On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:14:45PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
Thanks! We just had a little chat on IRC about this. For the records
let me summarise:
- the patch does basically what alist-copy does in srfi-1
Yep
- why not move all the alist stuff *into* srfi-1 even our extensions to
Peter Bex scripsit:
This grumpy robot thinks that would be really confusing; let's keep the
SRFI modules clean versions of the SRFI.
+1. SRFI 1 is as near to being a standard as the Scheme world knows outside
the RnRSs themselves. Indeed, the R7RS small language has changed a few
procedures
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:18:44PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
All other Schemes I tested with (Guile, Gauche, Scheme48, Racket and Gambit)
return +inf.0 for (/ 1.0 0.0) and -inf.0 for (/ -1.0 0.0).
They return +nan.0 for (/ 0.0 0.0). Extra data points would be welcome.
I'd like to open a CR
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110907 11:22]:
This touches on the subject of a general development
roadmap or strategy, which is probably a good thing to have, as long
as we don't become too dogmatic about it.
Yes a plan is a good thing. Having inspiration behind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/2011 09:25 PM, Christian Kellermann wrote:
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110907 11:22]:
This touches on the subject of a general development
roadmap or strategy, which is probably a good thing to have, as
On 7 September 2011 22:04, Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote:
Also, I've noticed (or think I have noticed) that users get lost in
the number of available eggs. Tagging, ranking or some other sort of
meta-view of the egg library might be something to think about.
Yes I have
