the last release

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread Richard Jones
On 20/11/2014 14:35, Bill McCormick wrote: OK .. It's been some time since I've had to to much Perl/web development. I last worked with C:A over 10 years ago, so I'm just coming back to what I know. Sounds like I need to take a look at Dancer. Yeah, Dancer2 is great, as is Web::Simple if you

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread jerry
On 11/20/2014 06:47, Richard Jones wrote: On 20/11/2014 14:35, Bill McCormick wrote: OK .. It's been some time since I've had to to much Perl/web development. I last worked with C:A over 10 years ago, so I'm just coming back to what I know. Sounds like I need to take a look at Dancer.

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread Thomas Krichel
jerry writes So I settled on cgiapp. Just enough magic to make my life easy. I am in a similar case. I use FCCI with cgiapp. I have a simple URL, get params from POST, look up some data, create XML and then transform it with XSLT to get back to the client, and write some XML to disk.

Re: [cgiapp] is this list still active?

2014-11-20 Thread jerry
On 11/20/2014 13:43, Thomas Krichel wrote: jerry writes So I settled on cgiapp. Just enough magic to make my life easy. I am in a similar case. I use FCCI with cgiapp. I have a simple URL, get params from POST, look up some data, create XML and then transform it with XSLT to get