You misunderstood my point. It wasn't about the nesting, it was about the
tags you're using. It would be more semantically correct to do something
like this:
ul id=actions
li
a href=xsvnwiki-atom/stream-wikiXML/a
/li
li
a href=fooEdit/a
/li
/ul
Agreed. :-)
The id of
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:50:44PM -0500, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
Beautiful. Thanks for the improvement. :-)
You're very welcome.
This CSS was prepared on the basis of the original HTML as it was
found on the wiki. I'd give this a huge overhaul, if possible,
though. It's very
I've spent a couple of hours hacking the CSS. The result can be viewed
at http://frohike.homeunix.org/stream-wiki.html
Feel free to snarf the CSS and plug it in the current wiki.
I like this quite much. Alejandro, would this be acceptable to you?
Absolutely; I like it as well.
I just
I've spent a couple of hours hacking the CSS. The result can be viewed
at http://frohike.homeunix.org/stream-wiki.html
Feel free to snarf the CSS and plug it in the current wiki.
Beautiful. Thanks for the improvement. :-)
This CSS was prepared on the basis of the original HTML as it was
On 2/20/07, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've spent a couple of hours hacking the CSS. The result can be viewed
at http://frohike.homeunix.org/stream-wiki.html
Feel free to snarf the CSS and plug it in the current wiki.
I like this quite much. Alejandro, would this be
On 2/14/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've spent a couple of hours hacking the CSS. The result can be viewed
at http://frohike.homeunix.org/stream-wiki.html
Feel free to snarf the CSS and plug it in the current wiki.
I like this quite much. Alejandro, would this be acceptable to
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:00:27PM -0500, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
* Any improvements to the CSS used by the wiki would be more than
welcome. :-)
I've spent a couple of hours hacking the CSS. The result can be viewed
at http://frohike.homeunix.org/stream-wiki.html
Feel free to snarf
Just a few thoughts that I believe would be good to keep on mind on
the discussion on centralized documentation:
* Egg authors have the choice between using eggdoc or using the wiki.
Originally all eggs used eggdoc and few started using the wiki as
their authoritative repository.
* When an
2007/2/12, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everybody,
I was having an e-mail discussion with Mario Domenech Goulart about Spiffy
and the conversation turned towards egg documentation.
The discussion started because Spiffy's documentation is starting to
grow beyond what fits comfortably on one
On 2/12/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was having an e-mail discussion with Mario Domenech Goulart about Spiffy
and the conversation turned towards egg documentation.
The discussion started because Spiffy's documentation is starting to
grow beyond what fits comfortably on one webpage
Felix and I have had related discussions. I don't mean to steer the
conversation away from the topic (how to do egg documentation) -- but I
would like to make sure we move in the direction of making things more
coherent and usable. Part of that should be that whatever is decided for egg
11 matches
Mail list logo
