[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Capture length in case-lambda to make it hygienic

Hi, the attached patch fixes #805, by capturing the core length procedure correctly. Thanks go to Moritz for finding and reporting this issue. Kind regards, Christian -- 9 out of 10 voices in my head say, that I am crazy, one is humming. From 2fdeaab6f1f3f240a6e45427d8ccd590d9e7e612 Mon Sep

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Capture length in case-lambda to make it hygienic

Hi Christian, Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org writes: the attached patch fixes #805, by capturing the core length procedure correctly. Thanks go to Moritz for finding and reporting this issue. I found yet another hygiene issue in `case-lambda' in the meantime and a similar one in

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] string-number shouldn't raise errors but return #f on failure

From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] string-number shouldn't raise errors but return #f on failure Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:22:31 +0100 Hi Peter, I have pushed your patch and dropped the C_i_ prefix from the internal helper procedure as